Philip Morris
Using Federal Funds to Lobby State and Local Leaders
Fields
- Area
- NICOLI,DAVID/OFFICE
- Document File
- 2023197591/2023197978/Tobacco Assist
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- Author (Organization)
- RJR Nabisco
- Named Organization
- Assist, Assist
- Congress
- Health Care Coalition
- Hhs, Dept of Health and Human Services
- Legal Services
- Mn Tobacco Control Lobby
- NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
- Nm Comm on the Public Health Impact of S
- American Cancer Society
- Site
- W6
- Named Person
- Sullivan
- Request
- Stmn/R1-037
- Stmn/R1-072
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- ied85e00
Document Images
.
RENT BY:RJR NABISCQ
;' 3-24-92 ; 14:27 ; 2026257208i 202457'9350;4 2
UlLOkA>t[M
Using rsderal Yunds to Lobby etate and Local Leaderr
The Department of Health and Human Services has created a new
federal program which will allow federal funds to be used to lobby
state and local elected and appointed officials. Called the
American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for cancer Prevention or
"ASSIST, I' the program is designed to reduce smoking by establishing '
and funding community-based smoking control coalitions in states
and large metropolitan areas. These grass-roots organizations
would be responsible for accomplishing the goals of the program by,
among other things, lobbying - by having a direct impact on and
involvement with local media and policymakers.
The National Cancer Institute is the agency within the
Department charged with the management of the ASSIST program.
Potential grantees were sent a model program to use to develop
their grant proposals, which was only made public through a Freedom
of Information Act request. This model makes several
recommendations for activities whioh would clearly call for
lobbying. For example, under a section entitled, "Integrating
Policies into a Comprehensive Initiative," grantees are told that
smoking control advocates should inform policymakers of the
importance and benefits of smoking control policies. Under
Recommended Activities, the model program states that each grantee
should:
"[p]rovide information to policymakers on the hazards of
involuntary smoking and smokeless tobacco, the addictive
properties of nicotine, improper or deceptive advertising
practices used to promote tobacco use, the potential for
excise taxes to reduce consumption, the degree of public
support for restricting smoking in public, and the benefits of
smoking control policies. This information can be given to
policymakers in a variety of ways, including workshops,
meetings with individual policymakers, and through testimony,
letters, and the media."
The model program does.include a disclaimer on lobbying, but
then includes in each of the grants awarded to the states a form
entitled, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities."
The Department of Health and Human Services will spend $115
million over seven years on the ASSIST program. An additional $25
to $30 million will be provided by the American Cancer Society.
Moreover, the Department also will spend approximately $20 million
for national coordination and evaluation.
Thirty-seven states submitted proposals to receive ASSIST
funds, and seventeen states were awarded grants. These include
Colorado, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and
Wisconsin.

SENT BY:RJR NABISCO ; 3-24-92 ; 14:28 ; 20262617206y 20245793504 3
When one looks at the actual grant applications that have been
approved, which were also available only under the Freedom of
Information Act, it becomes clear that one of the primary goals of
the ASSIST program is to create a grass-roots lobbying organization
around the United States. For example, the New Jersey ASSIST
program would use part of its federal funds to underwrite a task
force that will (1) amend existing clean indoor air laws; (2) enact
legislation that will restrict minors access to tobacco products;,
and (3) promote a state excise tax or ad valorem tax.
The Massachusetts ASSIST program will use part of its federal
funds to finance a conference involving advocacy and legislative
leaders to draft legislation which would be submitted
simultaneously to all of the New England state legislatures.
The Now Mexico ASSIST program would use federal funds to help
finance the New Mexico Committee on the Public Health Impact of
Smoking (NMCPHIS). The goal of the committee is to make New Mexico
a tobacco free state by 1996. In the past, the Committee has
employed a full-time lobbyist to work the state legislature, but it
has run short of funds. With the infusion of federal funds, the
Comntittee and the New Mexico ASSIST program will "be merged."
Some of the grantees were a bit skittish about being too
directly involved in lobbying. For example, the Minnesota ASSIST
program indicated that it would consider retaining the state's
existing tobacco control lobby as a subcontractor. The Colorado
ASSIST program would use part of its funds to organize and oversee
all of the various groups that are lobbying for legislative
changes.
Given the experience that many have had when the Legal
Services Corporation chose to use taderal funds to lobby Congrsss,
the ASSIST program creates an alarming precedent which should be
stopped immediately. As the Minnesota grantee noted in its
proposal,
"What is especially exciting about the plan is that it has the
potential to contribute a variety of benef its to the state
after the goals of ASSIST have been met. it will provide an
excellent opportunity for the creation of a broadly-based
health care coalition which could serve the state in other
health promotion eftorts."
All one has to do is substitute "abortion" or "family
planning" for I'smoking" to get a sense of the potential dangers of
the ASSIST program.
Secretary Sullivan should take the necessary steps to regain
control over the ASSIST program and make sure that federal funds
are not used to lobby federal, state, and local officials. Once
the federal government begins to finance one side of a public
policy debate, there can be no debate. There will only be the
federal government's position.
