Philip Morris
the Relative Risk of Daminozide (Alar / Kylar) Use
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- FOOT, FOOTNOTES
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Area
- LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
- Site
- N426
- Named Person
- Ames, B.
- Toth, B.
- Named Organization
- Univ of Ca Berkeley
- Request
- Stmn/R1-072
- Document File
- 2025545619/2025546382/Harvard University Office of
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- of Public Health
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Uniroyal Chemical
- Master ID
- 2025545673/6381
Related Documents:- 2025545673-6381 Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025545684 Telephone Locations and Protocol
- 2025545689-5696 Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the Acgih and the Epa
- 2025545697 Hps Newsletter Interview with A Risk Expert
- 2025545698-5711 Science and Its Limits: the Regulator's Dilemma
- 2025545713-5721 Risk / Benefit Analysis
- 2025545722-5725 Risk Management Commentary for Dr. D. Allan Bromley Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
- 2025545726-5729 Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An Introduction
- 2025545750-5792 Risk Assessment of Chemical Carcinogens: Is It Time for A Change?
- 2025545795-5799 Tools of Risk Analysis Applications of Epidemiology
- 2025545800-5810 Notice of Intended Changes - Benzene
- 2025545811-5822 Epidemiology in Risk Assessment for Regulatory Policy
- 2025545824-5850 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Use of Animal and Other Data As Predictors of Human Risk
- 2025545851-5871 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Uncertainties in Predicting Human Risks
- 2025545872-5881 How Do Cancer Risks Predicted From Animal Bioassays Compare with the Epidemiologic Evidence? the Case of Ethylene Dibromide
- 2025545882-5887 Use of Biological Assays in Short-Term Assessment of Inhaled Substances
- 2025545888
- 2025545889-5891 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Are Your Mushrooms Safe to Eat?
- 2025545892-5899 the Rat As An Experimental Animal
- 2025545901-5907 Non-Cancer Endpoints
- 2025545910-5939 Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
- 2025545940-5941 Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
- 2025545942-5944 Get - the - Lead - Out Guru Challenged A Decade-Old Scientific Argument Over the Effects of Low-Level Lead on Iq Turns Nasty Following Allegations of Misconduct
- 2025545945-5948
- 2025545949-5958 the Question of Thresholds for Radiation and Chemical Carcinogenesis
- 2025545959-5980 Are There Thresholds for Carcinogenesis? the Thorny Problem of Low-Level Exposure
- 2025545981-5990 Perspectives on Comparing Risks of Environmental Carcinogens
- 2025545991-5998 Acceptable Cancer Risks: Probabilities and Beyond
- 2025546000-6011 Ideas in Pathology Pivotal Role of Increased Cell Proliferation in Human Carcinogenesis
- 2025546012-6017 Cell Proliferation in Carcinogenesis
- 2025546019-6027 the Role of Expert Judgement in Risk Analysis
- 2025546029-6039 the Respiratory Tract As A Route of Exposure
- 2025546040-6045 the Respiratory Tract As A Portal of Entry for Toxic Particles
- 2025546047-6062 Limitations to the Use of Employee Exposure Data on Air Contaminants in Epidemiologic Studies
- 2025546063-6083 Benefit - Cost Analysis of Environmental Regulation: Case Studies of Hazardous Air Pollutants
- 2025546086-6089 Legislative and Regulatory Aspects of Risk
- 2025546090-6099 Connecticut's Dioxin Ambient Air Quality Standard
- 2025546100-6103
- 2025546105 Annals of Radiation Calamity on Meadow Street
- 2025546106 Caution Urged When Using Insect Repellents
- 2025546116 Volatile Organics and Inorganics Action Levels 900400
- 2025546134-6135 Summary of Radon Test Results of the Household Testing Program
- 2025546141-6145 Introduction to Discussion Sessions
- 2025546146-6149 Risk Assessment in Environmental and Occupational Health Risk of Alar (Daminozide)
- 2025546150-6160 Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in Our Children's Food
- 2025546161-6162 Pesticides, Risk, and Applesauce
- 2025546163-6168 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546169 Daminozide / Udmh
- 2025546173 Be Most Wary of Nature's Own Pesticides
- 2025546174-6175 A Movie Star Pares the Apple Industry
- 2025546176-6183 Summary of Toxicology Data on Daminozide and Udmh
- 2025546184-6194 Attachment I Graphs of Data From NCI / Ntp 83 Daminozide
- 2025546195-6196
- 2025546197-6202 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546203-6224 Regulatory Decision - Making Under Uncertainty: the Case of Alar
- 2025546226 Epa Moves to Reassess the Risk of Dioxin Urged on by the Scientific Community, Epa Is Developing A New Model for Estimating Dioxin's Risk
- 2025546227 US Government Orders New Look at Dioxin the Environmental Protection Agency Is Evaluating Data From the Past Decade That Suggest Dioxin's Toxicity May Be Overestimated. A Risk Assessment Model Based on Biological Mechanism Is Being Drawn Up.
- 2025546228-6235 Dioxin Toxicity: New Studies Prompt Debate, Regulatory Action New Data on Dioxin's Effect on Humans, A Clearer Picture of the Cellular Events It Precipitates, and New Animal Toxicity Studies May Provide Epa with A Firm Basis for Regulation
- 2025546236-6250 the Regulation of Gene Expression by 2,3,7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin
- 2025546251-6253 Dioxin Risks Revisited Armed with A New Understanding of How Dioxin Works on the Molecular Level, A Number of Scientists Are Challenging Epa to Change the Way It Does Risk Assessment
- 2025546255-6258 Lead Toxicity Case Study for Short Course on Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025546259-6267 Lead
- 2025546268-6275 Lead in Bone: Implications for Toxicology During Pregnancy and Lactation
- 2025546276-6281 the Long-Term Effects of Exposure to Low Doses of Lead in Childhood An 11 - Year Follow-Up Report
- 2025546282-6285
- 2025546298-6321 Review 890000 Alice Hamilton Lecture Lead and Human Health:Background and Recent Findings
- 2025546323-6348 Traps and Errors in Risk Analysis
- 2025546349-6356 Health Risks the Perception of Reality and the Realty of Perception
- 2025546357-6362 Communicating Risk Under Title III of Sara: Strategies for Explaining Very Small Risks in A Community Context
- 2025546363-6368 Industrial Risk Perceptions
- 2025546369-6370 Too Many Rodent Carcinogens: Mitogenesis Increases Mutagenesis
- 2025546371-6373 Has Risk Assessment Become Too 'conservative'?
- 2025546374-6378 Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions
- 2025546379-6381 Telling Reporters About Risk Dealing with Reporters Needn't Be the Least Agreeable Part of the Job.
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- olp02a00
Document Images
®s
l}4ViF2QYAL
C~~~%Jl
®t
UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
74 Amity Road
Bethany, Connecticut 06525
(243) 393-2163
THE REIATIVE RISK OF DAMINOZIDE (ALAR~/KYIAR®) IISE
Dr. Bruce 7x~es, inventor of the widely used Ames Mutagenicity Assay and
Professor of Biochemistry at the Dniversity of California, Berkeley, has
recently p-6-w-Iished a study xhich describes the relative risks of a
variety of natural and man-made carcinogens.l/
In this article, Dr: Ames states that rodent cancer tests can't be naed
to predict absolute huatian risks. gowever, they can be used to indicate
that s=e chemicals might be of greater concern than others. He ranks
these,carcinogenic hazards to humans by an index which relates h-man
exposure to carcinogenic potency. This index is called a FERP MEX
(g=an Exposure/Rodent Potency). Dr. Ames stresses the need to identify
i=pordant causes of cancer anong the vast rntmber of minimal risks. This
ree_uires knowledge of both the amounts of a substance to which h=a.*%s are
exposed and its carcinogenic potency.
A graphical representation of the relative carcinogenic risk or MERP
IhDEX for several substances which appear in Dr. Ames' article is
attached. The relative carcinogenic risk of these substances which
include beer, mushroomr, diet cola, peanut butter, bacon and chlorinated
tap water will surprise you. More surprisingly, when a BSRP I2IDFx is
calculated for daaiinozide and its by-product UMM, usinq worst case
resulta from ssouse studies conducted by B. Toth, the relative risk is
tenfold lower than tap water.
e
1/ B..N. Ames et al., Rarilcing Possib2e Carcinovenic Hazards, Science,
Vol. 236; pp. 271-280 (1987).
- -- ... a n.. oo_'T /G /AR

:JUL E: ' E:$ I I: 0Z F FpM UN I P.U',AL BE THAIaY
0
TO OX-AGrHEM FAGE.00
1)r. Anmes cautions that the HERP INAEX should not be used as a direct
estimaLe of human hazard, ssnce huaan zusceptibility at lower dose rates

\
100-a
90-I
80-~
70 -~
RELRTIVE CRRCIPd®aENIC RISK
k~OOl.tS
100
DIET COU
60
PEANUT
BUTTER
30
30-1
20-r
10-~
ALAR
BAC®N TAP PLUS
' tlfA"tfR LlOtA-i
.--~ 1 0.1
