Philip Morris
Topic: Knowledge, Lung Cancer
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT
- Master ID
- 2025010486/0498
Related Documents:
Document Images
Paze 9
SE 7'57
Topic: F:nowledze, Lun, Cancer
Title: Sr'cking and Health: Sicr.i°icance of the Rep---r` of
the S.:_ceor. Genera?'s Cor._.ittee to Philip N.c_ris Ircorp:.r_tc-1
A:.th^- k:.keha:-., H.
I
Recioier.t: Cull!man, H. and others
Pate: Februar, 18, 1964
Docu*'e-: Location: Internal Report 5f-
Co-,e^_s and Quotes:
This doc.::-.ent responds dire__iy the e es:io- "K!:a:
did you do in respo nse to reports that cig,_e.te s-.c}:in_
'caused' l;:ne cancer and other health probl'.e:-:s:" ^:F e-=irc
docu.nent should be read carefully, b:~t the flavor of it carn
be discerned fror the follokinc quotes.
The hcpe3-for result of these [re.:or-en--ced
researct.; efforts will be cicaret=es with
distincuishinc new prodict properties which
are biolocically approved on all r.:aj: health
a_es_ions. S.:z.`h p:o3c_s sho-.:ld be a--,ertise:
vioorously on the basis of studies so con-4.:cte--.
HeaLth impact wil I s,-:-ely be an ir.,p rtar.t ,
perhaps the most irpor_ant, basis for co--
pe:iltion in the ind.atry in the next few
years.
A special area of scientific activity
receininoa growing atte ntion in the recent
past and accorded emphasis in the report is
that of p~:lrtonary clea nsing rec}:anisc.s,
particularly cilia function. This to:?ether
with respiratory effects of s:rokine ir.
general, is due for increased scie nti`ic
inquiry in the future.
is

[Recommendation to management] Adopt as
internal policy for technical purposes
the view that greater benefit will accrue
from accepting the report's findings on
face value and proceeding to the cure of
ills, real and alleged as they may be,
than from the engaging indisputation and
refutation of these claims.
[Recommendation to management] Move
promptly and~effectively toward establish-
ment of suitable biological approval
specifications for all new smoking
products. . . . Apart from possible legal
requirements, such a polciy would enhance
ad'vertising opportunities.
[Recommendation to management] Provide a
substantive basis for vigorous health
advertising by publicati~on of suitable
articles in the technical literature.
Consideration~of the report's findings has
resulted in the following influences on
the Research Center program, to be acted
on promptly:
1. A broad review of bioassay
techniques . . will be undertaken
to define optimum criteria for use
in physiological studies, both
at the Center and elsewhere.
These criteria will include
specifically a quick test for
chemical carcinogenicity and best
measures of pulmonary cleansing
effectiveness . . . .
4. Present programs studying
gas phase adsorption and tar
fraction:carcinogenicity will be
emphasized~, to improve competitive
posture in these technical areas.
t
01

The value of filters is undersold in the
report and is the industry's best extant
answer to its problem. The Tobacco
Institute obviously should foster the
communication of the filter message by
all effective means. [Goes on to
specify recommendations of research to
be sponsored by TIRC.]
If it is true that the onus of proof in
the Smoking and Health issue has shifted
to the tobacco industry, then the industry
must come forward with evidence to show
that its products, present and prospective,
are not harmful. . . The industry should~
aband'on its past reticence with respect to
medical research. Indeed, failure to do
such research could give rise to negligence
charges. Further, it is not enough to
sponsor the work of third parties ....
Individual companies must also do their
own research if they expect to develop
proprietary positions for the health
competition.
I
N
0
N
~
0
N
0
~
~
ao
