Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Wells, A.J.
- Area
- SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-NEUCHATEL/STORAGE BAYS
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Site
- E21
- Recipient (Organization)
- Univ of Auckland
- Recipient
- Jackson, R.
- Document File
- 2028443175/2028443875/Peter Lee
- Named Person
- Glantz, S.
- Xxbeaglehole
- Litigation
- Ppla/Produced
- Master ID
- 2028443187/3224
Related Documents:- 2028443187
- 2028443188-3191 Review 729 Subject Ref 8b 'childhood and Adolescent Passive Smoking and the Risk of Female Lung Cancer'
- 2028443192-3199 Childhood and Adolescent Passive Smoking and the Risk of Female Lung Cancer
- 2028443200-3203 Review 730 Subject Ref 8b 'chapter 6: Passive Smoking' From the 'auckland Heart Survey'
- 2028443204-3219 Chapter 6: Passive Smoking
- 2028443220
- 2028443223-3224
- Named Organization
- Journal of the American College of Cardi
- Date Loaded
- 27 Jan 2000
- UCSF Legacy ID
- kgv42d00
Document Images
.-EC-15-93. tJED 1''2:56. ,: ]UL3.oNIdELLS-
A. JUDSOrd WELLS
.1 wiNOEer+taE -n.
KENNETT SOUARE. PENNSYLVANIA 193a9
PIoNE 2i5-3281045
Rod Jackson, Acting NeM
Department o.-: Episemi~ology'
School of Medicine
University of Auckland
Fax 64-9-373-7503'
Dear Dr. Jackson,
8 September, 1'993
Stan Glantz kindly sent along to me a copy of Chapter 6 of your
1989 thesis since he thought it would be a help to me in writing a
review of passive smoking and heart disease that I am doing for the
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. As usual I have
some questions about it and hoped that you could help me out. If
you can repLy by fax, my fax machime is connerted'to the same phone
number as above.
First, has the work been published in..any journal, i.e.,., the passive
smoking/heart part? I assume that M1 means myocardial i.nfarction
cases, MIC means controls for MI, CD ne=s cardiac death cases, and
CDC means controls for CD. if I'm wrong, please advise. Is any
update with more data available? I had some trouble trying,to
reconcile Table 1 with Table 6.3'. Specifically, when I calculate
odds ratios from-table 6.1, 1 get 1.2 instead of 1.5 and 3.17
instead of 2.7 in the first column; 2.88 vs. 2.4, 1.37 vs. 0.9'and
3.6 vs. 4.4 in the third column; and for the lower end of the
confidence interval at the top of the second-column I get 0.06 vs.
0.96. Which table is correct?, and if there are errors in Table 6.3',
do they carry over into,any of the later tables?
I note that you adjusted for age and social class in Table 6.4,.
These are the odds ratios that I probably will use in my paper.
Did you.by any chance try to adjust for any of the other heart risk
factors?' I know you state that the other risk factors dMnot
affect the active smoking relative risks, buc it is possible that
one or more of thew may have affected the passive smoking risks.
Thanks for the help. I am in the process of answetimg reviewe.rss
comments so am.about ready to go to press so a'-prompt responsew.ould
be a great help. Give my best regardss to Beaglehole.
Sin6e'rely,
Oi
a
N
~
N
~
~
W
N
N
N
