Jump to:

Philip Morris

Summary of Other Surveys Regarding Youth Access to Tobacco 870000 - 910000

Date: Feb 1995 (est.)
Length: 2 pages
2046624060-2046624061
Jump To Images
spider_pm 2046624060_4061

Fields

Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
Document File
2046624000/2046624124/Robert Woods Johnson
2046624001/2046624123/Robert Woods Johnson
2046624002/2046624122/Rwj
Master ID
2046624045/4062
Related Documents:
Site
N340
Litigation
Feda/Produced
Named Organization
American Cancer Society
Ca Dept of Health Services
Centers for Disease Control
NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
Univ of Mn
Area
SLAVITT,JOSHUA/SEC'Y FILES
Named Person
Forster
Marcus
Attachment
2046624045/2046624062
Date Loaded
23 Jul 2002
UCSF Legacy ID
kcx06c00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: kcx06c00 Log in for more options!
Summary of Other Surveys Regarding Youth Access to Tobacco 1987 -1991 Source and Year of Survry Dcscrin:ion of Survry Univcrsitv of Miancsota 19E" Tclcohonc survCV o( a (Forsxrct al. 1991) random sam?Ic of aduhs (.".oed 1(9-74 Ve2rs) m sG/en commuaities in Mianescta (N=821) An. enon Carxr. Sec:or: 19£9 TCCChene survev of a (.`/arcus at al., in press) rancom samplc of adulu, (e_ed > ISv:aa) in four state9:.4.Zor3 (N = 294), Penosrlvania (N = 291). Texas (N = 303), and Michizan (N = S8) Nationsl Gvtcer (nstitutc 1959 (Ccntea for Dlscase Cc ,:roi 1991b) Gli:ornla Deoart:nect of ~-;iii Servias 1990 .r'"hliCorlia DeeartL':e.^.[ ef Heaah $ervices 1591) "CD;\iMi-= Con;muni:: intervention Tna! .'cr Smokin ; Cessatioc. Telephoae survr: e! ranco- samplc of 300 to 400 adul:s (aeed =5-64 vezrs) in eacn of 1G U.<-. COVM:T" iaterventicn eommuaities Teieohonc sur:ev of a rnndom sample cc acults (a;cd > 19 ycarsl in Cali`on:e (N = 6,600) Questions or Statemests Rrsponses Do you favor or oppose prohibitm; tobacco signs and billboaros? . 73:n favor_e : prolr'ouion Do you (avor or oppose pronibiting tobacco 70% Cavcrc7 pronibitionn advertising in magazines and navspapc;? p:]ve^,sing ef clgaretts 4,rcemect across tne four sta:cs should be banned in samoicd: 61°o-69;a nnvspaocs, na,azincs, and cutaoor posters or billboards. Tobaccc comoenies should be "3`;o-51;0 proh!bited from distnbcting i: cc tobacco samoies on pcbiic prapcny or throu_h the mail. To6acco companies should be 497~-'9 0 prohibitcd from sponsorn_ sporss eveIts or advenis:n, their produrs at thae e+ens. Tobacco compar.ics should ?sreemevr ac:oss ae !0 not be allowed to sponsor comm.cities sar: p,eo: 3'.S-_6io socrtinl and cul:urai evcats. Do you think advertising of favcrec n ban 1-"1;, tobacco nrodec:s on ou:door smo'.<er G7`.o 1orsmokersl billboards snoald be a!lowed or bannr? Do you thin~ advenisin, of =9io fa,orcd a han. (58So tooacco arod_cts through s,mokers; 5,7, nor.s:nokcrs) ac~spapers and ma,aancs should be allo•xcc or barr.<d? Do you tnink sponsorsnio of SESo favored a ban (39% sponing or cuitural evn¢ by smokers; fi1 o ncns-o'~crs) tobacco comaan:es should be allo'~.] or banned? Do you :hinA :hat distnbution i54o favored a b::n (61 0 of f:oe cieareu¢ anc tobacco smoRers; S4;e nons^oKCrs) products or. pubiic propenv should be a::owed or banned? Do you think that distnSctlon 6 7 ic favore^_ a ban (iZ So of free tobacce samp'ies or smokers: 'S98 nonsmokez) couoons jo obtain Cree samola bv vailshould be allowcd or Sanced?
Page 2: kcx06c00 Log in for more options!
Summary of Other Surveys Regarding Youth Access to Tobacco 1987-1991 Scurce and Year of Survn• Dcscnpuor. of Survn• Universiry of .4,inncsota 1987 Tdepl•,one surveg of a (Forstcr n al. 1991) random sample of adults (nscd 18-i4vears) in seveq oommunitics tn Minneota (N=S=1) Amcr:can Canca Soccty 1539 Teiepltone s~rv-^r ci a (^Aarc.ts e: al.. ;n press) ranoor•: sampLe of adults (aged > 18 years) in four sta:es: Adzono (N = ?9:), Pennsylvania (N = 191), Tcrzs (V = 30~) acd M-ichigan (N = 95) National Carr zcr instiute Tcleol:onc sunev of a 1989 (Centers hcr Disease raadont sam?le oi 300 te 400 Control !991'u) adults (a;ed ?`-6<years) !n each of 10 U.S. CO V:vl' i- int:rventlcr. commUniaes Q.lifornin Dcsac:neat of Teieolione survr: of a ~calth ServiceslCalifortla ranoom samcle of ad:tlts Departmrn: of 4ealth (a;ed > 13 •+ears) i-: Services 1491) California (N = 6,600) -CO.V::r11T = Commanity Iaterven.tieo Tnai for Smokin, Cessation. Oues::on.s cr Stamaenu Do you favor or ocpose suspending a retaikrs tobacco licensc for salc ta minors? Do you favor or oppose clim:nating a:: dearc^e vendir.g machines? Do yau favor or oppose eiimmatine <i;areue •:eadin; machines where te-_nagcrs ;a1 h... Do you think tnere should be laws to ban the :ak of civarettes :hrou;h vendiag maciines? Responses 75% favereC suspeading Cae license :7So favored eliminauno [he mach:ns 80% iavorcC eilminatin; thc :nachines Suopon fcr a bac across :P•: four states samolec: 60;3-CS% Tobacco produc•s should be Agreement across the !0 as stdc:h'coctrolled as cammunities sampied: j1 ~o-?SS alcohol producs. Merohants •.rho seli tobacco to 77 m-937o minors shovlc be finec. Cigzrtteve~Gng uachines i69n-89`i~ , snould be clinlnamd in nlaccs wlure teens ;athr.. Do you tumk cilzar_tte 62=o favored a;;an (745'c vendin; macnincs that are smokers 579o nonsmo:<ers) accessibleto minors sheuid be allowetl or tanned ? Source: CDC (199,) :-able 2, p. 214 -

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: