Philip Morris
A Dictionary of Epidemiology
Fields
- Author
- Holland, W.W.
- Last, J.M.
- Area
- SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS/BLACK LATERAL OLD S&T
- Type
- PUBL, PUBLICATION, OTHER
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Master ID
- 2023512310/2514
Related Documents:- 2023512310-2514 Epidemiology and Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2023512316-2317 Statistical Significance and Confidence Intervals
- 2023512329-2340 Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer: A Critical Assessment
- 2023512341-2348 What Is the Epidemiologic Evidence for A Passive Smoking - Lung Cancer Association?
- 2023512361-2362
- 2023512442-2514 News & Numbers A Guide to Reporting Statistical Claims and Controversies in Health and Other Fields
- Document File
- 2023512309/2023512515/Ets Issue Binder: Epidemiology
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Named Organization
- Intl Epidemiological Assn
- Author (Organization)
- Intl Epidemiological Assn
- Site
- R529
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- yjc02a00
Document Images
A DICTIONARY OF
EPIDEMIOLOGY
SECOND EDITION
Edited for the
International Eprdemiological A.uocialion
bT
John M.. Last
TW9C7.TsEZo71
W
New York Oxford Toronto
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
1988

Oxford University Press
Oaford New York Toronto
Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madrar Karachi
Pcial'n6JaTa Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo
Nairobi Dar ea Salaam Cape Torn
Melbourne Auckland
and asaociaied companies in
Berhn Ibadan
C.opyright © 1988 by International Epidemiological Association, Inc.
Published bv Oxford Univenitv Press. Inc.,
200 Madison Avenue. New 1'ork. New York 10016
O.ford u a repstered irademark of Oxford University Preu
All riRhu rearrsed. No pan of this publiritinn mav be reproduced.
stored in a rrtneval rvrem, or tranamitied. in any form or bv anr means,
ek_rironic. mechanical. phoaoropvinR. recording. or aherwire,
without she prior permission of (hford Univenhy Presr.
Libnrv of Congress GauloRinR-in-Publication Data
A Dictionacy of epidemioloKr.
Includes b:h/io_Rraphies.
I. Epidemiob6v-Dictionaries. I. tast. John M.. 1926-
11. International EpideminloRiral Arrociation. --
IDNLM: 1. EpidemioloRv-dictionaricr.
WA 13 D5551
RA651.D55 1988 611.4'0)'21 B7-_l1109
ISBN 0-19-505400-6
15BN 0-19-505181--! tpbk.l
59CZ15t?'0z
2416111091551
Printcd in the Uniied Sutes of America
on acid-free paper
Foreword
The International Epidemiological Association is extremely
pleased that the Dicteonnry ojEpedcmiologY has been so successful
that a second edition has been demanded. As one of the Asso-
ciation's aims is to "spread the message," this work is an exam-
ple of "what we call it." Only if we all understand the same
thing when a particular term is used will the aim of the Asso-
ciation be capable of being fulfilled. This dictionary is funda-
mental to this objective.
W. W. Holland, MD FRCGP FRCP FFGM
President, lnternational Epidemiological Association

Preface
gsM1sCzoz
This dictionary, ictionary, appearing now in its second edition, is an at-
tempt to bring some order to the occasionally chaotic nomen-
clature of epidemiology. It is intended for all who are inter-
ested in epidemiology, especially those who are beginning to
study the subject, those whose first language is not English, and
those from other fields who need to know the terms epide-
miologists use.
Like all rapidly expanding sciences, epidemiology has been
confounded by the proliferation of words and phrases to de-
sc-ribe its co_ nccpts, principles, methods, and procedures. The
creation of new terms and disagreement about the meaning of
old ones can confuse beginners and established epidemiologists
alike.
Remarks by users of the first edition have reinforced the view
that the boundaries should be wide rather than narrow, that
the language should be simple, that some terms many epide-
miologists think everyone already knows should be included.
The second edition is larger than the first, partly for this rea-
son, and because terms omitted from the first edition have been
included and many old entries expanded.
The dictionary is not an index of permitted and proscribed
usage. I hope that it is authoritative without being authoritar-
ian. Where synonyms exist, the definition appears under the
most commonly used of these, but preference for one term over
another is not necessarily implied. In a few instances, the use
of a term is deprecated. Some terms that are properly de-
scribed as slang or jargon have been included because they are
widely used and their meaning is not always clear from the con-
text. Murphy's description of jargon is worth recalling: "ob-
scure and/or pretentious language, circumlocutions, invented
meanings, and pomposity delighted in for its own sake."
There was disagreement among the contributors to this edi-
tion about including certain acronyms and eponyms. An acro-
nym is a word made up of letters from two or more other words,
e.g. ANOVA for analysis of variance, or from initial letters, e.g.

preface viii
WHO for World Health Organization. All lay and technical vo-
cabularies contain acronyms; epidemiology has its fair share.
By convention, acronyms are spelt out the first time they ap-
pear in a text, and, if they are numerous, considerate editors
sometimes supply a glossary, oc at least list the acronyms along
with the words for which they stand in an index. Although this
dictionary is not the place for extensive mention of acronyms,
a few appeared in the first edition, and a few more appear
here.
Eponyms, the attachment of personal or place names to con-
cepts, diseases, methods or specific studies, also occur often
enough in published papers and books for us to recognize that
beginners need some guidance to the meaning of those most
widely used. Some appeared in the first edition, and a few have
been added to the second-though again this dictionary is not
the proper place for a full glossary of epidemiological eponyms
(where would such a glossary end!).
As was the case with the first edition, a large number of epi-
demiologists from many countries ntries have participated in this re-
vision. The original modest notices in a couple of journals and
a few casual remarks_ among friends produced a mailing list of
some forty persons, mainly in North America and the United
Kingdom. The mailing list rapidly grew until, by the fifth round
of correspondence in December 1986, there were 108 corre-
spondents in 25 countries. The list continued to grow after this
fifth and final round; but the published roster of names that
follows this preface is both more and less than the number of
active participants. Some seemingly inquired just from curiosity
and played no further part. Others wrote lengthy and often
vigorously argumentative comments and suggestions express-
ing not only their own views but those of colleagues in their
academic department or institution-in one instance,, col-
leagues elsewhere in that nation.
In addition to extensive comments from these correspon-
dents, I have made good use of other technical dictionaries and
glossaries in compiling this revision. All of these are listed in
the bibiliography, and many are also to_ be found in footnotes
that follow specific entries.
The compilers of dictionaries must exercise the greatest care
in the choice of words and in their arrangement. Most entries
in this dictionary have been repeatedly discussed with many
contributors, and in nearly all instances the wording has been
agreed upon by all; on the rare occasions when agreement eluded
us, the final decision was mine alone. Therefore, I accept full
responsibility for the deficiencies in the finished product.
The work has been sponsored by the International Epide-
49C?;TSC2'0%
ix
miological Association, which provided partial travel support
for me to attend two meetings in 1986; further support was
provided by the McLean Foundation and the Milbank Memo-
rial Fund. All royalties from the sale of this edition, like those
from the first edition, will go to the International Epidemiol-
ogical Association.
Finally, I thank Jeffrey House of Oxford University Press for
helpful advice and encouragement.
Ottawn, Canada
November 1987
J. M. L.
preface

Contributing Editors
J. H. ARRAMCON
Jerusalem. Israel
URSULA ACKERMAN-LIERRICH
Basel, Switzerland
RORERT ALLARD
Montreal, Quebec. Canada
JOHN C. BAILAR IH
Washington, DC, USA
CHRISTOP-HER 13ALDOCK
brisbane. Queensland, Australia
ROlERTO G. ISARUZZI
Sao Paulo, Brazil
ARRAM S. BENENSON
San Diego, CA, USA
ROGER BERNARD
Geneva, Switzerland
JEAN-FRANCOtS BOIVIN
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
BERNARO J. BRARIN
Madang, Papua New Guinea
C. RALPH BUNCHER
Cincinnati, OH, USA
BEVERLEY CARLSON
New York, NY, USA
JAMES CHIN
Berkeley, CA, USA
MICHEL COLEMAN
Oxford, England
L. CAYOLLA DA MOTTA
Lisbon, Portugal
GARET'H DAVIES
New Ilaw. Surrey. England
RICHARD DICKER
Atlanta, GA, USA
ALVAN R. FEINSTEIN
New Haven, CT, USA
DAVID FINNEY
Edinburgh. Scotland
JOSEPH L. FLEI55
New York, NY. USA
GARY D. FRIEDMAN
Oakland, CA. USA
MICHAEL GARRAWAY
Edinburgh, Scotland
SANDER GREENLAND
Los Angeles, CA. USA
TEE GUIDOTTt
Edmonton. Alberaa, Canada
WALTER W. HOLIAND
London, England
B_ARRARA HULKA
Chapel Hill. NC, USA
MICHEL IRRAHIM
Chapel lfill, NC. USA
LESUE M. IRwlc
Sydney. NSW, Australia
MILOS JENICEK
Montreal, Quebec. Canada
L. KARHAUSEN
Luxembourg, Luxembourg

contributing editors
HENK LAMRERTS
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
JOHN M. LAST
Ottawa, Ontario. Canada
DALE LAWRENCE
Atlanu. GA. USA
DAVID E. LILIENFELD
New York. NY. USA
GENEvICVE LOSLIER
Hudson, Quebec, Canada
ROSERT MACLENNAN
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
MARGARET F. MCCANN
Chapel Hill, NC. USA
ANTHONY B. MILLER
Toronto. Ontario, Canada
KIUMARSS NASSERI
Teheran, Iran
JOHN S. NEURERCER
Kansas City, KA, USA
NORMAN D. NOAH
London. England
ROBERT OSEASOHN
San Antonio, TX, USA
HARRIS PASTIDES
Amherst. MA, USA
MIQUEL PORTA
Barcelona. Spain
DAVID RoetNsoN
GeneYa, Switzerland
GEOrrREY A. ROSE
London. England
xii
KENNETH J. ROTHMAN
Boston, MA, USA
JAMES J. SCHLFSSELMAN
Bethesda, MD, USA
B.A.SOUTHGATE
London, England
CLAUDE STROHMENGER
Ottawa. Ontario, Canada
IAN St1THERLAND
Cambridge, England
MERVYN SUSSER
New York, NY, USA
A.V. SWAN
London, England
RODOLio SARACCI
Lyon, France
MICHEL TIIURIAUx
Copenhagen, Denmark
B. TOMA
Maisons-Alfort. France
CARL TYLER
Atlanta. GA, USA
ROBERT B. WALLACE
Iowa City. IA, USA
STEPHEN D. WALTER
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
KERR L. WHITE
Stanardsville, VA, USA
DONALD Wlc_tE
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
CORRESPONDING EDITORS
ERIK ALLANDER
Huddinge, Sweden
ALBERTA ALZATE
Cali. Colombia
GEOrrREY A. ANDERSON
Ottawa. Ontario, Canada
MARY JANE ASHLEY
Toronto. Ontario, Canada
r
R.S. BHOPAL
Glasgow, Scotland
PATRICIA A. BUrr1ER
Houston. TX, USA
ARVIND A. CARPENTR
Oak Ridge. TN, USA
CARL J. CASPERSON
Atlanta, GA. USA
DENIS CHARPIN
Marseilles, France
GERALD ER_ALD R. CHASE
Denver. CO, USA
EMIL E. CRISTOEANO
Akron, OH. USA
ORESTES FAGET CEPERO
Havana. Cuba
ANNE HERSEY COULiON
Los Angeles. CA. USA
DAVID CUNDIrT
Trenton, NJ, USA
ROGER DETEtS
Los Angeles, CA, USA
ROnGER DOYLE
Buffalo.. NY, USA
GERARD DURo15
Panis, France
JACtjUELINE FARIA
Quebec City, Quebec. Canada
G.1. FoaREs
Edinburgh, Scotland
LINA FORCtER
Sydney, NSW. Australia
EDUARDO_ FRANCO
Sao Paulo, Brazil
JACK FROOM
Stony Brook, NY. USA
TRUt.S GEDDE-DA/IL
Oslo, Norway
O.N.GIU.
London, England
xsn
correaponding editors
DAVID GOLDSMITH
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
PATRICIA GRAVGS
Madang, Papua New Guinea
VINCENT GUINEE
Houston, TX, USA
MATTI HAItAMA
Tampere, Finland
A. SCOTT HENDERSON
Canberra. ACT, Australia
CATHERINE HILL
Villejui(, France
ERNEST B. HOOK
Albany. NY, USA
J. JANCAR
Bristol, England
FINN KAMPER-JORGENSEN
Copenhagen, Denmark
H.W. KANIS
l.elysud, the Netherlands
JENNIrER KELSEY
New York, NY, USA
MARY CLAIRE KING
Berkeley. CA, USA
MAUa1CE KING
Leeds. England
GEORGE KNOx
Birmingham. England
JESS KRAUs
Los Angeles, CA. USA
H. OWVER LANCASTER
Sydney, NSW, Australia
F.D.K. LtoDEU.
Montreal, Quebec. Canada
IAN MCDOWEt1.
Ottawa. Ontario, Canada
H. MICHAEL MAETz
Birmingham, AL. USA
Luls MACJIo
Lisbon, Portugal
ssCzTsCzo%

corresponding editon
J.S. MALHI
Brighton. England
DIttEP V. MAVALANRER
Ahmedabad, India
DAVID MORRIS
London, England
C.S. MUIR
Lyon, France
ENRIQUE N,(JERA
Seville, Spain
KATE O'CONNOR
Ottawa. Ontario, Canada
H. TUNSTAt.L PEDOE
Dundee, Scotland
1. PLESKO
Bratislava, Czechoslovakia
PAULA RANTIKALLIO
Oulu, Finland
R.A. RoelNSON
St. Paul, MN. USA
ROGER ROCHAT
Atlanta, GA, USA
JEFFREY ROSEMAN
Birmingham, AL, USA
PHILIP ROSS
Honolulu, H1, USA
M. SARIC
Z.2breb, Yugoslavia
BjORN SMEDOY
Uppsala, Sweden
ANDREU SE('.URA
Barcelona, Spain
xiv
COLIN SOSKOLNE
Edmonton, Alberu, Canada
PAULA STEWART
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
RORERT SPASOFF
Ottawa, Onurio, Canada
D.STRACHILOV
Soha, Bulgaria
HuGH TILSON
Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
TOSHIO TOYAMA
Tokyo,Japan
EDWARD J. TRAPIDo
Miami, FL. USA
STJEPAN VIDACEK
7agreb, Yugoslavia
ANNE WALLING
Wichita, KA, USA
RORERT WE3T
Cardiff, Wales
JAN WIENPAHL
Los Angeles, CA, USA
WU X1-KE
Hefei, Anhui, China
M.J. WYSOCKI
Warsaw, Poland
FARAT YUSUF
North Rydc, NSW, Australia
FRED ZERFAS
Los Angeles, CA. USA
SHUx1AN ZU
Hefei, Anhui. China
A Dictionary of Epidemiology
o4MzsCzoZ

UEZZ SC07:o%
t
AsoRnDN RATE The estimated annual number of abortions per 1000 women of repro
ductive age (usually defined as age 15-44).
ABORTION RAT70 The estimated number of abortions per 100 live births in a given year.
AtSCIbSA The distance along the horizonul coordinate or x axis, of a point P from the
vertical or Y axis of a graph. PJee also AXIS, GRAPH, ORDINATE.
AR,iOLUTE RISK Usuall?this term means the observed or calculated risk of an event in
a population under study, as contrasted with the relative risk. Sometimes, however,
it is a synonym for attributable fracuon, excess risk, or risk difference; because of
the inconsistency, this term should be avoided. See also RISK.
ACCEPTARLE RISK The risk that has minimal detrimental effects, or for which the ben-
elits outweigh the potential hazards. Epidemiologic study has provided data for
calculation of risks associated with many medical procedures and also with nccupa-
tional and environmental exposures; these data are used, for instance, in CLlNICAL
DECISION ANALYSIS.
ACaURwt:v The degree to which a measurement, or an estimate based on measure-
ments, represents the true value of the attribute that is being measured. See also
MEASUR[MENT-, PRORLEMS WITH TERMINOLOGY.
AtJQUAINTANCE NETWORK Group of persons in contact or communication among whom
transmission of an infectious agent and of knowledge, attitudes, and values is pos-
sible, and whose social interaction may have health implications. See also TRANSMIS-
SION Or INFECTION. ACQVIRED IMMUNODEF7ClENCY ><VNDROMC (Syn: acquired immune deficiency syndrome)
(AIDS) For surveillance purposes, the Centers for Disease Control, Allanu, Geor-
gia,' define a case of AIDS as an illness characterized by (1) one or more of a group
of opportunistic or indicator diseases that are indicative of underlying cellular im-
munodcficiency; (2) absence of all known underlying causes of cellular immuno-
deficienc-y and absence of all other causes of reduced resistance to opportunistic or
indicator diseases. Additional criteria are serum positive for HIV antibody, positive
cuhure for HIV, and reduction of T4 "helper" lymphocytes.
The opportunistic or indicator diseases associated with AIDS include certain pro-
tozoal and helminth infections, notably Pneweocyitu cnrinti pneumonia and toxo-
plasmosis; fungal infections, notably candidiasis of esophagus. Irachea, bronchi or
lungs and cryptococcosis, especially affecting the central nervous syste m; bacterial
infections, notably with certain mycobacleria; viral infections, notably cytomegalo,
viruw and herpes simplex; and cancer, notably Kaposi4 sarcoma and lymphoma
limited to the brain.
AIDS-related complex (ARC) is the combination of H I V positive test with lymph.

ADL scale 4
adenopathy and persistent low fever but without immunodeFiciency or opportunis-
tic diseases.
' I9R7 Revision of case definition of AIDS for surveillance purposes. MMWR 36, I5:4S-9S. 1987.
ACTIVITIES Or DAILY LtVING (ADL) SCALE A scale devised by Katz and others' to score
physical JIrilitv/disability; used to measure outcomes of interventions for various
chronic disabling conditions such as arthritis. The scale is based on scores for re-
sponses to questions about mobiliq, selftare, grooming, etc. This was the first widely
used scale of this type; othen, mostly refinements or variations of the ADL L snle,
have since been developed.
' Kau S. Ford. AB. Moskowitz. RN', Jackson. BA, Jaffe. M W: Studies of illness in the aged. The
index of ADL, a sundardi:ed measure of biological function. fAAfA 185:9f4-919. 1963.
ACTUARIAL RATE See FORCE OF MORTALITI'.
ACTUARIAL TA/LE See_ LIFE TARLE. ACUTE
1. Referring to a health effect, brief; sometimes loosely used to mean severe.
2. Referring to exposure. brief, intense, or short-term; sometimes specifically re-
ferring to brief exposure of high intensity. See also CHRONIC.
ADAPTATION A heritable component of the phenotype which confers an advantage in
survival and reproductive success._ The process by which organisms adapt to envi-
ronmenul conditions.
ADDIT7VE MODEL A model in which the combined effect of several factors is the suwn of
V the effects that would be produced by each of the factors in the absence of the
others. For example. if factor X adds x.c7r to risk in the absence of f', and if factor Y
adds YSli to risk in the absence of X, an additive model states that the two factors
together will add (x+r)g to risk. See also INTERACTION; LINEAR MODEL; MATHEMAT-
ICAL MODEL; MULTIPLICATIVE MqDEL.ADJUSTMENT A summarizing procedure for a statistical measure in
which the effects of
differences in composition of the populations being compared have been mini-
mized by statistinl methods. Examples are adjustment by regression analysis and
by standardization. Adjustment often is performed on rates or relative risks, com-
monly because of differing age distributions in populations that are being com-
pared. The mathematical procedure commonly used to adjust rates for age differ-
ences is direct or indirect standardization.
ADVERSE REACTION, SIDE EFF'ECT Any undesirable or unwanted consequence of a pre-
ventive, diagnostic, or therapeutic procedure.
AETIOI.OGY, AETIOLOCIC See ETIOLOGY, ETIOLOGIC.
AGE DEPENDENCY RATIO See DEPENDENCY RATIO.
AGENT (OF DISEASE) A factor, such as a microorganism, chemical substance, or form of
radiation, whose presence, excessive presence, or (in deficiency diseases) relative
absence is essential for the occurrence of a disease. A disease may have a single
agent, a number of independent alternative agents (al least one of which must be
present), or a complex of two or more factors whose combined presence is essential
for thrdevelopment of the disease. See also CAUSnu-T-Y; NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT
CAUSE.
ACE-PERIOD COHORT ANALYSIS See COHORT ANALYSIS.
AGE-SEx PYRAMID See POPULATION PYRAMID. AGE-SEx_ REGISTER List of all clients or patients of a
medical practice or s_ervice, classi-
fied by age (birthdate) and sex; provides denominator for calculating age- and sex-
specific rates.
AGE-SPECIFIC FERTILtTY RATE The number of births occurring during a specified pe-
5 aealytic study
riod to women of a specified age group, divided by the number of person-years
lived during that period by women of that age group. When an age-specific fertility
rate is calculated for a calendar year, the number of births to women of the speci-
fied age is usually divided by the midyear population of women of that age.
ACE-SPEGIFIC RATE A nte for a specified age group. The numerator and denominator
refer to the same age group.
Example:
Age-specific death
rate (age Y5-34)
Number of deaths among residents
age 25-34 in an area in a year
x 100,000
Average (or midyear) population
age 25-34 in the area in that year
The multiplier (usually 100,000 or 1.000,000) is chosen to produce a rate that can
be expressed as a convenient number.
ACE STANDARDIZATION A procedure for adjusting rates, e.g. death rates, designed to
minimize the effects of differences in age composition when comparing rates for
dl(ferenl populations. See also ADJUSTMENT, STANDARDIZATION.
AGCREGATION S1AS (Syn: ecological bias) See ECOLOGICAL FALLACY.
AGING OF THE PQPOLAT7ON A demographic term, meaning an increase over time in the
proportion of older persons in the population. It does not necessarih imply an
increase in life expectancy or that "people are living longer than they used to." The
principal determinant of aging in the population has been a decline in the birth
rate: when fewer children are born than in prior vears, the result, in the absence
of a rise in the death rate at higher ages. has been an increase in the proportion of
older persons in the population. In developed societies, however. mortalitY change
is becoming a factor: little further mortality reduction can occur in thc lirsl hall of
life, so reductions are beginning to occur in the third and fourth quarters of lile,
leading 10 a rise in the proportion of older persons from this cause.
AIRBORNE INFECTION A mechanism of transmission of an infectious agenl bY particles,
dust, or DROPLET NUCLEI suspended in the air. See als0 TRANSMI3SION OF INFECTION.
ALGORrTHM Any systematic process that consists of an ordered sequence of steps with
each step depending on the outcome of the previous one. The term is conlmonly
used to describe a structured process, for insunce, relating to computer program-
ming or to health planning. See also DECISION TREE.
IrAt.GORmtM, CUNICAL (Syn: clinical protocol) An explicit description rsf sleps to be taken
in patient care in specified circumstances. This approach makes use of branching
logic and of all pertinent data, both about the patient and from epidemiologic and
other sources, to arrive at decisions that yield maximum benefit and minimum risk.
ALLELE Alternative forms of a gene, occupying the same locus on a chromosrnne.
ALPHA ERROR See ERROR. TYPE 1.
ALPHA LEVEL See SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
,~NALYSIS OF VARIANCE A statistical technique that isolates and assesses the contribution
of categorical independent variables 10 Yariation in the mean of a continuous de-
pendent variable. The observations are classified according to their calegories for
each of the independent variables, and the differences between the categories in
their mean values on the dependent variable are estimated and tested for statistical
significance.
J NALYTIC STUDY A study designed to examine associations- colnmonly putative or hy-
polhr.,ized causal relationships. An analytic study is usually concerned with idrnli-
R.M4,VII /'SC[..0Z

anirn.f model 6
fying or measuring the effects of risk factors, or is concerned with the health effects
of specific exposure(s). Contrast descriptive study, which does not test hypotheses.
The common types of analytic study are CROSS-SECTIONAL, COHORT, and cASE-GON-
TROL. In an analytic study, individuals in the study population may be classified
according to absence or presence (or future development) of specific disease and
according to "attributes" that may influence disease occurrence. Attributes may in-
clude age, race, sex, other disease(s), geneuc, biochemical, and physiological char-
acteristics, economic status, occupation, residence, and various aspects of the envi-
ronment or personal behavior. See 2130 _ CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT STUDY; GROSS-
SECTIONAL S_TVDY; STUDY DESIGN. ANIMAL MODEL Study in a population of laboratory animals that uses
conditions of an-
imals analogous to conditions of humans to model processes comparable to those
that occur r in human populations. See a1s0 ExrERtMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY.
ANTAGONISM Opposite o_ f SYNERGtsM. The situation in which the combined effect of two
or more factors is smaller than the solitary effect of any one of the factors. In
elOAssAY, the term may he used to refer to the situation when a specified response
is produced by exposure to either of two factors but_ not by exposure to both to-
gether.
ANTTttaoroMETRY The technique that deals with the measurement of the size, weight,
and proportions of the human body.
ANrsrwororxtuc (adj.) Pertaining to an insect's preference for feeding on humans even
when nonhuman hosts are available.
ANTI/ODY Protein molecule formed by exposure to a"foreign" or extraneous substance,
e.g., invading microorganisms responsible for infection, or active immunization. May
also be present as a result of passive transfer from mother to infant, via immune
globulin, etc. Antibody has the capacity to bind specifically to the foreign substance
(antigen) that elicited its production, thus supplying a mechanism for protection
against infectious diseases. Antibody is epidemiologically important because its con-
centration (titer) can be measured in individuals, and, therefore, in populations_ .
See also SEROErIDEMiOIAGY. ANTtGEN A substance (protein, polysaccharide, glycolipid, tissue
transplant, etc.) that is
capable of inducing specific immune response. Introduction of antigen may be by
the invasion of infectious organisms, immunization, inhalation, ingestion, etc.
ANTICENIC DRIR This term describes the "evolutionary" changes that uke place in the
molecular structure of DNA/RNA in micro-organisms during their passage from
one host to another. It may be due to recombination, deletion or insertion of genes,
to point mutations, or to several of these events. This process has been studied in
common viruses, notably the influenza virus.' It leads to alteration (usually slow
and progressive) in the antigenic composition, and thus in the immunologic re-
sponses of individuals and populations to exposure to the micro-organisms con-
cerned. See also ANTIGE_NIC SHIrT.
' Palcse P. 1'oung JF: Variation of Influenza A. B, and C Viruses. Seuwr 215:1468-1473. 1982.
ANTIGENIC sHt" This term describes mutation, i.e.. a sudden change in molecular
structure of DNA/RNA in micro-organisms, especially viruses, which produces new
strains of the microorganism. Hosts previously exposed to other strains have little
or no acquired immunity. Antigenic shift is believed to be the explanation for the
occurrence of strains of the influenza A virus associated with large-scale epidemic
and pandemic spread. Antigenic shift is responsibk for the susceptibility of host
populations to a new strain of influenza virus. See als0 ANTICENIC DRIrT.
ANTICENICI7Y (Syn: immunogenicity) The ability of agent(s) to produce a systemic or a
local immunologic reaction in the host. -
,
7 u.ociation, a.rmmetrical
Asuovtrtus A group of taxonomically diverse animal viruses that are unified by an ep-
idemiologic concept, i.e., transmission between vertebrate host organisms_ by blood-
feeding (hematophagous) arthropod vectors such as mosquitoes, ticks, sand flies,
and midges. The term is a contraction of arthropod-borne virus.
The intenction of arbovirus, vertebrate host(s), and arthropod vector gives this
class of infections several unique epidemiologic features. See VECTOR-s_ORNE INEE6-
TION for definition of terms used to describe these features.
AREA 6AMrL_INC A method of sampling that can be used when the numbers in the pop-
ulation are unknown. The total area to be sampled is divided into subareas, e.g., by
means of a grid that produces squares on a map; these subareas are then numbered
and sampled, using a table of random numbers. Depending upon circumstances.
the population in the sampled areas_ may first be enumerated, then a second stage
of sampling may be conducted. -
ARUTHMEI7C MEAN The sum of all the values in a set of ineasuremenu, divided by the
number of values in the set.
AR17F7CIAL 1NrELLIGENCE A branch of computer science in which attempts are made to
V duplicate human intellectual functions. One application is in diagnosis, in which
computer programs are often based upon epidemiologic analyses of data in hospital
charts or other clinical records.
ASCERTAWMt7NT Tfle process of determining what is happening in a population or study
group, e.g., famih and household composition, occurrence of cases of specific dis-
eases: the latter is also known as case-finding.
ASCERTAINMENT s1A5 Systematic failure to represent equally 211 classes of nses or per-
sons supposed to be represented in a sample. This bias may arise because of the
nature of the sources from which persons come. e.g., a specialized clinic: From a
diagnostic process influenced by culture, custom, or idiosvncracy; or, for example,
in genetic studies, from the statistical chance of selecting from large or small fami-
lies.
ASSAY The quantitative or qualitative evaluation of a hazardous substance; ; the results
of such an evaluation.
Asso_CSwnON (Syn: correlation, (statistialJ dependence, relationship) Sutistical depen-
dence between two or more events, characteristics, or other variables. An associa-
tion is present if the probability of occurrence of an event or characteristic, or the
quantity of a variable. depends upon the occurrence of one or more other events,
the presence of one or more other characteristics, or the quantity of one or more
other variables. The association between two variables is described as positive when
the occurrence of higher values of a variable is associated with the occurrence of
higher values of another variable. In a negative association, the occurrence of higher
values of one variable is associated with lower values of the other variaMe. An as-
sociation may be fortuitous or may be produced by various other circumstances;
the presence of an association does not necessarily imply a causal relationship. If
the use of the term "association"is confined 10 situations in which the relationship
between two variables is statistically significant, the terms "statistical association" and
"sutistically significant association" become tautological. However, ordinary usage
is seldom so precise as this. The terms "association" and "relationshili" are often
used interchangeably.
Associations can be broadly grouped under two headings, symmetrical or non-
causal (see below) and asymmetrical or causal.
Ai6OCtATION, ASYMMETRICAL (Syn: asymmetrical relationship) The definitive conditions
of asymmetrical associations are direction and time. Independent variable X must
cause changes in dependent variable Y, and the "caucal" va6at.h m,.-r n..._.a- ?1.
C4.C?'TSCzOZ
