Philip Morris
Methodology
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Area
- WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
- Characteristic
- MISS, MISSING PAGES
- Document File
- 2046342770/2046343082/Ets Communications Manual 950000 - 960000 Library Copy - Please Do Not Remove
- Site
- N403
- Master ID
- 2046342771/3081
Related Documents:- 2046342771-2772 Ets Manual
- 2046342773
- 2046342774-2827 Ets Communications Manual
- 2046342828 7
- 2046342829-2831 the U.S. Epa Report on Ets
- 2046342832 8
- 2046342833-2838 Epidemiology
- 2046342839 9
- 2046342840-2841 Ets in Perspective
- 2046342842 10
- 2046342843-2846 Risk Perspectives
- 2046342847 11
- 2046342848-2850 Indoor Air Quality
- 2046342851 12
- 2046342852-2874 Quotable Quotes
- 2046342875 13
- 2046342876-2878 Media Articles
- 2046342879-2884 Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Statistics
- 2046342885-2890 Epidemiology Faces Its Limits
- 2046342891-2892 Do Epidemiologists Cause Epidemics?
- 2046342893-2894 Media Articles Science and Public Policy
- 2046342895-2896 An Environment for Reform
- 2046342897 Cancer Risks for Thee, But Not for Me
- 2046342898-2900 Pc Cancer Risks
- 2046342901-2907 Passive Reporting on Passive Smoke
- 2046342908 Send Regulations Up in Smoke
- 2046342909-2918 Pandora's Box the Dangers of Politically Corrupted Science for Democratic Public Policy
- 2046342919-2921 Media Articles Exposure to Ets
- 2046342922 Smoke Rings
- 2046342923 Remember to Breathe Deeply
- 2046342924 'passive Smoking Risk Small'
- 2046342925 Lone Driver with the Mask
- 2046342926 'no Risk' for Passive Smokers
- 2046342927 Smoke Ills Debunked
- 2046342928 Passive Smoking 'no Risk'
- 2046342929 Passive Smoking 'equals Just One Cigarette A Week'
- 2046342930-2932 Media Articles Risk Perspectives and Assessment
- 2046342933 Rethinking Risk
- 2046342934-2936 Abortion and Possible Risk for Breast Cancer: Analysis and Inconsistencies
- 2046342937-2950 Choices in Risk Assessment the Role of Science Policy in the Environmental Risk Management Process
- 2046342951-2952 Media Articles American Extremism
- 2046342953-2964 Thomas Jefferson and the End of the Nanny State
- 2046342965-2966 Deadly Peril of A Society That Won't Take Any Risks
- 2046342967 Smell Police Are on the Sniff
- 2046342968-2969 No Smoke Without Firings
- 2046342970-2971 New Book Warns of U.S. - Style 'fear of Living'
- 2046342972 14
- 2046342973 Economic Impact
- 2046342974 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban Case Study
- 2046342975-2977 Economic Impact New York City Smoking Ban
- 2046342978 Economic Impact Annex 1: Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New York City
- 2046342979-2984 Potential Impact of Increased Smoking Restrictions in New New York City
- 2046342985 Economic Impact Annex II: Results of A New York Tavern and Restaurant Association Sponsored Survey Conducted by Price Waterhouse
- 2046342986-2987 Day 30: Smoking Ban Hitting the Bottom Line, Say Nyc Restaurants
- 2046342988 New York City Restaurant Survey Executive Summary
- 2046342989 Economic Impact Annex III: National Smokers Alliance Sponsored Survey
- 2046342990-2992 Executive Summary - Survey of New York City Restaurateurs
- 2046342993 Economic Impact Annex IV: Survey for the Tavern and Restaurant Owners Association Regarding Smoking Ban
- 2046342998 Economic Impact Annex V: Results of Survey by Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
- 2046342999-3001 to Dine or Not to Dine: Restaurant Patrons' Responses to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act
- 2046343002 Economic Impact Annex Vi: Press Coverage
- 2046343003 Restaurant Owners Plan Fight Against Smoking Restrictions
- 2046343004-3005 Restaurants Complying on Smoking Few Violations Logged in Law's First 6 Weeks
- 2046343006 the Great 950000 New York Smoke-Out Smoke Screen
- 2046343007 Restaurant Owners Vent Steam Over Smoking Law
- 2046343008 Angry Smokers Fume Over Tough N.Y. Ban
- 2046343009
- 2046343010-3012
- 2046343013 Scofflaw Smokers
- 2046343014 'enough': Smokers Find A Friend
- 2046343015 Poll: Bring Back Smoking Sections
- 2046343016 US Smokers Turn Tables on Bistros
- 2046343017 New Yorkers Strike Back at the Ashtray Police
- 2046343018 Economic Impact US National Restaurant Association - News Release
- 2046343019-3021 Economic Impact of OSHA-Imposed Smoking Ban Would Be Staggering, Restaurant Industry Testifies
- 2046343022 15
- 2046343023-3024 Accommodation
- 2046343025 Horeca Madrid Voluntary Agreement
- 2046343026-3027 Los Restaurantes Madrilenos De Mas De 25 Mesas Reservaran Voluntariamente Zonas Aisladas Para No Fumadores
- 2046343028-3029 General Agreement of Collaboration Between the Health Council of the City of Madrid and the Asociacion Madrilena De Empresarios De Restaurantes Y Cafeterias (Amerc - Madrilenian Association of Restaurant and Cafeteria Managers)
- 2046343030 Horeca Hotrec Guidelines
- 2046343031
- 2046343032-3035 Voluntary Actions to Accommodate Smoking and Non - Smoking Preferences
- 2046343036
- 2046343037 Horeca Iha / Bha Courtesy of Choice Programme
- 2046343038 Lower Vat Says Study Distinctively Individual Unify Stars and Crowns Wales Means Business
- 2046343039 Smoking or Non - Smoking
- 2046343040 Workplace Belgian Employer's Guidelines / Belgian 930000 Royal Decree
- 2046343041-3053
- 2046343054-3068
- 2046343069-3070
- 2046343071 Translation of Belgian Royal Decree on Workplace Smoking 930331
- 2046343072 Workplace Swiss Employer Guidelines
- 2046343073-3074 Rauchen Oder Nichtrauchen Am Arbeitsplatz
- 2046343075-3076 Fumer Ou Ne Pas Fumer Au Lieu De Travail
- 2046343077-3079 Smoking or No Smoking in the Workplace
- 2046343080 16
- 2046343081
- Author (Organization)
- Penn Schoen Associates
- Named Organization
- Ny Restaurant + Tavern Owners Assn
- Penn Schoen Associates
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- djr92e00
Document Images
Methodology
From April 29 to May 2. Penn + Schoen Associates, Inc. conducted 2008
interviews with New York State residents above the age of 18.
~ The.s.ample of respondents were taken from throughout ;he state in
proportion to past statewide electoral turnout figures.
Interviewing was done by telephone from the centfal telephone facilities of
Penn + Schoen Associates at their headquarters in Manhattan.
The marain of error for the entire sample is 4-2.2%, but is higher among
subgroups of resaanoents.
The survey was commissioned by the New York Restaurant and Tavern Owners
ssociation.
Key Findings
0
Th© findinas of this survey indicate that New York State residents
overwhelmingly fe~l the best way to regulate smoking in restaurants is for all
s©Etions of thc s:ate te foilow state regulations an.d alfow smcking at designated
areas
~/ These M^c;usions are ;onsistant a=ss subarours by age. income.
region ar-d by smokers and non-smokers
The sun,,ey ai.so showed that the now New York City regulations which ban
smoking in restaurants are confusing to consumers and has the potential for a
negative ercr.ornic impact on restaurant business
Penn ScJ'Aaen Assodates, inc.

General Findings
New York State residents, across all subgroups, show strong support for the
current state regulations and display a similar preference for all sections of the
state to follow these rules
~ By a ratio of more than 3:1, 73% of New York State residents said the
current state law requiring a no-smoking area in restaurants with a seeting
capacity of more than 50 is a good way to regulate smoking, and 22%
said it was a bad way
~ Along with the overwhelming support for current statr regulations, three
quar'ers of all respondents (75°'0) agree that all sec::ons of New York
State should foiiow the state rules on smokino versus the 22% who
~ disagree
~l And a clear -naJori;y (58%) feel there should be one smoking ordinance
for the who!e state versus the 37% who feel each local entity should have
a separate ru,e
. There is strong suppo:t fo: reso:ving the issue of smoking at restaurants by
allowing smoking at des~gnated tables
~( More than 6 in 10 New York State residen:s (61 %v) jee; the best way is to
allow sn}ox,no at aes:gnated taLfes
.1'
0
Cnly a third of resocndents (34°'0) think smoking should not be alloweci
anywhere
Cverall, New York S:atz residents uhquestionadly choose smokino regulations
that acc:,mmodate smokers and non-smokers over a policy that bans smoicing
entirely, even if it mear-,s restaurants could lose business
~ More than two-thirds (70%) of all responoents chose the policy of
acccmmodating s:okers and non-smokers over the 27% who chose the
smoking ban
New Yorlc State residents overwhelmingly agrer a reasonable amount of
regulation of smoking in restaurants is necessary
V Nearly two-thirds of all residents (64%) agr8e that the state laws
corticerning smoking in restaurants are sufficient
Perm t SdOwn Assodates, Ir,c. pa4e 3

Looal smoking laws do have the potential to hurt restaurant business
restaurant to more than three-quarters of all New York Stat.e residents
New York State residents overwhelmingly a,gree a reasonable amount of
regulation of smoking in restaurants is necessary
Nearly half of all New York State residents eavouf in a restaurant once a
week or more
. 4 The smoking policy is considered an important factor in choosing a
~1 Nearly two-thirds of all residents (64%) agree that the state laws
concerning smolcfng in restaurants are sufficient
Local smoking laws do have the potential to hurt restaurant business
4
Nearly half of all New York S:ate residents eat out in a restaurant onc: a
week or more
The smoking policy is considered an important factor in choosing a
re.staurant to more than three-quarters of all New York State residents
The New York City Regulations
About one-quarter (27°0) of all respondents were aware that New York C;ty.
Suffolk County, Chautauqua Coun:y and Niagara County each have their own
rules for sn-mking and 72% were unaware
0
A1most half (45%) have heard something about the new no-smoking regulations
in New York City
Respondents were read the following statement:
4
"New rules just went into effect in New York City banning smoking in the
dining areas in all restaurants with indoor seating for more than 35. Bars
and night dubs are covered if 40% or more of their sates are from food.
Restaurants with bars can allow limited smoking in their bar area, and
restaurants without bars can only have smoking in a separate room where
foad isn't served. Smoking is banned in the seating and viewing areas of
indoor and outdoor stadiums and arenas, and at outdoor plays and
concerts where seating or standing room is assigned by tickets."
Rsnn - Schom Associates. 1nc.
p,aSe a

~ NoE surprisingly, respondents thought the New York City regulations were
confusing, onerous and inferior to the New York State regulations:
V Nearly threequarters of all respondents (71 %) thought the rules are hard
for restaurant owners to comply with versus only onequarter1 (Z5°/a) who
thought th.ey are easy
~( Alrnast half said the rules are hard for consumers to simply understand
(48°la) -and one half (50%) said they are easy
~1 Whttn asked which rules do a better job of accommodating the neeris of
smokers and non-smokers. a majority said the State rules (47%), only
40% said the City rules and 14% did not know
0
Now York State Law Now Requires Any Restaurant With
Seating For More Than 50 To Have A No-St»oking Area
Big Enough To Meet Consumer Demand. In General, Do
You Think This Is A Good Or Bad Way To Regulato
Smoking And No Smoking In Restaurants?
GoCd
Way
Pwn- Scttoen Assar:ates. Inc.
Bad
Way
5%
®
dan`t know
