Philip Morris
Doll and Peto Study
Fields
- Author
- Newman, F.S.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- Site
- N28
- Recipient (Organization)
- PM, Philip Morris
- Named Person
- Dacko, P.
- Doll, R.
- Peto, R.
- Doll, R.
- Recipient
- Cullman, H.
- Document File
- 2025030516/2025030772/Doll & Hill
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- PM, Philip Morris
- Named Organization
- Journal of the Natl Cancer Inst
- Wa Post
- Master ID
- 2025030542/0660
Related Documents: - Date Loaded
- 14 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- yqk87e00
Document Images
PHILIP <<ORR'6S INCORPORATED
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
100 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
To: Mr. H. Cullman
From: ~ F. S. Newman
Subject: Doll and' Peto Study
Date: August 18, 1981
This is further to your recent inquiry about the study by
Sir Richard Doll and Richard Peto noted in The Washington
Post editorial youirecently sent me.
Pat Dacko has a copy of the study in the files she maintains.
The study, The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of
Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today, was
published in the Journal of the National Cancer Tnstitute
issue of June, 1981.
The study reviews the literature regarding avoidability of
cancer. The hypothesis of the study is that cancer may be
largely avoidable but that there is little evidence as to
the ways of avoiding today's cancers. However, cigarette
smoking is regarded as a "well recognized~hazard" and is
characterized as "the only cause whose effects are both
largely and reliably known." The mortality rates used are
epidemiological estimates. There does not appear to be any
new finding relating to tobacco.
Among the study's conclusions is that diet may be shown to be
a:factor in determining the occurrence of a high proportion of
stomach and'bowel cancer, and other cancers to a lesser degree,
and that it may be possible to reduce cancers by dietary control.
However, the authors conclude that there is little reliable
evidence at this point.
FSN/hm
