Philip Morris
Will OSHA Bar the Door to Workplace Smoking?
Fields
- Author
- Labar, G.
- Area
- BORELLI,TOM/SEC'Y FILES
- Type
- MAGA, MAGAZINE ARTICLE
- Attachment
- 2046594754/2046594981
- Named Organization
- Ash, Action on Smoking & Health
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Named Person
- Adkins, C.
- Document File
- 2046594743/2046595091/Missing
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Stmn/R1-059
- Stmn/R1-072
- Stmn/R1-059
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Occupational Hazards
- Master ID
- 2046594754/4981
Related Documents:- 2046594754-4980 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives One Hundred Third Congress First Session
- 2046594919-4922 Smoke and Mirrors How Cigarette Makers Kepp Health Question 'open' Year After Year Council for Tobacco Research Is Billed As Independent But Guided by Lawyers An Industry Insurance Policy
- 2046594972-4973 Special Report on Involuntary Smoking Legal Liability for Permitting Smoking
- 2046594974 Donald L. Helling, Et Al., Petitioners V. William Mckinney on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 2046594981
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- MISS, MISSING PAGES
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- Site
- N329
- Date Loaded
- 23 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- zcs81f00
Document Images
214
(EJ3
WILL OSHA BAR THE
DOOR To WORKPLACE
SMOKING?
Though most
employers already
have smoking
policies, recent
reports on the
dangers of
secondhand smoke
have put enormous
pressure on OSHA to
snuff out workplace
smoking.
By Gregg LaBar• . ;.
ou get the impression that if
OSHA offiaals had their way,
ey would rather not devote
Yth
their liauted resources to a controver-
sial societal issue such as smokeng.
They don't have much of a choice, how-
ever, geven the environment of legisla-
tion, lawsuits, and employer and em-
ployee concerns about the adverse
health effects of smoking.
'Doing nothing about workplace
smoking is still one of our options, but
it's not a very viable one,' admits
Charles Adkins, OSHA's director of
health standards programs. ' We will
have to do something, but it's certainly
not going to be quick or easy.'
Adk'uu said OSHA is considering two
standards-setting approaches designed
to protect nonsmokers from exposure to
passive tobacco smoke at work: The
agency will either develop a smoking-
speafichealth standard, or it will try to
address workplace smoking as part of a
broad-based generic rulemaking on in-
door air quality (IAQ). An official an-
nouncement could come as earl y as this
month in response to a lawsuit by Ac-
tion on Smoking and Health (ASH), a
Washington,D.C, antismoking group.
An OSHA spokesman said the re-
view of options has been very careful
because smoking is a highly emotional
issue and because if OSHA tackles
smoking on its own, presumably there
will be no action on IAQ. He said the at-
traction of developing a smoking-only
standard is that, despite all of the ac-
companying emotion and politics, it
could still be completed faster (in three
to five years) than an IAQ rule (which
would take five to eight years).
At press time, it appeared the agency
was leaning toward the more inclusive
IAQ approach-a decision that would
please labor unions and tobacco manufao-
tunss but infuriate publichealth activists.
Employers, at least 85 percent of whom al-
luly 1993/Occupational Harards 27
