Jump to:

Philip Morris

Where There's Smoke, There's Ire. After Years on the Defensive, Smokers Fight Back

Date: 14 Jan 1988
Length: 4 pages
2022875380-2022875383
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2022875380-2022875383

Fields

Author
Schachter, J.
Type
COMP, COMPUTER PRINTOUT
NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
Area
PARRISH,STEVE/OFFICE
Litigation
Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
Okag/Produced
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
Site
N326
Named Organization
Clean Air Associates
Group Against Smoking Pollution
Group Health
Harvard Univ
Inst for Study of Smoking Behavior + Pol
Long Island Railroad
People United for Friendly Smoking
Service Employees Intl Union
Smokers Rights Alliance
Smoking Policy Inst
TI, Tobacco Inst
Usg
Afl Cio Executive Council
Associated Press
Bakery Confectionery + Tobacco Workers I
Cafe Beverly Hills
Author (Organization)
Lexis Nexis
Los Angeles Times
Mead Data Central
Times Mirror
Named Person
Addison, R.K.
Brenton, D.
Francis, C.
Gadberry, B.
Lipson, A.
Mendola, T.
Nation, C.
Overall, D.
Overall, S.
Rigotti, N.
Rosner, R.
Scannell, R.
Surgeon General
Master ID
2022875166/5504
Related Documents:
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
vib02a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: vib02a00 Log in for more options!
Servioes of Mead' Data Central, Ina LEVEL 4- 26 OF 55 STORIES Copyright (c) ' 1988 The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles Times January 14, 1988, Thursday, Home Edition SECTION!: Business; Part 4; Page 1; Column 1; Financial Desk LENGTH: 1493 words PAGE 96 HEADLINE: WHERE THERE'S SMOKE, THERE'S IRE; AFTER YEARS ON THE DEFENSIVE, Sl/UKERS k IGHT BACK ,. BYLINE:' By JIM SCHACHTER, Times Staff Writer BODY: Remember the not-so-long-ago days when smokers would rather have fought than switched? When they'd have walked a mile for a cigarette? That fervor for smoking -- a phenomenon that might seem to have whee2ed its last gasp as city after city, from Los Angeles to New York, imposed restrictions on lighting up -- still burns brightly in some quarters. r l The quarrel New Year's Eve over a smoking ban on an L.A.-bound jet was onl y one sign that inveterate smokers -- insisting on their right to enjoy a habit with proven deadly effects -- are trying to choke back an ever-tightening noose of limitations on smoking i'n public places and at work. Other reports from the battlefront: ~ * In Minneapolis, a labor arbitrator last year overturned a ban on smoking ~. imposed by Group Health, a large Twin Cities health maintenance organization. The Service Employees International Union said the company had failedito negotiate the restriction with workers. * Restaurateurs and other business operators won the reversal of no-smoking ordinances last year in Telluride, Colo., and Beverly Hills, where one recalcitrant smoker paid a $100 fine rather than stub out a butt while dining at the Cafe Beverly Hills. +~ Amy Lipson of Baldwin~, N.Y. -- physically dependent on cigarettes, according to a doctor"s testimony -- has asked a New York administrative court to rule that a department store's policy of refusing to hire smokers is a form of illegal discrimination against the medically disabled. * In less than a year,, more than 500 people -- one-third of them civil N NN~ ~ liberties-minded nonsmokers -- have joined the Smokers' Rights Alliance, a Mesa, ~ Ar1Z.-based group founded'after four Phoenix-area cities estabLished strict ~ prohibitfons on smoking in public places. In each instance, tobacco's defenders insist, anti-smoking forces have pushed too far. "This is Big Brother. This is Carrie Nation. This is good old-fashioned' prohibitionism run rampant " said Ray Scannell a spokesman for the Bakery Confectionery and Tobacco ~Jorkers Internationai Union who, incidentally, is a m m ® ®
Page 2: vib02a00 Log in for more options!
Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. PAGE 97 (c) 1988 Los_Angeles Times, January 14, 1988 nonsmoker. "It's an attempt to dictate behavior, and Americans are not very good at having behavior dictated to them, especially by self-righteous moralists w ho have decided it's not good for you to smoke." Smokers have been onithe defensive in the United States at least since 1964, with the publication of the first surgeon general's report categorically linking smoking to lung disease. For men, the habit peaked in popularity that year, when 53% of adult males smoked. Women's smoking hit its zenith a year later, with 34% smoking in 1965, according to the industry-financed Tobacco Institute. Now, barely a third of the adult population smokes cigarettes, the Institute says, and sales have slid almost 9% since 1:981. Meanwhile, anti-smoking activists -- further armed with the surgeon general's 1986 report on the dangers of second-hand smoke and a 1985 study about smoking's role in industrial disease -- have grown more militant. 8anned on Some Flights By the end of last year, the burgeoning nonsmoking movement had helped convince 14 states to regulate smoking In private workplaces, 32 states to limit smoking in public offices and perhaps as many as 350 local governments to restrict smoking imrestaurants, hotels and other public places. On their own, hundreds of businesses have banned smoking entirely in company buildings. At least 40 won't knowingly hire smokers, according to a survey by the New Jersey Group Against Smoking Pollution (GASP). On Jan. 1, California banned smoking~on flights that begin and end in the state. Congress slapped a prohibition against smoking on flights scheduled to last two hours or less, effective in April. And with each new regulation,, nonsmokers -- who before might have hesitated about asking a stranger to put out a cigarette -- have grown bolder and bolder in their demands for fresh air. "There's so much pressure on smokers now and so many people who~have bad attitudes about the habit that people have to quit or smoke in closets," said Robert Rosner, executive director of the Smoking Policy Institute in Seattle. "There's incredible ill will toward smokers these days." ''tlany smokers have simply laid down before the anti-smoking steamroller, limiting their habit to respect the preferences of the nonsmokers who surround them. "Most smokers do not subscribe to the tobacco industry's concept that smoking is an inalienable right," said Dr. Nancy Rigotti, associate director of the Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy at Harvard University. Most nonsmoking policies, therefore, are put into effect with a minimum of resistance and conflict, smoking experts say. "The number of instances of non-compliance is really almost negligible, if you take the time to make it work," said Rita K. Addison, president of Clean Air Associates, a Bostonn consulting firm that has helped companies employing 250,000 workers implement smoking restrictions. Rebellion generally can be avoided, Addison and other consultants say, when employers give workers plenty of warning that smoking will be limited in the L EXI Z " tEXI ~~ Z. ` LEXIS KEXES,
Page 3: vib02a00 Log in for more options!
Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. PAGE 98 1] (c) 1988 Los Angeles Times, January 14, 1988 workplace, provide help in quitting for those who wish it and are consistent in imposing the limitations. Similarly, communities that mandate nonsmoking areas in restaurants and'other public places without barring smoking entirely have few if any problems. When the rules are less flexible, however, smokers begin to fume. Singer Connie Francis, for instance, was booked on battery and trespas s charges two years ago when she refused to extinguish a cigarette during a refueling stop on a Nassau-to-Los Angeles flight. An off-duty New York City police officer was shot in the face on New Year's EvQ a year ago by a youth he had told to stop smoking in a nonsmoking car on the Long Island'Rail Road. Tony Mendola, manager of the Cafe Beverly Hills, said he was never comfortable enforcing the city's short-lived ban on restaurant smoking:. But in the one case where police cited a patron in the restaurant, firm action was necessary, Mendola explained. "He was demanding his right to smoke, and he figured he was in a free country and nobody should be telling him he didn't have a right to smoke,° the restaurateur said. "He was loudand obnoxious and disrupting business." Most smoker militancy is of a more measured sort. Many unions are resisting the unilateral imposition of nonsmoking rules by companies as an infringement on their bargaining rights. The AFL-CI0 Executive Council in 1986 issued a statement calling for smoking issues to be worked out voluntarily in individual workplaces, and lawyers say companies are obliged to bargain with unions over limitations on smoking. In the non-union sector, courts have held that neither the right to smoke nor the right to work in a smoke-free environment is constitutionally guaranteed. Smoking bans imposed by non-union employers have provoked union organizing drives. One, at a plant operated by a USG Corp. division that ordered its employees to stop smoking both on the job and away from work, wonithe support of almost 25% of the work force, according to Scannell. Smokers' rights groups, meanwhile, are forming in opposition to the aritf-smoking forces' well-organized campaigns for local, state andifederal regulation of smoking. Polite and Pleasant As its name implies, People United for Friendly Smoking -- or PUFS -- is not into confrontational politics. Rather, the group, founded three years ago in St. Simons Island, Ga., is fighting against the kind of closed-mindedness that alienates friends.of long standing because one or the other becomes a strident nonsmoker. "We try to make ourselves as polite and pleasant as possible," said founder Dean Overall, who smokes just under a pack a day but whose husband and co-founder Sidney is a nonsmoker. "But what we do want to retain -- and this is the other sid'e of the equation -- is some part of this Earth. We don't want to be shoved into closets." E139Pv'El,fl~~LEXIS * KEJ3S m
Page 4: vib02a00 Log in for more options!
Services of Mead Data Central, Ina PAGE 99 (a) 1988 Los Angeles Times, January 14, 1988 The Smokers' Rights Alliance contends that anti-smoking groups exaggerate or invent much of the evidence they use to demonstrate the dangers of second-hand smoke. Its founder, David Brenton, says there is a backlash,developing among smokers that could become ugly if the no-smoking advocates grow more h i'g h-hand ed'. "People try to figure out how to be tolerant In the situations they're forced to deal with, but that doesn't mean they don't feel imposed upon," Brenton said. "At this point, smokers ... don't know how to redirect that sense of frustration. They feel in many cases it's a lost battle. They feel in many cases it's not fair, but what can they do? "That's precisely why our organization exists -- as a means to redirect that energy," he said. "We don't think throwing blows is a good idea. But we think that kind of thing will happen more and more, as the frustration level of smokers is on the rise." 6RAPHIC: Photo, Ray Scanneli Associated Press; Photo, Beverly Hills' smoking ban put retaurant manager Tony Mendola on the spot. BRIAN GADBERRY / Los Angeles Times SUBJECT: SMOKING; UNITED STATES -- HEALTH; DISCRIMINATION; CIVIL RIGHTS; GOVERNMENT REGULATIflN;, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING; UNIONS N O tN tJ ~ ~ ~ w w LEXIS 'f~'GxBS. 'LEXIS°i~'Ervi@S •

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: