Philip Morris
Where There's Smoke, There's Ire. After Years on the Defensive, Smokers Fight Back
Fields
- Author
- Schachter, J.
- Type
- COMP, COMPUTER PRINTOUT
- NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
- Area
- PARRISH,STEVE/OFFICE
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Site
- N326
- Named Organization
- Clean Air Associates
- Group Against Smoking Pollution
- Group Health
- Harvard Univ
- Inst for Study of Smoking Behavior + Pol
- Long Island Railroad
- People United for Friendly Smoking
- Service Employees Intl Union
- Smokers Rights Alliance
- Smoking Policy Inst
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Usg
- Afl Cio Executive Council
- Associated Press
- Bakery Confectionery + Tobacco Workers I
- Cafe Beverly Hills
- Group Against Smoking Pollution
- Author (Organization)
- Lexis Nexis
- Los Angeles Times
- Mead Data Central
- Times Mirror
- Los Angeles Times
- Named Person
- Addison, R.K.
- Brenton, D.
- Francis, C.
- Gadberry, B.
- Lipson, A.
- Mendola, T.
- Nation, C.
- Overall, D.
- Overall, S.
- Rigotti, N.
- Rosner, R.
- Scannell, R.
- Surgeon General
- Brenton, D.
- Master ID
- 2022875166/5504
Related Documents:- 2022875166 Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875167-5504 Smoking Policy Institute Incorporation and Stated Purpose
- 2022875182-5186 Smoking Policy Institute Index
- 2022875188 Certificate of Incorporation to Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875189-5199 Articles of Incorporation of Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875201 Certificate of Reinstatement to Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875202-5203 Application of Domestic Non Profit Corporation for Reinstatement
- 2022875204 Delinquency Notice
- 2022875205 Certificate of Administrative Dissolution
- 2022875206 Non Profit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875207 Nonprofit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875208 Statement of Change of Registered Office, Registered Agent, or Both Profit Corporations
- 2022875209 Non Profit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875210 Non Profit Corporation Reinstatement Report
- 2022875212 Application for Status As A Public Benefit Nonprofit Corporation
- 2022875214-5215 Ban on Smoking in Industry
- 2022875217-5218 Subsidizing Smokers - Something to Burn Over
- 2022875220-5221 Health Group Bans Smoking
- 2022875223 Smoking Policy Seminar to Be Held
- 2022875225-5228 2 Burning Questions: Who Tells Smokers to Put It Out?
- 2022875230-5232 Business Notes
- 2022875234-5235 Nonsmoking Business Can Mean Money in Bank, Conference Told
- 2022875237-5239 Where There's Smoke in the Office, There's Fire
- 2022875241-5242 Workplace Smoking Ban Works, Researchers Say
- 2022875244-5245 Uc - San Francisco, Feature / Banning Smoking in Workplace Helps Smokers Quit But They Don't Quit Their Jobs, Researcher Finds
- 2022875247 Doctor Says Hospitals Should Ban Smoking
- 2022875249 Doctor Urges Hospitals to Ban Smoking
- 2022875251-5271 the Macneil / Lehrer Newshour South Africa: Confronting Apartheid, Holy War, Campaign 850000: Senate Sweepstakes, Fumes at Work
- 2022875273-5275 the Drive to Kick Smoking at Work
- 2022875277-5281 the Smoking Lamp Is Definitely Not Lit, Firms in Northwest Lead Nation in Imposing Total Ban on Lighting Up in the Workplace
- 2022875283-5301 Macneil / Lehrer Newshour Fallout, Second-Hand Smoke
- 2022875303-5304 Warning: in More and More Places, Smoking Causes Fines
- 2022875306-5307 Appeals Court Rules Nonsmokers May Sue Employers for Negligence
- 2022875309-5310 Nonsmokers May Sue Employers, Appeals Court Precedent Rules.
- 2022875312-5315 Mounting Drive on Smoking Stirs Tensions in Workplace
- 2022875317-5322 Warning: No Smoking in the Office Anymore
- 2022875324 Washington State Supreme Court Will Review Secondhand Smoke Case.
- 2022875326-5333 Cry, the Embattled Smoker. Fume and Gloom As Activists Invade Tobacco Road
- 2022875335-5340 Is Smoking in Public on Its Last Gasps?. Tempers Flare As Anti-Cigarette Forces Wage An All-Out War
- 2022875342-5343 Thou Shalt Not Smoke. Companies Restrict the Use of Tobacco in the Workplace
- 2022875345 for Travelers, the Breathing Is Easiest in First Class
- 2022875347-5351 A Last Gasp for Smokers on Airliners?
- 2022875353-5357 the New Pariahs. Drinking Drivers, Smokers and Swingers Targeted in Sudden Turnaround of Attitudes
- 2022875359-5360 New Study Says Federal Agencies Smoking Policies Inadequate
- 2022875362-5363 Koop Pleased at Progress in Cutting Federal Workplace Smoking
- 2022875365-5367 There's No Smoke, Little Ire for Skokie's Police Recruits
- 2022875369-5370 Majority of Companies Have Smoking Policies
- 2022875372-5374 Smokers Hide and Drag Harder As Society Makes Them Outcasts
- 2022875376-5378 Workplace Smoke Lightening Up As Fewer Light Up
- 2022875385-5392 Smoking & Drug Policies. Whose Rights?. Over 40 Percent of the Nation's Largest Employers Have Drug-Testing Policies. Over 50 Percent Have Smoking Restrictions. Are They Reaching Too Far Into Employees' Personal Lives?
- 2022875394-5395 Taking on Big Tobacco in Dixie
- 2022875397-5403 the Ten Healthiest Cities in America
- 2022875405-5412 All Fired Up Over Smoking. New Laws and Attitudes Spark A War
- 2022875414-5417 Smoking Becomes 'deviant Behavior'
- 2022875419-5421 Weeding Smokers Out of the Workplace
- 2022875423-5425 Court Ruling Heats Up Smoking War
- 2022875427
- 2022875429 Seattle Smoking Foe Cited by Koop
- 2022875431-5449 Pentagon Probe. Iran - Contra Case. Kids and Smoking
- 2022875451-5452
- 2022875454-5457 Preaching, Not Puffing, Born-Again Quitters Seek 'converts', But Smokers Still Resist the Message
- 2022875459-5460 Smoking, Anti Smoking Group Knows How to Clear the Air
- 2022875462 Reduced Medical Plan Rates Offered to Smokefree Employers of Non-Smokers
- 2022875464-5467 Insurance Carrier Cuts Losses on High-Risk Clients
- 2022875469-5470 the Executive Life, Humiliating Times for A Boss Who Smokes
- 2022875472-5474 Insurer Offers Discounts to Non-Smoking Groups. Some Companies Holding Out on Smoking Policies.
- 2022875476-5477 Smokers: An Endangered Species
- 2022875479-5481 Burning Issue at Work, Firms' Rules Put Smokers Under Fire
- 2022875483-5485
- 2022875487-5488 Epa: Keep Smokers Nonsmokers Apart
- 2022875490-5491 More and More Firms Adopt Smoking Policies
- 2022875493-5494 Where There's Smoke You May Be Fired - or at Least Not Hired
- 2022875496-5499 Don't Light Up Near Me.
- 2022875501-5504 Tobacco Profits Still A Picture of Health
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- vib02a00
Document Images
Servioes of Mead' Data Central, Ina
LEVEL 4- 26 OF 55 STORIES
Copyright (c) ' 1988 The Times Mirror Company;
Los Angeles Times
January 14, 1988, Thursday, Home Edition
SECTION!: Business; Part 4; Page 1; Column 1; Financial Desk
LENGTH: 1493 words
PAGE 96
HEADLINE: WHERE THERE'S SMOKE, THERE'S IRE;
AFTER YEARS ON THE DEFENSIVE, Sl/UKERS k IGHT BACK
,.
BYLINE:' By JIM SCHACHTER, Times Staff Writer
BODY:
Remember the not-so-long-ago days when smokers would rather have fought than
switched? When they'd have walked a mile for a cigarette?
That fervor for smoking -- a phenomenon that might seem to have whee2ed its
last gasp as city after city, from Los Angeles to New York, imposed restrictions
on lighting up -- still burns brightly in some quarters.
r
l The quarrel New Year's Eve over a smoking ban on an L.A.-bound jet was onl y
one sign that inveterate smokers -- insisting on their right to enjoy a habit
with proven deadly effects -- are trying to choke back an ever-tightening noose
of limitations on smoking i'n public places and at work.
Other reports from the battlefront:
~ * In Minneapolis, a labor arbitrator last year overturned a ban on smoking
~.
imposed by Group Health, a large Twin Cities health maintenance organization.
The Service Employees International Union said the company had failedito
negotiate the restriction with workers.
* Restaurateurs and other business operators won the reversal of no-smoking
ordinances last year in Telluride, Colo., and Beverly Hills, where one
recalcitrant smoker paid a $100 fine rather than stub out a butt while dining at
the Cafe Beverly Hills.
+~ Amy Lipson of Baldwin~, N.Y. -- physically dependent on cigarettes,
according to a doctor"s testimony -- has asked a New York administrative court
to rule that a department store's policy of refusing to hire smokers is a form
of illegal discrimination against the medically disabled.
* In less than a year,, more than 500 people -- one-third of them civil N
NN~
~
liberties-minded nonsmokers -- have joined the Smokers' Rights Alliance, a Mesa, ~
Ar1Z.-based group founded'after four Phoenix-area cities estabLished strict ~
prohibitfons on smoking in public places.
In each instance, tobacco's defenders insist, anti-smoking forces have pushed
too far.
"This is Big Brother. This is Carrie Nation. This is good old-fashioned'
prohibitionism run rampant " said Ray Scannell a spokesman for the Bakery
Confectionery and Tobacco ~Jorkers Internationai Union who, incidentally, is a
m m ® ®

Services of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE 97
(c) 1988 Los_Angeles Times, January 14, 1988
nonsmoker. "It's an attempt to dictate behavior, and Americans are not very good
at having behavior dictated to them, especially by self-righteous moralists w ho
have decided it's not good for you to smoke."
Smokers have been onithe defensive in the United States at least since 1964,
with the publication of the first surgeon general's report categorically linking
smoking to lung disease.
For men, the habit peaked in popularity that year, when 53% of adult males
smoked. Women's smoking hit its zenith a year later, with 34% smoking in 1965,
according to the industry-financed Tobacco Institute. Now, barely a third of the
adult population smokes cigarettes, the Institute says, and sales have slid
almost 9% since 1:981.
Meanwhile, anti-smoking activists -- further armed with the surgeon general's
1986 report on the dangers of second-hand smoke and a 1985 study about smoking's
role in industrial disease -- have grown more militant.
8anned on Some Flights
By the end of last year, the burgeoning nonsmoking movement had helped
convince 14 states to regulate smoking In private workplaces, 32 states to limit
smoking in public offices and perhaps as many as 350 local governments to
restrict smoking imrestaurants, hotels and other public places. On their own,
hundreds of businesses have banned smoking entirely in company buildings. At
least 40 won't knowingly hire smokers, according to a survey by the New Jersey
Group Against Smoking Pollution (GASP).
On Jan. 1, California banned smoking~on flights that begin and end in the
state. Congress slapped a prohibition against smoking on flights scheduled to
last two hours or less, effective in April. And with each new regulation,,
nonsmokers -- who before might have hesitated about asking a stranger to put out
a cigarette -- have grown bolder and bolder in their demands for fresh air.
"There's so much pressure on smokers now and so many people who~have bad
attitudes about the habit that people have to quit or smoke in closets," said
Robert Rosner, executive director of the Smoking Policy Institute in Seattle.
"There's incredible ill will toward smokers these days."
''tlany smokers have simply laid down before the anti-smoking steamroller,
limiting their habit to respect the preferences of the nonsmokers who surround
them. "Most smokers do not subscribe to the tobacco industry's concept that
smoking is an inalienable right," said Dr. Nancy Rigotti, associate director of
the Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy at Harvard
University.
Most nonsmoking policies, therefore, are put into effect with a minimum of
resistance and conflict, smoking experts say. "The number of instances of
non-compliance is really almost negligible, if you take the time to make it
work," said Rita K. Addison, president of Clean Air Associates, a Bostonn
consulting firm that has helped companies employing 250,000 workers implement
smoking restrictions.
Rebellion generally can be avoided, Addison and other consultants say, when
employers give workers plenty of warning that smoking will be limited in the
L EXI Z " tEXI ~~ Z. ` LEXIS KEXES,

Services of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE 98
1]
(c) 1988 Los Angeles Times, January 14, 1988
workplace, provide help in quitting for those who wish it and are consistent in
imposing the limitations. Similarly, communities that mandate nonsmoking areas
in restaurants and'other public places without barring smoking entirely have few
if any problems.
When the rules are less flexible, however, smokers begin to fume.
Singer Connie Francis, for instance, was booked on battery and trespas s
charges two years ago when she refused to extinguish a cigarette during a
refueling stop on a Nassau-to-Los Angeles flight. An off-duty New York City
police officer was shot in the face on New Year's EvQ a year ago by a youth he
had told to stop smoking in a nonsmoking car on the Long Island'Rail Road.
Tony Mendola, manager of the Cafe Beverly Hills, said he was never
comfortable enforcing the city's short-lived ban on restaurant smoking:. But in
the one case where police cited a patron in the restaurant, firm action was
necessary, Mendola explained.
"He was demanding his right to smoke, and he figured he was in a free country
and nobody should be telling him he didn't have a right to smoke,° the
restaurateur said. "He was loudand obnoxious and disrupting business."
Most smoker militancy is of a more measured sort.
Many unions are resisting the unilateral imposition of nonsmoking rules by
companies as an infringement on their bargaining rights. The AFL-CI0 Executive
Council in 1986 issued a statement calling for smoking issues to be worked out
voluntarily in individual workplaces, and lawyers say companies are obliged to
bargain with unions over limitations on smoking.
In the non-union sector, courts have held that neither the right to smoke nor
the right to work in a smoke-free environment is constitutionally guaranteed.
Smoking bans imposed by non-union employers have provoked union organizing
drives. One, at a plant operated by a USG Corp. division that ordered its
employees to stop smoking both on the job and away from work, wonithe support of
almost 25% of the work force, according to Scannell.
Smokers' rights groups, meanwhile, are forming in opposition to the
aritf-smoking forces' well-organized campaigns for local, state andifederal
regulation of smoking.
Polite and Pleasant
As its name implies, People United for Friendly Smoking -- or PUFS -- is not
into confrontational politics. Rather, the group, founded three years ago in St.
Simons Island, Ga., is fighting against the kind of closed-mindedness that
alienates friends.of long standing because one or the other becomes a strident
nonsmoker.
"We try to make ourselves as polite and pleasant as possible," said founder
Dean Overall, who smokes just under a pack a day but whose husband and
co-founder Sidney is a nonsmoker. "But what we do want to retain -- and this is
the other sid'e of the equation -- is some part of this Earth. We don't want to
be shoved into closets."
E139Pv'El,fl~~LEXIS * KEJ3S
m

Services of Mead Data Central, Ina
PAGE 99
(a) 1988 Los Angeles Times, January 14, 1988
The Smokers' Rights Alliance contends that anti-smoking groups exaggerate or
invent much of the evidence they use to demonstrate the dangers of second-hand
smoke. Its founder, David Brenton, says there is a backlash,developing among
smokers that could become ugly if the no-smoking advocates grow more
h i'g h-hand ed'.
"People try to figure out how to be tolerant In the situations they're forced
to deal with, but that doesn't mean they don't feel imposed upon," Brenton said.
"At this point, smokers ... don't know how to redirect that sense of
frustration. They feel in many cases it's a lost battle. They feel in many cases
it's not fair, but what can they do?
"That's precisely why our organization exists -- as a means to redirect that
energy," he said. "We don't think throwing blows is a good idea. But we think
that kind of thing will happen more and more, as the frustration level of
smokers is on the rise."
6RAPHIC: Photo, Ray Scanneli Associated Press; Photo, Beverly Hills' smoking ban
put retaurant manager Tony Mendola on the spot. BRIAN GADBERRY / Los Angeles
Times
SUBJECT:
SMOKING; UNITED STATES -- HEALTH; DISCRIMINATION; CIVIL RIGHTS; GOVERNMENT
REGULATIflN;, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING; UNIONS
N
O
tN
tJ
~
~
~
w
w
LEXIS 'f~'GxBS. 'LEXIS°i~'Ervi@S
