Philip Morris
Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- DRAW, DRAWING
- LIST, LIST
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Area
- LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
- Site
- N426
- Named Person
- Burkitt
- Down
- Ewing
- Hodgkin
- Kaposi
- Surgeon General
- Wilms
- Down
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- American Cancer Society Special Subcomm
- American Society for the Control of Canc
- Az State Univ Tempe
- Baylor College of Medicine Houston
- Beth Israel Hospital
- Blue Cross
- Boston Univ
- Brandeis Univ Waltham
- Brigham + Womens Hospital
- Brown Univ Providence
- Ca Inst of Tech
- Ca State Coll Fullerton
- Caa Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Cancer
- Cancer Nursing News
- Carnegie Inst of Wa
- Carnegie Mellon Univ Pittsburgh
- Case Western Reserve Univ Cleveland
- Catholic Med Ctr of Brooklyn + Queens
- Childrens Hospital of San Francisco
- City of Hope Natl Med Ctr
- City Univ of Ny
- Clark Martire
- Cold Spring Harbor Lab
- Columbia Univ Ny
- Comm on Unproven Methods of Cancer Manag
- Cornell Univ Ithaca
- Cornell Univ Ny
- Creighton Univ Omaha
- Dana Farber Cancer Ctr
- Dartmouth Coll Hanover
- Divisional Boards of Directors
- Drexel Inst of Tech
- Duke Univ Durham
- Duquesne Univ Pittsburgh
- East Carolina Univ Greenville
- Eleanor Roosevelt Inst for Ca Res
- Emory Univ Atlanta
- Foundation for Biomedical Res
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Res Ctr
- Gallup Org
- Georgetown Univ Dc
- Hahnemann Med Coll Philadelphia
- Harvard Boston
- Harvard Cambridge
- Henry Ford Hospital
- Hhs, Dept of Health and Human Services
- Hri, Health Research Inst,Roswell Park
- Il Cancer Council
- Inst for Cancer Res
- Intl Assn of Laryngectomees
- Jackson Lab
- Jefferson Medical Coll Philadelphia
- Jewish Hospital of St Louis
- Johns Hopkins Univ Baltimore
- Kaiser Foundation Res Inst
- Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medici
- Ks State Univ Manhattan
- La Jolla Cancer Res Ctr
- La State Univ Baton Rouge
- Lehigh Univ Bethlehem
- Loyola Univ Chicago
- Ma Eye Ear Infirmary
- Ma General Hospital
- Ma Inst of Technology
- Marine Biol Lab
- Md Anderson Cancer Center
- Medical Biol Inst
- Medical Coll of Pa Philadelphia
- Medical Coll of Va Richmond
- Medical Coll of Wi Milwaukee
- Medical Research Council
- Mi Cancer Foundation
- Mi State Univ East Lansing
- Millers Childrens Hospital
- Montefiore Hospital
- Mount Sinai Sch of Med Ny
- Nas, Natl Academy of Sciences
- Natl Board of Directors
- Natl Center for Health Statistics
- Natl Inst of Allergy + Infectious Diseas
- Natl Inst on Drug Abuse
- Natl Jewish Hosp + Res Ctr
- Natl Society Board of Directors
- Natl Society House of Delegates
- NC State Univ Raleigh
- NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
- New England Med Ctr Hosp
- NIH, Natl Inst of Health
- Northern Ca Ca Program
- Northwestern Univ Chicago
- Ny Acad of Sciences
- Ny Medical Center
- Ny Univ
- Oak Ridge Natl Lab
- Office of Technology Assessment
- Oh State Univ Columbus
- or Health Sciences Lab
- or State Coll Corvallis
- or State Univ Corvallis
- Oxford Univ England
- Pa State Univ Hershey
- Pacific Northwest Res Fdn
- Portland State Univ
- Princeton Univ
- Pub Health Res Inst
- Purdue Univ Lafayette
- Reed Coll Portland
- Rockefeller Univ Ny
- Rutgers Univ New Brunswick
- Salk Inst for Biol Studies
- Sci Res Inst
- Scripps Clinic + Research Foundation
- Sgc, Surgeon General's (Advisory) Comm
- Showa Univ Res Inst St Petersburg
- Ski, Sloan-Kettering Inst
- St Jude Childrens Research Hospital
- St Louis Univ
- Stanford Univ
- State Univ of Ia Ia City
- State Univ of Ny Albany
- State Univ of Ny Buffalo
- State Univ of Ny Downstate
- State Univ of Ny Stony Brook
- Surveillance + Operations Research Branc
- Syracuse Univ
- Temple Univ Philadelphia
- Tufts New England Med Ctr
- Tufts Univ Medford
- Tulane Univ New Orleans
- Tx A+M College Station
- United Ostomy Assn
- Univ Louis Pasteur Strasbourg
- Univ of Al Birmingham
- Univ of Ar Fayetteville
- Univ of Az Tucson
- Univ of Ca
- Univ of Chicago
- Univ of Cincinnati
- Univ of Co Boulder
- Univ of Ct Storrs
- Univ of De Wilmington
- Univ of Fl Gainesville
- Univ of Ga Athens
- Univ of Hi Honolulu
- Univ of Il Urbana
- Univ of in Bloomington
- Univ of Ks Lawrence
- Univ of Ky Lexington
- Univ of Louisville
- Univ of Ma Amherst
- Univ of Md Baltimore
- Univ of Med + Dentistry of Nj Newark
- Univ of Mi Ann Arbor
- Univ of Miami Coral Gables
- Univ of Mn Minneapolis
- Univ of NC Chapel Hill
- Univ of
- Ahf, American Health Foundation
- American Cancer Society Special Subcomm
- Request
- Stmn/R1-072
- Document File
- 2025545619/2025546382/Harvard University Office of
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- of Public Health
- Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Master ID
- 2025545673/6381
Related Documents:- 2025545673-6381 Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025545684 Telephone Locations and Protocol
- 2025545689-5696 Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the Acgih and the Epa
- 2025545697 Hps Newsletter Interview with A Risk Expert
- 2025545698-5711 Science and Its Limits: the Regulator's Dilemma
- 2025545713-5721 Risk / Benefit Analysis
- 2025545722-5725 Risk Management Commentary for Dr. D. Allan Bromley Assistant to the President for Science and Technology
- 2025545726-5729 Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An Introduction
- 2025545750-5792 Risk Assessment of Chemical Carcinogens: Is It Time for A Change?
- 2025545795-5799 Tools of Risk Analysis Applications of Epidemiology
- 2025545800-5810 Notice of Intended Changes - Benzene
- 2025545811-5822 Epidemiology in Risk Assessment for Regulatory Policy
- 2025545824-5850 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Use of Animal and Other Data As Predictors of Human Risk
- 2025545851-5871 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Uncertainties in Predicting Human Risks
- 2025545872-5881 How Do Cancer Risks Predicted From Animal Bioassays Compare with the Epidemiologic Evidence? the Case of Ethylene Dibromide
- 2025545882-5887 Use of Biological Assays in Short-Term Assessment of Inhaled Substances
- 2025545888
- 2025545889-5891 Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Are Your Mushrooms Safe to Eat?
- 2025545892-5899 the Rat As An Experimental Animal
- 2025545901-5907 Non-Cancer Endpoints
- 2025545940-5941 Cancer Facts & Figures - 890000
- 2025545942-5944 Get - the - Lead - Out Guru Challenged A Decade-Old Scientific Argument Over the Effects of Low-Level Lead on Iq Turns Nasty Following Allegations of Misconduct
- 2025545945-5948
- 2025545949-5958 the Question of Thresholds for Radiation and Chemical Carcinogenesis
- 2025545959-5980 Are There Thresholds for Carcinogenesis? the Thorny Problem of Low-Level Exposure
- 2025545981-5990 Perspectives on Comparing Risks of Environmental Carcinogens
- 2025545991-5998 Acceptable Cancer Risks: Probabilities and Beyond
- 2025546000-6011 Ideas in Pathology Pivotal Role of Increased Cell Proliferation in Human Carcinogenesis
- 2025546012-6017 Cell Proliferation in Carcinogenesis
- 2025546019-6027 the Role of Expert Judgement in Risk Analysis
- 2025546029-6039 the Respiratory Tract As A Route of Exposure
- 2025546040-6045 the Respiratory Tract As A Portal of Entry for Toxic Particles
- 2025546047-6062 Limitations to the Use of Employee Exposure Data on Air Contaminants in Epidemiologic Studies
- 2025546063-6083 Benefit - Cost Analysis of Environmental Regulation: Case Studies of Hazardous Air Pollutants
- 2025546086-6089 Legislative and Regulatory Aspects of Risk
- 2025546090-6099 Connecticut's Dioxin Ambient Air Quality Standard
- 2025546100-6103
- 2025546105 Annals of Radiation Calamity on Meadow Street
- 2025546106 Caution Urged When Using Insect Repellents
- 2025546116 Volatile Organics and Inorganics Action Levels 900400
- 2025546134-6135 Summary of Radon Test Results of the Household Testing Program
- 2025546141-6145 Introduction to Discussion Sessions
- 2025546146-6149 Risk Assessment in Environmental and Occupational Health Risk of Alar (Daminozide)
- 2025546150-6160 Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in Our Children's Food
- 2025546161-6162 Pesticides, Risk, and Applesauce
- 2025546163-6168 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546169 Daminozide / Udmh
- 2025546170-6172 the Relative Risk of Daminozide (Alar / Kylar) Use
- 2025546173 Be Most Wary of Nature's Own Pesticides
- 2025546174-6175 A Movie Star Pares the Apple Industry
- 2025546176-6183 Summary of Toxicology Data on Daminozide and Udmh
- 2025546184-6194 Attachment I Graphs of Data From NCI / Ntp 83 Daminozide
- 2025546195-6196
- 2025546197-6202 Daminozide Special Review Technical Support Document - Preliminary Determination to Cancel the Food Uses of Daminozide
- 2025546203-6224 Regulatory Decision - Making Under Uncertainty: the Case of Alar
- 2025546226 Epa Moves to Reassess the Risk of Dioxin Urged on by the Scientific Community, Epa Is Developing A New Model for Estimating Dioxin's Risk
- 2025546227 US Government Orders New Look at Dioxin the Environmental Protection Agency Is Evaluating Data From the Past Decade That Suggest Dioxin's Toxicity May Be Overestimated. A Risk Assessment Model Based on Biological Mechanism Is Being Drawn Up.
- 2025546228-6235 Dioxin Toxicity: New Studies Prompt Debate, Regulatory Action New Data on Dioxin's Effect on Humans, A Clearer Picture of the Cellular Events It Precipitates, and New Animal Toxicity Studies May Provide Epa with A Firm Basis for Regulation
- 2025546236-6250 the Regulation of Gene Expression by 2,3,7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin
- 2025546251-6253 Dioxin Risks Revisited Armed with A New Understanding of How Dioxin Works on the Molecular Level, A Number of Scientists Are Challenging Epa to Change the Way It Does Risk Assessment
- 2025546255-6258 Lead Toxicity Case Study for Short Course on Risk Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Health 910904 - 910906
- 2025546259-6267 Lead
- 2025546268-6275 Lead in Bone: Implications for Toxicology During Pregnancy and Lactation
- 2025546276-6281 the Long-Term Effects of Exposure to Low Doses of Lead in Childhood An 11 - Year Follow-Up Report
- 2025546282-6285
- 2025546298-6321 Review 890000 Alice Hamilton Lecture Lead and Human Health:Background and Recent Findings
- 2025546323-6348 Traps and Errors in Risk Analysis
- 2025546349-6356 Health Risks the Perception of Reality and the Realty of Perception
- 2025546357-6362 Communicating Risk Under Title III of Sara: Strategies for Explaining Very Small Risks in A Community Context
- 2025546363-6368 Industrial Risk Perceptions
- 2025546369-6370 Too Many Rodent Carcinogens: Mitogenesis Increases Mutagenesis
- 2025546371-6373 Has Risk Assessment Become Too 'conservative'?
- 2025546374-6378 Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions
- 2025546379-6381 Telling Reporters About Risk Dealing with Reporters Needn't Be the Least Agreeable Part of the Job.
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- OVER, OVER SIZE DOCUMENT
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- mkp02a00
Document Images
w
1~1PtER1C~1
~` ~CANTM3
0
OREGON
11,800
CALIF.
101,000
WAS H.
17,300
NEV.
4,100
IDAHO
3,500
MONT.
3,200
ARIZ.
13,000
WYO.
1,300
W lS.
20,200
0
ILL
48,000
LA.
17,500
" MICH.
-;~ 37,400
IND.
23,200
KY.
16,800
TENN.
21,000
MISS.
12,000
ALA.
18,000
=
N.Y.
77,500
PA.
59,000
OHIO
49,000
W. VA. ' °
8,900 VA.
23,500
N.C.
24,500
GA.
22,500
S.C.
13,000
FLA:
~ 65,500
i~..i, ~~r
[~, ~_
9
I
UTAH
3,500
ALASKA
1,000
VT.
2,300
N.H.
4,000
MAINE
5,500,
4,900
CONN.
14,400
~ N.J.
' 36,500
DEL
MD. 2,800
19,300
~ D.C.
3,200
PUERTO
RICO
6,000
MASS.
28,400
Estimated number of new cancer cases in 1989 by states, total:1,010,000' (excluding Puerto Rico).
'Excluding non-melanoma skin cancer and carcinoma in situ.
BASED ON RATES FROM NCl SEER PROGRAM (1983-1985}.
202554S910

CONTENTS
CANCER: BASIC DATA .................................... 3
Basic Data ................................................. 3
How Cancer Works ...................................... 4
Trends in DiagTosis and Treatment .................... 4
Cancer Death Rates by Site, U.S., 1930-1985" ........... 5
New Cancer Cases-1989* .............................. 6
Cancer Deaths--1989* .................................... 7
Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths
by Sex for A11 Sites-1989* ........................... 8
SELECTED CANCER SITES .............................. 9
Lung Cancer .............................................. 9
Colon and Rectu.m Cancer .............................. 9
Breast Cancer ............................................. 10
Uterine Cancer ........................................... 10
Ovarian Cancer ........................................... 11
Oral Cancer ............................................... 11
Cancer Incidence and Deaths by Site
and Sex-1989 Estimates* ............................ 12
Prostate Cancer ...............:.......................... 12
Bladder Cancer ........................................... 13
Skin Cancer ............................................... 13
Pancreatic Cancer ........................................ 14
Leukemia ................................................. 14
Five-Year Cancer Survival Rates for
Selected Sites" ......................................... 15
How to Estimate Cancer Statistics Locally* ............ 15
CANCER BY AGFs AND RACE ............................ 16
Black Americans .......................................... 16
The Economically Disadvantaged ....................... 16
Hispanic-Americans ..................................... 16
Children ................................................... 16
Trends in Survival by Site of Cancer, by Race* ........ 17
PREVENTION ............................................... 18
Primary Prevention ...................................... 18
Secondary Prevention ................................... 18
Cancer-Related Checkup Guidelines ................... 19
Colorectal Cancer: Early Detection Is the Key ......... 19
Breast Cancer: A Program of Action .................... 20
Tobacco Use .............................................. 20
Nutrition and Cancer:
A Common Sense Approach ........................ 21
THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY .................. 22
Profile ..................................................... 22
Public Education ......................................... 22
Professional Education .................................. 23
Service and Rehabilitation ............................... 24
Costs of Cancer ........................................... 25
Allocation of ACS Funds, 1987-1988* ................... 25
RESEARCH .................................................. 26
The ACS and Research ................................... 26
Cancer and the Environment ........................... 27
Cancer's Seven Warning Signals ...................... .. 28
30-Year Trends in Age-Adjusted Cancer
Death Rates* .......................................... 29
Summary of Research Grants and
Fellowships* .......................................... 30
Comprehensive Cancer Centers ........................ 31
Chartered Divisions of the ACS .............. Back Cover
'Table/Chart
SOURCES OF STATISTICS
@ ncicCence
Since there is no national office which records every new cancer
case, there is no way of knowing exactly how many new cases of
cancer are diagnosed each year. In the past, estimates of cancer
incidence were made by extrapolating from the experience of the
few population-based cancer registries.
Estimates of incidence in Facts & Figures editions prior to 1974
were based on data from two state cancer registries. The issues
from 1974 through 1978 used information from the National Cancer
Institute's Third National Cancer Survey (1969-1971) of nine major
areas of the United States.
Then in 1973, NCI began a new and larger program, gathering
data from 11 population-based registries. It is called SEER, standing
for Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results. Beginning with the
1979 edition of Facts & Figures, SEER incidence information has been
used. Each time a new data base is introduced, there may be some
sharp changes in figures, due to the more accurate data. The changes
do NOT indicate either a cancer epidemic or miracle cure.
For valid comparisons between years, incidence statistics from
the 1974 through 1978 editions of Facts & Figures may be compared
with one another, while those from the 1979 to 1984 editions may
be compared.
The latest available information for this 1989 edition is SEER data
from the years 1983-1985.
Mortality
The source for mortality statistics has remained constant over the
years: the National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health
and Human Services.
The 1989 figures are estimates based on the latest available
information, which includes mortality data through 1985.
Beginning with the 1981 edition of Facts & Figures, mortality rates
per 100,000 population were age-adjusted to the 1970 census
population, rather than the 1940 census population. Comparing
these charts and figures with those of previous years may indicate
false trends.
Survival
Because of the 5-year waiting period, survival statistics take longer
to compile. In this edition, we show the latest survival rates for
cases diagnosed in the period 1979-84 in the SEER program.
C1989, American Cancer Society, Inc. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this
publication or portions thereof in any form.
For written permission, address American Cancer Society, 1599 Clifton Road, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329.
2

C A N C E R F A C T S A N D F 1 G U R E S 1 9 8 9
CANCER: BASIC DATA
BASIC DATA
What is cancer?
Cancer i:5 a large group of diseases characterized by
uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. If
the spread is not controlled or checked, it results in
death. However, many cancers can be cured if detected
and treated promptly.
How is cancer treated?
By surgery, radiation, radioactive substances, chem-
icals, hormones and immunotherapy.
Who get<.; cancer?
Cancer strikes at any age. It kills more children 3
to 14 than a ny other disease. And cancer strikes more
frequently with advancing age. In the 1980's, there were
estimated over 4.5 million cancer deaths, almost 9
million new cancer cases, and some 15 million people
under medical care for cancer.
How many people alive today will get cancer?
About 76 million Americans now living will even-
tually have cancer; about 30%, according to present
rates. Over the years, cancer will strike in approximately
three out of four families.
How many ipeople alive today have ever
had canceir?
There are over 5 million Americans alive today who
have a history of cancer, 3 million of them with diag-
nosis five or more years ago. Most of these 3 million
can be considered cured, while others still have evi-
dence of cancer. By "cured" is meant that a patient
has no evidence of disease and has the same life
expectancy as a person who never had cancer.
The decision as to when a patient may be considered
cured is one that must be made by the physician after
examining the individual patient. For most forms of
cancer, five years without symptoms following treat-
ment is the accepted time. However, some patients can
be considerect cured after one year, others after three
years, whereas some have to be followed much longer
than five years.
How many new cases will there be this year?
In 1989 about 1,010,000 people will be diagnosed as
having cancer.*
How many people are surviving cancer?
In the early 1900's few cancer patients had any hope
of long-term survival. In the 1930's less than one in
five was alive at least five years after treatment. In the
1940's it was one in four, and in the 1960's it was one
in three.
Today, about 405,000 Americans, or 4 out of 10 patients
who get cancer this year, will be alive 5 years after
diagnosis. The gain from 1 in 3 to 4 in 10 represents
about 67,000 persons this year. This 4 in 10, or about
40% is called the "observed" survival rate. When normal
life expectancy is taken into consideration (factors such
as dying of heart disease, accidents and diseases of
old age) 49%~o will be alive 5 years after diagnosis. This
is the "relative" survival rate, and is considered a more
accurate yardstick of our battle against cancer.
Could more people be saved?
Yes. About 178,000 people with cancer will probably
die in 1989 who might have been saved by earlier
diagnosis and prompt treatment.
How many people will die?
This year about 502,000 will die of the disease-1,375
people a day, about one every 63 seconds. Of every
five deaths from all causes in the U.S., one is from cancer.
In 1988 an estimated 494,000 Americans died of cancer.
In 1987 it was 483,000; in 1986 the figure was 469,376.
What is the national death rate?
There has been a steady rise in the age-adjusted**
national death rate. In 1930 the number of cancer deaths
per 100,000 population was 143. In 1940 it was 152. By
1950 it had risen to.158 and in 1986 the number was
171. The major cause of these increases has been cancer
of the lung. Except for that form of cancer, age-adjusted
cancer death rates for major sites are leveling off, and
in some cases declining.
Can cancer be prevented?
Some cancers, not all. Most lung cancers are caused
by cigarette smoking, and most skin cancers by fre-
quent overexposure to direct sunlight. These cancers
can be prevented by avoiding their causes. Certain can-
cers caused by occupational-environmental factors can
be prevented by eliminating or reducing contact with
carcinogenic agents. See Prevention section, pp.18-22
'These estimates of the incidence of cancer are based upon data from the National Cancer Institute's
SEER Program (1983-1985). Non-
melanoma skin cancer and carcinoma in situ have not been included in the statistics. The incidence
of non-melanoma skin cancer is esti-
mated to be over 5f)0,000 cases annually.
"Age-adjusted-a m,ethod used to make valid statistical comparisons by assuming the same age
distribution among different groups being
compared.
3

C A N C E R F A C T S A N D F I G U R E S 7 9 8 9
BASIC DATA
HOW CANCER WORKS
Normally, the cells that make up the body reproduce
themselves in an orderly manner so that worn-out
tissues are replaced, injuries are repaired and growth
of the body proceeds.
Occasionally, certain cells undergo an abnormal
change and begin a process of uncontrolled growth and
spread: One cell divides into two, those redivide into
four, and so on. These cells may grow into masses of
tissue called tumors-some benign and others malig-
nant (cancerous).
The danger of cancer is that it invades and destroys
normal tissue. In the beginning, cancer cells usually
remain at their original site, and the cancer is said to
be localized. Later, some cancer cells may invade
neighboring organs or tissue. This occurs either by
direct extension of growth or by becoming detached
and carried through the lymph or blood systems to
other parts of the body. This is called metastasis of
a cancer.
This spread may be regional-confined to one region
of the body-when cells are trapped by lymph nodes.
If left untreated, however, the cancer is likely to spread
throughout the body. That condition is known as
advanced cancer, and usually results in death.
Because a case of cancer becomes progressively more
serious with each stage, it is important to detect cancer
as early as possible. Aids to early detection include
cancer's Seven Warning Signals and the cancer risk
factors.
TRENDS IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
The diagnosis and treatment of cancer has become
increasingly individualized. Early detection is followed
by more precise staging, and the use of more than one
kind of therapy, often in combination.
Some cancers, which only a few decades ago had
a very poor outlook, are often being cured today; acute
lymphocytic letikemia in children, Hodgkin's disease,
Burkitt's lymphoma, Ewing's sarcoma (a form of bone
cancer), Wilms' tumor (a kidney cancer in children),
rhabdomyosarcoma (a cancer in certain muscle tissue),
choriocarcinonla (placental cancer), testicular cancer,
ovarian cancer and osteogenic sarcoma. Other cancers
have not yet yielded to effective treatment, and are
the focus of continuing research.
An outstanding example of progress is the improve-
ment in the management of testicular cancer in young
men. More prec,ise diagnostic tools and staging allow
better selection of treatment. The use of combinations
of cancer drugs has resulted in remarkably improved
survival. In 20 years, the 5-year survival rate of testicular
cancer rose from 63% to 91%.
The following developments indicate the directions
of current and luture research:
New ways have been found to use an old drug, 5-
fluorouracil, more effectively against metastatic colon
cancer. By combining it with leukovorin it is a much
more potent inhibitor of colon cancer cells.
* Analysis of onc:ogene products is a promising new
means of predicting which tumors are likely to recur
after surgery.
o Use of potent growth factors stimulates normal bone
marrow cells to withstand very high doses of che-
motherapeutic: drugs.
P,A genetic fusing; of cancer cells with normal cells can
produce disease-fighting "monoclonal antibodies"-
specific antibod:ies tailored to seek out chosen targets
on cancer cells. Their potential in the diagnosis and
treatment of can,cer is under study.
New understanding of the causes of pain in cancer
patients has increased the options for controL Regular
use of oral pain medicines, infusions or injections
of analgesics, procedures to interrupt pain pathways,
are among the effective approaches available.
Studies with agents like synthetic retinoids (cousins
of vitamin A), and other substances are being under-
taken to see if recurrences of certain cancers can be
prevented. Another step is to see if these agents
can reduce cancer in high risk groups.
New approaches to drug therapy use combination
chemotherapy and chemotherapy with surgery or
radiation. New classes of agents are being tested for
their effectiveness in treating patients resistant to
drug therapies now in use.
Many patients with primary bone cancer now are
treated successfully by removing and replacing a
section of bone rather than by amputating the leg
or arm. Drugs and radiation therapy are being used
effectively after bone cancer surgery, resulting in dra-
matic improvement in survival.
New high technology diagnostic imaging techniques
have replaced exploratory surgery for some cancer
patients. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one
example of such technology under study. It uses a
huge electromagnet to detect tumors by sensing the
vibrations of the different atoms in the body. Com-
puterized tomography (CT scanning) uses X rays to
examine the brain and other parts of the body. Cross-
section pictures are constructed which show a
tumor's shape and location more accurately than is
possible with conventional x-ray techniques. For
patients undergoing radiation therapy, CT scanning
may enable the therapist to pinpoint the tumor more
precisely to provide more accurate radiation dosage
while sparing normal tissue.
Immunotherapy holds the hope of enhancing the
body's own disease-fighting systems to control
cancer. Interferon, interleukin-2 and other biologic
response modifiers are under study. Recently,
interferon was made available as the treatment for
hairy cell leukemia, a rare blood cancer of older Amer-
icans. Interleukin-2 is under very active research in
the treatment of kidney cancer and melanoma.
4

C A N C E R F A C T S A N D F 1 G U R E S 1 9 8 9
BASIC DATA
This research area will take many years to find the
proper role of these agents in cancer treatment.
Many cancers are caused by a two-stage process
through exposure to substances known as initiators
and promoters. Research scientists are exploring
ways of interrupting these processes to prevent the
development of cancer.
New technologies have made it possible to use bone
marrow transplantation as an important treatment
option in selected patients with aplastic anemia and
leukemia. Bone marrow transplantation for other
cancers is under study. The administration of larger
doses of anti-cancer drugs or radiation therapy may
be tolerated by some patients if their bone marrow
is storecl and later transplanted to restore marrow
function (autologous bone marrow transplants).
Hyperthermia is a way to increase the heat or tem-
perature of the entire body or a part of the body.
It is known that heat can kill cancer cells. A cell tem-
perafure of'45 degrees kills cancer cells. A temperature
of 42-43 degrees makes the cell more susceptible to
damage by ionizing radiation (X rays). Studies are
underway to learn if hyperthermia can increase the
effect of radiation or chemotherapy.
With medical progress producing longer survival
periods for many cancer patients, clinical concerns
are expanding to include not only patients' physical
well-being but also their psychosocial needs. The
patient's and family's reactions to the disease, sexual
concerns, employment and insurance needs, and
ways to provide psychosocial support, have emerged
as important areas of research and clinical care.
Improvements in cancer treatment have made
possible more conservative management of some
early cancers. In early cancer of the larynx, many
patients have been able to retain their larynx and
their voice; in colorectal cancer, fewer permanent
colostomies are needed; and the surgery required in
many cases of breast cancer is often more limited.
Prostatic ultrasound, a rectal probe using ultrasonic
waves producing an image of the prostate, is currently
being investigated as a potential means to increase
the early detection of occult, or not clinically sus-
pected, prostate cancer.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been successful
against certain types of cancers. This involves giving
chemotherapy to shrink the cancer and then removing
it surgically.
CANCER DEATH RATES* BY SITE, UNITED STATES, 1930-85
. ~
;
LUNG
.
. :
:
. :
.'
:
.~
.
BREAST
ATE
i COLON
r `x s
UTERUS
E~t
VE~t
U V .
$
C
~
~. 10 ~~ STOMA -,_
~y.W P NCRla- - - ° I
. --
LEUKEMIA
BL0
ECTUM
YEAR
'Rate for the population standardized for age on the 1970 U.S. population.
Sources of Data: National Center for Health Statistics and Bureau of the Census, United States.
Note: Rates are for both sexes combined except breast and uterus female population only and prostate
male population only.
5

NEW CANCER CASES-1989
Estimated New Cancer Cases for All Sites Plus Major Sites, by State-1989
_ ALL SITES* MAJOR SITES
Number
of Female Colon & Skin
STATE Cases Breast Rectum Lung Oral Uterus Prostate Melanoma Pancreas Leukemia
Alabama 18,000 2,400 2,300 2,800 450 950 2,100 400 500 450
Alaska 1,000 150 125 150 40 20 100 50 20 10
Arizona 13,000 1,800 1,700 1,900 350 550 1,500 300 350 375
Arkansas 11,300 1,100 1,500 1,900 200 400 1,000 350 350 300
California 101,000 14,200 13,500 15,400 3,500 5,000 10,000 3,200 2,600 2,800
Colorado 9,400 1,500 1,5()O 1,200 225 450 1,100 400 250 250
Connecticut 14,400 2,200 2,300 2,000 450 600 1,400 40a 375 375
Delaware 2,800 400 450 500 40 125 275 70 70 80
Dist. of Columbia 3,200 450 400 450 250 150 450 60 90 60
Florida 65,500 8,300 10,200 10,600 2,200 2,800 7,600 1,800 1,700 1,600
Georgia 22,500 2,800 2,900 3,700 850 1,100 2,400 600 550 600
Hawaii 3,300 350 450 450 150 150 275 80 90 80
Idaho 3,500 500 475 475 60 125 425 150 80 125
Illinois 48,000 7,000 7,800 7,400 1,400 2,400 4,700 950 1,300 1,300
Indiana 23,200 3,200 3,700 3,800 650 1,200 2,200 600 550 550
Iowa 12,700 1,800 2,100 1,800 400 550 1,500 300 375 375
Kansas 9,900 1,400 1,600 1,600 300 450 1,200 200 300 325
Kentucky 16,800 2,100 2,500 3,000 450 850 1,600 350 375 425
Louisiana 17,500 2,200 2,200 3,000 550 750 1,700 300 500 400
Maine 5,500 750 950 850 150 250 600 100 150 150
Maryland 19,300 2,700 2,900 3,000 650 800 1,900 550 400 450
Massachusetts 28,400 4,800 4,500 3,800 800 1,000 2,600 800 700 700
Michigan 37,400 5,500 5,300 5,800 1,000 1,700 3,600 900 950 1,000
Minnesota 16,400 2,300 2,600 2,100 400 650 2,00D 400 450 450
Mississippi 12,000 1,100 1,400 1,800 300 600 1,200 250 325 300
Missouri 23,500 3,200 3,900 3,700 700 1,200 2,000 600 650 700
Montana 3,200 500 425 425 60 150 400 90 100 100
Nebraska 6,400 900 1,100 900 150 350 750 175 225 175
Nevada 4,100 500 500 750 150 175 375 150 90 70
New Hampshire 4,000 650 650 600 80 200 400 125 125 90
New Jersey ^ 36,500 5,500 6,200 5,300 1,200 1,800 3,500 950 1,000 850
New Mexico 4,500 600 600 550 125 175 550 80 150 150
New York 77,500 12,100 13,200 10,900 2,500 4,000 7,900 2,100 2,300 2,000
North Carolina 24,500 3,400 3,200 4,000 900 1,300 2,700 750 700 700
North Dakota 2,700 400 450 325 70 125 450 40 90 90
Ohio 49,000 6,800 7,700 7,900 1,400 2,200 4,700 1,200 1,300 1,300
Ok9ahoma 14,000 1,800 1,900 2,500 400 550 1,400 500 425 450
Oregon 11,800 1,700 1,600 2,000 300 425 1,200 350 325 350
Pennsyfvania 59,000 8,800 10,000 8,600 1,700 2,500 5,300 1,600 1,500 1,500
Rhode Island 4,900 700 900 700 200 200 500 150 150 100
South Carolina 13,000 1,900 1,700 2,000 500 750 1,500 400 350 250
South Dakota 2,900 425 500 375 40 125 350 80 90 100
Tennessee 21,000 2,600 2,800 3,500 700 950 2,200 500 550 600
Texas 54,500 7,300 7,200 8,800 1,800 2,600 5,000 1,600 1,400 1,700
Utah 3,500 550 450 350 100 200 600 100 100 125
Vermont 2,300 350 375 350 80 150 250 50 50 90
Virginia 23,500 3,300 3,400 3,800 800 1,100 2,500 700 600 600
Washington 17,300 2,500 2,300 2,800 550 830 1,800 500 500 450
West Vitrginia 8,900 1,200 1,200 1,500 200 375 800 200 250 250
Wisconsin 20,200 3,100 3,200 2,700 450 900 2,300 400 550 650
Wyoming 1,300 225 200 204 30 30 150 50 30 30
United States 1,010,000 142,000 151,000 155,000 31,000 47,000 103,000 27,000 27,000 27,000
Puerto Rico 6,000 450 450 350 425 750 400 500 100 175
oDoes not include carcinoma in situ or non-melanoma skin cancer.
iheae estimates are offered as a rough guide and shou{d not be regarded as definitive. They are
calculated according to the distribution of
estimated 1989 canc cv deaths by state. Especially note that year-to-year changes may only represent
improvements in the basic da:ta.
6

CANCER DEATHS-1989
Estimated Cancer Deaths for Al! Sites Plus Major Sites, by State-1989
ALL SITES MA JOR SITES
_ Number Death Rate Skin
of per 100,000 Female Colon & Mela-
STATE Deaths Population` Breast Rectum Lung Oral Uterus Prostate noma Pancreas Leukemia
Alabama 8,900 214 700 950 2,600 125 200 550 100 425 300
Alaska, 500 221 30 50 150 10 10 20 10 25 10
Arizxta 6,500 180 550 700 1,800 100 50 400 70 300 225
Arkansas 5,600 190 350 600 1,800 60 100 300 80 300 225
Calitornia 50,000 181 4,400 5,500 14,100 950 900 2,600 700 2,500 1,800
Colorado 4,700 141 450 600 1,200 60 70 275 80 250 200
Connecticut 7,200 217 650 950 1,800 125 125 375 90 400 275
Delaware 1,400 250 125 175 450 10 20 60 10 60 50
Dist. of Columbia 1,700 264 175 175 400 70 60 125 10 100 50
Florida 32,500 182 2,500 4,100 9,800 600 490 2,100 400 1,600 1,000
Ge)r;;ia 11,200 202 850 1,200 3,400 250 250 700 150 500 400
Hawaii 1,700 191 100 175 375 50 20 80 20 80 50
tdafio 1,800 158 150 175 400 20 25 125 30 100 80
Illinois 24,000 201 2,100 3,100 6,600 450 600 1,300 200 1,300 900
Indiana 11,500 217 950 1,500 3,500 175 300 600 125 550 425
Iowa 6,400 190 550 850 1,600 125 125 400 70 350 300
iCamas 4,900 171 425 650 1,300 90 100 350 50 275 225
Kenv.ky 8,400 207 650 1,000 2,800 125 175 425 80 375 300
Louisiana 8,800 212 650 900 2,800 150 175 475 80 450 300'
Maine 2,800 199 225 400 800 40 60 175 20 150 90
Maryland 9,600 244 800 1,200 2,700 175 175 500 125 425 300
Massachusetts 14,100 220 1,500 1,900 3,500 250 275 750 175 650 475
Michigan 18,600 226 1,600 2,100 5,300 275 400 1,000 200 900 650
Minnesota 8,100 181 700 1,100 2,000 125 125 550 90 450 350
Misshsippi 5,100 186 325 .500 1,700 80 100 350 60 300 225
Misscuri 11,800 196 950 1,500 3,400 175 250 550 125 550 450
Montana 1,600 186 150 175 375 20 30 100 20 100 70
Nebraska 3,300 173 300 450 800 40 70 200 40 200 175
Nevada 2,100 216 150 200 600 40 20 100 30 80 40
New IHampshire 2,100 197 200 250 550 30 40 90 30 100 70
New JetSey 18,100 230 1,600 2,500 4,900 325 375 950 225 900 550
New Mexico 2,300 168 200 250 500 30 40 150 20 125 70
New 1'ork 38,500 200 3,800 5,400 9,800 750 950 2,200 475 2,100 1,400
North Carolina 12,200 203 1,000 1,300 3,700 225 275 750 175 550 425
North Dakota 1,300 171 125 175 300 20 20 125 10 90 60
Ohio 24,000 227 2,100 3,100 7,300 400 600 1,300 250 1,200 850
Oklahoma 7,000 163 550 800 2,300 100 100 375 100 325 275
Oregon 5,900 198 500 650 1,800 100 75 350 70 300 225
Pennsylvania 29,500 221 2,600 4,000 7,800 475 700 1,500 350 1,400 1,000
Rhode Island 2,500 227 250 350 650 60 40 125 30 125 70
South Carolina 6,500 209 550 650 1,900 125 125 425 90 325 175
South Dakota 1,500 180 125 200 325 10 30 125 20 100 80
Tennessee, 10,400 202 800 1,100 3,300 200 200 600 125 500 375
Texas 27,000 155 2,200 2,900 8,100 475 500 1,400 350 1,300 1,000
Utah 1,800 118 175 175 275 20 30 175 30 90 80
Vermont 1,200 196 100 150 275 20 30 70 10 60 50
Virginia 11,700 219 950 1,400 3,500 225 225 650 150 500 375
Washington 8,600 181 750 900 2,600 150 150 500 100 425 300
West Virginia 4,400 202 350 500 1,400 60 100 225 50 200 175
Wisconsin 10,000 197 950 1,300 2,500 125 175 650 90 500 425
Wyomin;; 700 128 70 75 175 10 10 30 10 40 30
United States 502 000 204 43,000 61,000 142,000 8,700 10,000 28,500 6,000 25,000 18,000
Puerto Rico 3,500 150 200 250 400 175 150 300 400 80 150
`Adjusted to the age distribution of the 1970 U.S. Census Population.
7

ESTIMATED NEW CANCER CASES AND DEATHS BY SEX FOR ALL SITES-1989
ESTIMATED NEW CASES ESTIMATED DEATHS
~ Total Male Female Total Male Female
ALL SITES 1,010,000' 505,000' 505,000' 502,000 266,000 236,000
Buccal Cavity & Pharynx (ORAL) 30,600 20,600 10,000 8,650 5,775 2,875
Lip 4,200 3,700 500 100 75 25
Tongue 6,000 3,900 2,100 1,950 1,300 650
Mouth 11,700 7,000 4,700 2,600 1,600 1,000
Pharynx 8,700 6,000 2,700 4,000 2,800 1,200
Digestive Organs 227,800 115,200 112,600 123,000 64,400 58,600
Esophagus 10,100 7,200 2,900 9,400 6,900 2,500
Stomach 20,000 11,900 8,100 13,900 8,200 5,700
Small Intestine E 2,700 1,400 1,300 900 500 400
Large Intestine ~ (COLON-RECTUM) 107,000 50,000 57,000 53,500 26,000 27,500
Rectum 44,000 23,000 21,000 7,800 4,000 3,800
Liver & Biliaxy Passages 14,500 7,500 7,000 11,400 5,800 5,600
Pancreas 27,000 13,000 14,000 25,000 12,500 12,500
Other& Unspecified Digestive 2,500 1,200 1,300 1,100 500 600
Respiratory System 171,600 114,000 57,600 147,100 96,900 50,200
Larynx 12,300 10,000 2,300 3,700 3,000 700
LUNG 155,000 101,000 54,000 142,000 93,000 49,000
Other & Umapecified Respiratory 4,300 3,000 1,300 1,400 900 500
Bone 2,100 1,200 900 1,300 700 600
Connective Tissue 5,600 3,000 2,600 3,000 1,400 1,600
SKIN 27,000" 14,500" 12,500" 8,200t 3,200 3,000
_
BREAST 142,900"' 900"' 142,000'°` 43,300 300 43,000
_
GenitalOrgaws 181,800" 109,900 71,900" 52,200 29,100 23,100
Cervix Uteri ~
(UTERUS) 13,000"' - 13,000°' 6,000 - 6,000
Corpus, Endometrium 34,000 - 34,000 4,000 - 4,000
Ovary 20,000 - 20,000 12,000 ~ 12,000
Other & Unspecified Genital, Female 4,900 - 4,900 1,100 - 1,100
Prostate 103,000 103,000 - 28,500 28,500 -
Testis 5,700 5,700 - 350 350 -
Other & Unspecified Genital, Male 1,200 1,200 - 250 250 -
Urinary Organs 70,200 49,000 21,200 20,200 12,900 7,300
Bladder 47,100 34,500 12,600 10,200 6,900 3,300
Kidney & Other Urinary 23,100 14,500 8,600 10,000 6,000 4,000
Eye 1,900 1,000 900 300 150 150
Brain & Central N ervous System 15,000 8,200 6,800 11,000 6,000 5,000
Endocrine Glands 12,600 3,700 8,900 1,750 775 975
Thyroid 11,300 3,000 8,300 1,025 375 650
Other Endocrine 1,300 700 600 725 400 . 325
Leukemia 27,300 15,200 12,100 18,100 9,800 8,300
Lymphocytic Leukemia s13, 00 7,500 5,500 7,000 3,900 3,100
Granulocytic Leukemia V,300 7,200 6,100 10,600 5,600 5,000
Monocytic Leukemia 1,000 500 500 500 300 200
Other Blood & Lymph Tissues 51,800 27,000 24,800 27,400 14,100 13,300
Hodgkin's Disease 7,400 4,200 3,200 1,500 900 600
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas 32,800 16,800 16,000 17,300 8,900 8,400
Multiple Myeloma 11,600 6,000 5,600 8,600 4,300 4,300
All Other & Unspiecified Sites 41,800 21,600 20,200 36,500 18,500 18,000
NOTE: The estimates of new cancer cases are offered as a rough guide and should not be regarded as
definitive. Especially note that
year-to-year changes may only represent improvements in the basic data. ACS six major sites appear
in boldface caps.
'Carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancers are not included in totals. Carcinoma in situ of
the uterine cervix accounts for more
than 50,000 new casEs annually, and carcinoma in situ of the female breast accounts for about 10,000
new cases annually. Non-melanoma
skin cancer accounts for more than 500,000 new cases annually.
°tvlelanoma only. 'Invasive cancer only.
iNCIDENCE ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON RATES FROM NCI SEER PROGRAM 1983-85.
tMelanoma 6,000; other skin 2_)00
8

C A N C E R F A C T 5 A N D F I G U R E 5 1 9 8 9
SELECTED CANCER SITES
LUNG CANCER
Incidence: An estimated 155,000 new cases in 1989.
The incidence rate in white males rose from 82.7 per
100,000 in 1982 to 84.2 in 1984. The incidence rate in
white females and in black males and females also rose.
Mortality: An estimated 142,000 deaths in 1989. The
age-standardized lung cancer death rate for women is
higher than that of any other cancer. It has surpassed
breast cancer which for over 50 years was the number
one cancer Ici:ller of women.
Warning Signals: A persistent cough; sputum
streaked with blood; chest pain; recurring attacks of
pneumonia or bronchitis.
Risk Factors: Cigarette smoking; history of smoking
20 or more years; exposure to certain industrial sub-
stances such as asbestos, particularly for those who
smoke. Involuntary smoking increases the risk. Expo-
sure to radiation may also contribute to lung cancer.
Early Detecl,ion: Lung cancer is very difficult to detect
early; symptoms often don't appear until the disease
has advanced considerably. If a smoker quits at the time
of early precancerous cellular changes, the damaged
bronchial lining often returns to normal. If a smoker
continues the habit, cells may form abnormal growth
patterns that lead to cancer. Diagnosis may be aided
by such procedures as the chest X ray, sputum cytology
test and fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Treatment: Treatment depends on the type of, and
stage of lung cancer. Surgery, radiation therapy and
chemotherapy are all options. For many localized
cancers, surgery is usually the treatment of choice. Since
the majority of patients with lung cancer have tumor spread, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are
often
combined with surgery. In small cell cancer of the lung,
chemotherapy alone or combined with radiation has
largely replaced surgery as the treatment of choice, with
a large percentage of patients experiencing remission-
in some cases, long-lasting remission.
Survival: Only 13% of lung cancer patients (all stages,
whites and blacks) live five or more years after diag-
nosis. The rate is 33% for cases detected in a local-
ized stage; but only 24% of lung cancers are discovered
that early. Rates have improved only slightly over a
recent 10-year period.
COLON AND RECTUM CANCER
Incidence: An estimated 151,000 new cases in 1989,
including 107,000 of colon cancer and 44,000 of rectum
cancer. Their combined incidence is second only to that
of lung cancer i;excluding common skin cancers).
Mortality: Aii estimated 61,300 deaths in 1989, second
only to lung cancer. This includes 53,500 for colon cancer
and 7,800 for rectum cancer.
Warning Signals: Bleeding from the rectum, blood
in the stool, change in bowel habits.
Risk Factors: Personal or family history of colon and
rectum cance, personal or family history of polyps in
the colon or rectum; inflammatory bowel disease.
Evidence suggests that bowel cancer may be linked
to the diet. A diet high in fat and/or low in fiber content
may be a signii.ficant causative factor.
Early Detection: The ACS recommends three tests
as valuable aids in detecting colon and rectum cancer
early in people without symptoms.
The digital rectal examination is performed by a
physician during an office visit. The ACS recommends
one every year after age 40.
The stool blood slide test is a simple method of testing
the feces for hidden blood. The specimen is obtained
by the patient at home, and returned to the physician's
office, a hospit:al or clinic for examination. The ACS
recommends the test every year after 50.
Proctosigmoidoscopy, known as the "procto," is an
examination in which a physician inspects the rectum
and lower colon with a hollow lighted tube. As the
site of most colorectal cancers appears to be shifting
higher in the colon, longer, flexible instruments are
being used as well as the rigid scope. The ACS rec-
ommends a procto every 3 to 5 years after the age
of 50, following two annual normal exams.
If any of these tests reveals possible problems, a
physician may recommend more extensive studies,
such as colonoscopy and a barium enema. Colono-
scopes view the entire colon.
Treatment: Surgery, at times combined with radia-
tion, is the most effective method of treating colorec-
tal cancer. Chemotherapy is being studied to determine
its possible role in treating advanced cases.
In cases of colon cancer, a permanent colostomy, the
creation of an abdominal opening for the elimination
of body wastes, is seldom needed, and is infrequently
required for patients with rectal cancer. One report
found permanent colostornies necessary for only 15%
of patients whose rectal cancers are detected early. For
those who do have permanent colostomies, the Society
has a special patient assistance program. (See p. 25)
Survival: When colorectal cancer is detected and
treated in an early, localized stage, the 5-year survival
rate' is 87% for colon cancer and 79% for rectal cancer,
compared with 40% and 31% respectively, after the
cancer has spread to other parts of the body.
9

C A N C E R F A C T S A N D
F 1 G U R E S 1 9 B 9
SELECTED CANCER SITES
BREAST CANCER
Incidence: An estimated 142,900 new cases in the
United States during 1989. About one out of 10 women
will develop b reast cancer at some time during her
life.
Mortality: An estimated 43,300 deaths (43,000 females;
300 males) in 1989, in females, second only to lung
cancer, now th,e foremost site of cancer deaths in
women.
Warning Sij;rdals: Breast changes that persist such
as a lump, thickening, swelling, dimpling, skin irrita-
tion, distortion, retraction or scaliness of the nipple,
nipple discharge, pain or tenderness.
Risk Factors: Over age 50; personal or family history
of breast cancer; never had children; first child after
age 30.
Early Detection: The American Cancer Society rec-
ommends the monthly practice of breast self-exami-
nation (BSE) by women 20 years and older as a routine
good health habit. Most breast lumps are not cancer,
but only a physician can make a diagnosis.
The A.merican Cancer Society and the National
Cancer Institute, in their joint Breast Cancer Detection
Demonstration program, found that mammography-
a low-dose x-ray examination-could find cancers too
small to be felt by the most experienced examiner.
Besides its effectiveness in screening women without
symptoms, mammography is recognized as a valuable
diagnostic technique for women who do have findings
suggestive of breast cancer. Once a breast lump is
found, mammography can help determine if there are
other lesions in the same or opposite breast which are
too small to be felt. All suspicious lumps should
be biopsied for a definitive diagnosis-even when the
mammogram is described as normal.
The Society recommends a mammogram every year
for asymptomatic women age 50 and over, and a
baseline mammogram for those 35 to 39. Asymptom-
atic women 40 to 49 should have mammography every
1-2 years. In addition, a professional physical exam-
ination of the breast is recommended every three
years for women 20 to 40, and every year for those
over 40.
Treatment: Several methods may be used, depending
on the individual woman's preferences and medical
situation-surgery varying from local removal of the
tumor to mastectomy, radiation therapy, chemotherapy
or hormone manipulation. Often two or more methods
may be used in combination. Patients should discuss
with their physicians possible options available con-
cerning the specific management of their breast cancer.
New techniques in recent years have made breast
reconstruction possible after mastectomy, and the cos-
metic results are good. Reconstruction now has be-
come an important part of treatment and rehabilitation.
(See p. 25)
Survival: The 5-year survival rate for localized breast
cancer has risen from 78% in the 1940's to 90% today.
If the breast cancer is not invasive (in situ), the survival
rate approaches 100%. If the cancer has spread, how-
ever, the rate is 60%.
Despite an increasing incidence of breast cancer,
longer survival has helped to stabilize mortality rates
over the last 50 years.
UTERINE CANCER
Incidence: An E=.stimated 47,000 new invasive cases
in 1989, including 13,000 cases of cancer of the cervix,
and 34,000 cases of cancer of the endometrium or body
of the uterus. Invasive cervical cancer incidence has
steadily decreased over the years, while cancer in situ
has risen in all groups. Cervical cancer is most common
today among low s,ocioeconomic groups but all groups
are at risk. Endom etrial cancer afflicts mostly mature
women, and diagnosis usually is made between the
ages of 55 and 69.
Mortality: An e;>timated 6,000 deaths in 1989 from
cervical cancer, 4,000 from endometrial cancer. Overall,
the death rate from uterine cancer has decreased more
than 70% during the last 40 years, due mainly to the
Pap test and regular checkups.
Warning Signal's; Intermenstrual or postmenopausal
bleeding or unusual discharge.
RLk Factors: Fo r cervical cancer: early age at first
intercourse, multiple sex partners. For endometrial
cancer: history of infertility, failure of ovulation, pro-
longed estrogen therapy and obesity.
Early Detection: The Pap test, an examination under
a rnicroscope of cells from the cervix and body of the
10
uterus, is a simple procedure which can be performed
at appropriate intervals by physicians as part of every
pelvic examination. For cervical cancer, women who
are or have been sexually active, or have reached age
18 years, should have an annual Pap test and pelvic
examination. After a woman has had three or more
consecutive satisfactory normal annual examinations,
the Pap test may be performed less frequently at the
discretion of her physician.
The Pap test is highly effective in detecting early
cancer of the uterine cervix; it is only 50% effective
in detecting endometrial cancer. Women at high risk
of developing endometrial cancer should have an endo-
metrial tissue sample at menopause.
The hormone estrogen frequently is given to women
during and after menopause to make up for the decline
in estrogens normally produced by the ovaries.
Estrogen helps to control menopausal symptoms such
as hot flashes or thinning of the vaginal lining causing
painful sexual intercourse. For mature women, there
are certain risks associated with such treatment,
including an increased risk of endometrial cancer.
Women and their physicians should carefully discuss
