Philip Morris
in the Suit 1. Philip Morris Gmbh, Fallstrasse 40, 8000 Munich 70, Officially Represented by Its Directors, Staffan Gunnarsson, Dr. Dietrich Flugs, Berndt Heider and Gunter Wille, and 2. The Limited Partnership of H.F. & Ph. F. Reemtsma & Co., Represented by Its General Partner, Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken Gmbh, Which Is in Turn Represented by Its Directors, Dr. Horst Wiethuchter and Wolf Schulemann, Parkstrasse 51, 2000 Hamburg 52, the Plaintiffs, Represented in Court by: Attorneys Klaus Storch, Dr. H. Schwanhausser, Dr. H. Eichmann, Dr. B. Von Linstow, and Gerhard Barth, Mauerkircherstrasse 8, 8000 Munich 80 Versus B.A.T. Cigaretten-Fabriken Gmbh, Officially Represented by Its Directors, Dieter Von Specht and Gunter Uhe, Alsterufer 4, 2000 Hamburg 36, the Defendents, Represented in Court by: Attorneys Rainer Klaka, Dr. Michael Nieder, Guido Diemer, Dr. Christof Kruger, Delpstrasse 4, 8000 Munich 80, Concerning A Petition for An Order to Cease and Desist (Unfair Competition Law) Decision Docket No. 019149/64vi
Fields
- Author
- Ernstmoll
- Streicher
- Sturm
- Streicher
- Type
- PLEA, PLEADING
- Area
- REIF,HELMUT/OFFICE
- Request
- Stmn/R2-038
- Named Organization
- Din
- Federal Constitutional Court
- Hansa Superior State Court Hamburg
- Hf + Phf Reemtsma
- Munich State Court I 7th Civile Chamber
- Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken
- Superior State Court Frankfurt
- Tc126
- Wg6
- Bat Hamburg
- Federal Constitutional Court
- Document File
- 2028397492/2028397799/Missing
- Named Person
- Barth, G.
- Diemer, G.
- Eichmann, H.
- Ernstmoll
- Flugs, D.
- Gunnarsson, S.
- Heider, B.
- Klaka, R.
- Kruger, C.
- Nieder, M.
- Schulemann, W.
- Schwanhausser, H.
- Storch, K.
- Streicher
- Sturm
- Uhe, G.
- Vonlinstow, B.
- Vonspecht, D.
- Wiethuchter, H.
- Wille, G.
- Diemer, G.
- Author (Organization)
- Munich State Court I 7th Civile Chamber
- Master ID
- 2028397493/7798
Related Documents:- 2028397493-7494 Wg6
- 2028397495 Index
- 2028397496-7497 Background
- 2028397498-7501 United States Patent 4,256,122 Cigarette Filter
- 2028397502-7506
- 2028397507-7513 United State Patent Office 3,490,461 Cigarette Ventilation
- 2028397514-7517 United States Patent 4,331,166 Cigarette
- 2028397518-7519
- 2028397520 Response to Reports From US Testing and Fresenius Laboratories
- 2028397521-7525 Puff Parameter Analyzer Critique
- 2028397526-7529
- 2028397530 Insertion Depth Using Ppa Low Tar Brands, Perforation 10-14 Mm
- 2028397531 Insertion Depth Normal Smoking Low Tar Brands, Perforation 10-14 Mm
- 2028397532-7545 Pitfalls in the Sensory Analysis of Smoking Behaviour
- 2028397546-7547 Recent Trends in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Research
- 2028397548 the Kamm - Fine Holder
- 2028397549-7554 Measurements of Lip Pressure Exerted on A Cigarette During Normal Smoking
- 2028397555-7559 United States Patent 4,627,448 Tobacco Smoke Article Holder and Method Therefor
- 2028397560-7576 Evaluation of A Modified Cigarette Holder
- 2028397577-7578 Investigations Into Smokers' Behaviour A Method to Determine the Depth of Insertion on Smoked Cigarettes
- 2028397579 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 1/0.1 Perforation at 11-13 Mm, Vent 78 Percent
- 2028397580 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 2/0.2 Perforation at 11-16 Mm, Vent 73 Percent
- 2028397581 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 4/0.4 Perforation at 10-14.5 Mm, Vent 60 Percent
- 2028397582 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 4/0.4 Perforation at 11-14 Mm, Vent 60 Percent
- 2028397583 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 5/0.5 Perforation at 10-13 Mm, Vent 45 Percent
- 2028397584 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 9/0.7 Perforation at 10-14 Mm, Vent 40 Percent
- 2028397585 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 16/1.2 Perforation at 11-13 Mm, Vent 17 Percent
- 2028397586 Insertion Depth - Brand Data 1/0.2 Perforation at 13-15 Mm, Vent = 83 Percent
- 2028397587 Insertion Depth Study on 24 Brands Average Insertion Depth 12 Mm
- 2028397588 Insertion Depth - 5 Brands 1-3 Mg Tar Perforation at 10-15 Mm, Vent 60-82 Percent
- 2028397589 Response to Aubort
- 2028397590-7592 the Following Is the View of Dr. Gio Gori of the Franklin Institute, Which We Feel Is Particularly Relevant to the Subject of in-Mouth Sampling Experiments
- 2028397593-7603 A Critique of Dr Aubort's in-Mouth Study
- 2028397604-7614 Effect of Sampling Location on the Measurement of Smoke Concentration in A Glass Model of the Human Mouth
- 2028397615 Effect of Point of Sampling in A Glassmouth
- 2028397616 Effect of Point of Sampling in A Glassmouth
- 2028397617 Relative Human Uptake
- 2028397618-7621 Steady-State Concentration of Cotinine As A Measure of Nicotine-Intake by Smokers
- 2028397622-7632 Smoker Intake From Cigarettes in the 1-Mg Federal Trade Commission Tar Class
- 2028397633-7647 Cigarette Smoking Pharmacokinetics and Its Relationship to Smoking Behaviour
- 2028397662-7664 Development of Machine Smoking Parameters for Measurement of Cigarette Tar Yield in the United Kingdom
- 2028397665-7680 A Psychophysical Study on the Effectiveness of Cigarette Filters
- 2028397681-7685 A Paired Comparison Test Procedure for the Sensory Evaluation of Strength of Flavor and Ease of Draw of Cigarettes
- 2028397686-7736 Prediction of Secondary Vortex Flowfields Generated by An Interacting Multiple Free-Jet Configuration
- 2028397737-7740 Litigation
- 2028397741-7750 Decision
- 2028397751-7762 in the Matter of: the Corporation Philip Morris Belgium, Having Its Corporate Headquarters at 189, Chaussee De La Hulpe, Brussels 1170, R.C. Brussels No. 252.268, Plaintiff, Appearing Through Me Louis Van Bunnen and Me Jean-Pierre Van Cutsem, Attorneys. Against: the Corporation Bat Benelux-Odon Warland, Whose Corporate Headquarters Is at 38, Rue De Koninck, Brussels 1010, Defendant, Appearing Through Me Antoine Braun and Me Thierry Van Innis, Attorneys. A.C./2.290/83.
- 2028397763-7773 En Cause De: La S.A. Philip Morris Belgium, Ayant Son Siege Social Chaussee De La Hulpe, 189 A 1170 Bruxelles, R. C. Bruxelles No. 252.268, Demandresse, Comparant Par Me Louis Van Bunnen Et Me Jean-Pierre Van Cutsem, Avocats. Contre: La S.A. Bat Benelux-Odon Warland, Dont Le Siege Social Est Etabli A 1080 Bruxelles, Rue De Koninck, 38, Defenderesse, Comparant Par Me Antoine Braun Et Me Thierry Van Innis, Avocats. A.C./2.290/83.
- 2028397774-7785 En Cause De: La S.A. Philip Morris Belgium, Ayant Son Siege Social A 1170 Bruxelles, Chaussee De La Hulpe, 189, Appelants, Representee Par Maitre Louis Van Bunnen, Avocat A 1180 Bruxelles, 234 Avenue Coghen Et Par Maitre Jean-Pierre Van Cutsem, Avocat A 1000 Bruxelles, 2 Rue Brederode. Contre: La S.A. B.A.T. Benelux, Etablissement Odon Warland, Ayant Son Siege Social A Molenbeck St. Jean, Rue De Koninck, 38, R.C. Bruxelles, 8.338, Intimee, Representee Par Maitres Antoine Braun Et Thierry Van Innis, Avocats A 1200 Bruxelles, Avenue De Broqueville 116/Bte 10. Audience Publique Civile Du: 850706 R.G. No 1212/83 Arret Definitif
- 2028397797-7798 Barclays
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Site
- E5
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Brand
- Barclay
- UCSF Legacy ID
- lzk56e00
Document Images
1, The question..as to. whethere the possilb.ili:ty of misleadin%
the consumer could be precludea' by providiing additional
information on the cigarett* packages was also broached
at the hearing. However, the Chamber sees no reason to
take a, final position with respect to ttals question
because the petition for an injunction seeks the general
prohibition of the sale and distribution of BARCLAYSS
cigarettes. In addition, the Plaintiffs did' not request
that the sale and diatribution of the cigarettes be
prohibited only until certain clarityi!ng additions can bee
providedl. The Plaintiffs also did not specify what the
nature of' such additional information should be. The
Chamber therefore sees no reason, or way to avoid
rejecting; the petition for an injlunction outright and to
decide at least in favor of such a limited restriction.
Given the stipulations of 5 3 al of' the Tobacco Crdinance,
there is also some question as to whether additional
information on the n1cotine and condensate values woulf3
even be permissible. Any modification of the information
which is precisely prescribed by law, namely the text,
through addi'tions would'at the very least seem tenous.
Moreover, given the extremely controversial complex of'
different testing methods and tezting results, the
Chamber would not know what additional info_mation to
suggest or impose ul the Defendant..
4. The petition of' the nefendants for an injunction is
refused, and' the latter shall bear the court costs.
The pronouncement of ' provisional execution results from
55 7®R,
Dr. Ernat-Mo11
Par.
6,
and 711 of'the Civil Practice LaW..
(Signature) (Signature) (Signaturr)'
or. 8treicher Sturm
State Court Judge State Court Judge State Court Judge
id'
