Philip Morris
Smoking: Social Unacceptability Issue
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT
- Site
- N28
- Characteristic
- CONF, CONFIDENTIAL
- PARE, PARENT
- Document File
- 2025025270/2025025532/Operation Berkshire (Icosi)
- Master ID
- 2025025444/5507
- 2025025445-5451 Suggested Material for Doll Interview
- 2025025452 Breathing Fire Over Fags
- 2025025453 Smoking, Pill Deadly Duo, Says Doctor
- 2025025454 Tar Cut Curbs Cancer
- 2025025454A Warning to Mothers - to - Be Smoking Is A Baby Hazard
- 2025025455 Most Approve Sports Sponsors
- 2025025456 Smoking and Your Sport
- 2025025457-5460 Hot Springs Papers on the Social Unacceptability Issue.
- 2025025461-5480 A Review of and Recommendations on Passive Smoking and Social Acceptability of Smoking
- 2025025482A on Smoking-Ban Laws
- 2025025483 Non-Smokers Battle for Air
- 2025025484 Cigaret Feud Lights Up Here
- 2025025485 'illegal' Smokers Jailed
- 2025025495 Public Smoking Ban 'hazard to Economy'
- 2025025496 Spokesman Tells Tobacco Institute Stand
- 2025025497
- 2025025498 Lung Assn. Hits Tobacco Unit's Claim
- 2025025499 Doctors Tobacco Official Differ on Cigarette Danger
- 2025025500 Cigarets Harmful? 2 Sides Defend Views
- 2025025501 Smoking in Dome Ruling 'blow' for 'freedom'
- 2025025502 Smoketiquette. It Makes Smoking More Pleasant for Everyone.
- 2025025503
- 2025025504-5505 Smoker or Nonsmoker?
- 2025025506-5507 the Social Unacceptability Issue
Related Documents:
Document Images
ISSUF
At tbc: C})a:irmar' s Conference in IIot Spri.nggs, tTa: ; there was un~.n;i-
rnous cti.grcc:nn"el;t tatclt; tizc~ social unac:ccptal)ility issue constitutes "a more
scri:ous threat to the Inclustry's future e than any othe,:° aspect of the attack on
sanokinb. "
Reports showecl that the issue has bee): gaining in strengtfi,, particularly
ovez' the l),-.1stthrce years,, and pres erztly shows no signs of abating. L:-I i'act,,
recer:t developments indicate vri:despz~ead~ and broadening support for seoreg4ting
sl-nolcers in (]csignateoi public t,l3ces;. The intensity of activity in this respect
grcat'cr in 1975 thsc, in thc,
among C3. S. strAte Icbi''Clal ires was about four tiaactis
hrcvir.tts yeal, resul.,ti.n~ in 22 bi7ils restricting smoking in nulli-ic Placoys
enZctea iT-Ao 12w.
Many nat::o17aI oi'-anlZa.tions which previously had taken aL'tl-s1Y)oi:i:;g pJ-
sltio.i7' S'olelV on thi' i);.L5is ol. +1ea1{.i] consequences to smokers have no:i found in
socirt7.' unne rcrl t.~T~i'';ity issue a new form of attack which (a) acti.-vely enL.sts tE7e
the
_ c.
support oC (b) givcs some Lct;islators a pe: ceived cause for
slaondirln to thcil rr:;r -smo)cilng col:: ti.tuen_ts- by sponsorint; or si:ppc,rtin~ )'t-sl ric-
tiv0 IS3I1:,(C) Ll1GtLlseF: t'UAt C:r31TSplL?:f::i of Sn1GJ:ers', and (d)'ptlus the Zill)iisti'a
ctt1Ci
zt ; ci~;I~l.cr~ < c s, ,u . ti,clr on the dc[ensite.
T{1:? )'C.F,!l1'. ~. ,.: ~~
.,. !%lt t.{f:.` {.'[`Il([)I:!U7)ilil 1ri(1~11/{f Fl:i',~~r12a77::11t 1f.,..lllct
2oz~ozs481

-2._
been joincci 1.5Y a pote;nt hsyctiologic:al and behavioral insinuation. First, the
smokcr was tolcl' that lie was harming his own health; then the government was
pcrsuaded that sx»ol:ins is a sufficient public i-~ealthi hazarel; to require rernedial
action. Now, the s]7rokerr is being depicted, as an i.nconsiderate, annoying, self-
ish person who is
liarming not only his own health but also that of the non-smoker;
thus, re strictive measures are" tieing proposed and; enacted' to protect the non-
smoker frorn smokers in public places.
Typical examp'_es of the non-smoker responses are the following exhibits:
C?il siaitakinn-ban Ia«-s
After rearlinr: the recent storv, "Smoking ban
in puhlic pla ccs eriticizcd,° rclat.ing the rcmarY.s
of hfrs. Ann 13rosdcr as a represcntative of the
Tobacco Insiitute, Iicoulcl!hardly fcel impressed:
Though a tmn-n:nker. I maLc a point nfwnrler-
standin{; the icet.+.':>;s of thc "othcr sic:c."'I3:d.' hcr
reasons riven in opnnsition to the ne:v la+vs that
prohilrit sir.rr6in[ in mamr areas arounrl the coun-
try are too weak to Fikc much considcratinn.
Contrary to xvha:t \trs. I;ro.ccier thinks, 12n's
against ealin~~ gariic, mnnchir-_ nninns, wearing
strong prrfurnc, or husnmin;t a, favnrite snnF in
lxulilic can hardly hr ertuatccl xvitii smoking.
1'htrc arc comc n; aious diffcrenccs.
She states that the Tobacco Institute takes the
position that s:nnking "may he hazanlnus tn
health." Are the hundreds of stiulics ennctur.trd
by public an(U private organizations testinG the
cffccts of cigarette smnice on those who inhale it
of no cvidhnce? These studics are more con-
clnsitic than the inctfitute sccm:s willing tcaiaccrpt.
1'Inw clr,cs the institute support its slzncli in con-
tradiction to Ihe stat'cn;cnt isvuccl h?. the sur>;c.nn,
t;cncral that "cigarette smoking IS ciangerous to
]ic.itfi?"
If smokers are now bcgirnnili>; to fcelllike sec-
ond-class citSzcns, maybe Ihcv are unclerstandina
what nonsnrol:crs hace felt for t;ir last se.eral
decades. It tvill bre intrrestin; to sce the netir laws
that may co;rtinuc t'n cmcrcc dospile the cl3iin
that they arc "nucnforr.calilc." The sucross nf
Ihese lwws may hetp deciifc if they are "unreason,
ablc."
ANNrTTE 't'tlC:1:T:P
2929 Montavesta P.cl., Lcxington, Ky.
LOU ISV ILLi
COU]1IEl.-JOURNAL
JUN'L 23, 1976

-2._
been joincci 1.5Y a pote;nt hsyctiologic:al and behavioral insinuation. First, the
smokcr was tolcl' that lie was harming his own health; then the government was
pcrsuaded that sx»ol:ins is a sufficient public i-~ealthi hazarel; to require rernedial
action. Now, the s]7rokerr is being depicted, as an i.nconsiderate, annoying, self-
ish person who is
liarming not only his own health but also that of the non-smoker;
thus, re strictive measures are" tieing proposed and; enacted' to protect the non-
smoker frorn smokers in public places.
Typical examp'_es of the non-smoker responses are the following exhibits:
C?il siaitakinn-ban Ia«-s
After rearlinr: the recent storv, "Smoking ban
in puhlic pla ccs eriticizcd,° rclat.ing the rcmarY.s
of hfrs. Ann 13rosdcr as a represcntative of the
Tobacco Insiitute, Iicoulcl!hardly fcel impressed:
Though a tmn-n:nker. I maLc a point nfwnrler-
standin{; the icet.+.':>;s of thc "othcr sic:c."'I3:d.' hcr
reasons riven in opnnsition to the ne:v la+vs that
prohilrit sir.rr6in[ in mamr areas arounrl the coun-
try are too weak to Fikc much considcratinn.
Contrary to xvha:t \trs. I;ro.ccier thinks, 12n's
against ealin~~ gariic, mnnchir-_ nninns, wearing
strong prrfurnc, or husnmin;t a, favnrite snnF in
lxulilic can hardly hr ertuatccl xvitii smoking.
1'htrc arc comc n; aious diffcrenccs.
She states that the Tobacco Institute takes the
position that s:nnking "may he hazanlnus tn
health." Are the hundreds of stiulics ennctur.trd
by public an(U private organizations testinG the
cffccts of cigarette smnice on those who inhale it
of no cvidhnce? These studics are more con-
clnsitic than the inctfitute sccm:s willing tcaiaccrpt.
1'Inw clr,cs the institute support its slzncli in con-
tradiction to Ihe stat'cn;cnt isvuccl h?. the sur>;c.nn,
t;cncral that "cigarette smoking IS ciangerous to
]ic.itfi?"
If smokers are now bcgirnnili>; to fcelllike sec-
ond-class citSzcns, maybe Ihcv are unclerstandina
what nonsnrol:crs hace felt for t;ir last se.eral
decades. It tvill bre intrrestin; to sce the netir laws
that may co;rtinuc t'n cmcrcc dospile the cl3iin
that they arc "nucnforr.calilc." The sucross nf
Ihese lwws may hetp deciifc if they are "unreason,
ablc."
ANNrTTE 't'tlC:1:T:P
2929 Montavesta P.cl., Lcxington, Ky.
LOU ISV ILLi
COU]1IEl.-JOURNAL
JUN'L 23, 1976

. V.~).~..
$txCRAlttEN7o; CALIf.
l3EE
D: 166,621 -- S. (9t1,Q::4
sr,CCAVdId1O 6'tiV-OPOtISI,rl rwea
L:..: W 1375
0SHSj3 Defers Decision
I\JonStyjoker's Baffle ~ ~~ ~A~~f
I3yROF:ALD
. I3LlOP3UGIi
13ce 9tnlf tVriter
and a d~iy in a smolcy posnrc tn smo*,:rrs. leungcs would
rec, ::. e
conference room 'nzust be "The nonsmol:cr in a spncc valued at $`.::,O~:09 a
fnlloncd'by a day in bcd. smnkcfillcci atrioshhcre yc,ar. Ifr saicl' it
Gld' f d
° d
l
utcrs tn o rcpcato ts cr.pn.,c to subsMnces cost tile sl.cte Smo mtihr,n
/t band of inlensc tmn-
-smol:crs slu;,gccf'it out frJr battles witli supcrvisors tliat can Cause acute a ycar in lost
t'itne for
t
l
f
fivc hours ticstrrday with
rcpresearta t il~es of
California Luvincss ovcr.r
e:hcther tl:cy ha e a ri0d
to smol.cfrcc air atkork.
After Kcaring the
testirnony, the Oc-
cupntionaf! Safcty ancl
I lcolth St;mc',irds 13nnrcl
deferred a dccision uutil
n'ext n:ontli- Put !:cvcral
bo:'ird r,tanl,crs indicated
dnuhts r:h^,:t rt pro,7osecd
tcgulatiqn cccluirirtg a!1
and"di:aress and cari the smo!:in, lounpes and,
aggrawa,tc existing takingsmokcbr.cal:s; c'iscascs and have the
pnt cn 1 ia1[o causc c hron i C AI I'.ibra of the
ctiscasc including can- CaliforniaManufacturert
cer," said Dr. Elfricrlc Association said the
hasal, chief of the
cicpartmcnt's canccr
control section.
P.ut rep:esentatives of
Ctn, loyr,rs warned that
thc prrlpnscd regulation is
noU «'m kahli: anci ttiould
l;
o
te r
crnploy,crcin protcctr.pn- s,i)nkers. 'I''ric burdcn of t'c proliibi['t `cly ex-
sntnl:c_rs fnn~~ ha~in^ to l,to,i sccns [o I:c oa lhc pcnsi~ c.. I.cndo.f ~:ilncss
inlialttob:rcco;umcse non~,~mokrr to snmcho.v `'monf; t~he cmltlhyers -
~~ prmc tliit smol:ing is t':;is Greg , Lijrscomb
AJthourlt the lcnr.h ~ I+ ~riiif_tl. Let's put tile ci~t~ut)~ dircctnr of thc
hcaring ~:as c.nnductod , State llcpii tmc.nt of
~~ith pr~lilrness between turc.ca of proof on tile Gcn^rat Services. f'de saicl
tttehvosiclts,it~~acclhar sr1incers." that the State of
I~rop!ised rei:ulalion is nr't
u: ithin the cnnccpl of' the
nccupa tion;tl safetx act:
liic said' it would l.ot be
cnforccabl'~c_ Ciydc
If~uGchinsnn, a San
1=rancisc~F attorney
representing t'iir hotcl
and mntct industr-y, ^.ccid
recquircnicnts for non~
smokim; areas .couldn't
work in his inclustry.,
"Idow do %~c protect the
non smnkinr cock'tail
w:1tlress frncn thc p:itron
who smokes?" he asked.
that feelings over the ilt~re u~orc cc~ernf Ca.i'iliornia has ap- Board chairman A. 1V.
issue ran clcen. A suc- r cp:csent:ttil~cs of lhe prnxim;ttoly J7,pD0 cnt- 'Ptn~nor, ~cL nn
saiif he is a
ccssinn of nonsrnol:cre Statc Dchartmcnt of [,loyrs ~cho nre smnkor. n3n-smolcrr, saicf'e
t9tc
rose to tcll nf,1i~:~rs clxnt lIcn{thI u~hi~°h prnhnsr-'snn~c 35 par c.^nt of thc p;npnsal
h::s scriocrs
nt tc~nrl: rnoms. thc rcf ulnlinn. slto s:dd'& statc work furee. Ilc s,i.f l,rolbfcros. lie said
tlto -
of bunnin,^, cYcs, of pain~-ci tI'~c cvitlcncc i s clcnr thnt it wt~ulcf cost the ~d'atte board
cnulkt only ndopt
brc;ithinf;. Sct'cnal s:iid' tuo:i sniniccrs suff'cr hoth S&9f.000i in alteration slandards
"trhic:r nrc
that ci~;:rrettc srnnkc l.tty,sic.-rl h.nrrn nnd cnstti to prnpare lount;cs rcason4nbdc and Cn-
I'craJly makes ihem sic~: ctiscomfort froni cx- for tlic smoi:crs nnd the furecabic,"
ancf fc
lo;a crr.ptoycs. s) mp-oms o
tnrtl,ttton pcrsons t mnt~ to ana fnot t
Icatfin,r, tatsarnin_Ss that
the person coi;iplaininf;
rtl,r.ut tl;c srncl:c %sas in
jrt+p arcly of lbsing his or
hcrjab:
"1lre xsorry about not,
ta!ainfi away the rif;hts of
lhe smoiccrs," said Paul
?,r.,xcclay of S;in Franc cisco, a n attorncv
rci;rescnti'r,,^, GhSI'
(Grotlh F\Eai11St. Cnlo':ing
1't>llulinn), "Wii; t a1)otttt
i
hts
f thc non-
tl

i
,.~.
~
i
11
In smoke of baf~~~~
~
1
~ ,~C~'~~~~~~r~
By Ronald l:otulak
Scicnco cddor
71f3; GRGIt'dP:G rt:ml,crs of pcrsons
who use lr:tr(n!,;c fans to blo^i ci~,eret
.smol:o 3aao1: into the faces of srnol:crs
2nd poar v:.,tcr into ash t.mys arr (?et-
g tiny under tl,c sl:in of the lofsncc;o indusr
t s';.
Tlrcy catne to town il:c~da_, ard
c:11Gd a lucss conference in t11c Hyatt
lt^.; cr.cy )4otcl Chica,r,o to co:::f~lain that
tmol:ors are N.,co;ning incrensinf;l} ha:-
rWsc-cl by nonm:aokcrs, and they want it .
to stop.
Anne P.rowdcr, reprcs^_ntin , the 'Po-
hzcco Ins!itutc, )nc., Washington. said
srnoOkcrs are hcir.g made tn feel lil:e
sccrnd<clss citiz^ns, Pcrsocutnd t*v, such
la,rs as Ciiicaf;o's rcc.entlv stiiicncd i3cn-
r:llc aGainst snioking in sosne puhlic
placcs.
7f1IiCf,, T'.1\D of 1-ocs. mLiclr arc on
the incrc: sc, arc 2n iufniii-.cmcnt on.
Fmnkcrs"rilililc, ]31owdcr Faidi Tl:cy arce
.
tr.'inc, madc r'n "self-riFhtccus people
tnir.g to impose their will en others,"
she s:dd. . '
]3ut the roc+f fell in uhcit ]3row~dcr
claunl-& Iia,L tt:c evidence lin::inf: ciPa-
rc: snrokinf: to lu: 1; c, nccr, h,^nrt rlis-
cas_, and othcr ailiacnts : rcr "nLtra-
Gt~~us and mcdi;ally tmsulrstn:ftinicd."
lier chnrrc infuriilcd Dr. 1'trtran, 14.
Cnrmnn', n:cdi°aL director of tlie Chica-
ro l.cn,^, AcFoci:,linn. Thc ltrnq :nsocii-
fionharf c:rllbd a rress co:,far^ncc of i/s
oum dn.tin t::c hiil from tl:c '1:ut,;rcco
Lmt,:6u!c ccnfrrcncc for thc c\, rc~.c parr-
j"c or rcfutin tc"aacco i:zdaSlrv cl:runr.
"11~c'rc not f.rine to let people s°ffinr,
ci::ccr cnrr.c to C:uc:rpp and pct
tcil't it_" fumc,l Carnmr, .%rha i:c chitt'vf
eccupatinnal' aatf cnrirr,nrncntol nrrdr,
cinr M thc Vhircrsity of 11!inois Schuol
of Public Jlealth.
'7JLt;T Attl; E1:\1:1\G afl sorls ul
F
irrccf,onsi!rle retnarhs," lie s:rid. "Thcre
is not n word of truth in tisJral tlmy
sav"
13rnicilcr :it:kcd «hy is it that only two:
per ccnt of hcavy m;rokcr:t I:ct li:r
r
c:rnccr.':'1!iicre ^rc othc: fnclors: such as
pcnrtic: and al;c tlrat lrtav a role, sha
~nd cif-:rrcls tn:py or rnay ' nnt~ bc
iinillic:rlcd. Ap, raxino:llr!y Gf1 tniltion
Amcrici n . ~mukc er;::rrct::.
"'1'Itc evidence rcl:rtin}; cirarcl snrok-
I
inf; to canccr of Lho lunF; ar.rl many
othcr disrascs such as cmpi:VScma and
c:xonic bronchitis is hcttcr docurncntcd
th.m an. othcr fact in thc histury of
mc<licinc," ca;d C:Irna\C.
.only, cip:rPvt snnolicrc gcl sqiiamous
ccll lunf; canccr, and Ihare are 9Q;041
dciths from this tualif;nancy cactt
tcar," hc said. There liiva hcsn nrorc
th:rn 7.nAI t.tudres in ?2 caun:rr.cs linkiny
cif;;rrcts to Jung cancor; he said.

.~r. t l--
Uozens of Cluc:iec):tnS haVL h:ttC (0
spcncl ;t nif:ht in jail'hcc:ruNc thc:y wcrc
ttntthle to f?sst tile S?5 1;ond aftcr hut;_
arrested f'Or ;tlle,,cdl,v smof:in<.: on a
ChiCaLu I r:insit i\tithoriry tt;tirrur htos
That',`s flic estimtttc uf ohurr:crs tvltu
l:cch close w,ttch on 13r;nch 9_s of tile
Circuit Court of Coc1l; Cntinty, dlihhctf
Smof:er:ti' COurt" sincc Chi~.ruct ti
strict anti-sinofcln_; law '.~cnt intu cRcc:t
l;tst vcar.
More lh:ui X'.1(4 l;cop1c wcrc con-
victcd in 1975 in Smolccrs' Court of
this ol!'cnw. ctccutclin,, to ;utiroiccsnian
for thc Chic:rco Ilicc: 'I hu~c 'Wl;n
Coultf f)Otib l'Mnd ~till!ulti n Iiavl to
scv¢r.r) Itorn-s ii1 cu',tntl)' K'fi0rC frc'Ci:rl
tile red t::{-,c ,urrotirn.lint-, ttici, arrests.
Fines fur t16u,~e cortviclccl raa,_c fioni
S50 to Sa)Il: 13tit.fui!4:c l=rancii+ Ii,iv.Dh,
who until vcry recently ran this cotrrt,
(ielicvcs thosc: %.:hu spcnt' the ni<.~'at in
jail have paid their c1cht 10 wcicty~' :utol
therefore hc doesn't tinc them.:mCCOrc1'-
iag to .1n intcmicvu in oLc Ciiic:q"o
Tr-ilntrne.
I3arth rrftr*:ctl to Ctlf; til0ut the courtI
with. 1h TiOhaceo (Y)u.r.cr hec:!u,~c
he is no lomner a~si,:nrcl to it. I Ie al,u
rcfusctl to vcri:~~ any st,ttititical: infor
nc:ttion, rcl'crring that yttcsticin to Cook
Cou;;t<<'s Cllrk of Circurl Cc~urt.
I'eter Deuel', a st3okcsmanr for the
clc:rk, tistid the volutac is so heavy
thruu0h timcrkcrr,' Court, ancl tile city*s
27 other specialty clivisions, that no
statistics are stv,tiialbla.
"As a ma!iter of fact, givirg,the
smokers a special courtroom is far
too good for them. Any poiic^ offi-
cer should be etnpowered to shoot
on sight any person ohscrved
smoking in luuNic."
(3ob~Grcene
Chicago Sun-Tim.es Cofumnrst
"Call hitck in about a year whcn the
new conrputcr is wa:trkine:" ltc 4::itf:
f3,u tfi, in ;tn intcrvicw with C~ic;t tt
Daily iews. saicl hc is aclarncrW r'wut
stia)t>!nq pcohle, from. ;rnwng t:ther
thinLs, lit,lhlintt up hcfare g.ettim, out-
Sic!e a hus or train just bccauLc it'ss
wiitt!'y outside.
1'Jomcn have also spent tile nillh( irt
jaill because they didn't have bon:.t'..
ChiQT1o s0urccs say.:
The Tobacco Uh;erver traced the
casc of one man n-h:) clainicJ to hat c~
lost his job because hL had', a: "rccorc!"
"
after his smol:ine ;trrc.t.
Tfie cmployer %sottld not con:rncnt.
While Chicawcs's h;trassmcnt of
smoltcrs conrinucs. albeit at a slow.cr
lnacc this ye,tr bccause of puhliciv_y
aLcnut the :rrre,ts. New York ahr:,,a:cn ;Y
ilati given ul),
'Fhatl city in 1i97-1 itassecl' an cr:t.c:,-
sivc no-smukiiig st,t:utc covcring.,trra-
frOm lcclurc halix to u[)eta !iut!"cs t;:~
sttpcrm:trkets.
Ahout, 206 tickets htr: e becn, i:r-
succl. With finr, r:tnr_,itig from k5 t.i
SSU: Snaokers in clcv:rtor.. hcmc.rr-
fttcc a ftnc 0,1111,10 S, 1.000 ancl one
in jaiL
l3ut health cleharttncnt oliicials rttim:~
to The Observer t h,tt t hC}. n0IN have nt
rrnoney fcat' tianitariitns to prowl to nat .
illegal smokers.
1

for Positi.vc llction
In the U. S. we have been making efforts (1) to monitor local, state,
an<ll national act'ivitics relating to the social unaccehtalbility issue, and (2) to
conduct lc-islati,rc ].oLbying activities and relations pirograms as countcAvailing
zalecisures.
These efforts are primarily nuade through The Tobacco Institute, an
industry organization comprised of 11 companies that manufacture and market
tobacco products. Founded in 1958, The Institute is located in Washington,
D. C. , and cum-rently has a staff of approximately 35 personnel and secretaries.
There are, in addition to the president, 12 senior vice-presidents for govern-
ment relations, communications, state activities, and; adniinistration. Although
this staff is considered'rattier small in comparison~ with other organizations
representing comparable industries on the Washington scene, it does have the
back-up assistance of outside consultants, member company attorneys and'public
relations heads, retained lobbyists, state trade associations, et~c.
The ori;inal mission of The Institute is indicated by the following sectioas
of its charter:
1. To proniote a better understanding by the public of the tobacco
industry and its place in the national economy;
2. To cooperate with governmental agencies and puhlic officials tj 1 .
with reference to the tobacco industry;
O
~
3. To collect and disseminate inform:ztion, relating to it'le use of ~
tobacco
; .
~
.~
~

V ._
I
4. To collect and cli.s,crninatc scientific and mcc:i6.c<al n-iaUerial
relatinl; to tobacco;
5. To collcct and dissen)irratc infcirn)ation relatina to tile tohacco
industry publistied or rcleasecl by any t;overnrr-lent4zli agency,
federal or state, or derived from other sources independent
of the industry; '
6. To collect' and disseminate i.nf.orniation relating to legislative
and adininistrative cleveloprnents, federal or state, affecting
the tobacco industry;
7. To pre omote public good! will.
PIZOVjD3ED, ;lOWl;VLTi, that the Corporation shall have no power to
participate in anJ, activity or give consideration to any matter re-
lating to, the managenzent or control of any of its rner_ibers or to the
operations by any of its iizembers of their respective businesses, in-
cludi.ng, without limitation, matters relating to the purchase, manu-
facture, tr anspor. tation, advert'ising, pricing or marketing of tobacco
or tobacco products.
mechani:;;in which, in many instances, made it tile spokesnian for the lncitustry;
and, in addition, it became the industry's principal means for trying to influ-
Obviously, with the advent of the Surgeon; General's Report in Jsnuaiy-
1J6':sl,, Tine l'nsti:tute was called upon~ to represent tile Indust'ry.'s interests beyond
tile collc,ction and diisscniinationi of information. It had' to develop a responsive
lobbying organization concerned! with actions in state legi:aatures tliat relate to
ence or thwart legislative activities involving tobacco. This latter responsi'-
bility Tlie institute a prt ominent role in the Congressional I:e::rinf;s in tl:e
late 1960's anci early 1970's, and has been considerably extended to provide a
tohacc:'o taxation and snioking regulations.
Reference was made earlier to the fact that' 22 bills restricting sinokinL
t'

in i-,tih].ic: j;1accs had been enact'ed' into law hy statc let;i'slatures in 1075. L1cUu-
ally, thcre N,,crc 1G7 other similar bills that were introduced but not enacted.
W'hilc it i%,ould hc difficult and perhaps too optiinisti.c to credit The Institute
with the defeat of those unenacted bills, we can rjcver. thcl.Qss conchide that its
infl.uencc was evident.
The reason is that The Institute's State Activities Divisioni has an active
progranl, of state legislative lobbying activities and monitoring services. A
st'afff of four full-time rcprescntatives have multi-state responsibilities and main-
tains close liaison with, the state chapters of. the National Association of Tobacco
Distributors, i;,hich also have lobbying efforts.
In addition, The Institute retains over 30 attorneys in the various states
who adw-ise on legislative trcnd's and, when required, - actually lobby in the Iiidus-
t'ry''s behalf. When suits by anti-smo}cint; parties: are instituted, The Institute
engages oi° is aparty to defense counsel. Two recent such cases (in Pontiac,
IARichit;an, anel' NewOr3:cans, Louisiana): were successful'ly defended against ef-
forts to ban smoking in enclosed sporting arenas.
Thus, we have an organized system for alerting the U. S. Industry to pro-
posal's to restrict sinol:inf; and for taking an aggressive role in opposingsuch
actiorls 1)}- state leUisl~:tions and in the courts. Jt i:; our opinion, however, that
,morc einPhasis mLi::,t be placed on thi.s particular role of The Institute. Even if
9 L`ills out of 101 arc defeated, the one that becomes law and restricts certain
public tiinokin;; is one too Many.. It t;encrally receives a great deal of pubIici}y

al"ttt :;tl'6rtl";tl)cns: i13tt,-s1I7o}cJ-Illf~ CnCOULCt( J':"i~;, llOn-~4ICtQli(:r rebCll!'Otl
and' further assaults the rit;1-,ts~ and coz,science of tilc smol.cr. With the rno,tnt-
ing campaii;n t'o lliakc: smo):inr; unaccept:ahlc in public places, through non--
smoJ;er sealtinnent auld smoherr guilt, the industry will have to marshal alli its
resources. ,SurcLy, legislative activiltics need to lbe pursued and, in~appropriate
cases, 7iti.gation, proceedings instituted in order to assert and protect toba.cco
,inter(:stis. (See L ::hiUit I as e.nc.Nalnple of represent.t tion of the Indus'?.'y on the
local level. )
Inch.stry Emissaries
A novel and son;elvhzt courageous move-was made by The I.nstitute iast
year in an attempt to bring Industry advocacy to the local level. Previously,
certain etiecutives of The Institute had been conducting an occasional ro:)c3shczev,
comral~ face to fr~ce with local and regional news nned'ia a.a representatives in brief-
ing meetinggs. . The ri~sults -%rere sorne.: hat pro>,nisint;. The qualification is
necessary, because while son-ie favorable publicity appeared there was never-
tllc]le:;s so:ne hii;l,?y r:ritical rebuttals froi-nanti-snnohing forces; in many cases,
the latter publicity overshadowed the former.
ITowever, it was evident that the media would listen to Industry shoxces-
rncil and often report objcc:tively about the "otller side of tlie smoha:n~ and hcalth
controversy. " L:rlcourzged ilrat an organized of full-time spoke: rTlen could
accorrVTr1i5h illoirc than the occa:;iclnal rozad:;l/ow bricfinl.; y, '1'Irc: lnsti.t'uto em1;1oycd~
at~~-.
