Philip Morris
Summary of Discussion Regarding Support for Basic Research
Fields
- Type
- SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/100 PARK FILE ROOM
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Named Organization
- Kraft General Foods
- Nas, Natl Academy of Sciences
- Scripps Research Inst
- Nas, Natl Academy of Sciences
- Named Person
- Edelman, G.
- Lerner, R.
- Nobel
- Lerner, R.
- Document File
- 2023038165/2023038344/PM Research Program Review 900000
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Master ID
- 2023038166/8343
Related Documents:- 2023038166
- 2023038167 Philip Morris Support for Basic Research
- 2023038172-8202 Curriculum Vitae Richard Alan Lerner, M.D.
- 2023038203-8214 Curriculum Vitae Gerald M. Edelman
- 2023038215-8217
- 2023038218-8219 Gerald Maurice Edelman A Biological Sketch
- 2023038220
- 2023038221 Richard A. Cramer
- 2023038222-8228 William H. Beers 6436 Avenida Cresta La Jolla, Ca 92037
- 2023038229 Arthur J. Benvenuto Biography
- 2023038230-8232 Biographical Sketch Ames S. Early
- 2023038233-8236 Curriculum Vitae Charles C. Edwards, M.D.
- 2023038237-8240 James C. Gaither Career Summary
- 2023038242-8245 Background William E. Nelson
- 2023038246 David S. Tappan Jr. 910200 Biography
- 2023038247-8251 Alejandro Zaffaroni, Ph.D. 910823 Biography
- 2023038252
- 2023038253-8259 A Research Institute
- 2023038260 Notice the Difference and You Will Change Your View About Smoking
- 2023038261
- 2023038266 Philip Morris Research
- 2023038271
- 2023038283 Physical Research
- 2023038284
- 2023038285-8289 Conf T. Osdene / Bob Pages
- 2023038290-8291
- 2023038293-8295 Art Support
- 2023038296-8297 Research Program Review
- 2023038298-8299 Research Projects in 900000, in Vivo Studies
- 2023038300
- 2023038301
- 2023038302-8309 Internal Reports Issued by the Research and Development Department Period Covered: 891215 - 900228 Volume 6, Issue 1
- 2023038310 Research Program Review
- 2023038311 Research Program Review - Richmond R&D
- 2023038312-8327
- 2023038328-8343
- Site
- N28
- Date Loaded
- 14 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- ueo87e00
Document Images
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS REGARDIN
SUPPORT FOR BASIC RESEAR H
Some of the products manufactured by the operating companies of Philip
Morris have been implicated in one way or another with various chronic human
diseases. With respect to cigarettes in particular, but also with respect to other
products manufactured by the Company, we have taken the position publicly that,
until the fundamental biological mechanisms of cancer and other chronic diseases
are understood, no categorical conclusions about the role of any product in these
diseases can be reached. We have also publicly said that more research is necessary
in order to discover how these biologicall mechanisms work.
Recent developments in scientific research, especially in the areas of cell
biology and molecular genetics, suggest that important breakthroughs may soon be
possible which will significantly improve our understanding of the processes by
which many chronic diseases occur.
For these reasons, and because current Philip Morris basic research support is
not focused in a manner which brings the most benefit to the varied interests of the
Philip Morris companies and our consumers as well as the total body of science,
there has been increased interest at Philip Morris in supporting a more focused
research effort which will provide answers to these difficult issues.
We have consulted with some of the leading scientists in the field of basic
research in an- effort to determine what research to support, and how. Two such
scientists, Gerald Edelman, a Nobel Laureate as a result of his work on the chemical
structure of antibodies, and now with The Scripps Research Institute, and Richard
Lerner, a member of the National Academy of Science and President of The Scripps
Research Institute, have been asked to advise the Company on these issues and
research matters generally.
N
O
N
O
CW
0
~
Ow.

~...._ _:...~ . :__:.:.. _.,.,;. ..~----- -_. ..._.... .:
t
Edelman and Lerner wholeheartedly support the basic research concept, and
have urged us to identify a unique research niche that a program sponsored by
Philip Morris could occupy. They urged us to support research which would meet
the following four criteria:
1. lead to an understanding of the cellular mechanisms involved in
chronic diseases;
2. be at the "cutting edge" of current scientific investigation;
3. be attractive to the best researchers throughout the world; and
4. have the potential to lead to a major advancement in the state of
scientific knowledge.
They further recommended the creation of a research institute which would bring
together, under one roof, leading scientists, to focus on research meeting these
criteria. Understanding that we preferred not to fund "bricks and mortar" or
manage research laboratories, they suggested asking an existing research
or anization to provide the land, build the laboratories and lease them to us, as well
.
asrri
~anage the institute. We would then provide the major initial funding to
accompany whatever other research grants the scientists were able to obtain.
Edelman and Lerner recommended this concept, rather than the more
traditional corporate funding of researchers located in institutions scattered
throughout the world, because it is truly unique. For the first time, an entire
institute would be devoted to one research area providing the opportunity for
interaction, on a regular and frequent basis, among researchers in that area. They
emphasized that this focus and daily sharing of ideas would optimize the chances
for significant scientific breakthroughs.
As discussions with Edelman and Lerner were taking place, scientists at Kraft
General Foods were exploring the area of nutrition research. More specifically,
these scientists were addressing the questions of how nutrition, foods and nutrients,
2

can be employed to improve functional health and offset the health risks associated
with our lifestyles and environments. Scientists working on both projects agreed to
discuss whether the two could be merged into a common project which would be of
value to all areas of the Company and provide a vehicle for consolidation of all
Philip Morris sponsored basic research. The objective of such a project would be to
contribute to the advancement of basic scientific knowledge in a defined area so that
the knowledge could be applied to the consumer products of Philip Morris
companies, to optimize their impact on the quality of life of our customers, as weIl
as contribute to the advancement of science generally.
Subsequent meetings and discussions among Philip Morris scientists and Drs.
Edelman and Lerner resulted in agreement with the four research criteria
previously mentioned, as well as the addition of two more: -
1. that the research be, and be seen to be, pro bono publico; and
2. that the research contribute information useful to the specific business
needs of the Philip Morris companies.
The participants in these discussions agreed that the most spectacular results
in biomedical research during the next decade will be achieved in the area of Signal
Transduction, which is concerned with the mechanisms by which extracellular
stimuli elicit both transitory and lasting responses in cells. Normal cell growth and
differentiation are dependent on the ability of the cell to receive, interpret and
respond appropriately to both external and internal signals. An understanding of
how cells process these signals will lead to an understanding of the mechanisms
involved in both normal cell growth as well as aberrant cell behavior leading to
chronic diseases. Not only will such an understanding lead to the prevention and
cure of certain chronic diseases, but it will provide essential information for ways
we can modify our-products to change beneficially cell responses which will lead to
better health, improved functional capacity and a better quality of life, covering an
entire life span.
3

Research into Signal Transduction meets all the research criteria.
1. This research studies the mechanisms by which outside stimuli affect
the growth and development of cells - some benign and quite normal, others;
leading to disease.
2. This research contributes to a basic understanding of cell biology and,
therefore, to scientific knowledge generally. In this sense, it is indeed pro bono
publico.
3. This is the next great research area, the study of which is just beginning.
It is exciting, "cutting edge" research, which will attract the best scientific minds.
4. This research provides the greatest potential for scientific
breakthroughs which, when they occur, will have the most impact on the
understanding of the human disease processes, leading to prevention and cures for
the major chronic diseases affecting our aging population.
5. This research may lead to new products, or modifications in current
products, which will have an effect on our health and quality of life. Therefore, this
research could contribute information useful to the specific business needs of Philip
Morris companies.
We are continuing to explore specific issues, including whether an institute is
indeed the best way to achieve our research objectives and, if so, how it should be
organized and managed, what should be its size and location, and how much
funding should we provide. We are also continuing to discuss the specific ways in
which such research may provide us with opportunities to improve our products
and benefit our consumers.
4
N
0
N
CJ
O
W
~
