Philip Morris
Legislative Approaches to A Smoke Free Society
Fields
- Author
- Barr, G.
- Glantz, S.A.
- Hanauer, P.
- Glantz, S.A.
- Area
- SLAVITT,JOSHUA/OFFICE
- Type
- PUBL, PUBLICATION, OTHER
- Site
- N340
- Request
- Stmn/R1-037
- Stmn/R1-102
- Named Organization
- Coloradoan
- Contra Costa Times
- Environment Intl
- Gallup
- Journal of Public Health Policy
- Los Alamos Monitor
- Los Angeles Daily Journal
- Los Angeles Downtown News
- Los Angeles Herald
- Los Angeles Times
- Ny State Journal of Medicine
- Ny Times
- Oakland Tribune
- Population + Development Review
- Preventive Medicine
- Sacramento Bee
- San Jose Mercury
- Smoking + Health Reporter
- Wa Post
- Wall Street Journal
- Business + Health
- Contra Costa Times
- Named Person
- Abbett
- Auth
- Bradley
- Goodman, E.
- Graff, D.
- Greene, R.
- Rowan, C.
- Scott, A.
- Stein
- Auth
- Document File
- 2025684071/2025684856/Americans for Non Smokers
- 2025684072/2025684855/Americans for Non Smokers
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- American Nonsmokers Rights Foundation
- Master ID
- 2025684073/4854
Related Documents:- 2025684073
- 2025684074
- 2025684085-4138 A Study of Public Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking and the Tobacco Industry in 780000
- 2025684139-4144 Proposition P: Anatomy of A Nonsmokers' Rights Ordinance. The Basics of Beating the Tobacco Industry
- 2025684145-4152 California City and County Smoking Ordinances
- 2025684153-4154 States Placing Limitations Nonsmoking in Public Places. States with Laws Addressing Smoking in the Workplace
- 2025684155-4230 Bibliography on Involuntary Smoking
- 2025684231-4232
- 2025684233-4234 Tobacco Smoke and the Nonsmoker
- 2025684235-4241 Testimony of James L. Repace in the Matter on Senate Bill 1440, the Nonsmokers' Rights Act of 850000. Before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office and General Services, Committee on Governmental Affairs Washington, D.C. 850930
- 2025684242-4248 Testimony of Joseph A. Califano, Jr. Before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office and General Services
- 2025684249-4255 Testimony of Alfred Munzer, M.D. On Behalf of the Coalition on Smoking or Health and Its Member Organizations the American Lung Association the American Heart Association the American Cancer Society on the Nonsmokers' Rights Act of 850000 Before the Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office and General Services Committee on Government Affairs U.S. Senate 850930
- 2025684256-4262 Written Testimony of Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D. Submitted to the Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General Services Committee on Governmental Affairs United States Senate for Hearing on S.1440 the Non-Smokers Rights Act of 850000 850930
- 2025684263-4278 Statement of the Honorable Bill Ross Commissioner Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation S-1440, on the Non-Smokers Rights Act of 850000 Before the United States Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs Washington, D.C. 850930
- 2025684279-4297 Clean Your Room A Compendium on Air Pollution
- 2025684298-4308 Indoor Pollutants
- 2025684309-4310
- 2025684311-4312 Celebrities Who Have Supported Nonsmokers' Rights
- 2025684313 Known Causes of Residential Fires National Figures for 810000
- 2025684314 Known Causes of Residential Fires California Figures for 810000
- 2025684315-4320 Tobacco Industry Conglomerates - Status Report on Diversification in the Tobacco Industry 840000 Representative Products
- 2025684321-4326 Written Testimony of Professor Marvin M. Kristein. Ph.D. Departments of Economics and Community and Preventive Medicine State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General Services Committee on Governmental Affairs United States Senate Hearing on S. 1440, to Restrict Smoking to Designated Areas in All U.S. Government Buildings 850930
- 2025684327-4349 How Much Can Business Expect to Profit From Smoking Cessation?
- 2025684350-4353 Wanted: Smoking Policies for the Work Place. Company Activities in Smoking Control
- 2025684354-4367 A Smokefree Workplace An Employers' Guide to Nonsmoking Policies
- 2025684368 California Poll Majority Would Restrict Smoking
- 2025684369-4372 Strong Sentiment to Restrict Smoking in Public Places
- 2025684373
- 2025684374-4375
- 2025684376 Summary of Results of the 830400 Survey by the Gallup Organization 'survey of Attitudes Towards Smoking'
- 2025684377 840000 Gallup Monthly Report on Eating Out
- 2025684378-4383 the Prevention Index 850000 A Report Card on the Nation's Health Summary Report
- 2025684384-4386 People of Michigan Say 'yes' - They Do Want to Limit Smoking in Public Places
- 2025684387-4389 Public Support for A State Law Restricting Smoking in Public Places
- 2025684390-4391
- 2025684392-4429 Michigan Survey 8
- 2025684430-4436 Testimony of Harry Perlstadt, Ph.D, M.P.H., Chairperson Michigan Coalition on Smoking or Health Before the Michigan House Public Health Committee Sub-Committee on H. B. 4500
- 2025684437 Summary of 800000 Minnesota Poll
- 2025684438 Good Idea Defies Smoke Screen
- 2025684439 Thy Neighbor's Lungs
- 2025684440 Smoking Your Wife to Death
- 2025684441 Oh, to Breathe in Nassau County...
- 2025684442 Contra Costa Packs It in
- 2025684443 Clearing the Air
- 2025684444-4445 Secondhand Smoke
- 2025684446 Tobacco Company Crusaders Try Weapon of 'courtesy'
- 2025684447 Cigarette Makers Set Greed Record
- 2025684448 Why Does Anyone in This Nation Still Smoke Cigarettes?
- 2025684449 Good Neighbor
- 2025684450-4451 Frisco Votes An Antidote to Smoking Poison
- 2025684452 News Item: San Francisco Passes Toughest Anti-Smoking Law in U.S.
- 2025684453 'thank You for Smoking'
- 2025684454
- 2025684455
- 2025684456-4457
- 2025684458
- 2025684459
- 2025684460
- 2025684461 5 Regulation of Smoking - Initiative Statute Argument in Favor of Proposition 5. Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 5
- 2025684462-4474 Cigarette Smoke and the Nonsmoker
- 2025684475-4482 A Rebuttal to the Tobacco Industry's Paper, 'cigarette Smoke and the Nonsmoker'
- 2025684483-4486 Response to American Lung Association of Superior, California Document 'the Need for Smoking Control Legislation in Butte County: A Case Statement'
- 2025684487-4488
- 2025684489-4493 A Statement on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking
- 2025684494 Los Angeles City Public Smoking Issue Public Opinion Survey Summary of Findings
- 2025684495 Survey of Los Angeles City Voters 506 Interviews Margin of Error: Plus or Minus 5 Percent
- 2025684496
- 2025684496A Poll Shows L.A. Voters Oppose Anti-Smoking Law for Business
- 2025684497
- 2025684498
- 2025684499-4500 Appendix: A Slanted Poll on Smoking Law
- 2025684501-4504 Michigan Tobacco and Candy Distributors and Vendors Association Michigan Statewide Survey 850429 - 850430
- 2025684505-4506 Account of Tobacco Institute Poll in Fort Collins, Colorado, 841100
- 2025684507-4509 Tobacco Institute Poll Raising Eyebrows Here
- 2025684510-4522 Development of A Comprehensive Ordinance Regulating Smoking in Enclosed Public Places and Places of Employment
- 2025684523-4532 Regulation of Smoking in Public Places and the Workplace
- 2025684533-4549 Opinion 82 - 55 Regulation of Smoking in the Workplace in the City and County of San Francisco
- 2025684550-4565 Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684566-4577
- 2025684578-4581 Addiction Mortality in the United States, 800000: Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Substances
- 2025684582-4605 Economic Costs of Smoking: An Analysis of Data for the United States
- 2025684606-4611 Questions and Answers on Proposed Nonsmokers' Rights Legislation
- 2025684612-4631 A Quantitative Estimate of Nonsmokers' Lung Cancer Risk From Passive Smoking
- 2025684632-4633 the Oregon Indoor Clean Air Act and You An Explanation of the Law and the Rules for Its Implementation
- 2025684634-4639 Smoking in the Workplace City of San Jose Ordinance 21830
- 2025684640 Cityline Thank You for Observing San Diego's New No Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684641-4642 Thank You for Observing San Diego's No-Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684643-4645 City of Ft. Collins No-Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684646-4653 the Smoking Policy Handbook
- 2025684654-4655
- 2025684656 Equal Employment Opportunities 42 Uscs 2000e-2. Discrimination Because of Race, Color, Religion, Sex, or National Origin
- 2025684657 Compiled Laws Annotated 37.2202 Employer, Prohibited Acts
- 2025684658-4669 Model Smoking Pollution Control Ordinance
- 2025684670-4680 An Ordinance Amending the Los Angeles Municipal Code to Regulate Smoking in Public Places and Places of Employment.
- 2025684681-4686 Ordinance Number 0-15865 An Ordinance Amending Chapter IV, Article 5, Division 1 of the San Diego Municipal Code by Amending Sections 45.0101, 45.0102, 45,0103, 45.0104, 45. 0105, 45.0107 and 45.0108 Relating to Regulation of Smoking in Public Places and Places of Employment
- 2025684687-4689 Ordinance No. 298-83 (Health Regulations) Amending Part II, Chapter V, of the San Francisco Municipal Code (Health Code) by Adding Article 19 Thereto, Regulating Smoking in the Office Workplace
- 2025684690-4702 Ordinance No. 85-005 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 of the Sacramento City Code Relating to Smoking
- 2025684703-4704 Ordinance No. 85-016 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 37, Section 37.22, of the Sacramento City Code Relating to Smoking
- 2025684705-4709 Ordinance No. 3476 Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Chapter 9.14 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Prohibit Smoking in Elevators, Public Restrooms, and Indoor Service Lines and Regulating Smoking in the Workplace
- 2025684710-4716 Ordinance No. 16.84 An Ordinance of the City of Mountain View Repealing Section 21.46 of the Mountain View City Code, and Adding Article II to Chapter 21, Relating to the Protection of One's Right to Fresh Air Through the Prohibition and Regulation of Smoking in Certain Places
- 2025684717-4720 Proposed Ordinance Regarding Smoking in the Workplace
- 2025684721 San Francisco Anti-Smoking Law A Success
- 2025684722 Sf Controls Are Working Smokers Survive Their New Habit
- 2025684723 A Month with Smoking Law: Problems Resolved Smoothly
- 2025684724-4726 County Close to Being Smoke-Free
- 2025684727
- 2025684728-4731 No Smoking Ordinance, Implementation and Enforcement.
- 2025684732-4733
- 2025684734-4734A
- 2025684735 No Smoking Ordinance Information
- 2025684736-4738 Non-Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684739-4739A Smoking Ordinance - Status Report on Implementation of Enforcement and Effectiveness
- 2025684740-4751 the San Francisco Experience with Regulation of Smoking in the Workplace: the First Twelve Months
- 2025684752-4753
- 2025684754
- 2025684755-4757
- 2025684758-4761 Contact List for Information Regarding the Experience of California Cities Relative to Enforcement of Existing Smoking Regulation Ordinances
- 2025684762-4763
- 2025684764-4773 Testimony of Robert D. Tollison on the 'non-Smokers Rights Act of 850000' S. 1440 Before U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office and General Services
- 2025684774-4815 Economic Impact of Instituting Smoking Prohibitions in U.S. Government Buildings
- 2025684816-4819 Pleasant Hill City Council Considers Model Smoking Law
- 2025684820 L.A. Councilman to Propose Anti-Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684821 L.A.'s Gravy Train Does the City Council Care How Tawdry It Looks?
- 2025684822 City Panel Studies No-Smoking Proposal
- 2025684823 Watered Down No-Smoking Law Gets Preliminary Ok. No-Smoking Ordinance Endorsed
- 2025684824 L.A. Council Acts to Limit Smoking at Places of Work 10-1 Vote for Measure
- 2025684825-4826 Council Adopts Tough Law on Smoking on Job
- 2025684827-4828 Conflicts Mostly Solved Few Fired Up Over L.A. Smoking Law
- 2025684829 L.A. Council Acts to Ease Curbs on Smoking at Work Victory for Businesses
- 2025684830 Tobacco Firms Act to Snuff Out Smoking Law View Weakening of L.A. Plan As Just A First Step
- 2025684831 No-Smoking Law Opponent Hosting Council at Resort. Council: Desert Retreat
- 2025684832-4833 L.A. Strengthens Draft Ordinance to Curb Smoking Penalty for Retaliation. Orange County Revives Anti-Smoking Ordinance
- 2025684834 Council Puts Some Muscle Back in L.A. Smoking Law
- 2025684835 L.A. Approves Strict on-Job Smoking Law Smoking: Law Approved, Goes to Bradley
- 2025684836 Bradley to Sign No-Smoking Ordinance, Press Aide Says
- 2025684837 the Region Law's Opposition Doused
- 2025684838 Clock Running for No-Smoking Plans
- 2025684839-4841 Smoking on the Job No More Ifs, Ands, Butts - It's Law
- 2025684842-4843 A Month with Smoking Law: Problems Resolved Smoothly
- 2025684844 Jonesville County Health Coalition Announces Introduction of Jonesville Smoking Law
- 2025684845-4847 Medical Association Head Endorses Nonsmokers' Rights Plan
- 2025684848-4854 Michael Schildberger Show Radio 310 Melbourne Australia Friday, 850726 9:10 A.M.
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- PARE, PARENT
- Date Loaded
- 23 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- ugc81f00
Document Images
Legislative Approaehes to a
S'moke Free Society
Appendix
}:,
Peter Hanauer
Glenn Barr
Stanton A. Glantz
AMERICAN NONSMOKER:S' RIGHTS FOL?NDs1'T'IONI
Berkeley, California

u
C
Cbpyriglnt @1I9ss;
by American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation
2054 University Ave., Suite 500, Berkeley,, Cal;fornfia 94704
All rights reserved. No part of'this publication may be reproduced or transmitted' in any form or by
any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy. recording, or any information storage and
retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
ISBN 0-9616473-0-2

V
List of Appendices
A. "A Study of'Public Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking and the Tobacco Itidkistry in, 1978."'
The Roper Organization May, 1978;, prepared for the Tobacco ~ Institute
B. "Proposition P: Anatomy of' a Nonsmokers' Rights Ordinance," Peter Hanauer. 1New York
State Journat of Medicine, July, 1985
C': Charts of'Cali'fornia and national~ nonsmokers' rights laws
D: "Bibliography on Involuntary Smoking," compiled by Stanton A. Glantz and Lydia Jensen
E. 1986 Letter fiom Siargeon Generali C. Everett Koop to Americans for Nonsrnokers' Rights
summarizing the health e$'ects ~ of second-hand smoke
F. "Tobacco Smoke and the Nonsmoker" brochure
G. Testimony in support of n+onsmokers''rights legislationi before the tJnited'. States Senate
Siab
cmmmittee on Civil Serviee, Post Office and~ General Services of the Committee on Govern-
mental Affalas,, September 30, 1985
James L. Repace
Joseph A. Califano, Jr.
Alfred Munzer, M.D.
Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D.
Bill Ross
H. Indoor air pollution studies
Excerpts from "C1ean Your Room!! A Compendium on Indoor Pollution." California
Department of Consumer Affairs, February, 1982
Exeerpts from Indoor Polfutants,,National Academy Press; 1981
I. Letter of support for a nonsmokers' rights ordinance from the Greater Riverside (California)
Chambers of Commerce
J. Celebrities who have supported nonsmokers' rights
10'
~
0
~
co

vivi1
. Sacramento, 1984
San,Francisco. 1982
V. Tobacco1 Institute legal opinion on constitutionality of nonsmokers' rights legislation
W. "Smoking a the Workplace: Legal' Issues," Timothy J. Lowenburg. American Lung Associa
tion; 1983
X. "Addiction Mortality in the United States, 1980: Tobacco; Alcohol, and Other Substances."
R.T. Ravenholt,, Population and'Developrnent Review, December, 1984
.
Y: "Economic Costs of Smoking: An Analysis of Data for the United States," Dorothy Rice.
December 28, 1983
Z: Questions and Answers on Proposed lYonsmokers" Rights Legislation
AA. "A Quantitative Estimate of Nonsmokers' Lung Cancer Risk from Passive Smking,"' Repace
and Lowrey,, Environment Internataonal; April, 1985
BB. Brochures explaining how smoking pollution contro]' laws work
Oregon
San Jose
San Di+ego :
. Fort Coll2ns
CC. Sample brochure for businesses explaining, a voluntary workplace smoking program, and in-
cluding a survey measuring the success of the program
DD: Legal opinion on the right of'an employer to hire only nonsmokers, Tom Downs, September.
11, 1985.
EE. Model Smoking, Pollution Control Ordinance
FF. Sample smoking pollution control i ordinances
Los i Angeles
San Diego
San Francisco
Sacramento
Palo Alto:
Mountaih, View
GG. Legal opinion on validity of clause in workplace smoking ordinance prohibiting ret!aliatib.n by
employer against emplioyee for asserting rights under the law, Paul N. Dubrasich, October 18.
1984

C
VOLIIlC I
Psapsr.d, for
WE 'lOBA'CC0 IZ:STZ'TtJTL
lsay 1978,
T.k RCPMt G'R'G`,KITA:'i0N Iz_.
a-z

IM r'tODUC';'_O't2
This is the aixth bi'ennial nationa2 opir.ion su-vey we have condti:eted
for The Tobacco Institute. Like all its predecessors it deals with public atti-
tndies towards tl'u smokirag and health~ issue and attitudes towards both the to2iacco
industry and government regulation of'it. Ia the more recent surveys in the
series, a secoad focus of'the studies has beem oA the passive smokinq/non-=oke='s
rights issues lhis survey updates all sajjor, tren& areas &,nd: breaks significant newgroun3 in the
passive smok!ingi/r.on-smokers rights area.
A complete description of the survey, aethodology, sample size, i.nter-
vie+.*ing, dates, etc., as well as copies of the questionnaires used, may be found
in the Metho3ology~' section following: this~ Itisalysis' section.

ix
HH. Newspaper articles on success of nonsmokers' rights laws
Wall Street Journal, August 15, 1984
Saeramento Bee, April 3, 1984
Los Angeles Timies; May 13; 1'985
Contra Costa Times, November 1'7, 1985
II. Letters~and testimony of enforcement officials and'channber of commerce officials attesting to
the success of snnoking, pollution control ordinances
Cupertino
East Lansing, Michigan.
Minnesota
Pasadiena
'Poway
: San Diegp
San Francisco
San Jose
Santee
West Hollywood (letter from City Councilinember quoting, chamber of commerce offi-
cials)
JJ. List of officials in California responsible for administering smoking pollution control laws.
KK. Sample petition seeking passage of a nonslnokers" rights ~ law
LL. Tobacco Institute testimony before the jJnited'~ States Senate Subcommittee on Civil Service.
Post Office and' General Services of the Committee on~ Governmental Affairs, September 30.
1985
MM: Sample action letters to grass roots supporters
Pleasant Hill
San Francisco
Los Angeles (postcard)
NN. Case study of Los Angeles workplace smoking ordinance, as reported by the Los Angeles press
"T..A. Councilman to Propose Anti-Smoking Ordinance," Los Angeles Times. July 8.
1983 ~
"L.A.'s Gravy Train," Los Angeles Herald; Feb. 3, 1984
~
"City Panel' Studies No-Smoking Proposal,"' Los Angeles Daily Journal: Feb 16': 1984 Q
0
~

;
i
k-
A STUDY OF
PU'BI-1iC ATTlTUDES TOWARD
CIGARETTE SMOKING AND
THE TOBACCO, INDUSTRY
IN 1978
VOLUME' I
MAY 1978
0
X
oph
Q
?*~IwS -RE Cfl''7 8U406 QR 6
A
a_1

(
vi'
K. Data on smoking and fires
Known Causes of Residentiali Fires: National Figures for 1981. California, Fire Incident
Reporting System
Known Causes of Residential Fires: California, Figures for 1981. California Fire Incident
Reporting System
L. "Tobacco Industry Conglomerates," Smoking and Health Reporter. July. 1984
M. Cost of smoking to lbusiness
Testimony of Professor Marvin Kristein before the United States Senate Subcommittee
on Civil' Service Post Office and General Services of the Committee on Governmental
Affairs, September 30, 1985
"'hTiow Much Can Business Expect to: Profit From Smoking Cessation?" M. Kristein.
Preventive Medicine, 1983
"Wamted: Smoking Policies for the Work Place;" ML Kristein, Business and Health.
I+dovember, 1984
"A Smokefree WorkpIace,"' California Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, 198'5.
N'. Public opinion surveys on smoking restrictions
1984 Cali'fornia Poll
. 1983 National Gallup Polll
1984 Galdup ;Monthly Report on Eating Out
1985 Harris Poll
1984 Michigan Survey
Summary of 1980 Minnesota Poll
O. Editorials supporting nonsmokers' rights
Los Angeles Times, February 10~ 1985'
New York Times, April12 1980.
New York Times, January 2'1, 1981
New York Times, February 11, 198G
Oakland Trib'une, September 20 1985.
San Jose Mercury; May 20, 1983
Washington Post, November 22, 1985
P. Columnists supporting nonsmokers' rights
Ellen Goodman. August 6, 1985
(

n. 8
ob j'.ctivi in otlz opinion ia tu develop aut~ositativ+e ;nd credible eviGlence with
- s.spect to the effecu of passive smc4cinq on the nor.-smcker "s heal th. The issue,
s' re sse it, is t#o lznqer' vhat the smoksz does to hi!mstlf, but vhat he dbes ta~
others.
I
