Jump to:

Philip Morris

Counter - Advertising for Friendly Witness

Date: Jul 1990 (est.)
Length: 1 page
2023914967
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2023914967

Fields

Master ID
2023914806/5052
Related Documents:
Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
Site
N332
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Document File
2023914805/2023915131a/Briefing Book H.R. 5041 Waxman Hearing 900712
Request
Stmn/R1-037
Area
HAN,VICTOR/OFFICE
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
UCSF Legacy ID
fxv24e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: fxv24e00 Log in for more options!
Counter-Advertising For Friendly Witness The tobacco industry argues that its advertising is not intended to create more smokers, but to encourage brand- switching. If it's true -- as the cigarette companies claim -- that advertising campaigns fail to have a significant effect on increasing smoking rates, why do the tobacco companies bother to advertise at all? Why would so much money be spent simply to get people to switch brands? The stakes are high, and the cigarette market in the United States is fiercely competitive. Based on 1988 figures, a one-point market share is worth $558 million. In such a setting, competing brands often cancel each other out. Because of the general inefficiency of the advertising media and the cost of competition, the various cigarette manufacturers spend a great deal of money both vying for the attention of switchers and to solidify brand loyalty for their customers.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: