Philip Morris
Indoor Air Pollution, Poor Ventilation Hurting Productivity of U.S. Workers
Fields
- Area
- SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS/BLACK LATERAL OLD S&T
- Type
- NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
- Document File
- 2026331826/2026331919/E.T.S. 850800
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Organization
- Honeywell
- Site
- R529
- Master ID
- 2026331872/1880
Related Documents: - Named Person
- Woods, J.E.
- Author (Organization)
- Pacific Business News
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-037
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- xiu85e00
Document Images
hbndcy, Pebrvorr 25, 1985 PAC1fIC BU51NE55 NEWS
~nd ~ ~"oor air pollut~ oor ventilation
'on1 ~ .
hurting productivity of U.S. workers
AIEW YORK -- Poor veatilation and cigarette smoke are
the top air-qua8ty problems that interferee witlt tbe prod'uc-
ttviry of office workess, accord'tng to a nationaT survey
¢onducted by Honeywetl Technntysis.
Poor veatilation is a problem for 67 percent of the people
who say tbey have difficulty doing their work because of the
air quafity in the3r offices. Cigarette smoke bothers 54 per-
ccat of tttese workers and 53 percent feel improved air
quality would usalce their offtces more produaive.
The Honeywell Technalysis survey polled a represeatative
sample of 600 office workers, 18 years or oider, who work at
least 20.hourt a weelc in an office settiag in wbich five or
more persons are employed.
Oft"ioe wotkers cotnplain of ntcmerous respirawry prob-
letns and pbysical reaccions frora iadoor air poltution.
Among those cited ttsost frequently by coraplaining workers
were tired or sTeepy feelings (56 percent), nasal congestion (4S
peroent), eye irritations (41 pesceat), brcathiAg difficulties (40
percent), and headaches (39 percent).
`The survey raises wartsiag flags for managetnau and
health professionats." said James E. Woods, Ph.D., senior
staff scaentfst for Honeywell's Corporate Physical Sciences
Center. `'ihe fiadings warn managers that they risk losing
worker productivity by reducing ventilation to cut eaergy
costs. Tbe impaat reducad vensiiation has on air quaGty is
being discovered by researrhers, scientists, and industry ex
pats. Office workers al:so are beginning to verbalize com-
plaints about air-quality issues.
Twenty-four percent of those polled say the air quality
Mhere they worl is 'only fair" or even "poor." Another 32
percent rate the air quality as 'excelleat," and 44 percent
consider it "good." "
Lighting and temperature are tbe other top factors that
affect productivity.
Poteatially seriout heahh issua exist for the 22 percent of
office workers who comptain of gas and vapor futnes and the
19 percent who say they breacbe i:ritauag chetnicals, such as
fortaaldehyde.
"Theae nltirrfatdy iaay be the most dangerous pollotacts,'
Woods said. 'But many office workers undoubtedly area't
even aware tbey're befng exposed to thesa and of tHe health
problams they may face."
CoRimon C.ontaaninan ein addition to forsmldehyde in-
dude arbon dioxide, asbestos, ozone, sulfur dioxide; nitro-
gen dioude, and radon (a radioaaive and inert gas found ia
aoil). according to Woods.
The sources of these pottutants are tinked to office
furnisiaings and equipment, fabrics, applianrex, the ground
beneath buildiugs, and peopl'e them,sdves, W'oods added.
The Honeywdl Ter.iusalysis survey aIso uncovered an air-
quality gender gap. Thirty-four percent of the womea believe
the air quality wbete they work is only fair" or "poor,"
but only 18 percent of the mea share that opinion. Sixty-fivc
percent of the wotnen say that corracting air-quality prob-
lems wiIl produce higher productivity, compared with 47
percent of the mrsz.
This margin of dissatisfa¢tion betwean women and. men
may come from aignificant differencoa in working conditions
reaorted in the survey. Men are much more likely to woric in
fully eneloaec3' oiFh:es and to have greater aetress to windows,
and h:~ve trrrter mobility in offica.
HOW POLi.UTAN''I'S aTTAClCTEit BODY
