Philip Morris
Summary of Radon Test Results of the Household Testing Program
Fields
- Type
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Document File
- 2025545619/2025546382/Harvard University Office of
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- of Public Health
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- Site
- N426
- Area
- LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Ct Dept of Health Services
- Preventable Diseases Division
- Master ID
- 2025545673/6381
Related Documents:- 2025545673-6381 Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025545684 Telephone Locations and Protocol
- 2025545689-5696 Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the Acgih and the Epa
- 2025545697 Hps Newsletter Interview with A Risk Expert
- 2025545698-5711 Science and Its Limits: the Regulator's Dilemma
- 2025545713-5721 Risk / Benefit Analysis
- 2025545722-5725 Risk Management Commentary for Dr. D. Allan Bromley Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
- 2025545726-5729 Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An Introduction
- 2025545750-5792 Risk Assessment of Chemical Carcinogens: Is It Time for A Change?
- 2025545795-5799 Tools of Risk Analysis Applications of Epidemiology
- 2025545800-5810 Notice of Intended Changes - Benzene
- 2025545811-5822 Epidemiology in Risk Assessment for Regulatory Policy
- 2025545824-5850 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Use of Animal and Other Data As Predictors of Human Risk
- 2025545851-5871 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Uncertainties in Predicting Human Risks
- 2025545872-5881 How Do Cancer Risks Predicted From Animal Bioassays Compare with the Epidemiologic Evidence? the Case of Ethylene Dibromide
- 2025545882-5887 Use of Biological Assays in Short-Term Assessment of Inhaled Substances
- 2025545888
- 2025545889-5891 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Are Your Mushrooms Safe to Eat?
- 2025545892-5899 the Rat As An Experimental Animal
- 2025545901-5907 Non-Cancer Endpoints
- 2025545910-5939 Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
- 2025545940-5941 Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
- 2025545942-5944 Get - the - Lead - Out Guru Challenged A Decade-Old Scientific Argument Over the Effects of Low-Level Lead on Iq Turns Nasty Following Allegations of Misconduct
- 2025545945-5948
- 2025545949-5958 the Question of Thresholds for Radiation and Chemical Carcinogenesis
- 2025545959-5980 Are There Thresholds for Carcinogenesis? the Thorny Problem of Low-Level Exposure
- 2025545981-5990 Perspectives on Comparing Risks of Environmental Carcinogens
- 2025545991-5998 Acceptable Cancer Risks: Probabilities and Beyond
- 2025546000-6011 Ideas in Pathology Pivotal Role of Increased Cell Proliferation in Human Carcinogenesis
- 2025546012-6017 Cell Proliferation in Carcinogenesis
- 2025546019-6027 the Role of Expert Judgement in Risk Analysis
- 2025546029-6039 the Respiratory Tract As A Route of Exposure
- 2025546040-6045 the Respiratory Tract As A Portal of Entry for Toxic Particles
- 2025546047-6062 Limitations to the Use of Employee Exposure Data on Air Contaminants in Epidemiologic Studies
- 2025546063-6083 Benefit - Cost Analysis of Environmental Regulation: Case Studies of Hazardous Air Pollutants
- 2025546086-6089 Legislative and Regulatory Aspects of Risk
- 2025546090-6099 Connecticut's Dioxin Ambient Air Quality Standard
- 2025546100-6103
- 2025546105 Annals of Radiation Calamity on Meadow Street
- 2025546106 Caution Urged When Using Insect Repellents
- 2025546116 Volatile Organics and Inorganics Action Levels 900400
- 2025546141-6145 Introduction to Discussion Sessions
- 2025546146-6149 Risk Assessment in Environmental and Occupational Health Risk of Alar (Daminozide)
- 2025546150-6160 Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in Our Children's Food
- 2025546161-6162 Pesticides, Risk, and Applesauce
- 2025546163-6168 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546169 Daminozide / Udmh
- 2025546170-6172 the Relative Risk of Daminozide (Alar / Kylar) Use
- 2025546173 Be Most Wary of Nature's Own Pesticides
- 2025546174-6175 A Movie Star Pares the Apple Industry
- 2025546176-6183 Summary of Toxicology Data on Daminozide and Udmh
- 2025546184-6194 Attachment I Graphs of Data From NCI / Ntp 83 Daminozide
- 2025546195-6196
- 2025546197-6202 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546203-6224 Regulatory Decision - Making Under Uncertainty: the Case of Alar
- 2025546226 Epa Moves to Reassess the Risk of Dioxin Urged on by the Scientific Community, Epa Is Developing A New Model for Estimating Dioxin's Risk
- 2025546227 US Government Orders New Look at Dioxin the Environmental Protection Agency Is Evaluating Data From the Past Decade That Suggest Dioxin's Toxicity May Be Overestimated. A Risk Assessment Model Based on Biological Mechanism Is Being Drawn Up.
- 2025546228-6235 Dioxin Toxicity: New Studies Prompt Debate, Regulatory Action New Data on Dioxin's Effect on Humans, A Clearer Picture of the Cellular Events It Precipitates, and New Animal Toxicity Studies May Provide Epa with A Firm Basis for Regulation
- 2025546236-6250 the Regulation of Gene Expression by 2,3,7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin
- 2025546251-6253 Dioxin Risks Revisited Armed with A New Understanding of How Dioxin Works on the Molecular Level, A Number of Scientists Are Challenging Epa to Change the Way It Does Risk Assessment
- 2025546255-6258 Lead Toxicity Case Study for Short Course on Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025546259-6267 Lead
- 2025546268-6275 Lead in Bone: Implications for Toxicology During Pregnancy and Lactation
- 2025546276-6281 the Long-Term Effects of Exposure to Low Doses of Lead in Childhood An 11 - Year Follow-Up Report
- 2025546282-6285
- 2025546298-6321 Review 890000 Alice Hamilton Lecture Lead and Human Health:Background and Recent Findings
- 2025546323-6348 Traps and Errors in Risk Analysis
- 2025546349-6356 Health Risks the Perception of Reality and the Realty of Perception
- 2025546357-6362 Communicating Risk Under Title III of Sara: Strategies for Explaining Very Small Risks in A Community Context
- 2025546363-6368 Industrial Risk Perceptions
- 2025546369-6370 Too Many Rodent Carcinogens: Mitogenesis Increases Mutagenesis
- 2025546371-6373 Has Risk Assessment Become Too 'conservative'?
- 2025546374-6378 Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions
- 2025546379-6381 Telling Reporters About Risk Dealing with Reporters Needn't Be the Least Agreeable Part of the Job.
- Request
- Stmn/R1-072
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- hlp02a00
Document Images
Page ,f 2
SUMMARY OF RADON TEST RESULTS OF THE HOUSEHOLD TESTING PROGRAM (*)
Second Phase Cities and Towns (**)
(TestinQ Conducted February - Anril. 1938)
- -- .,., - - -
.luly 19o0
Tawn
Andover
13ranford
Bridgeport
Ilurl ington
Chaplin
P.aston
Groton
Guilford
Iladdam
Kent
M-.ld Letown
Plonroe
tlew llartford
14. Stonington
Preston
RidgeEield
Scotland
Stonington
Voluntown
Waterlord
Watertown
W Cndt-iam
Woodbridge
Woodbury------J
Overall
Lowest Livable Area
(i.e., basement)
pCi 1 1 of Iiomes
Geometric >4 > 20
/ITests Min. Max. Mean*** pCI/1 pCi/I
83 0.2 19.0 1.7 20% 0%
96 0.0 85.0 2.3 39% 1.2%
78 0.1 26.0 2.2 27% 1%
83 0.7 21.0 1.9 11% 1%
86 0.2 12.0 1.8 16% 0%
92 0.2 12.0 2.5 24% 0%
96 0.0 18.0 1.8 13% 0%
93 0.3 483.0 2.4 27% 5%
96 0.2 47.0 3.2 38% 1%
62 0.2 17.0 2.4 29% 0%
92 0.2 21.0 1.1. 11% 1%
91 0.2 21.0 1.4 9% 1%
84 0.2 11.0 1.3 11% 0%
97 0.1 45.0 1.8 27% 2%
95 0.0 12.0 1.4 12% (1%
87 0.3 19.0 1.6 9% 0%
19 0.3 19.0 2.1 42% 0%
93 0.2 29.0 1.7 14% 2%
78 0.2 72.0 2.4 29% 4%
98 0.0 8.4 1.4 5% 0%
84 0.3 10.0 1.8 11% 0%
99 0.2 14.0 1.9 17% 0%
97 0.4 32.0 2.8 35% 2%
-----94 0.3 33.0 2.5 31% 4%
-------------------------------------------------
2066 0.0 483.0 1.9 20% 2%
Lowest Lived-In Area
(i.e., first floor)
pCi 1 ir of Homes _
Geometric > > 20
IfTests Min. Max. tlean*** Cp i/1 Cp i/1
89 0.0 15.0 1.1 11% 0%
97 0.0 32.0 1.1 17% 5%
79 0.0 11.0 0.9 4% 0%
91 0.0 14.0 1.3 6% 0%
85 0.1 8.2 1.3 8% 0%
96 0.0 9.1 1.5 8% 0%
99 0.0 8.0 0.9 6% 0%
93 0.2 112.0 1.7 18% 1%
98 0.5 43.0 2.2 22% 1%
62 0.1 9.6 1.1 13% 0%
91 0.1 21.0 0.6 6% 1%
91 0.2 7.3 0.8 3% 0%
85 0.2 21.0 1.1 8% 1%
98 0.0 39.0 1.2 12% 1%
96 0.0 7.6 0.7 3% 0%
89 0.1 11.0 0.9 5% 0%
20 0.2 9.8 1.0 5% 0%
98 0.1 16.0 1.1 9% 0%
79 0.0 32.0 1.9 20% 4%
99 0.1 6.6 1.0 6% 0%
88 0.3 4.6 1.2 3% 0%
73 0.3 26.0 1.4 8% 1%
98 0.3 32.0 1.7 11% 1%
94 -0.2 25.0 1.7 20% 2%
--------------------------------------------
2096 0.0 112.0 1.2 10% 1%
* 48-iw ur samples using charcoal devices.
*** Sampling emphasized higher radon potential areas, thus overall state radon level is expected to
be lower.
E3ec,ause radon data are log-normally distributed, the appropriate descriptive statistic for the
average Is
the geoQetric mean.
t'VT"sszoZ

Page I T 2
STATE OF CONNECT-ICUT
,nEPARTl19ENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
PREVENTARLE DISEASES DIVISION
SHMI'lARY (DF RAI7ON TEST RESMS OF llilu HUUtiI:HULiD TE5T11VG PRf1lsKAM (")
flverall _ Results for First & Second Phase Municipali ties (**).-
July 1988
Lowest Livable Area Lowest Lived-in Area
(i.e., basement) (i.e., first floor)
pCi 1 of Homes pci 1 of Homes
Geometric > 4 > 20 Geometric ~-> 20
!/Tests Min. Max. Mean*** pCi/1 Cp i/1 ftests Min. Max. Mean*** Cp i/1 Cp i/1
TOTAL 3378 0.0 483.0 2.1 21X 2% 3409 0.0 112.0 1.3 10% 0.6%
------------- ---------- - ------------------ -- - --- - ---------- - ------------
First Phase Towns (**)
(Testing Conducted December, 1987 - February, 1988)
Updated Results - June 1988
To «i Lowest Livable Area Lowest Lived-in Area
(i.e., basement) (i.e., first floor)
pCi 1 of Homes pCi 1 of Homes
Geometric > 4 >20 Geometric > 4 > 20
#Tests Min. Max. Mean*** pCi/1 pCi/1 l/Tests Min. Max. Mean*** pCi/1 pCi/1
Ansonia 93 0.5 58.0 3.9 43% 9% 95 0.3 19.5 1.7 14% 0%
Bethlehem 89 0.3 22.7 2.2 26% 1% 89 0.3 9.0 1.6 10% 0%
East Hampton 91 0.4 19.1 2.5 23% 0% 91 0.3 13.6 1.6 6% 0%
Glastonbury 103 0.5 37.0 2.1 23% 4% 103 0.0 17.3 1.1 11% 0%
Goshen 91 0.1 75.0 2.1 22% 2% 91 0.2 25.5 ,1.5 11% 1%
Madison 99 0.3 36.3 3.2 37% 5% 99 0.2 34.7 1.5 14% 1%
Hansfield 93 0.6 10.0 2.2 10% 0% 94 0.5 4.9 1.6 3% 0%
t9ontville 99 0.7 25.3 2.4 15% 1% 98 0.7. 10.4 1.9 10% 0%
Pomfret 81 0.8 13.8 2.2 6% 0% 81 0.7 7.3 1.7 3% 0%
Portland 97 0.4 30.4 1.7 13% 2% 97 0.4 12.7 1.2 3% 0%
Torrington 93 0.8 37.8 2.2 18% 1% 93 0.5 10.7 1.4 10% 0%
Trumbull 88 0.8 15.2 2.5 16% 0% 88 0.5 12.8 1.5 6% 0%
Weston 96 0.9 98.4 3.3 35% 4% 97 0.8 35.2 2.3 19% 1%
Westport 97 0.6 49.0 3.1 30% 3% 95 0.6 36.5 2.0 16% 2%
-^ -------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Ov
1 1312
era
i.
0.1 98.4 2.5 23% 2% 1313 0.0 36.5 1.6 10% 0.4-
SL t9tFss'z®z
