Philip Morris
Economic Impact of OSHA-Imposed Smoking Ban Would Be Staggering, Restaurant Industry Testifies
Fields
- Author
- Prince, J.
- Webster, W.
- Area
- WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
- Type
- PRES, PRESS RELEASE
- Site
- N403
- Named Person
- Naylor, B.
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Document File
- 2046342770/2046343082/Ets Communications Manual 950000 - 960000 Library Copy - Please Do Not Remove
- Named Organization
- Bureau of the Census
- Icr Survey Research
- Natl Restaurant Assn
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Author (Organization)
- Natl Restaurant Assn
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2046342771/3081
- 2046342771-2772 Ets Manual
- 2046342773
- 2046342774-2827 Ets Communications Manual
- 2046342828 7
- 2046342829-2831 the U.S. Epa Report on Ets
- 2046342832 8
- 2046342833-2838 Epidemiology
- 2046342839 9
- 2046342840-2841 Ets in Perspective
- 2046342842 10
- 2046342843-2846 Risk Perspectives
- 2046342847 11
- 2046342848-2850 Indoor Air Quality
- 2046342851 12
- 2046342852-2874 Quotable Quotes
- 2046342875 13
- 2046342876-2878 Media Articles
- 2046342879-2884 Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Statistics
- 2046342885-2890 Epidemiology Faces Its Limits
- 2046342891-2892 Do Epidemiologists Cause Epidemics?
- 2046342893-2894 Media Articles Science and Public Policy
- 2046342895-2896 An Environment for Reform
- 2046342897 Cancer Risks for Thee, But Not for Me
- 2046342898-2900 Pc Cancer Risks
- 2046342901-2907 Passive Reporting on Passive Smoke
- 2046342908 Send Regulations Up in Smoke
- 2046342909-2918 Pandora's Box the Dangers of Politically Corrupted Science for Democratic Public Policy
- 2046342919-2921 Media Articles Exposure to Ets
- 2046342922 Smoke Rings
- 2046342923 Remember to Breathe Deeply
- 2046342924 'passive Smoking Risk Small'
- 2046342925 Lone Driver with the Mask
- 2046342926 'no Risk' for Passive Smokers
- 2046342927 Smoke Ills Debunked
- 2046342928 Passive Smoking 'no Risk'
- 2046342929 Passive Smoking 'equals Just One Cigarette A Week'
- 2046342930-2932 Media Articles Risk Perspectives and Assessment
- 2046342933 Rethinking Risk
- 2046342934-2936 Abortion and Possible Risk for Breast Cancer: Analysis and Inconsistencies
- 2046342937-2950 Choices in Risk Assessment the Role of Science Policy in the Environmental Risk Management Process
- 2046342951-2952 Media Articles American Extremism
- 2046342953-2964 Thomas Jefferson and the End of the Nanny State
- 2046342965-2966 Deadly Peril of A Society That Won't Take Any Risks
- 2046342967 Smell Police Are on the Sniff
- 2046342968-2969 No Smoke Without Firings
- 2046342970-2971 New Book Warns of U.S. - Style 'fear of Living'
- 2046342972 14
- 2046342973 Economic Impact
- 2046342974 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban Case Study
- 2046342975-2977 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban
- 2046342978 Economic Impact Annex 1: Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New York City
- 2046342979-2984 Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New New York City
- 2046342985 Economic Impact Annex II: Results of A New York Tavern and Restaurant Association Sponsored Survey Conducted by Price Waterhouse
- 2046342986-2987 Day 30: Smoking Ban Hitting the Bottom Line, Say Nyc Restaurants
- 2046342988 New York City Restaurant Survey Executive Summary
- 2046342989 Economic Impact Annex III: National Smokers Alliance Sponsored Survey
- 2046342990-2992 Executive Summary - Survey of New York City Restaurateurs
- 2046342993 Economic Impact Annex IV: Survey for the Tavern and Restaurant Owners Association Regarding Smoking Ban
- 2046342994-2997 Methodology
- 2046342998 Economic Impact Annex V: Results of Survey by Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
- 2046342999-3001 to Dine or Not to Dine: Restaurant Patrons' Responses to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act
- 2046343002 Economic Impact Annex Vi: Press Coverage
- 2046343003 Restaurant Owners Plan Fight Against Smoking Restrictions
- 2046343004-3005 Restaurants Complying on Smoking Few Violations Logged in Law's First 6 Weeks
- 2046343006 the Great 950000 New York Smoke-Out Smoke Screen
- 2046343007 Restaurant Owners Vent Steam Over Smoking Law
- 2046343008 Angry Smokers Fume Over Tough N.Y. Ban
- 2046343009
- 2046343010-3012
- 2046343013 Scofflaw Smokers
- 2046343014 'enough': Smokers Find A Friend
- 2046343015 Poll: Bring Back Smoking Sections
- 2046343016 US Smokers Turn Tables on Bistros
- 2046343017 New Yorkers Strike Back at the Ashtray Police
- 2046343018 Economic Impact US National Restaurant Association - News Release
- 2046343022 15
- 2046343023-3024 Accommodation
- 2046343025 Horeca Madrid Voluntary Agreement
- 2046343026-3027 Los Restaurantes Madrilenos De Mas De 25 Mesas Reservaran Voluntariamente Zonas Aisladas Para No Fumadores
- 2046343028-3029 General Agreement of Collaboration Between the Health Council of the City of Madrid and the Asociacion Madrilena De Empresarios De Restaurantes Y Cafeterias (Amerc - Madrilenian Association of Restaurant and Cafeteria Managers)
- 2046343030 Horeca Hotrec Guidelines
- 2046343031
- 2046343032-3035 Voluntary Actions to Accommodate Smoking and Non - Smoking Preferences
- 2046343036
- 2046343037 Horeca Iha / Bha Courtesy of Choice Programme
- 2046343038 Lower Vat Says Study Distinctively Individual Unify Stars and Crowns Wales Means Business
- 2046343039 Smoking or Non - Smoking
- 2046343040 Workplace Belgian Employer's Guidelines / Belgian 930000 Royal Decree
- 2046343041-3053
- 2046343054-3068
- 2046343069-3070
- 2046343071 Translation of Belgian Royal Decree on Workplace Smoking 930331
- 2046343072 Workplace Swiss Employer Guidelines
- 2046343073-3074 Rauchen Oder Nichtrauchen Am Arbeitsplatz
- 2046343075-3076 Fumer Ou Ne Pas Fumer Au Lieu De Travail
- 2046343077-3079 Smoking or No Smoking in the Workplace
- 2046343080 16
- 2046343081
Related Documents:
Document Images
teaft Nn FWdWuKdHospiMlltl/ lndusiry
~~
t2A,'ElErR4'.QSfFi Sf[tEEI: NW.. WASH(NG"[ON. DC 200363097 20QJ331-5900 FAX: 202/331-2429
~N ews Release
NATIONAL
RESTAURANT
ASSOCIATION
CONTACT: Wendy Webster
Manager, Media Relations
(202) 331-5938
Jeffrey Prince
Senior Director
(202) 331-5935
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ECONOMIC IlIRPACT OF OSHA-PAPOSED SMOKING BAN WOULD BE
STAGGERING, RESTAURANT INDUSTRY TESTIFIES
Washington, D.C. -- October 24, 1994 - The nation's restaurants will experience
$18.2 billion in lost sales if a ban on smoking in the workplace is imposed by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), according to an analysis of
consumer research commissioned by the National Restaurant Association.
Testifying before OSHA today at the agency's hearings on its proposed Indoor Air
Quality (IAQ) standard, incoming association vice president Biff Naylor noted that OSHA's
strict smoking ban would cut deeply into the customer base of some restaurants, in turn
reducing sales, impacting jobs and shrinking sales tax revenue.
~ "While a no-smoking policy would likely have little effect in a fast food facility,
which sells items that can be carried out," Naylor testified, "Obviously, a tableservice
restaurant, where patrons are motivated to socialize, as well as dine, would likely suffer."
In May 1994, the association commissioned ICR Survey Research to conduct a survey
among a random, nationally projectable sample of 1200 adult consumers, in order to quantify
smoking behavior in terms of current smokers, former smokers and nonsmokers; and to
-OVER-

2
assess how this behavior affects the frequency and duration of visits to specific types of
eating and drinking places. The survey also sought to quantify purchase intentions regarding
specific categories of food and beverages such as desserts, coffee or other hot beverages,
wine and other alcoholic beverages.
"Assuming smokers actually respond the way they said they would if a ban on
smoking in the workplace - and that includes restaurants - is imposed, the economic impact
on our industry would be $18.2 billion in lost sales, based on 1994 sales projections," said
Naylor. "That is a staggering amount, representing 6.5 percent of total foodservice sales in
1994, but that is what would result from fewer prospective visits and dramatically shorter
stays, which in turn would result in fewer purchases of drinks before dinner, wine with
meals, coffee and other after-dinner drinks, and dessert. "
Naylor, a Los Angeles restaurateur, added that these menu items might seem like
"extras" or "frills," but they are the items that tend to generate the highest profit margins,
and are of critical importance in an industry where before-tax profits hover around 3 or 4
percent.
Under OSHA's proposed rule, a restaurant could build a separate room, maintain it
under negative pressure and exhaust it seperately to the outside. Patrons could go into this
room to smoke, but servers could not enter it. The restaurant could not serve food or drink,
present a check, wipe off tables or counters or do any of the things that would make the
room usable.
"The rule in a nutshell says you can't work where you smoke or smoke where you
work. In effect it bans smoking in restaurants," Naylor said.

LmcHng Nie FoodservicdHospiratity Industry
c200 S~.1rENTEENTH STREE[: NW.. WASHINC;ION. DC 20036-3097 202/331-5900 FAX: 20?/33I-2429
N eWs Release
3
-
NATIONAL
RESTAURANT
ASSOCIATION
The National Restaurant Association, which submitted 25 pages of comments on
OSHA's proposed IAQ standard in August, has pointed out that the significant loss of sales
to the industry would have an outward spiral, with a loss of $913 million in sales tax
revenues for state and local governments. Association economists calculated this figure
based on sales tax estimates generated by the Bureau of the Census in their Annual Retail
Trade Report survey.
"iAtimately, such sales losses would result in job losses as foodservice operators
reduce costs to absorb reduced revenues," said Naylor. "That's more bad news for state and
local governments, who directly bear the costs of unemployment compensation and lost
income tax revenues. "
The National Restaurant Association has requested that OSHA categorically exempt
foodservice establishments from the IAQ proposal.
-###-
