Jump to:

Philip Morris

the Relative Risk of Daminozide (Alar / Kylar) Use

Date: 08 Jul 1988
Length: 3 pages
2025546170-2025546172
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2025546170-2025546172

Fields

Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
FOOT, FOOTNOTES
Area
LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
Site
N426
Named Person
Ames, B.
Toth, B.
Named Organization
Univ of Ca Berkeley
Request
Stmn/R1-072
Document File
2025545619/2025546382/Harvard University Office of
Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
of Public Health
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
Uniroyal Chemical
Master ID
2025545673/6381
Related Documents:
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
olp02a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: olp02a00 Log in for more options!
®s l}4ViF2QYAL C~~~%Jl ®t UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. 74 Amity Road Bethany, Connecticut 06525 (243) 393-2163 THE REIATIVE RISK OF DAMINOZIDE (ALAR~/KYIAR®) IISE Dr. Bruce 7x~es, inventor of the widely used Ames Mutagenicity Assay and Professor of Biochemistry at the Dniversity of California, Berkeley, has recently p-6-w-Iished a study xhich describes the relative risks of a variety of natural and man-made carcinogens.l/ In this article, Dr: Ames states that rodent cancer tests can't be naed to predict absolute huatian risks. gowever, they can be used to indicate that s=e chemicals might be of greater concern than others. He ranks these,carcinogenic hazards to humans by an index which relates h-man exposure to carcinogenic potency. This index is called a FERP MEX (g=an Exposure/Rodent Potency). Dr. Ames stresses the need to identify i=pordant causes of cancer anong the vast rntmber of minimal risks. This ree_uires knowledge of both the amounts of a substance to which h=a.*%s are exposed and its carcinogenic potency. A graphical representation of the relative carcinogenic risk or MERP IhDEX for several substances which appear in Dr. Ames' article is attached. The relative carcinogenic risk of these substances which include beer, mushroomr, diet cola, peanut butter, bacon and chlorinated tap water will surprise you. More surprisingly, when a BSRP I2IDFx is calculated for daaiinozide and its by-product UMM, usinq worst case resulta from ssouse studies conducted by B. Toth, the relative risk is tenfold lower than tap water. e 1/ B..N. Ames et al., Rarilcing Possib2e Carcinovenic Hazards, Science, Vol. 236; pp. 271-280 (1987). - -- ... a n.. oo_'T /G /AR
Page 2: olp02a00 Log in for more options!
:JUL E: ' E:$ I I: 0Z F FpM UN I P.U',AL BE THAIaY 0 TO OX-AGrHEM FAGE.00 1)r. Anmes cautions that the HERP INAEX should not be used as a direct estima•Le of human hazard, ssnce huaan zusceptibility at lower dose rates ![Nost likely differ from the high dosage rates that rodents are exposed to. nlerefore, the actual hazard or risk at low dose rates might be 'much less than the fiERP values aould suqgest. HQ eoncludes that ... current levels of pesticide residues... are likely to ba of stinimal concern relative to the background levels of natural subctances..."
Page 3: olp02a00 Log in for more options!
\ 100-a 90-I 80-~ 70 -~ RELRTIVE CRRCIPd®aENIC RISK k~OOl.tS 100 DIET COU 60 PEANUT BUTTER 30 30-1 20-r 10-~ ALAR BAC®N TAP PLUS ' tlfA"tfR LlOtA-i .--~ 1 0.1

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: