Jump to:

Philip Morris

Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health Are Your Mushrooms Safe to Eat?

Date: 04 Sep 1991
Length: 3 pages
2025545889-2025545891
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2025545889-2025545891

Fields

Type
SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
Area
LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
Site
N426
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
Document File
2025545619/2025546382/Harvard University Office of
Continuing Education Short Course Program Harvard School
of Public Health
Master ID
2025545673/6381
Related Documents:
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Named Person
Erickson
Toth
Request
Stmn/R1-072
Named Organization
Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
jkp02a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: jkp02a00 Log in for more options!
Risk Analysis in Environmental and Occupational Health September 4, 1991 ARE YOUR MUSHROOMS SAFE TO EAT? Raw commercial mushrooms, obtained from the supplier of local food stores, have been tested in a bioassay (Toth and Erickson, 1986) similar to those used for synthetic organic chemicals. We can therei`ore perform a risk assessment on raw mushrooms similar in all respects to the risk assessments performed on synthetic organic chemicals. In the mushroom experiment, there was one control group of 50 mice for each sex and one experimental group of 50 mice for each sex, the former kept on a normal diet and the latter fed the material under test at an average rate of about 1.57,000 mg/kg-day for their lifetime (assuming mice weigh 30 g). Feeding of the dosed group was ad Ilb mushrooms (without other feed) 3 days/week, normal diet 4 days/week; while the control group received the normal diet. Average mushroom consumption was 11 g/day/mouse during days on which mushrooms were the only food available (mushrooms are about 90°/) water). The experiment was continued for the natural lifetime of the animals, and no differences were seen in the lifefime of the dosed animals versus the control groups. However, the average weight of the dosed animals was substantially lower than the average weight of the control groups. There were increased incidences of tumors in several organs: TurrnDr site:type Sex Control Group Dosed Group }_Significance Bone :various F 0/50 8/50 0.003 Bone:various M 0/50 8/50 0.003 Forestomach:various F 0/50 19/50 2.3 x 10-' Forestomach:various M 2/50 14/50 0.00094 Liver:hepatoma F 0/50 4/50 0.059 Liver:hepatoma M 1/50 6/50 0.055 Lunca:All tumors F 13/50 20/50 0.1 Lung:Adenoma F 6/50 12/50 0.096 Lunci:,Adenocarcinoma F 7/50 11/50 0.22 Lung:All tumors M 17/50 31/50 0.0045 Lunci:Adenoma M 12/50 24/50 0.006 Lunc~:Adenocarcinoma M 9/50 13/50 0.23 1
Page 2: jkp02a00 Log in for more options!
Risk An~dysis in Environmental and Occupational Health September 4, 1991 From these results we can construct the following estimates for potency (q, and q,*) in mice. 't'umor site:type Sex q, (kg-d/mg) q,* (kg-d/mg) Elone:Various F 1.1 x 1e 1.9 x 10, Elone:Various M 1.1 x 10, 1.9 x 1e F'orestomach:Various F 3.0 x 1e 4.4 x 1e Forestomach:Various M 1.8 x 10-1 2.9 x 10' Lung:Total F 1.3 x 10-' 2.9 x 10' Lung:Total M 3.5 x 1e 5.8 x 10' Using the EPA methodology, the value chosen from these would be the highest value of q,* that corresponds to a statistically significant result - 5.8 x 1V kg-d/mg - and this value would then have to be extrapolated to humans using a surface area factor of (70 kgI30 g)"' = 13.26. Such an approach leads to an upper bound estimate of carcinogenic potency in humans of 7.7 x 10"6 kg-dlmg. What does this imply for eating; raw mushrooms in your salad? (1) A upper bound estimate of potency of 7.7 x 10' kg-dlmg implies that the dose rate required to give an upper bound estimate of risk of 10' is 0.013 mg/kg-d, or about 23 g (0.82 oz) per lifetime. (2) A consumption of 1 oz/month (13.3 mgikg-d) of raw mushrooms corresponds to an upper bound estimate of lifetime risk of 1 x 1V. (3) According to Toth and Erickson (1986), estimated annual US consumption of these mushrooms was 340 x 106 kg in 1984-1985. This was an annual average per capita consumption of about 55 mg/kg-d, corresponding to an upper bound estimate of lifetime risk of 4.3 x 1V. Presumably not all the mushrooms would be eaten raw, but we have no idea. what would be the effect on the carcinogenicity of the mushrooms of cooking them. (4) With the figures given in (3), the upper bound estimate of the annual number of cancers expected in the US to be due to mushrooms is about 8500! 2
Page 3: jkp02a00 Log in for more options!
Risk Anaf ysis in Environmental and Occupational Health September 4, 1991 Comment Mushrooms are known to contain various compounds, including hydrazine analogs, that are mutagenico in vitro and/or carcinogenic in laboratory animals under certain conditions. An extract of mushrcoms of the type tested has also been shown to be mutagenic. However, the spectrum of tumors found in this experiment on raw mushrooms was not what might be expected from the known carcinogenic compounds present in the mushrooms. Presumably there are different carcinogenic compounds are also present, or there was an interaction with other chemicals present. Referemu's Toth, B. and J. Erickson. 1986. Cancer Induction in mice by feeding of the uncooked cultivated mushroom of commerce Agaricus Bisporus. Cancer Research 46 (1986) 4007-4011.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: