Philip Morris
Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
Fields
- Area
- KEANE,DENISE/OFFICE
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Master ID
- 2024702259/2723
Related Documents:- 2024702259
- 2024702260
- 2024702261
- 2024702262
- 2024702263
- 2024702264
- 2024702265
- 2024702266
- 2024702267
- 2024702268
- 2024702269 44
- 2024702270-2311 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702312 51
- 2024702313 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments 930700 - 931200
- 2024702314-2343 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702344 52
- 2024702404 53
- 2024702405-2433 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702434 54
- 2024702435-2467 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702468 55
- 2024702469-2498 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702499 56
- 2024702500-2526 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702527 57
- 2024702528-2559 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702560 58
- 2024702561-2603 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702604 59
- 2024702605-2633 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702634 60
- 2024702635-2692 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- 2024702693 61
- 2024702694-2723 Report on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Document File
- 2024702258/2024702724/Reports on Recent Ets and Iaq Developments 930700 - 931200 Shook, Hardy & Bacon
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Site
- N388
- Author (Organization)
- Shb, Shook,Hardy & Bacon
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- evy24e00
Document Images
JULY23; 11993
[I17] CDC Launches New Antismoking Campaign
According to a press report, a new anti-smoking
advertising,campaign has been devised by the Centers
for Disease Control, an& Prevention, (CDC). The ads
are apparently targeted toward nonsmokers in the
workplace and were unveiled during,a June 23, 1993,
meeting of the Interagency Committee on Smoking
and Health. Intended for television and other media,
the CDC ads reportedly urge employees to tell their
bosses they want a smoke-free workplace. See Occupa-
tional Health 6' Safety News, July 9, 1993.
MEDIA COVERAGE
[18] "Invironment: The New Horizon - Indoor
Environmental Quality," Consulting Specifying
Engineer, J,une 1993
This supplement to the monthly publication took an
engineer's look at the effective construction of buildings
which address total: indoor environmental qualityin their
design. The article used the accommodation of smokers in
the workplace as a case study for developing a model.
The article included'strategies for accommodating
smokers in high-rise, mid-rise, and small office build-
ings, which included technology such as displacement
ventilation, air filtration technology, air pressure zones,
and individual smoking areas.
[ 119] "The Great American, Smokeout", CNN'
C'rossf re, July 2, 1993
Crossfire hosts Mike Kinsley and Pat Buchanan
discussed discrimination against smokers and smoking
with, guests Dave Brenton, editor of The American
Smoker's Journal, and Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of
Public Citizen's Health Research Group. The lively,
yet largely unsubstantial, debate yielded comments that
a typical nonsmoker's exposure to ETS amounts to
roughly the equivalent of one cigarette a yearand'that
airlines are in financial trouble in part because they
banned smoking on, planes.
[20] "How Secondhand Smoke Hurts Kids," R.
IsraeloffS Parents Magazine, August 1993
Citing the EPA Risk Assessment on ETS, this article
discusses the purported effects of ETS exposure on
7
young and unborn children. The alleged effects on
young children are said to include increased incident of
infections, asthma, increased'chance of SIDS and lung
cancer. The purported effects of ETS exposure to
fetuses are alleged to include low birth weight, dimin-
ished llrng function and a diminished milk volume inn
the mother.
The article goes on to offer some suggestions to lower
children's exposure to ETS. The suggestions ranged
fromquitting smoking and finding smoke-free day care
centers to joining local1ealth and advocacy organiza-
tions that fight for the rights of nonsmokers.
[211 "Anti-scent Sentiment Catching,on in Offices,"
S. Rostler, The Plain D'ealer, July 16, 1993
The author of this article discusses the issue of
fragrance bans in workplaces and compares them to
ETS bans. The ban on fragrances at public meetings in
San Francisco is mentioned, and a number of people
who are annoyed by perfumes are quotedl regarding
their coping,strategies when in the presence of heavy
scents in the workplace. A partner in a Cleveland law
firm specializing in occupationall safery and health
issues observes that there is no easy way for employers
to:enforce a ban on scents.
SCIENTIFIC/TECHNICAL ITEMS
LUNG CANCER
[22] "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung
Cancer," E.T.H. Fontham, P. Correa, P.A.
Buffler, R. Greenberg, P. Reynolds, and A. Wu-
Williams, The Cancer Bulletin 4 5(1): 92-94,
1993' [See Appendix A]',
This brief article discusses the 1991 Fontham, et al.,
study of spousal'smokingt ln addition to providing a
summary of the design and results of the study, the
authors mention potential confounders. They claim
t}iat their calculated risk estimates "persisted" after
adjustment for vegetable consumption, family history
of lung cancer, and employment in "high,-risk"' jobs:
They also indicate that they have collected some d'ata,
on radon levels, and discount radon as a potential',
confounder, as well.

8'.
CARDIOVASCULAR ISSUES.
[23] "Association of Passive Smoking with Increased
Coronary Heart Disease Risk Is Not Explained
by Elevation of Leucocyte Count," M.S. Green,.
J. Shaham, J. Green, G. Harari, and J.
Bernheim, European Journal of Public Health 3:
14-I 7, 1993 [See Appendix A]
In this study, conducted in Israel, leucocyte counts
are compared in~ smokers, nonsmokers and persons
reportedly exposed to ETS. [Leucocytes are a kind of
blood cell. Leucocyte count has been reported to be
associated with an~ increased risk of coronary heart
disease.] The authors report that reportedly ETS-
exposed persons had leucocyte counts similar to those
of nonsmokers.
RESPIRATORY DdSEASES AND CONDITIONS -
ADULTS
[24]i "Effects of Maternal Smoking and Childhood
Respiratory Illness on Pulmonary Function in
Young Adults: The CAR.DIA Study," J.E.
Dunn, S. Kellie, K. Liu, and J. Keller,,Society
for Epidemiological Research, 1993 Annual
Meeting, Keystone, Colorado, Abstract No. 306,
June 1993 [See Appendix A]
According to these authors, a comparison of current
lung function data and reports of maternallsmoking
and childhood respiratory illness before age ten suggesct
that early lung infections and maternal smoking may
"affect" adult lung,function:
[2'5]' "Passive Smoking and Evolution of Lung
Function in Young Adults. An Eight-Year
Longitudinal Study," M.S. Jaakkola, J.J.K.
Jaakkola, P. Ernst, and M.R. Becklake, American
Review ofRespiratoryDisease 147(4 Part 2):
A215, 1993 [See Appendix A]
In this abstract, the authors report on a study in~
which 117 never smokers were tested for lung function
at the start of the study and'. then again after eight
ETS/IAQ REPORT, ISSUE 52
years. ETS exposure was reportedly not associated1with
"clinically important ventilatory impairment," ass
measured by change in lung function over time.
[26] "Effets Sanitaires d'une Exposition Chronique a
la Fumee de Tabac sur une Population de Non
Fumeurs (Health Effects of Chronic Exposure to
Tobacco Smoke on a Non-Smoker Population)"
[English abstract only] ` A.M. Laurent, A. Bevan,
N. Chakroun, Y. Courtois, B. Valois, M.
Roussel, B. Festy, and S. Pretet, Rev. PneumoL
Clin. 48: 65-70, 1993 [See Appendix A]
In this study, conducted in~a prisons 14 nonsmokers
lived for one month in a cell'with three smokers. At the
end of the study, there were reportedly no differences in
measurements of lung function, expired carbon monox-
ide, cotinine, or other possible indicators of exposure.
RESPIRATORY DISEASES AND CONDITIONS -
CHILDREN
[27] "Privilege and Health - What Is the Connec-
tion?" Ms Angell, New EnglundJournal ofl['ledi-
crne 329(2): 126-127; 1993 [See Appendix A],
This editorial focuses on the correlation between~
socioeconomic status (usually measured using income
education~andJor profession) and'health endpoints.
The author uses childhood asthma an& "passive
smoking' as an example of the need'to consider socioeco-
nomic status in interpreting a reported ~ association.
[28] "Is Passive Smoking a Cause of Asthma in
Childhood.>"' R. Ehrlich, M. Kattan, and D.E.
Lilienfeld, Journal of Smoking=Related Disorders
4(2): 91-99, 1993 [See Appendix A]
Available studies investigating parental smoking and
childhood asthma or lower respiratory conditions (e.g.,
wheezing) are reviewed in this paper. The authors
acknowledge inconsistencies among the studies, and
indicate that further questions remain. Nevertheless, in
their opinion, a causal'relationship between maternal
smoking and childhood asthma is supported by the
available data.
(

JULY 23, 1993
ETS E?tiPOSURE AND MONITORING
[29] "Measuring Exposure to Environmental To-
bacco Smoke in Studies of Acute Health Ef-
fects," M.C. Marbury, S.K. Hammond, and N.J.
Haley, American Journal ofEpiderrriology
137(10); 1089-1097, 1993 [See Appendix A]
This paper reports on a study comparing question-
naires, ambient nicotine measurements, and urinary
cotinine measurements as methods for characterizing
ETS exposure in a population of 48 children under the
age of two. The authors report that, ambient nicotine
measurements and urinary cotinine measurements
provided better data than, did questionnaires, but thatt
the two rneasures were so closely correlated as to be
redund'ant. As ambient nicotine measurements were
more easily obtained, the authors suggest that theywilly use that, method in their future work.
INDOOR' AIR QUALITY
[30] "Indoor Air: Potential Health Risks Related to.
Residential Wood Smoke, as Determined Under
the Assumptions of the US EPA Risk Assess-
rnent IVlodel, " K.S. Sidhu, J.L. Hesse,,and A W.
Bloomer, Indoor Environment 2: 92-97, 1993
[See Appendix A] I
The authors of this paper apply EPA methodology too
generate risk estimates for components of wood smoke,
and'project excess cancer cases of 0 to 5 in a population
of 100,000 for formaldehyde and 0 to 10 in a popula-
tion of 100 million for polycydic aromatic hydrocar-
bons. They suggest that exposure to wood smoke
"should be recognivxd as a potentially significant health
risk factor,"'especially for "sensitive populations," i.e.,
children, asthmatics and persons with heart disease.
[31] "A Prevalence Study of the Sick Building,
Syndrome (SBS) and' Facial Skin Symptoms in
Office Workers," B. Stenberg, K.H. Mild, M.
Sandstrom, J. Sundell, and S. Wali, Indoor Arr
3: 71-81, 1993 [See Appendix A]
In this paper, Swedish researchers report on a selected
set of data collected in a study of nearNy 5,000 office
workers. They report that female gender, asthma/
rhinitis, paperwork, and work with VDTs were related
with an increased prevalence of sick building symp-
toms in their study population. They also report a
relationship between perception of health and percep-
tion of indoor climate in their sample.
[32] "Volatile Organic Compounds in Ventilating
Air in Buildings at Different Sampling Points in
the Buildings and Their Relationship with the
Prevalence of Occupant Symptoms," J. Sund'ell'',
B. Andersson, K. Andersson, and T. Lindvall,
Indoor Air 3':' 82-93, 1993 [See Appendix A]
The authors of this Swedish study report that occu-
pant reports of symptoms were associated with elevated
formaldehyde levels and with a decrease in total VOC
levels between supply air and room air. They termed
the latter °`lost' TVOC," and suggested it could be
related to chemical transformations of the substances.
IN EUROPE & AROUND THE
WORLD
REGULATORY AND ~~ LEGIiSLATIVE.
MATTERS
EUROPEAN PARIi.IAh1ENT
[33] Briefing Paper on "Passive Smoking" Released
OniJune 22, 1993, the Directorate General for
Research of the European Parliament released a
briefing paper entitled "Smoking Tobacco andl Health:
Passi've Smoking," The paper provides an overview of
governmental studies on ETS, including the EPA Risk
Assessment on ETS, to support its position that "[t]he
inhalation of other people's tobacco smoke has become
recognised as a serious health hazard." In a cursory
fashion, the paper links ETS exposure to lung cancer;
irritationlof eyes, nose, throat and lower respiratory
tract and adult asthma; lieartdisease; exacerbation of ~
sick building syndrome; and diseases in children such Q
as bronchitis, pneumonia, reduced lung function, glue N
ear, asthma, wheezing, low birth weight and cot deaths. eip]
%I
The bulk of the document focuses upon legal issues. ,~
Strengths and weaknesses of ETS products liability ~
cases are noted. Among the weaknesses discussed are w
rZ
~

lo
causatiom problems, lack of knowledge by the tobacco
industry about alleged risks prior to the early 1980s,
and intervening causation, i.e., smokers might not have
heeded a warning about purported dangers of ETS
exposure even if the tobacco companies had given it.
Cases against the industry and employers all over the
world are discussed, including TIA'v: AFCO, Broin,
Butler, Veronica Bl'and, and Liesel Scholem. Richard:
Daynard of the Tobacco Products Liability Project is
cited as a source of information regarding cases in the
United States in which nonsmokers have recovered
benefits or~ damages on the basis of a variety of legall
theories. The paper concludes with a discussion of the
granting of legal aidlin the United Kingdom for a
woman who is planning,to sue her boss for injuries
allegedly suffered as a result of ETS exposure. "The
granting of legal aid in this case may show the direction in
whicl't the climate of opinion is moving," the paper states.
GERMhNY
[34] Railway System Places Further Restrictions on.
Smoking
According to a press reportthe Bundesbahn is
planning to restrict smoking to seats in the smoking
area of train carriages. Previously, smoking was also
permitted in side aisles and entrances. The Ministry of
Transport reportedly announced that the change
would take place sometime this year. See Die Tabak
Zeitung, It fay 21, 1993.
LEGAL ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENTS
AUSTRALIA
[35] Former Spouses Seek Injunctions to Stop
Smoking in Front of Children
According to a press report, applications have been.
filed in Adelaide andMelbourne to stop former
spouses from smoking in front of their children. The
cases are believed to be the first of their kind in Austra-
lia and are expected to be heard later this month in Family
Law Court. See Canberra Times, Australian, Age, West
Australian, Advertrser, and CourierMai4 July 7, 1993.
ETS/IAQ REPORT, ISSUE 52
[36] Employers Advised to Make Premises Smoke Free
Partners in the personal' injury insurance division of
Phillips Fox have reportedly advised employers to ban
smoking in~ the workplace. "Employers must ensure
that their premises become smoke-free or they face
criminal'and'civil litigation," state partners John
Boland and Norman Abrams. They apparently regard
information about the alleged health effects of ETS as
"unequivocal medical and scientific evidence." SeeAge,
July 13, 1993.
OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
FRANCE
[37] Booklet Counters Misrepresentations About
Smoking Bans
The Tobacco Documentation ~ and Dnformationi
Centre in Paris has issued a booklet entitled "What
One Hears About Tobacco" to correct misrepresenta-
tions that have been made about public smoking banss
in France and the European Community. Among
those issues discussed are the claims tharo smoking is
regulated in public places everywhere in Europe and
that ETS endangers the health of nonsmokers. French
legislation on smoking,in public places is reprinted ini
the booklet.
N ETHE RLAN DS
[38] Amsterdam Airport to Impose Smoking
Restrictions
In 1994, Amsterdam's Schipholiwilllreportedly
become the first airport in Europe to impose signifi-
cant restrictions,on smoking. Wiil'a the exception of a
few designated smoking,areas, smoking will not be
permitted in the departure and arrival halls and at the
luggage carousels. The restrictions will apparently cost
millions of guilders as ashtrays willl need to be replaced
with rubbish bins and no smoking signs. SeeAlgemeen
Dagblacr; May 28; 1993'.
(

JULY 23, 1993
UNITED: KINGDOM~
[39] Employees Forbidden from~ Smoking When in
Uniform
The Pembrokeshire NHS Trust in West Wales has
reportedly banned smoking for workers at anytime that
they are in uniform, including,whileomor offd'uty.
Apparently,, those wishing to smoke on the way to or
from work must change out of uniform to do so. The
policy is believed to be the first of its kind in the
country. According to a health workers union official,
the policy goes too far. °°We fully support no smoking
in hospitals and health centers,"'he reportedly said,
"but what employees do when they are off duty is up to
them."' See Today, Juiy2, 1993.
[40] Smoking in Restaurants Leaflet Produced
The Restaurateurs Association of Great Britain hass
produced a leaflet entitled Smoking in Restaurants for
distribution throughout the leisure industry. The
leaflet, which was produced in conjunction with~the
Tobacco Advisory Councilprovielespractical sugges-
tions for accommodating smokers and nonsmokers in
the same restaurant.
[;41] Bare Majority Favors Restaurant Smoking Bans
According to a survey conducted by MORI for the
Health Education Authority, some 51 percent of
respondents reportedly think smoking should be
banned in restaurants. Forty-five percent of those
surveyed said there should be designated'smoking
areas, and three percent said customers should be free
to smoke wherever they wisht The survey was appar-
ently conducted last year, but the results have yet to be
published. According to a press report, the findings
contrast with current practice, as a large majority of
restaurants permit patrons to smoke when and where
they wish. See The Times, July 17, 1993.
11

JULY'23, 1993
APPENDIX A
The numbersassignedlto the following article
summaries correspond with the numbers assigned to
the synopses of the articles in the text of this Report.
LUNG CANCER'
[22] "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung
Cancer," E.T.H. Fontham, P. Correa, PA. Buffler,
R Greenberg, P. Reynoldsand A. Wu-Williams,.
The Cancer Bulletin 45 (1): 92-94, 1993
"In late 1985, a multicenter US study was initiated to
evaluate the association! of ETS with the risk of lung
cancer in: nonsmoking females. The study was designed to
minimize some of the method'ologi,c problems that have
been:discussed in review[s]'! of ETS lung cancer studies by
the National Research Council and the International
Agency for Cancer Research, among others. These
induded misdassification of smoking status, inaccuracy of
case diagnosis and cell type, recall bias, ETS exposure
from sources in addition to the spouse, and' inadequate
control of potential confounders. The fmdings of the first
3' years of this study are summarized' here."'
"The estimated risk of lung,cancer in nonsmoking
women that is associated with living with a spouse who
smoked'was approximately 30%, regardless of which
control group was used in the comparison. An increase
in the risk of approximately 50%; was observed for
adenocarcinoma of the lung compared to each control
group. Separate analyses were conducted for subjects
who personally responded and for those whose infor-
mation was obtained from surrogate respondents. The
findings were consistent for self- and proxy-respon-
dents. All odds ratios were adjusted for age, race,
geographic region,, respondent type, income, and
education. An ~ approximate 30% risk of lung cancer
associated with spousal ETS exposure persisted'~ after an
additional adjustment was made for the consumption~
of vegetables (the most significant food or nutrient
factor),, family history of lung cancer, and employment
in high-risk occupations or industries. Household
radon levels were determined in a sample of case and
control' homes under separate funding. Radon levels are
quite low in all of the areas included in our study: <1%
of all homes tested had levels of>_4 pCilL. The ob-
served' increased risk of lung,cancer associated! with
A-I
ETS exposures is unlikely to result from confoundingg
by radon, diet, or other such factors."
"The findings of this study- which included methods
to evaluate recall bias, minimize misclassification of
smokers as nonsmokers, ensure accuracy of diagnosis and
classification of lung cancer, and adjust risk estimates for
potential confounders - are consistent with and' extend
the findings of numerous published reports that did not
address all of these issues: The overall 30% increased~ riskk
associated with ETS exposurefrom a smoking,spouse is
remarkably close to the 25% to 34% estimates of the
evaluation of relevant studies in the 1986 report of the
National Research Council. Thesignifieano positive dose
response to exposure to tobacco smoke within households,
in occupational settings, and in social settings d'uring adult
life strongly supports an etiologic role of ETS in lung
cancer in nonsmokers and extends the findings from the
home into the workplace and'public settings."'
CARDIOVASCUT AR ISSUES
[23] "Association of Passive Smoking with Increased
Coronary Heart Disease Risk Is 23Not Explained
by Elevation of Leucocyte Count," M.S. Green, J.
Shaham, J. Green, G. Harari,. and J. Bernheim,.
European Journal ofPublic Health 3: 14-17, 1993
"The increased risk of coronary hean; disease in
cigarette smokers may be due at least partly to an
elevation~of the leucocyte count. Chronic passive
smoking has also been found to be associated with an
increased risk of coronary heart disease, but its effect
on the leucocyte count has not been reported. in this
study 250 male factory empl'oyees aged 20-64 years
were interviewed on smoking behaviour an& exposure
to environmental tobacco smoke, and blood counts
were determined. Urinary cotinine was measured by
radio-immunoassay and corrected for urinary creati~
nine concentrations. Mean leucocyte count was
significantly higher among smokerstompared with
nonsmokers. On the basis of smoking history, passive
smokers had leucocyte counts similar to non-smokers."
"The aim of this study was to compare the leucocyte
count in~cigarette smokers with that of non-smokers
exposed to varying concentrations of environmental
tobacco smoke. Utinary cotinine concentrations were
used'to determine the extent of exposure to environ-
mentalltobacco smoke."

A-2
"These findings demonstrate that leucocyte count is
not significantly elevated in non-smokers exposed to
different levels of environmental tobacco smoke. In,
addition, among light smokers there was no increase in
leucocyte count. This suggests that if in fact elevation of
the leucocyte count contributes to the risk of coronary
heart disease in smokers, this is not likely to be the
mechanism for passive smokers or indeed for light
smokers. In general the mechanism for the increased
risk of coronary heart disease in passive smokers is not
well understood. It has been postulated'that it may be
due to effects on blood factors such as platelet aggrega-
tion or through a role of the d'amaging,and muragenic
effects of agents such as the polycyclic aromatic hydro-
carbons on the endothelial and smooth muscle cells. In
addition, extensive exposure to environmental'tobacco
smoke may result in red'uced! oxygen supply to the
myocardium."'
"The findings of this study suggest that ar the popula-
tion level[ at least among adult men, chronic exposure
to environmentall tobacco smoke has little or no effect
on leucocyte count."
"Despite this finding an effect in some heavily
exposed individualk cannot be excluded."
RESPIRATORY DISEASES AND CONDITIONS
- ADULTS.
[24] "Effects of Maternal Smoking and Childhood
Respiratory Illness on Pulmonary Function in
Young Adults: The CARDIA Study," J.E Dunn, S.
Kellie, K Liu, and J. Keller, Society for Epidemio-
logical Research, 1993 Annual Meeting, Keystone,
Colorado, Abstract No. 306, June 1993
"The effects of maternal smoking and childhood
respiratory illness (self-report of physician-confirmed
asthma, pneumonia or bronchitis before age 10) onn
adult pulmonary function were assessed using,the
baseline ( Y 985-1986)' data of CARDIA (a study of
lifestyle and cardiovascular disease risk factors in~ 5,155
Black (B) and~White (W) male (M) and female (F) ~
adults aged 1'$-30 years), Meam FEV1/FVC and
FEF25-75 in exposed and unexposed groups were
compared withimeach race, sex, and current smoking,
status stratum while controlling for age, height, and
ETS/1AQ REPORT, ISSUE 52
pack-years of cigarettes. Even when excluding ever-
asthmatics, maternalI smoking was associated with
lower FEV1i/FVC and FEF25-75 in BF and WF
smokers. Childhood pneumonia or, bronchitis was
associated with lower FEV 1/FVC in BM and WM
non-smokers and WF smokers and! WM non-smokers,
all without history of asthma: Excluding those with
active asthma, childhood asthma was associated with
reduced' FEV 1VFVC in all non-smokers except'WF, as
welll as in WM smokers, and with reduced' FEF25-75
in all' non-smokers except WM, as well as in BF and
WM smokers. These data suggest that early lung
infections and maternal smoking may affecti adulti lling
function independ'ently of asthma, and the effect of
childhood asthma on aduln l'ung function can be seen
in, persons without active asthma."
[25] "Passive Smoking and Evolution of Lung
Function in Young Adults. An Eight-Year
Longitudinal Study," M.S. Jaakkola, J.J.K.
Jaakkola, P. Ernst, and M.R. Becklake, American
Review ofRespiratory Disease 147(4' Part 2):
A215, 1993
"Little is knowmabout the effects of passive smoking
on lung function during young adulthood. Our
objective was to examine the relation between exposure
to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the rate of
change of ventilatory lung,function in young adults
during a study period of 8 years, with an additional
aim to recognize susceptible subgroups.... There was
no statistieally significant relation between exposure to
ETS during or before the study period and evolution of
FEV,or FEFZ5-7g. 25-75.physiologically relevant effect
on evolution of ventilatory function is unlikely to be
associated with the exposure levelk experienced by our
study population. A statistically significant but physi,
ologically unimportant relation between cumulative
home exposure to ETS before the study and [change in
FEVJwas observed in a subgroup of subjects 25 years
of age or younger. There was no evidence of modifica-
tion by atopy, wheezing or gender. Our results suggest
that exposure to ETS in young adulthood in office
work environment and at home does not lead to
clinically important ventilatory impairment in the
exposure levels as experienced in Canadian housing
conditions in the 1980's. This does not refute the
possibility that higher exposure levels may be harmful_"

JULY 23, 1993
[26] "Effets Sanitaires d'une Exposition Chronique a
la Fumee de Tabac sur une Population de Non
Fumeurs (Health Effects of Chronic Exposure to
Tobacco Smoke on a Non-Smoker Population)"
[English abstract only],,A.M. Laurent, A. Bevan,
N. Chakroun, Y. Courtois, B. Valois, M.
Roussel, B. Festy, and S. Pretet, Rev. PneumoL
Clin. 48: 65-70,,1993
"A study devised'! to evaluate the effects of chronic
exposure to tobacco smoke on the health of a popula-
tion of non~smokers was conducted in a prison."
"Fourteen volunteers among male, non-smoking
prisonners [sic]', in good health and without history of
lung,disease were put for thirty days in a cell that was
already occupied by three smokers. These subjects were
examined on arrival and on the 30th day of their
imprisonment. The examination included filling a
questionnaire concerning daily habits and food,
respiratory function tests, measurement of CO in the
expired air, measurement of nicotine, cotinine, thio-
cyanates and.cadmium concentrations in blood and in
urine, andmeasurement of mutagenic substances
excreted. The purpose of the study was to detect
possible changes in the variables tested between the
first and last days of confinement."
"No significant difference could be demonstrated
within this lapse of time. These results are in agree-
ment with the data available in the literature. In the
present state of our knowledge, it is diffcult to find
evidence of a biological impact, notably on the concen-
trations of the specific indicators nicotine and'cotinine,
in~subjects passively exposed to tobacco smoke."
RESPIRATORY DISEASES AND: CONDITIONS
- CHILDREN
[27] "Privilege and Health - What Is the Connec-
tion?" M. Artgell, New England journal of
Medicine 329(2): 126-127, 1993
"Anyone who follows the medical literature knows
that 'socioeconomic status' is a powerful determinant
of health. Irt~ current jargons socioeconomic status
refers to a mix of factors that shape a person's relative
social advantage. It is usually gauged by income,
education, profession, or some combination of the
three, but no one knows exactly which factors deter-
A-3
mine health, much less how they do so. It does not
seem to be simply a matter of the privileged' having
better access to health care. Nevertheless, in study after
study socioeconomic status emerges as one of the most
importano influences on~mortal'iry and morbidity."
"So closely does socioeconomic status correlate with
that health that it confounds the interpretation of
much clinical research. For example, studies of the
effect of passive smoking on childhood asthma are
uninterpretable unless an attempt is made to control
for socioeconomic status. Without such control, it is
impossible to know whether the increased prevalence
of asthma in the children of smokers is really because
of passive smoking or because smokers are more likely
to~be poor and'poverry, itself is associated with a hig}ier
prevalence of asthma.... Indeed, if the direct effect of
a variable under study - for example, passive smoking
or exposure to lead - is small, and the effect of
socioeconomic status is large, it, may be very difficult to
correct for socioeconomic status adequately. In, such
instances, stratifying subjects in only a few groups
according to income or education may not be svffi-
cient. To eliminate entirely the confounding effect of
socioeconomic status may require stratifying subjects
into a great many subgroups."
"Yet, despite the imponance of socioeconomic status to
health, no one knows quite how it operates. It is perhaps
the most mysterious of the determinants of health.
Income, education, and profession are not likely to
influence health directly. Instead, these factors are almost
certainly proxies for other variables that have a direct
impact on health. But what are these variables? Most
relevant studies attempt to control for such obvious ones
as cigarette smoking and heavy aleohol! consumption,
both of which. are more frequent among the disadvan-
taged. And the increased frequency of trauma and
substance abuse among the poor cannot explain the
increased morbidity and mortality from other causes. One O
can imagine a host of other influences - such as diet, ~
stress, exposure to infectious agents or toxic chemicals -,~
that are related to socioeconomic status, but there is very 11
little evidence to point to any of them as a major cause of ~
the health difference between.the advantaged and the ~
disadvantaged. "' ~
.
"Except for a few special', conditions that afl"ect black ~'
Americans disproportionately, such as hypertension,
the poorer health of black Americans probably reflects

A-4
other correlates of lower socioeconomic status rather
than race itself."
"[W]e are too quick to'medicalize' many social ills.
For example, we 'treat"drug abuse, as well as kleptoma-
nia; compulsive gambling, and a host of other 'co-
dependencies.' ...[I]t may be time to reverse this
tendency to medicalize, and to be more ready to regard
medical illness as the result - direct or indirect - of
social' factors. Certainly, there can be little doubt that
research on the connection between health and socio-
economic status - given the strength of this connec-
tion - would yield important information about the
pathophysiology of disease."
"Dealing with the social causes of disease and re-
sponding to its medical effects are not mutually
exclusive. We should do:both, People already burdenedl
by poverty and lack of education should not also carry
a disproportionate share of illness."
[28] "Is Passive Smoking a Cause of Asthma in
Childhood?"'R. Ehrlich, M. Kattan, and D.E.
Lilienfeld, Journal of Smoking-Related Disorders
4(2): 91-99, 1993
"The number of epidemiological studies of the
association between passive smoking,and asthma and
wheezing in children~ is growing and the aim of this
review is to re-examine the epidemiological evidence.
Because of underdiagnosis of asthma and the difficul-
ties of defining asthma for epidemiological purposes,
wheezing as well as non-specific bronchial
hyperresponsiveness are included'as outcomes of interest,
although they inay lack some specificity for clinical
asthma. For purposes of exposition, the epidemiological I
studies are divided according to the type of population
studied, viz- general population studies and studies of
asthmatics using health services. These in turn are further
grouped according to study designi"
"Despite inconsistency among the studies reviewed; a
coherent pattern is emerging, Imparticular, studies
which have been able to separate out maternal'smoking
have been more consistently positive than those that
did not make this distinction. Further, among the
studies which quantified' maternal smoking, nearly all
have been able to show some exposure-response
relationship between maternal smoking and some
measure of asthma or wheeze."
ETS/IAQ REPORT, ISSUE 52
"In~ generaL the evidence for an effect of passive
smoking on wheezingandlother lbwer respiratory
illness is more consistent for children under two years
of age than that for older children,"
"Despite the emerging evidence concerning the impor-
tance of maternal smoking, variation~remains among
study findings, and this is likely to continue. Part of this
variation between studies is due to the difliculties of
measuring accurately the child's true dose of smoke
exposure. Furthermore, ETS is a complex mixture of
agents, any or a number of which may be implicated."
"The association between maternal smoking and asthma
and wheezing illness in children satisfies a number of the
criteria for causality. There is reasonable consistency
among studies, an exposure-response relationship has been
demonstrated and an appropriate temporal relationship
established in prospective studies."
"Pn addition, the association has biological'plausibiliry
although the mechanism remains to be definedand
there is not strong evidence that confounding accounts
for the observed increase in risk."'
"From a public health perspective the impact of such
a causal relationship is considerable. Assuming a
relative risk of asthma due to: maternal smoking of 1.5,.
after controlling for confounding, and a maternal
smoking prevalence of 30%, an attributable proportion
of 113% can be calculated. This is the proportion of
asthma and persistent wheeze in childhood that could
be prevented! in the absence of maternal smoking. This
should add further weight to public health, clinical and
educational efforts to reduce the burden of illhealth,
[sic]I imposed on young children by the tobacco
smoking habiC"
ETS Exl>OSURE A1vD MONITORING
[29] "Measuring Exposure to Environmental To-
bacco Smoke in Studies of Acute Health Ef-
fects," M.C. Marbury, S.If. Hammond, and N.J.
Haley, American Journal of Epidemiology
137(10): 1089-1097, 1993
"In preparation for an investigation of environmental
tobacco smoke and lower respiratory illness in~children
under 2 years of age, we conducted a study to compare
methods of characterizing exposure to environmeotal
tobacco smoke, induding questionnaires, urinary

JULY 23, 1993
cotinine measurement, and ambient nicotine measure-
ment. Our purposes were to examine the relations
among the three measures and their variability over
time and to assess feasibility and logistic issues. Al-
though ventilation~ rates were not measured, the study
was conducted during a period when rates were
expected to:be stable."
"Thirteen girls and 35 boys under 2'years of age, all
non-Hispanic white, were enrolled in the study. In 23
homes neither parent smoked; five homes were in the
low exposure group."
"All three measured varied significantly, depending
on which parent(is) smoked. Concentrations of ambi-
ent nicotine and urinary cotinine were higher when the
mother smoked than when the father smoked and
highest when both parents smoked."
"In this study, we initially compared three differentt
methods of estimating exposure, questionnaire, urinary
cotinine, and ambient nicotine, on a cross-sectional
basis in a population with varying degrees of exposure.
Urinary cotinine and ambient nicotine concentrations
were highly correlated with each other. This correlation~
suggests that, even though one is a measure of exposure
and the other a measure of dose, they provide equally
valid but redundant, information about exposure in this
study population."
"Given equal validity, the choice between the two
measures then depends on feasibility. Ohe component
of feasibility is the variability of the measure, as greater,
variability requires that more measurements be made
for accurate exposure estimation. While both measure-
ments showed variability over time, urine cotinine was
more variable."'
"[WJe found'that one measurement of ambient
nicotine during an 8-week period; when ventilation
rates are relatively stable, would be adequate for
achieving reasonable precision in our exposure esti:
mate. In contrast, three measures of urinary cotinine
would be needed to obtain the same degree of preci-
sion. In addition, we were able to collect complete dataa
on ambient nicotine measurements, whereas we were
unable to obtain urine samples at 20 percent of the
visits. Thus, for this study population, air monitoring
of nicotine is more feasible."
"[QJ luestionnai'res will undoubtedly continue to be
used in studies of environmental tobacco~smoke, either
A-5
as the whole or as a part of the assessment strategy.
V{/hen used in conjunction with an objective marker,,
each can be used to help interpret the other. For
example, in the cross-sectionall study, both~ the pattern
of activity room nicotine concentrations and urinary
cotinine levels indicated'that fathers smoked fewer
cigarettes in the house than mothers, although fathers
were reported to have smoked more. This was not due
to a difference in where the fathers smokedas all
fathers were reported to have smoked in the living
room or family room."
"[T]he pilot study provided information on the use of
nicotine sampl'ers. Placing nicotine samplers in both
the activity room and''the bedroom~ is unnecessary. The
concentrations in the two rooms were highly correlated'
throughout the study."
INDOOR AIR QUALITY'
[30) "Indoor Air: Potential Health Risks Related to
Residential Wood Smoke, as Determined Under
the Assumptions of the US EPA Risk Assess-
ment Model," K.S: Sidhu, J.L. Hesse, and A.W.
Bloomer, Indoor Enuironment 2: 92-97, 1993
"Residentiallwood smoke contains inorganic and
organic particulates, ash, carbon monoxide, nitric
oxide, nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (benzo[a]pyrene
benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene
benzo['ghilperylene, and'~indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene),
phenols and sulfur dioxide. Benzo[la]pyrene and
formaldehyde are classified as group B'z,and group B,
carcinogens, respectively, by the United States Envi-
ronmentall Protection Agency. Reported concentrations
and potential health risks of the released contaminants
are discussed~ In general, wood smoke is an irritant to
the eyes,, nose,, and the respiratory tract. It has the
potentialito cause chronic respiratory problems,
Because there are indications that wood smoke may
cause adverse effects on human healths exposure to this
source of air pollution should be minimized."
"The objectives of this paper are to formulate cancer
risk assessments and to review the potential healthh
effects of several indoor air contaminants released by
wood-burning stoves."
"The exposure assessment and risk characterization
for formaldehyde released from non-airtight wood'
