Philip Morris
Accommodation
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Area
- WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
- Master ID
- 2046342771/3081
Related Documents:- 2046342771-2772 Ets Manual
- 2046342773
- 2046342774-2827 Ets Communications Manual
- 2046342828 7
- 2046342829-2831 the U.S. Epa Report on Ets
- 2046342832 8
- 2046342833-2838 Epidemiology
- 2046342839 9
- 2046342840-2841 Ets in Perspective
- 2046342842 10
- 2046342843-2846 Risk Perspectives
- 2046342847 11
- 2046342848-2850 Indoor Air Quality
- 2046342851 12
- 2046342852-2874 Quotable Quotes
- 2046342875 13
- 2046342876-2878 Media Articles
- 2046342879-2884 Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Statistics
- 2046342885-2890 Epidemiology Faces Its Limits
- 2046342891-2892 Do Epidemiologists Cause Epidemics?
- 2046342893-2894 Media Articles Science and Public Policy
- 2046342895-2896 An Environment for Reform
- 2046342897 Cancer Risks for Thee, But Not for Me
- 2046342898-2900 Pc Cancer Risks
- 2046342901-2907 Passive Reporting on Passive Smoke
- 2046342908 Send Regulations Up in Smoke
- 2046342909-2918 Pandora's Box the Dangers of Politically Corrupted Science for Democratic Public Policy
- 2046342919-2921 Media Articles Exposure to Ets
- 2046342922 Smoke Rings
- 2046342923 Remember to Breathe Deeply
- 2046342924 'passive Smoking Risk Small'
- 2046342925 Lone Driver with the Mask
- 2046342926 'no Risk' for Passive Smokers
- 2046342927 Smoke Ills Debunked
- 2046342928 Passive Smoking 'no Risk'
- 2046342929 Passive Smoking 'equals Just One Cigarette A Week'
- 2046342930-2932 Media Articles Risk Perspectives and Assessment
- 2046342933 Rethinking Risk
- 2046342934-2936 Abortion and Possible Risk for Breast Cancer: Analysis and Inconsistencies
- 2046342937-2950 Choices in Risk Assessment the Role of Science Policy in the Environmental Risk Management Process
- 2046342951-2952 Media Articles American Extremism
- 2046342953-2964 Thomas Jefferson and the End of the Nanny State
- 2046342965-2966 Deadly Peril of A Society That Won't Take Any Risks
- 2046342967 Smell Police Are on the Sniff
- 2046342968-2969 No Smoke Without Firings
- 2046342970-2971 New Book Warns of U.S. - Style 'fear of Living'
- 2046342972 14
- 2046342973 Economic Impact
- 2046342974 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban Case Study
- 2046342975-2977 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban
- 2046342978 Economic Impact Annex 1: Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New York City
- 2046342979-2984 Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New New York City
- 2046342985 Economic Impact Annex II: Results of A New York Tavern and Restaurant Association Sponsored Survey Conducted by Price Waterhouse
- 2046342986-2987 Day 30: Smoking Ban Hitting the Bottom Line, Say Nyc Restaurants
- 2046342988 New York City Restaurant Survey Executive Summary
- 2046342989 Economic Impact Annex III: National Smokers Alliance Sponsored Survey
- 2046342990-2992 Executive Summary - Survey of New York City Restaurateurs
- 2046342993 Economic Impact Annex IV: Survey for the Tavern and Restaurant Owners Association Regarding Smoking Ban
- 2046342994-2997 Methodology
- 2046342998 Economic Impact Annex V: Results of Survey by Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
- 2046342999-3001 to Dine or Not to Dine: Restaurant Patrons' Responses to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act
- 2046343002 Economic Impact Annex Vi: Press Coverage
- 2046343003 Restaurant Owners Plan Fight Against Smoking Restrictions
- 2046343004-3005 Restaurants Complying on Smoking Few Violations Logged in Law's First 6 Weeks
- 2046343006 the Great 950000 New York Smoke-Out Smoke Screen
- 2046343007 Restaurant Owners Vent Steam Over Smoking Law
- 2046343008 Angry Smokers Fume Over Tough N.Y. Ban
- 2046343009
- 2046343010-3012
- 2046343013 Scofflaw Smokers
- 2046343014 'enough': Smokers Find A Friend
- 2046343015 Poll: Bring Back Smoking Sections
- 2046343016 US Smokers Turn Tables on Bistros
- 2046343017 New Yorkers Strike Back at the Ashtray Police
- 2046343018 Economic Impact US National Restaurant Association - News Release
- 2046343019-3021 Economic Impact of OSHA-Imposed Smoking Ban Would Be Staggering, Restaurant Industry Testifies
- 2046343022 15
- 2046343025 Horeca Madrid Voluntary Agreement
- 2046343026-3027 Los Restaurantes Madrilenos De Mas De 25 Mesas Reservaran Voluntariamente Zonas Aisladas Para No Fumadores
- 2046343028-3029 General Agreement of Collaboration Between the Health Council of the City of Madrid and the Asociacion Madrilena De Empresarios De Restaurantes Y Cafeterias (Amerc - Madrilenian Association of Restaurant and Cafeteria Managers)
- 2046343030 Horeca Hotrec Guidelines
- 2046343031
- 2046343032-3035 Voluntary Actions to Accommodate Smoking and Non - Smoking Preferences
- 2046343036
- 2046343037 Horeca Iha / Bha Courtesy of Choice Programme
- 2046343038 Lower Vat Says Study Distinctively Individual Unify Stars and Crowns Wales Means Business
- 2046343039 Smoking or Non - Smoking
- 2046343040 Workplace Belgian Employer's Guidelines / Belgian 930000 Royal Decree
- 2046343041-3053
- 2046343054-3068
- 2046343069-3070
- 2046343071 Translation of Belgian Royal Decree on Workplace Smoking 930331
- 2046343072 Workplace Swiss Employer Guidelines
- 2046343073-3074 Rauchen Oder Nichtrauchen Am Arbeitsplatz
- 2046343075-3076 Fumer Ou Ne Pas Fumer Au Lieu De Travail
- 2046343077-3079 Smoking or No Smoking in the Workplace
- 2046343080 16
- 2046343081
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Document File
- 2046342770/2046343082/Ets Communications Manual 950000 - 960000 Library Copy - Please Do Not Remove
- Named Organization
- Bha
- Horeca
- Iha
- Horeca
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Site
- N403
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- prq65e00
Document Images
ACCOMMODATION
0
EUROPEAN EXAMPLES OF SELF-REGULATION ACCOMMODATING
SMOKERS AND NON-SMOKERS AT THE WORKPLACE AND IN
PUBLIC PLACES (HORECA):
A. HORECA
Madrid Voluntary Agreement
Hotrec Guidelines
IHA/BHA Courtesy of Choice Programme
B. WORKPLACE
Belgian Employer's Guidelines/Belgian 1993 Royal Decree
Swiss Employer Guidelines
ACCOMMODATION
European examples of self-regulation accommodating smokers
and non-smokers at the workplace and in public places (HoReCa)
An approach to smoking at the workplace and in public places that recognises
the preferences of both smokers and non-smokers makes good management and
business sense.
Numerous examples show that self-regulation, rather than restrictive, inflexible
government regulations is the best approach to the smoking issue.
This sections provides evidence that the HORECA sector, and workplace
interests (employers and unions) in Europe are capable of accommodating both
smokers and non-smokers through self-regulation. The materials can be used
with HoReCa representatives, Unions, Employer's associations, regulatory
bodies, Government representatives and the media.
Accommodation Page 1
