Philip Morris
International Specialty Conference on Combustion Processes and the Quality of the Indoor Environment Niagara Falls, Ny, 880927 - 880929
Fields
- Author
- Zahn, L.S.
- Area
- LOGUE,MAYADA/OFFICE
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Recipient (Organization)
- Leonard Zahn + Associates
- Named Person
- Osdene, Thomas
- Amman, H.
- Coultas, D.
- Crouse, W.
- Dockery, D.
- Eatough, D.
- Guerin, M.
- Halley, N.
- Jacobs, M.
- Matsukura, S.
- Mccarthy, J.
- Repace, J.
- Samet, J.
- Spengler, J.
- Sterling, T.
- Walkinshaw, D.
- Wells, J.
- Amman, H.
- Recipient
- Gertenbach, R.F.
- Document File
- 2025541818/2025541921/Leonard Zahn
- Author (Organization)
- Leonard Zahn + Associates
- Copied
- M, H.C.
- G, J.F.
- H, W.D.
- G, J.F.
- Site
- N426
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Organization
- Air Pollution Control Assn
- American Lung Assn
- Ashrae, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating + Air-Conditioning Engineers
- Brigham Young Univ Provo
- Canada Natl Research Council
- Covington Burling
- Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
- Harvard
- Intl Speciality Conference on Combustion
- Lor, Lorillard
- Oak Ridge Natl Lab
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Simon Fraser Univ Burnaby
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Univ of Nm Albuquerque
- Univ of Toronto
- Ahf, American Health Foundation
- American Lung Assn
- Request
- Stmn/R1-147
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- syx83e00
Document Images
.
MEMORANDUM
T S. DS'n.lPNF January 10, 1989
JAN1 s
~~~
CC: WDH
TO: Robert F. Gertenbach
JFG
FROM: Leonard S. Zahn ` HCM
SUBJECT: International Specialty Conference on Combustion
Processes and the Quality of the Indoor Environment
Niagara Falls, NY, Sept. 27-29, 1988
It was a small meeting both in the number of papers and those
attending: there were about 35 of the former and 75 of the lat-
ter. The gathering was sponsored by Air Pollution Control Associ-
ation committees dealing with building factors and ventilation,
monitoring and modeling, and residential and commercial fuel com-
bustion.
The subject of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) seemed to
have been uppermost in the minds of the planners; it was the cen-
tral focus, or drew considerable attention, in 40% of the presen-
tations. One session was devoted to ETS characterization and ex-
posure; another was on ETS policies. Also emphasized by several
speakers was the use of biomarkers to help determine exposure to
ETS, especially among children and infants.
Some interesting comments were heard during the meeting, but
only few of the data reported appeared to be new. One paper of-
fering data about problems related to ETS measurements came from
a New Mexico scientist. Several reports were repetitions or re-
writes of material presented in recent years. Other papers, deal-
ing with ongoing studies, provided up-to-date information.
Perhaps the most significant disclosure at the meeting was
that the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Con-
ditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) would soon recommend new ventilation
standards for buildings in order to deal with any problems re-
lated to ETS. It was made clear that questions had been raised
about tobacco industry pressure regarding ETS in buildings.
JAMES REPACE of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was
on the program with a review of data that he said justified re-
strictive legislation for ETS. He criticized nearly all the re-
ports at the meeting which sought to portray ETS exposure as less
of a health hazard, or no hazard at all in a practical sense.
Joining him in this effort, but to a far lesser degree, was A.
JUDSON WELLS, a consultant to the American Lung Association.
Another speaker from the EPA reported that mutagenic compounds
had recently been detected in emissions from kerosene heaters,
devices whose usage is most marked in the South and Northeast.
eonard
,, ZM PUdLIC RELA74ON5 COUNSEL
(af ~n~d/Associates4lnG
13 LINCOLN ROAD P.O. BOX 223 GREAT NECK, N.Y. 11022 (5I6)482-5715

2.
The highlights:
.1. DOUGLAS WALKINSHAW, of Canada's National Research Council
and a faculty member at the University of Toronto, was the one
who reported to the meeting on ASHRAE's forthcoming standard.
(ASHRAE, an organization of people in industry, government and
academia, develops concensus standards for building ventilation
that generally are accepted throughout the United States and
Canada.)
ASHRAE's previous ventilation standard, approved in 1981 (and
known as 62-81), called for a dual rate of ventilation, or two
different figures, for buildings: 5 cubic feet (of outside air)
per minute (CFM) per person in nonsmoking spaces, 15 CFM per per-
son in smoking spaces. The latter was raised to 20 CFM in office
situations. The figure for houses was 10 CFM per room. This dual
rate confused many people, Walkinshaw said.
The proposed new standard (actually a revision called 62-81R)
recommends 15 CFM per person in any space, or at least a one-
third air change every hour, "whichever governs," he said. This
applies both to residential and nonresidential structures.
Walkinshaw said the revised standard, by eliminating the dual
rate of the 62-81 standard, should not be construed as an example
of submission to tobacco industry pressure. The standard does not
"void or downplay" the ETS-indoor air quality issue. The most im-
portant element is that if buildings are properly operated and
maintained, there will be few problems regarding ventilation.
He said that ASHRAE has not and will not provide health-based
indoor air criteria but will provide such criteria on the basis
of comfort of building inhabitants.
(The new standard also contains proposed air quality criteria
for radon, chlordane, ozone, and carbon dioxide.)
2. Repace, describing smoking as a practice that was "quite
deadly and not connected with long life," offered nothing new as
he repeated his claim about the lethal effects of ETS.
Repace gained widespread attention several years ago when he
said ETS was responsible for at least 5,000 lung cancer deaths
annually in the U.S. At Niagara Falls, he said at least seven
other studies have produced figures that were in "remarkable"
agreement with his.
Much of his talk consisted of citations from the work of
others in the ETS area. One such source was a 1984 paper by S.
MATSUKURA of Japan on ETS and urinary cotinine levels in non-
smokers. Later in the meeting, NANCY HALLEY of the American
Health Foundation urged Repace -- "I cannot caution you strongly
enough" -- not to use Matsukura's data, saying they were suspect

7
3.
and unduplicated. Repace agreed.
Repace raised what seemed to be a new aspect for him when he
said a number of reports have linked ETS to heart disease. While
saying that these reports weren't conclusive "at the present
time," he noted that it's plausible from an epidemiological and
biological standpoint to relate ETS exposure to heart disease.
Nicotine and other substances in tobacco have been associated
with increased cholesterol deposition in arteries, he said, add-
ing that he'd gotten his information on smoking and the heart
from something called "A Physician Looks at Smoking."
3. Haley said research at the American Health Foundation on
biomarkers of smoke exposure has expanded to include DNA adducts
and is concentrating on such substances as benzo(a)pyrene, 4-ami-
nobiphenyl and nicotine-derived compounds.
Few good agents exist as suitable biomarkers, she said. Among
those she called "direct" biomarkers were carbon monoxide, car-
boxyhemoglobin, thiocyanata, nicotine, and cotinine, the major
metabolite of nicotine.
"Indirect" metabolites she listed were hydroxyproline (in-
creased excretion of this amino acid in the urine is an indica-
tion of lung injury), thioethers, aromatic amines, and urinary
mutagens.
Haley said a study (in which she apparently participated)
looked at persons who recently had stopped smoking and never-
smokers. Both groups were given chewing gum that contained nico-
tine, and the findings suggested that the mode of uptake of nico-
tine may be related to elimination of the substance from the
body.
Another study of municipal workers in a southern community
examined ETS exposure at home and at work. It was found that fe-
male nonsmokers were more likely to be wed to smokers than to
nonsmokers.
Urinary cotinine measurements of these subjects were made,
Haley said, adding that such measurements can be used to estimate
ETS exposure, but not exposure to carcinogens. Other potential
markers for disease risk have to be examined, such as hydroxy-
proline, N-nitrosoproline, thioethers, and mutagenicity.
4. DAVID COULTAS of the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,
said many questions remain about ETS, especially in regard to
exposure-response relationships in children and about lung cancer
in adults. He made the comment during a talk on the variability
of measures of ETS exposure in the home. (Coauthors included
JONATHAN SAMET of New Mexico and two men from the Harvard School
of Public Health, Jfl HN McCARTHY and JOHN SPENGLER.)

4.
He described a study of residents of 10 homes where ETS expo-
sure was measured by an air sampling device (developed at Har-
vard), questionnaires were used, and urinary cotinine concentra-
tions were examined. Inhabitants of the houses (which included
one apartment and one mobile home) included both smokers and non-
smokers.
Basically, the study turned up these findings, none of which
was statistically significant: an increase in respirable suspen-
ded particulate matter was associated with one or more smokers in
the home and with the colder months of the year. Nicotine levels
also were increased in the presence of smoking, but were not as-
sociated with any season of the year.
Many factors that could not be measured may contribute to the
variability of ETS levels in a dwelling, Coultas said. For atmos-
pheric measurements of ETS, concentrations depend on the intensi-
ty and duration of smoking, room size, ventilation, absorption of
smoke components, and methods of collection. Particle concentra-
tion also is affected by sources other than tobacco smoke. Fur-
thermore, at a given level of nicotine exposure, urinary cotinine
levels are also influenced by uptake, metabolism and excretion,
and these are likely to vary among individuals.
The ability to predict levels of these markers is also limited
by the subjects' inability to describe, conclusively and ade-
quately, each kind of exposure.
Coultas said scientists are able to categorize and sort out
groups of people, but don't do too well when it comes to individ-
uals. Future studies of methods of ETS measurement will have to
realize the importance of other factors that may contribute to
atmospheric and biologic markers.
5. DOUGLAS DOCKERY of the Harvard School of Public Health gave
data from the most recent followup of children in the the Six
Cities Study in which his institution has been engaged for many
years.
A total of 5,338 white children aged 7-11 years were last ex-
amined in the spring of 1986; the previous examination was in the
fall of 1983. Their parents answered questionnaires that sought
information about household smoking practices, cooking stoves,
kerosene heaters, and wood-burning stoves.
About 50% of the children are now exposed to ETS at home as
compared to about 66% ten years ago, Dockery said. Prior to age
2, the incidence of respiratory ills (cough, chest ailments) was
consistently found to be increased in the children in direct re-
lation to increases in the amount of smoking in the home. No as-
sociation with ETS expo'sure at home was found for nonrespiratory
ailments in the children.

5.
The researchers initially found a protective effect of ETS on
a subgroup of children with asthma or asthma-related symptoms.
However, they found the effect resulted from the fact that smok-
ing parents either stopped or reduced their smoking because of
the children's illness. Small declines in pulmonary function were
found among these children, but these weren't statistically sig-
nificant.
Gas stoves used for cooking seemed to have a minor effect on
respiratory symptoms in the children overall. More of an effect
was seen in children from homes where the stoves had pilot lights
than in those without lights, indicating a socioeconomic effect.
(Stoves without pilot lights are newer and usually have electric
starters.)
When gas and electric stoves were used to provide heat, a
stronger association was seen in regard to pulmonary ailments.
Again, socioeconomic factors seem to be involved, and this must
be studied further.
Space heaters (kerosene, wood-burning stoves) were related to
elevated rates of chest illness in nonasthamtics and "nonwheez-
ers," but only in the last year of the study period. No adverse
effect on pulmonary function was seen.
Commenting on the paper, THEODOR STERLING of Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, urged Dockery and
his colleagues to recognize and include in their study the fact
that the fathers of most of the children are blue collar workers
who smoke and bring home industrial dusts and particles on their
clothing, skin and hair. This recommendation was made not to re-
move the smoking factor, Sterling said, but to provide a chance
to study the potential effects of occupation.
6. A survey of ETS in restaurants and offices in different
cities was reported by WILLIAM CROUSE of the Lorillard Research
Center, Goldsboro, NC. (Coauthors were two scientists at R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Co.)
The survey was done under "real world conditions" and used a
battery-powered monitor contained in a briefcase, Crouse said.
The findings showed that ETS exposures in offices and restaurants
were quite low.
Nicotine was the best indicator of the presence of ETS. Re-
spirable suspended particle matter (RSP) isn't an appropriate
marker for ETS. Offices and restaurants are different environ-
mental categories with respect to RSP, but not for nicotine.
Smoking behavior of patrons in the different restaurants surveyed
was similar.
Repace criticized the report, saying the smoker density in
restaurants wasn't described and, therefore, it was difficult to
interpret the data. He also criticized Crouse's use of cigarette

6.
equivalent data from the measurements. Further, while ETS expo-
sure of nonsmokers in restaurants and offices may be low, the
health risk still exists. He said Crouse had failed to prove that
RSP was not a good marker for ETS.
Haley commented that monitors used in such studies should be
placed in the breathing zone of the subjects. Also, it would be
helpful to know how many smokers and nonsmokers were present at
the sites where measurements were taken.
7. Particle phase nicotine, not gas phase nicotine, may be a
suitable tracer for many indoor ETS components, said DELBERT
EATOUGH of Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, in a paper on
methods for assessing exposure to ETS. Carbon monoxide and nitro-
gen oxides are unsatisfactory tracers.
He said "unique, conservative" tracers for particulate phase
ETS seem to be 3-ethenylpyridine, particle phase nicotine and
solanesol. The first-named compound is easily measured indoors
where smoking is present, he said, but few data are currently
available. RSP and particulate mutagens may be suitable tracers
of ETS in some, but not all, indoor environments.
Eatough said he expected a report to be published soon that
isoprene might be a good marker for the particulate phase of ETS.
8. In a review of the formation and general characteristics of
ETS, MICHAEL GUERIN of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge,
TN, said little research has been done on the chemical and physi-
cal dynamics of ETS. However, much has been done on sidestream
and mainstream smoke.
Not much really is known about the general characteristics of
ETS, he said, adding that most work in this area has dealt with
epidemiological aspects.
There's evidence sugesting that sidestream smoke has virtually
the same chemical makeup as mainstream smoke and that ETS is
chemically stable, i.e., it does not undergo any major transfor-
mation. However, some recent work indicates otherwise, Guerin
said.
9. Sterling, of Burnaby, reviewed his studies of contaminants
in "regular," not "sick," buildings, saying he used methods that j~
people can handle without difficulty. Q
He stressed ventilation factors, especially in regard to smok- ~
ing rooms or areas in office buildings. Air from such rooms often
is circulated into nonsmoking areas, he said. ~
His studies of four buildings -- three modern, sealed struc-
tures with mechanical ventilation, the other an older building ~
with natural ventilation -- have led him to conclude that air

7.
circulation is the most important factor in complaints about ETS.
RSP was found to be substantially higher in smoking areas and
its presence in nonsmoking areas depended on air circulation pat-
terns.
Repace criticized several aspects of the paper, including the
fact that there was no information about the number of smokers
involved. Sterling replied that the thrust of the work was about
circulation and recirculation of air and the effect on ETS.
10. HARRIET AMMAN of the EPA, discussing health effects from
unvented kerosene heaters, said there are unpublished data on mu-
tagenic particles being emitted by such heaters. These particles
have carcinogenic potential, she added.
About 17 million kerosene heaters have been sold in the U.S.;
some 6 million are believed to be in use at present, mostly in
the South and Northeast. About 35-40% of the heaters are found in
mobile homes; another 15-20% in apartments.
The.heaters emit sulfuric acid, ammonium sulfate, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, etc. Their use has been
associated with reduced mucociliary clearance, pulmonary cell
changes indicative of chronic bronchitis and pulmonary disease,
decreased pulmonary function, and other pulmonary symptoms.
11. Also on the program was MATTHEW JACOBS of Covington and
Burling, Washington, DC, legal counsel to the Tobacco Institute.
Among the subjects he covered were: court cases aimed at banning
smoking in workplaces; legislation to restrict smoking in public
and private worksites; constitutional aspects of antismoking leg-
islation, etc.
-END-
