Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Billick, I.H.
- Area
- SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS/BLACK LATERAL OLD S&T
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Recipient (Organization)
- PM, Philip Morris
- Recipient
- Osdene, T.S.
- Document File
- 2023553111/2023553140/E204 Billick, Irwin H.
- Request
- Stmn/R1-147
- Site
- R529
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Person
- Mcfarland, R.
- Rupp
- Osdene, Thomas
- Rupp
- Master ID
- 2023553112/3139
Related Documents: - Named Organization
- Board of Directors
- Ciar, Center for Indoor Air Research
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- crf85e00
Document Images
-T, S. 0SINNE
n 1pQ>f.
Dr. Thomas S. Osdene
Director of Science and Technology
Philip Morris U.S.A.
P.O. Box 26603
Richmond, Va. 23261
Dear Dr. Osdene:
456 Sutherland Lane
Prospect Heights, Illinois 60070
March 4, 1988
I have received your letter of February 24, 1988 and I must admit
that I am somewhat mystified by its contents. Just to set the record
straight, I never declined~lan offer to serve as the executive
director of the Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR). Indeed, an
offer never was made either verbally or in writing by anyone
associated with the CIAR. I was expecting,such an off er to be
transmitted to me through Dick McFarland, who I assummed was your
sole agent in this matter. I was informed by Mr. Rupp, at one point,,
that the Board of Directors had decided to terminate negotiations
with me on this position~. I never have been certain what Mr. Rupp's
role or authority was in this matter, but, I took his information.at
face value:.
Up until that time II had assummed that our negotiations were
proceeding satisf actorily. The financial compensation was adequate
and', with the exception of some minor adjustment in.the fringe
benefits, I had~no problems in this area. I felt that were still
some areas of the draft contract that needed clarification, but,
these were not serious.
However, as some operational points needed clarification~I sent you a
letter on February 4, 1988 so that you and the rest of the Board
would clearly understand what issues concerned me. This letter was
meant to be a basis of discussion until we all understood the issues
and could arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution. I regret that
you never took the opportunity to respond to my letter or subsequent
phone call to discuss these issues. Your letter of February 24 dealt
partially with the some of the points I raised. We never were really
far apart and all the issues probably could have been dealt with to
the satif action of all parties.
I never at any time had any misgivings about the mission of the
Center nor my ability to act as its Director. II regret that you made
the decision to terminate our discussions and~I wish you the best of
luck in your searchifor a Director who will meet your requirements.
Sincerely,
Irwin H. Billick
