Jump to:

Philip Morris

More and More Firms Adopt Smoking Policies

Date: 26 Jun 1990
Length: 2 pages
2022875490-2022875491
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2022875490-2022875491

Fields

Type
COMP, COMPUTER PRINTOUT
NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
Site
N326
Area
PARRISH,STEVE/OFFICE
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
Named Organization
Pacific Northwest Bell
Smoking Policy Inst
US Today
Author (Organization)
Lexis Nexis
Mead Data Central
US Today
Master ID
2022875166/5504
Related Documents:
Named Person
Reynolds, B.
Rosner, R.
Litigation
Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
Okag/Produced
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
rjb02a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: rjb02a00 Log in for more options!
Services of Mead Data Central;, Inc. LEVEL 1- 4©F 55 STORIES Copyright cc? 1990 Gannett Company Inc. USA TODAY June 26, 1:990, Tuesday, FINAL EDITION SECTION: NEWS LENGTH: 336 words HEADLINE: More and more firms adopt smoking policies PAGE 11 BODY: Robert Rosner, 33 is executive director of the Seattle-based Smoking Polic Institute, a non-profit organization that works with businesses on t he issue of smo ing. He was interviewed yUSTOD" s ar ara eynol s. USA TODAY: Isn't the issue of smoking at work a relatively new concern for business? ROSNER: I started on the iissue eight years ago and I have seen an incredible increase in interest on smoking policies at work. USA TODAY: You advise employers. What do they ask you? ROSNER: They realize that there are problems associated with smoking in the workplace. Companies are getting complaints from employees, and'they have decided that they need to do something. USA TODAY: What do you advise them? ROSNER: We go through a:problem-solving approach,of looking at their facilities, and looking at their ventilation system and their people, and we try to determine the best policy for their needs. USA TODAY: Do you have an example of a company that has banned smoking? ROSNER: Pacific Northwest Bell introduced a total ban on smoking in the workplace five years ago. USA TODAY: What was the reaction of the employees? ROSNER: The company recently did a survey and asked employees, is our policy right? And 70% agreed it was right. It then asked how many thought that it was not strict enough, and 19% said it was not. USA TODAY: Weren't a lot of smokers angry? ROSNER: What's interesting in this study was that 60% of the smokers said t he ban~on smoking was adequate. USA TODAY: Are you finding that more companies are refusing to hire workers who smoke? ROSNER: Not really. The number for that has remained quite constant. We very strenuously advise companies not to refuse to hire smokers. And there are t= LEJIS "NEu e s"LEXIs"NEXe s"
Page 2: rjb02a00 Log in for more options!
Servrces of Mead Data Central, Ina. PAGE 12 (c) 1990 USA TODAY, June 2b, 1990 companies that say you can't smoke outside of our building, and I think that is wrong. Once an employee goes home, why be concerned about that? My position is that once an employee leaves the building or is on his own time, smoking is irreievant. SUBJECT: SMOKING; EMPLOYEE NOTES: Accompanies; Topic; SMOKING AT WORK; There's no doubt; we must ban smoking Cm LEXISONEx IsOc Ex IS®NE x Is0

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: