Philip Morris
Indoor Air Pollution, Poor Ventilation Hurting Productivity of U.S. Workers
Fields
- Area
- SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS/BLACK LATERAL OLD S&T
- Type
- NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
- DRAW, DRAWING
- Document File
- 2026332912/2026333153/Indoor Air Quality
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Organization
- Honeywell Technalysis
- Site
- R529
- Master ID
- 2026333026/3034
Related Documents: - Named Person
- Woods, J.E.
- Author (Organization)
- Pacific Business News
- Request
- Stmn/R1-037
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- bru85e00
Document Images
a
Mondar, Fehruary 25, 198S PACiFIC 3U5iNtSb NCwo
Indoor air pollution, poor ventilation
.
hrtf , f ~
a~ ~ng product ~v~f
~i of U.S. workers
NEW YORK - Poor veat~ation aad citarate smoke ate
the top air-quality problems t3:at insertere. with the produc.
. dv;ty of office worlce:x, according to a national sttrvey
conduaad by Honeywdl Techaaiysis.
Poor veatiluion is a problem for 67 percent of the people
who say they have difficulty doing their work because of the
air -quafuy in their offices. Ggarette smoke bothers 54 per-
cent of these workers and 53 percent fed improved air
quafiry would make their offices more productive.
The Honeywell Tedma3yss survey polled a represeatuive
liGtiV POltrilTANTS Iti7TatCC THE BODY
sampiaof 600 office worken, 18 years or older, who work at least 20.hours a week in an office
setting in which five a'
.~
more persons are employed.
Ofr= workers complairt of numerous respiratory prob-
n _
lems and physical reactions from indoor air -poiJurion. I r / ~
N\
~
~~
-/
Among those dted most frequently by complaining workers open"
l,.o,,,,,,,
43 I j rv~. -wn y I.~+~....
l
i
6
f
eongess
oa (
aasa
peremt),
eags (S
were tfred or skepy
pereent), eye irritacioas (41 percent), breathing difficuldes (40 1( /('->~ ~~":.~._'
...
percent). and headaches (39 percent). ( j 1 T/ !"Oi"°` -
"The survey raises warning flags for management and
health professionats,." said James E. Woods, Pn.D., sen~or
sratf scientist for Honeywell's Corporate Physical Sae:~ces
Center. "The findings warn managers that they risk losing
worker produaivity by reducing ventilation to att eaer;y
costs. The impact reduced ventilation has on air quaCuy is
being discovered by resaarchers, scientists, and industry ex-
peru. Office workers also are beginning to verbalize mm-
pliinar about air-qEality issnes.
Twenty-four percent of those polled say the air quality '
yhere they work is "oniy fair" or even "poor. AnorAer 32
percent rate the air quality as "excelkn[," and 44 percent
consider it "good."
Lighting and temperature are the other top factors that
affecr productivity.
Potentially serious health issues exist for the 22 percent of
otfiee workers who complain of gas and vapor fumes and the
19 percent who say they breathe irritating chcmicals, such as
.
formaldehyda
"'Ibese ukimately issay be the most dangerous pollutants,^
Woods said. "But many office workers undoubtedly arealt
even aware they're being exposed to them and of the health
problems they may face."
Common contamiaants in addition to formaldehyde in-
ctude carboa dioxide, asbestos, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitro-
gen dioxide, and radon (a radioactive and inert gas found in
aoil). according to Woods.
The sources of these pollutants are linked to office
furnisnings and equipment, fabrics, applEances, the ground
beaeath buildings, and people themselves, Woods added.
The Honeywdl Tec3inaiysis survey also uncovered an air-
quality Smder Sap. Thirty-four perceat of the women believe
the air quality where they work is 'only fair" or "poor,"
but only 18 percent of the men share that opinion. Sixty-five
perccat of the women say that correcting air-quality prob-
lems will produce higher productivity, cotnpared with C
percent of the men.
This margin of dissatisfaction between women and men
mr.y come from signific=t differences in working conditions
rcponed in the survey. Men are mucli more Gkdy to work in
fully cnclobeai off;ces and to have greacer aetxss to windows,
ancl have greater mobility in ofGem.
