Jump to:

Philip Morris

Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Compendium of Technical Information

Date: May 1991
Length: 174 pages
2040225115-2040225288
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2040225115-2040225288

Fields

Author
Behrens, R.
Bennett, G.
Cain, W.S.
Glantz, S.A.
Novotny, T.E.
Parmley, W.W.
Repace, J.L.
Area
BORELLI,TOM/CARLSTADT
Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
Site
N329
Request
Stmn/R1-037
Named Organization
Communications Workers of America
Control Data
Dun Bradstreet
Employee Advisory Council
Employee Assistance Program
Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
FDA, Food and Drug Administration
Fortune 500
Gallup Org
General Telephone of Ca
Harvard Univ
Hay Huggins
Holiday
Iarc
Johnson Johnson
La Pacific
Louis Harris + Associates
Mi Bell
Milbank Quarterly
Msi Insurance
Nas, Natl Academy of Sciences
Natl Center for Health Comm
Natl Center for Health Statistics
Natl Clearinghouse for Smoking + Health
Natl Heart Lung + Blood Inst
Natl Research Council
Natl Restaurant Assn
Nchs
Non Smokers Inn
Northwestern Univ
Ny Times
Nyserda
Office of Prevention Education + Control
Office of Technology Assessment
Office on Smoking + Health
Pa Blue Shield
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Pacific Northwest Bell
Prevention Magazine
Provident Indemnity Life Insurance
Rainier Bancorporation
Rainier Bank
Ralston Purina
Research + Forecasts
Roper, Roper Org
Sg
Smoking Issues Steering Comm
Speedcall
Tx Instruments
United Auto Workers
United Steel Workers Union
Unum Life Insurance
US Bureau of Census
US Congress
US Dept of Transportation
US Employee Relations
US Gypsum
US Public Health Service
Ut State Dept of Health
Wcbs Tv
Wellness Comm
Westlake Community Hospital
Workplace Health Fund
Ymca
Acoustical Products
Amalgamated Clothing + Textile Workers U
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Board of Family Practice
American Family Insurance Group
American Society of Personnel Administra
Ashrae, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating + Air-Conditioning Engineers
Bureau of Natl Affairs
Canadian Pediatric Assn
Cardinal Industries
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention +
Centers for Disease Control
Named Person
Albert, R.
Allred, E.N.
Aronow, W.
Astrup, P.
Baek, S.O.
Becker, D.
Beil, L.
Benditt, E.
Benditt, J.
Berglund, L.G.
Boleij
Bonham, G.
Broffman, P.
Brunekreef
Burghuber, O.
Butler, T.
Cain, W.S.
Chesebro, J.
Clark, R.E.
Clausen, G.H.
Coggins, E.I.
Coghlin, J.
Coultas
Cuddeback
Cummings, K.M.
Davis, J.
Davis, R.M.
Deanfield, J.E.
Dicorleto, P.
Dietz, R.
Dobson, A.
Endicott
Fanger, P.O.
Fischer
Fleming, D.W.
Fox, P.
Frederick
Friedman, J.
Fuster, V.
Gallup
Gann, P.H.
Garland, C.
Gierer, R.
Gillis, C.
Glantz, S.A.
Grandjean, E.
Green, C.E.
Greenberg
Grot, R.A.
Gurlinger, A.
Gvozdjak, J.
Gvozdjakova, A.
Hamilton
Hammond, S.K.
Hansen, E.
Harris
Haskins, R.
Hawkins, L.H.
Hawthorne
He, Y.
Helsing, K.
Hirayama, T.
Hole, D.
Huey, R.J.
Hugod, C.
Humble, C.
Humpreys, C.M.
Hunter, M.
Isseroff, R.
Jarvis
Jermini, C.
Junkins, J.
Kawachi, I.
Kefalides, A.
Kendall, D.A.
Kerka, W.F.
Khalfen, E.
Kirk, Pww
Kjeldsen, K.
Klochkov, V.
Kristein, M.M.
Kristensen, T.
Kuller
Lamb, D.
Leaderer, B.P.
Lee, P.
Leonardos, G.
Lester, J.N.
Lindquist
Lipsitt, E.D.
Lough, J.
Lowrey, A.H.
Luce, B.L.
Luck
Majesky, M.
Mangels, J.D.
Manning, W.G.
Martin, M.
Mason, R.
Matsukura
Mcmurray, R.
Miesner
Moller, S.B.
Moschandreas, D.
Moskowitz, W.
Muhm, J.
Murphy, C.L.
Nau
Nielsen, K.S.
Nielson, C.
Nitschke
Nystrom, C.W.
Oconnell, M.
Oldaker, G.B.
Olshan, A.
Ott, W.R.
Palmer, J.
Parker
Parmley, W.W.
Pattishall
Pearce, N.
Penn, A.
Perlman, D.
Perry, R.
Persily, A.
Peterson, L.R.
Pisha, S.
Plischke, K.
Pritchard
Pukander, J.
Randerath, E.
Reinken, K.
Remmer, H.
Repace, J.L.
Revis, N.
Riboli, E.
Rice, D.P.
Rickert, W.S.
Rigotti, N.A.
Riley, E.C.
Ritchie
Rogers, C.C.
Rogers, W.R.
Roscovanu, A.
Rosenstock, I.M.
Ross, R.
Rothman, K.
Russell, L.B.
Saba, S.
Sahin, F.
Schelling, T.C.
Schlipkoeter, H.W.
Schneiders
Schweitzer, S.O.
See, L.C.
Sexton, K.
Sheldon
Sheps, D.
Sinzinger, H.
Spengler
Sterling
Stillman, F.A.
Surgeon General
Svendsen, K.
Szalai
Thomsen, H.
Tosun, T.
Vaughn, W.M.
Virgolini, I.
Visscher, W.
Wald, N.
Wall, M.A.
Warner, K.E.
Weber, A.
Webertschopp, A.
Weis, W.L.
Wells, A.
Wilkstrand, J.
Williams, D.C.
Wilson, R.W.
Winneke, G.
Yaglou, C.P.
Document File
2040225000/2040225584/Epa Technical Compendium
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention +
Centers for Disease Control
Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
Indoor Air Div
John B Pierce Lab
Natl Heart Lung + Blood Inst
Office of Air + Radiation
Office of Prevention Education + Control
Office on Smoking + Health
Univ of Ca San Francisco
Wa Business Group on Health
Yale Univ
Master ID
2040225004/5288
Related Documents:
Characteristic
DRFT, DRAFT
OVER, OVER SIZE DOCUMENT
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
edq02a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote CHAPTER 6 PASSIVE SMOKING AND HEART DISEASE: EPIDEMIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY~ Stanton A. Glantz PhD William W. Parffiley MeD. Division of Cardiology School of Medicine University of California San Francisco, CA 94143 Introduction The first disease linked to active smoking was lung cancer. It is, therefore, not surprising that the first disease linked to passive smoking was also lung cancer (USPHS, 1986). Before the advent of mass marketed cigarettes, lung cancer was a rare disease. The fact that smoking is the major identifiable cause of lung cancer made identifying this link -- for both active and passive smoking -- relatively straightforward. This situation contrasts i4ith heart disease, which has many risk factors, so it is not surprising that it took longer for the scientific community to conclude that active smoking caused heart disease (USPHS, 1983). Once the link between smoking and heart disease was established, it became clear that smoking accounted for more heart disease deaths than lung (and other) cancers because of the high prevalence of heart disease. Similarly, smoking is the most important preventable cause of coronary disease. Given this history, it is not surprising that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has now been linked to heart disease in nonsmokers (Wells, 1988; Kristensen, 1989) and may result in a substantial number of unnecessary coronary heart disease deaths in nonsmokers. Most of the evidence linking ETS and coronary heart disease has appeared since the US Surgeon General (USPHS, 1986) and National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 1986) last reviewed the evidence on the health effects of ETS. Based on the information available as of early 1986, both these reports concluded that the evidence linking ETS and heart disease was equivocal and that more research was necessary before any definitive statements could be made. These conclusions were reasonable at the time they were made. In the four years since these reports were written, considerable information on both the epidemiology and biological mechanisms by which ETS may cause heart disease has accumulated from several areas of scientific investigation. In fact, most of the results 1This chapter is an adaptation of a peer-reviewed manuscript of the same title (Glantz and Parmley, 1990). 80
Page 2: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote presented in this chapter were published after the 1986 Surgeon General and National Academy of Science reports. First, there are now 11 epidemiological studies on the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the home and the risk of heart disease in the nonsmoking spouse of a smoker. All but one of these studies yielded a relative risk greater than 1.0. There are several lines of biologic evidence which make this association plausible. There is evidence that exposure to ETS reduces exercise tolerance of healthy individuals as well as people with existing coronary artery disease. Such reduced exercise capability is one of the landmarks of acute compromises to the coronary circulation. There is evidence, from both human and animal studies, that exposure to tobacco smoke, including passive smoking, increases aggregation of blood platelets. Such increases in platelet aggregation are an important step in the genesis of atherosclerosis. In addition, increasing platelet aggregation contributes to coronary thrombosis, the cause of acute myocardial infarction. Finally, carcinogenic agents in ETS, including benzo[a]pyrene have been shown to produce injuries to the endothelial cells which line arteries. Such injuries are the first step in the development of atherosclerosis. Thus, exposure to ETS can contribute to both short term and long term insults to the coronary circulation and the heart. Effects of Primary Smokinq Before reviewing the evidence linking ETS with coronary artery disease, it is worth summarizing the evidence linking active smoking with coronary artery disease. This evidence was summarized in the 1983 Surgeon General's Report, which was devoted entirely to cardiovascular disease (USPHS, 1983); it concluded: In 1980, diseases of the circulatory system were responsible for approximately one-half of the total U.S. mortality. CHD was the sinale most important cause of death, accounting for approximately 30 percent of all U.S. deaths. Cigarette smoking is one of the three major independent CHD risk factors. The magnitude of the risk associated with cigarette smoking is similar to that associated with the other two major CHD risk factors, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia; however, because cigarette smoking is present in a larger percentage of the U.S. population than either hypertension or hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking ranks as the largest preventable cause of CHD in the United States. Cigarette smoking also acts synergistically with the other major risk factors to greatly increase the risk for CHD. Arteriosclerosis is the predominant underlying cause of cardiovascular disease, and atherosclerosis is the form of 81
Page 3: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote arteriosclerosis that most frequently causes clinically significant disease, including CHD, atherothrombic brain infarction, atherosclerotic aortic disease, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Cigarette smoking contributes both to the development of atherosclerotic lesions and to the clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic vascular disease, including sudden death. Although the precise pathophysiologic basis of these clinical manifestations is not understood, it may be related to several deleterious cardiovascular effects of cigarette smoking, including production of an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, a decrease in threshold for ventricular fibrillation, and an increase in platelet aggregation. Nicotine and carbon monoxide are the tobacco smoke constituents most closely associated with these adverse effects; other cigarette smoke constituents such as hydrogen cyanide, oxides of nitrogen, and carbon disulfide are being studied for possible pathologic cardiovascular effects. Since 1983, evidence has also mounted that the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke can injure the arterial endothelium and initiate the atherosclerotic process. ~ All the compounds implicated as damaging to the cardiovascular system of smokers have been identified in ETS (USPHS, 1986; NRC, 1986). Enidemioloaical Studies on ETS and Heart Disease Since 1984, the epidemiological evidence linking exposure to ETS with heart disease has rapidly accumulated. The results of the eleven published studies are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1; four studies present data on men, nine on women, and one on both sexes combined. Despite minor differences in methodology or end points (some used death from ischemic heart disease of any origin and some were limited to death from myocardial infarction), the results of these studies are remarkably consistent. All the studies on men yielded relative risks of death from heart disease exceeding 1 for nonsmoking men married to smokers, with a median risk of 1.2. All but one of the studies on women (Lee et al, 1986) yielded relative risks exceeding 1, with a median relative risk of 1.4. Several studies also suggested an increase in the risk of nonfatal coronary symptoms (Svendsen et al, 1987; Palmer et al, 1988; Hole et al, 1989; Dobson et al, 1990); quantitative results in Table l only reflect risk of death, not coronary symptoms. Consistency of an observation across different studies increases the confidence one can have in the belief that an association is causal, unless all studies have the same bias. When interpreting the results of such epidemiological studies, it is always important to consider biological plausibility and potential confounding variables which could explain the results. 82
Page 4: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote Aside from noting that the compounds in mainstream smoke that have been implicated in heart disease are in ETS, we will defer the discussion of biological plausibility until later in this chapter, when we discuss the effects of ETS on platelets and the atherogenic agents in ETS. For now, we will concentrate on potential confounding variables. These are particularly important in a disease like heart disease, because it is known to be caused by multiple risk factors. All of the studies controlled for the most important confounding variable, age, and several (Garland et al, 1985; Svedsen et al, 1987; He, 1989; Hole et al, 1989; Humble et al, 1990) controlled for several known risk factors for coronary artery disease, in particular levels of cholesterol, blood pressure and weight (or body mass or body mass index). Most of the studies also included one or more measures of socioeconomic status, such as the nature of the housing or amount of education. Lee (1988, 1989, 1990) has suggested that the elevated risk of heart (and other) disease with passive smoking could be due to misclassification of nonsmokers who are really smokers. In addition, Wald (1986) has noted that some people who say they live yith nonsmokers-Yrave detectable levels of the nicotine metabolite cotinine in their blood, indicating that they are actually exposed to ETS, either at work or at home. The former type of misclassification will tend to lead to an overestimate of the risks associated with ETS and the latter will lead to an underestimate of the risk. Careful analysis of the question of misclassification -- which applies generally to studies of ETS and not just heart disease -- have demonstrated that the observed risks cannot be explained by this technical problem (Wald, 1986; Wells, 1986, 1988, 1990; Kawachi and Pearce, 1989; Reinken, 1989). In addition, both the Surgeon General (USPHS, 1986) and the National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 1986) were presented with the argument that misclassification errors accounted for the link between ETS and lu W cancer and concluded that ETS caused lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers. To date,.no compelling case has been made that this technical error explains consistent findings linking ETS with heart (or lung) disease. Indeed, the net effect of these two types of misclassification errors is to lead to an underestimate of the effects of passive smoking for lung cancer. There is.always the possibility that there is some other confounding variable relating to cultural factors,'such as the nature of housing or employment or the nature of time spent outside the home. Most studies look only at a crude measure of exposure-spouse smoking-and it is possible that this is an indicator variable for other things, such as poor diet, risky lifestyle, or stress. The fact that results are similar from all over the world in widely varying cultural settings -- including several regions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and China -- argues against this concern. 83
Page 5: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote Several authors also observed a dose-response relationship (Table 1) between increasing amounts of smoking by the spouse and the risk of heart disease in the nonsmoking spouse (Helsing et al, 1988 (statistically significant in women, but not men); Hole et al, 1989; Garland et al, 1985 (although not statistically significant); Humble et al, 1990; He, 1989; Hirayama, 1984). The presence of such dose-response effects across multiple studies, done in different locations with different criteria supports the hypothesis that the epidemiology is revealing a real effect of ETS on heart disease in nonsmokers. While all but one of the studies in Table 1 and Figure 1 yielded relative risks greater than 1, the fact remains that 3 of the studies in men and 4 of the studies in women had 95% confidence intervals for the relative risk of passive smoking for heart disease that fell below 1.0, meaning that the risk was not statistically significantly elevated above 1.0 (with P<.05). It is important to note that the 95% confidence intervals do not lie symmetrically about 1.0, but rather are skewed towards higher risks. To avoid false negative conclusions, Rothman (1978) suggested examining the confidence interval, as we have done, in concluding the exposure to ETS elevates the risk of heart disease. One can assess formally how confident one can be in reaching a negative conclusion by computing the power of the study to detect an effect of specified size (Friedman et al, 1978). Table 1 shows estimates of the power of each of the studies to detect a 20% increase in risk-of heart disease (i.e., a relative risk of 1.2) with the available samples. The power was computed as described in Muhm and Olshan (1989), using a two-sided test for the relative risk with a Type I risk of 5% (i.e., requiring the 95% confidence interval for the relative risk to exclude 1.0 before concluding a statistically significant elevation in risk in an individual study). Most of the studies have low to moderate power. The two (Helsing et al, 1988; Hole et al, 1989) that have power above the desirable level of 80% both identified significant increases of heart disease risk with ETS exposure. Interestingly, the study by Lee (1986) which was the only one with a relative risk below 1, also had the lowest power to detect an effect, only 3%. It is possible to combine the results of these studies in a formal analysis to derive a global estimate of the relative risk and associated 95% confidence interval. By combining the studies, the sample size and so the power to detect an effect increases. Pooling the studies in Table 1 yields an estimate of the relative risk of death from heart disease of 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6) for men and 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.4) for women. These results are consistent with those reported by Wells (1988) who used the studies by Gillis et al (1984), Lee et al (1986), and Helsing et al (1987) to compute a pooled relative risk of 1.3 (with a 95% confidence interval from 1.1 to 1.6) for men and the studies by Hirayama (1984), Gillis et 84
Page 6: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote al (1984), Garland et al (1985), Helsing et al (1988), Lee et al (1986), and Martin et al (1986) to compute a pooled relative risk of 1.2 (with a 95% confidence interval from 1.1 to 1.4) for women. Exposure to ETS significantly (p < 0.001) increases the risk of death from heart disease in nonsmokers. Finally, it is worth noting that all these studies are based on the smoking habits of the nonsmoker's spouse, and so exposure to ETS at home. Household exposures to ETS at home are generally much smaller than exposures at work, where the density of smokers is generally higher (Repace and Lowrey, 1985,1987). As a result, these studies will generally underestimate the risk and attendant public health burden due to ETS-induced heart disease if a substantial proportion of the controls are exposed at work. Kawachi et al (1989) have adjusted Wells' (1988) relative risks to account for workplace exposures to ETS and found that the relative risks increase to 2.3 (95% CI 104 - 3.4) for men and 1.9 (95% CI 1.4 - 2.5) for women. In addition, Wells (1988) and Kawachi et al (1989) indicate that the number of heart disease deaths due to passive smoking is an order of magnitude greater than the number of lung cancer deaths due to passive smoking. These epidemiological studies demonstrate a connection between ETS exposure and death from heart disease. We now turn our. attention to possible physiological and biochemical mechanisms which could explain these observations. Acute Effects of ETS Ex osure Chronic exposure to ETS exerts carcinogenic effects by increasing the cumulative risk of a molecule of one of the carcinogens in the ETS damaging the DNA in a cell and initiating or promoting the carcinogenic process. To date, no one has identified any effects of acute exposure to ETS (or, for that matter, any other carcinogen) on cancer. The situation with heart disease is different. In heart disease there are both important chronic changes (i.e., the development of atherosclerotic lesions) and acute changes. The latter include an increase in myocardial oxygen demand which may outstrip the oxygen supply and produce ischemia, and increased platelet aggregation which can lead to coronary thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction. When the coronary circulation cannot provide enough oxygen to the myocardium to meet the demand, the result is ischemia which can be silent or result in anginal chest pain. Earlier onset of angina or hypotension during exercise is a reflection of more severe heart disease. oxygen supply can be reduced by atherosclerotic narrowing or vasoconstriction of the coronaries or by reducing the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood by forming carboxyhemoglobin. Khalfen and Klochkov (1987) confirmed earlier work by Aronow (1978) demonstrating that exposure to ETS significantly reduced exercise ability in patients with coronary artery disease and the rate 85
Page 7: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote pressure product (heart rate times systolic blood pressure). In both studies, patients were exposed to realistic levels of ETS by simply sitting in a waiting room while someone was smoking. These effects were present in both smokers and nonsmokers (Khalfen and Klochkov, 1987) and regardless of whether or not the room was ventilated (Aronow, 1978; Khalfen and Klochkov, 1987). Exposure to ETS also increased resting heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and resulted in a lower heart rate at the onset of angina (Aronow, 1978). Blood carboxyhemoglobin was increased by about 1% after exposure to ETS (Aronow, 1978). Sheps et al (1987) found no change in cardiovascular function in subjects with angina in response to mild elevation in blood carbon monoxide similar to that experienced in passive smokers when they exposed their subjects to pure carbon monoxide. In contrast, Allred et al (1989) found a significant dose-response relation between carboxyhemoglobin level and the change in the length of time to both electrocardiographic and symptom manifestation in men with angina pectoris exercising after exposure to CO. Even a small increase in the carboxyhemoglobin level, representing a seemingly minor reduction in the oxygen-carrying capacity of hemoglobin, was associated with the statistically sIgnificant effects. Acute exposure to ETS leads to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen $upply and demand during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. While this discussion has concentrated on the carbon monoxide in ETS as the active agent, it is likely that some other component of the ETS is also contributing to this effect. The effects of ETS on cardiac performance are, in fact, severe enough to affect exercise performance in young healthy subjects with no evidence of heart disease. McMurray et al (1985) blindly exposed young healthy women to pure air and air contaminated with ETS while they exercised on a treadmill. The results were similar to those observed in patients with coronary artery disease. Resting heart rate was increased during exposure to ETS, which increased blood carboxyhemoglobin by about 1%. Exposure to ETS significantly reduced maximum oxygen uptake (by 0.251/min and time to exhaustion (by 2.1 min). Exposure to ETS also increased the perceived level of exertion during exercise, maximum heart rate, and COz output. It also significantly increased levels of lactate in venous blood (from a mean of 5.5 mM during control period to 6.8 mM after exposure to ETS). This greater lactate at a lower oxygen consumption during the passive smoking trials indicates a greater reliance on anaerobic metabolism. The combined effect of the reduced oxygen carrying capacity and increased lactate resulted in a reduction in maximal aerobic power and 'the duration of exercise. Thus, even in healthy subjects, exposure to ETS adversely affects exercise performance. The acute effects of CO and direct tobacco smoke on exercise performance are well documented in the literature. Exposure to CO ~ (or CO in tobacco smoke), and the subsequent elevation of blood Q carboxyhemoglobin levels to ca. 3%, has been shown to decrease 86 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Page 8: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote exercise duration in patients with ischemic heart disease and decrease short-term maximal exercise duration in young healthy men. It is conceivable, therefore, that elevations in COHb due to ETS could have similar effects. While the association between active smoking and cardiovascular disease is well known (USPHS, 1983), little is known about the relative importance of each component of tobacco smoke that may be responsible for this relationship. Most experts agree, however, that both CO and nicotine are important, and other constituents of the smoke may play a role as well. Active smoking clearly aggravates the decrease in 02 capacity induced by CO through an increase in the OZ demand of the heart (Deanfield et al, 1986). Passive smoking exposes an individual to all components in the cigarette smoke, but the CO component dominates heavily because only 1%- or less of the nicotine is absorbed from passive smoking compared to 100% in an active smoker (Wall et al, 1988; Jarvis, 1987). Currently available information indicates that acute exposure (1 to 2 h) to passive smoke will increase a nonsmoker's COHb level by about 1% (Jarvis, 1987). This small incremental increase in COHb due to ETS alone may not be enough to trigger acute cardiovascular effects unless combined with other sources of CO or with other components of ETS having a similar effect (e.g., nicotine). Lamb (1984) has suggested that at maximal exertion. levels, up to 90% of the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood may be needed. Because of the carbon monoxide, and perhaps other constituents, ETS reduces this capacity, so the muscle cannot maintain its high rate of aerobic metabolism unless cardiac output is further increased; people with heart disease and reduced ventricular reserve have difficulty meeting this demand. In sum, exposure to ETS increases the demands on the heart during exercise and reduces the capacity of the heart to respond. This imbalance increases the ischemic stress of exercise in patients with existing coronary artery disease and can acutely precipitate symptoms. Moskowitz et al (1990) found evidence that adolescent children of parents who smoked may suffer from chronic tissue hypoxia such as that observed in anemia, chronic pulmonary disease, cyanotic heart disease or high altitude. These children had significantly elevated levels of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (DPG), which suggests that the body is attempting to compensate for hypoxia by increasing DPG level in blood to meet tissue oxygen 'requirements, even after correcting for age, weight, height and sex. These changes were dose-dependent; the greater the exposure to ETS (measured both in terms of parental smoking and serum thiocyanate in the children), the greater the increase in DPG. There is also evidence that acute exposure to ETS directly affects the myocardial muscle at a cellular level. Gvozdjakova et al (1984) exposed rabbits in a 50 liter child's incubator to the smoke of three burning cigarettes smoked over a 30 minute period and measured several variables related to the metabolism of cardiac 87
Page 9: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote mitochondria. (Mitochondria are the subcellular elements that control cellular respiration; they convert oxygen into usable energy in the form of ATP.) They had three groups of rabbits: one group exposed to a single dose of ETS, one group exposed to 30 min of ETS twice daily for two weeks, and one group exposed to 30 minutes of ETS twice a day for eight weeks. They measured mitochondrial respiration (Q02) as the consumption of oxygen after adding ADP to a vessel containing mitochondrial fragments. Using pyruvate as a substrate, mitochondrial respiration QO was reduced significantly compared to control (pure air) for all hses of ETS, even a single exposure (Figure 2), to about half the control value. The oxidative phosphorylation rate was also reduced significantly at all exposures by about one-third. There were no significant changes in the coefficient of oxidative phosphorylation (ADP:02) with ETS exposure. Gvozdjakova et al concluded that pyruvate as a substrate was a sensitive indicator of the toxic action of the ETS on the oxidative process. Later, to further isolate where in the process of mitochondrial respiration, the ETS acted, Gvozdjak et al (1985, 1987) reported data on succinate, NADH, and cytochrome oxidase activity in the mitochondria in the four groups of rabbits. Figure 2 shows the lFesults of exposure to ETS on the activity of NADH oxidase, succinate oxidase and cytochrome oxidase of myocardial mitochondria. The activity of the first two oxidases exhibited no changes compared with the control group -- neither after a single exposure to ETS or following exposures up to 2 weeks. Cytochrome oxidase activity decreased both after a single exposure to ETS and over time, with increasing effects as the duration of exposure to ETS is extended. The observation that cytochrome oxidase and not NADH or succinate oxidase activity was affected by ETS suggests that the deleterious effects of ETS on myocardial mitochondrial respiration occur at the terminal segment of the mitochondrial respiration process. Prolonged exposure to carbon monoxide has been shown in some studies to induce ultrastructural changes in myocardium (Kjeldsen et al, 1974; Thomsen and Kjeldsen, 1974; Lough, 1978). Later, Kjeldsen and co-workers (Hugod et al, 1978), using a blind technique and the same criteria to assess morphological myocardial damage found no significant changes in the coronary arteries or aorta in normocholesterolemic rabbits exposed to CO at concentrations from 200 to 4000 ppm for' up to 12 weeks. They suggested that the positive results obtained earlier were due to the non-blind evaluation techniques and the small number of animals used in these studies. Later, Hugod (1981): confirmed these negative results using electron microscopy. In addition, the earlier studies were conducted at "moderate" levels of CO (100 to 150 ppm) which are considerably higher than levels of CO found in smoke-polluted environments (reported to be as high as 40-50 ppm, but more typically are around 10 ppm) (NRC, 1986). These negative studies only argue against an effect of CO in inducing coronary 88
Page 10: edq02a00 Log in for more options!
Draft - Do not cite or quote atherosclerosis, and not a direct effect of CO on myocardial oxygen supply and demand (Deanfield et al, 1986). Acute exposure to ETS not only increases the demand and compromises the supply of oxygen to the heart as a whole, but also reduces the myocardium's ability to use this oxygen to create ATP to provide energy to support the heart's pumping activity. This effect probably results from several of the compounds in ETS acting simultaneously on the cardiovascular system. Effects on Platelets The action of ETS to increase platelet aggregation is another way in which ETS can acutely increase the risk of a coronary event. When blood platelets aggregate inappropriately and form a thrombus (blood clot), this clot can form in a fissured plaque in the coronary circulation and precipitate a myocardial infarction. Platelets are important for the normal body process of hemostasis, to prevent blood loss after an injury. Hemostasis depends on complex interactions among the dynamics of blood flow, components of the vessel wall, blood platelets and plasma proteins. A thrombus can be considered as an inappropriate form of hemostasis and is composed-of a mass of cellular material held together by a network of fribrin. Definitive evidence has confirmed that platelets play a major role in thrombus formation and embolization, especially in the arterial system. In addition, increasing evidence has shown that platelet deposition and thrombus formation can contribute to the growth and progression of atherosclerotic plaques (Fuster and Chesebro, 1981; Ross, 1986). An arterial tbrombus appears to develop in three phases: platelet adhesion, platelet aggregation, and activating of clotting mechanisms. Passive smoking increases platelet aggregation and so increases the likelihood of thrombus formation and myocardial infarction. Table 2 summarizes the results of three studies (Davis et al, 1985a, 1986, 1989) on the effects of cigarette smoke on platelet aggregation and damage to the arterial endothelium (lining). (We will discuss the effects on the endothelium below.) Davis et al (1989) also measured platelet aggregate ratios and endothelial cell counts in nonsmokers before and after being exposed to 20 minutes of ETS while sitting in a hospital atrium. Mean values before and after passive smoking were 0.87 and 0.78 (P=.002) for platelet aggregate ratios and 2.8 and 3.7 (P=.002) for counts~ of anuclear endothelial cell carcasses in venous blood. These changes are in between the effects observed after nonsmokers smoked two tobacco cigarettes and the effects observed after smoking two non-tobacco cigarettes (Davis et al, 1985a) and similar to the values observed in nonsmokers who smoked two cigarettes while trying not to inhale (Davis et al, 1986). These effects were not correlated with the level of nicotine in the blood of the experimental subjects in any of these or other (Davis et al, 1985, 1987), related studies on how drugs modify platelet aggregation and endothelial cell counts. In 89

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: