Philip Morris
Uc - San Francisco, Feature / Banning Smoking in Workplace Helps Smokers Quit But They Don't Quit Their Jobs, Researcher Finds
Fields
- Type
- COMP, COMPUTER PRINTOUT
- PUBL, PUBLICATION, OTHER
- Site
- N326
- Area
- PARRISH,STEVE/OFFICE
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Named Organization
- Pacific Northwest Bell
- Public Health Service Indian Hospital
- San Francisco General Hospital
- Seattle Univ
- Smoking Policy Inst
- Univ of Ca
- Albers School of Business
- Group Health Cooperative Hospital of Pug
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Public Health Service Indian Hospital
- Author (Organization)
- Business Wire
- Lexis Nexis
- Mead Data Central
- Lexis Nexis
- Master ID
- 2022875166/5504
Related Documents:- 2022875166 Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875167-5504 Smoking Policy Institute Incorporation and Stated Purpose
- 2022875182-5186 Smoking Policy Institute Index
- 2022875188 Certificate of Incorporation to Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875189-5199 Articles of Incorporation of Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875201 Certificate of Reinstatement to Smoking Policy Institute
- 2022875202-5203 Application of Domestic Non Profit Corporation for Reinstatement
- 2022875204 Delinquency Notice
- 2022875205 Certificate of Administrative Dissolution
- 2022875206 Non Profit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875207 Nonprofit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875208 Statement of Change of Registered Office, Registered Agent, or Both Profit Corporations
- 2022875209 Non Profit Corporation Annual Report
- 2022875210 Non Profit Corporation Reinstatement Report
- 2022875212 Application for Status As A Public Benefit Nonprofit Corporation
- 2022875214-5215 Ban on Smoking in Industry
- 2022875217-5218 Subsidizing Smokers - Something to Burn Over
- 2022875220-5221 Health Group Bans Smoking
- 2022875223 Smoking Policy Seminar to Be Held
- 2022875225-5228 2 Burning Questions: Who Tells Smokers to Put It Out?
- 2022875230-5232 Business Notes
- 2022875234-5235 Nonsmoking Business Can Mean Money in Bank, Conference Told
- 2022875237-5239 Where There's Smoke in the Office, There's Fire
- 2022875241-5242 Workplace Smoking Ban Works, Researchers Say
- 2022875247 Doctor Says Hospitals Should Ban Smoking
- 2022875249 Doctor Urges Hospitals to Ban Smoking
- 2022875251-5271 the Macneil / Lehrer Newshour South Africa: Confronting Apartheid, Holy War, Campaign 850000: Senate Sweepstakes, Fumes at Work
- 2022875273-5275 the Drive to Kick Smoking at Work
- 2022875277-5281 the Smoking Lamp Is Definitely Not Lit, Firms in Northwest Lead Nation in Imposing Total Ban on Lighting Up in the Workplace
- 2022875283-5301 Macneil / Lehrer Newshour Fallout, Second-Hand Smoke
- 2022875303-5304 Warning: in More and More Places, Smoking Causes Fines
- 2022875306-5307 Appeals Court Rules Nonsmokers May Sue Employers for Negligence
- 2022875309-5310 Nonsmokers May Sue Employers, Appeals Court Precedent Rules.
- 2022875312-5315 Mounting Drive on Smoking Stirs Tensions in Workplace
- 2022875317-5322 Warning: No Smoking in the Office Anymore
- 2022875324 Washington State Supreme Court Will Review Secondhand Smoke Case.
- 2022875326-5333 Cry, the Embattled Smoker. Fume and Gloom As Activists Invade Tobacco Road
- 2022875335-5340 Is Smoking in Public on Its Last Gasps?. Tempers Flare As Anti-Cigarette Forces Wage An All-Out War
- 2022875342-5343 Thou Shalt Not Smoke. Companies Restrict the Use of Tobacco in the Workplace
- 2022875345 for Travelers, the Breathing Is Easiest in First Class
- 2022875347-5351 A Last Gasp for Smokers on Airliners?
- 2022875353-5357 the New Pariahs. Drinking Drivers, Smokers and Swingers Targeted in Sudden Turnaround of Attitudes
- 2022875359-5360 New Study Says Federal Agencies Smoking Policies Inadequate
- 2022875362-5363 Koop Pleased at Progress in Cutting Federal Workplace Smoking
- 2022875365-5367 There's No Smoke, Little Ire for Skokie's Police Recruits
- 2022875369-5370 Majority of Companies Have Smoking Policies
- 2022875372-5374 Smokers Hide and Drag Harder As Society Makes Them Outcasts
- 2022875376-5378 Workplace Smoke Lightening Up As Fewer Light Up
- 2022875380-5383 Where There's Smoke, There's Ire. After Years on the Defensive, Smokers Fight Back
- 2022875385-5392 Smoking & Drug Policies. Whose Rights?. Over 40 Percent of the Nation's Largest Employers Have Drug-Testing Policies. Over 50 Percent Have Smoking Restrictions. Are They Reaching Too Far Into Employees' Personal Lives?
- 2022875394-5395 Taking on Big Tobacco in Dixie
- 2022875397-5403 the Ten Healthiest Cities in America
- 2022875405-5412 All Fired Up Over Smoking. New Laws and Attitudes Spark A War
- 2022875414-5417 Smoking Becomes 'deviant Behavior'
- 2022875419-5421 Weeding Smokers Out of the Workplace
- 2022875423-5425 Court Ruling Heats Up Smoking War
- 2022875427
- 2022875429 Seattle Smoking Foe Cited by Koop
- 2022875431-5449 Pentagon Probe. Iran - Contra Case. Kids and Smoking
- 2022875451-5452
- 2022875454-5457 Preaching, Not Puffing, Born-Again Quitters Seek 'converts', But Smokers Still Resist the Message
- 2022875459-5460 Smoking, Anti Smoking Group Knows How to Clear the Air
- 2022875462 Reduced Medical Plan Rates Offered to Smokefree Employers of Non-Smokers
- 2022875464-5467 Insurance Carrier Cuts Losses on High-Risk Clients
- 2022875469-5470 the Executive Life, Humiliating Times for A Boss Who Smokes
- 2022875472-5474 Insurer Offers Discounts to Non-Smoking Groups. Some Companies Holding Out on Smoking Policies.
- 2022875476-5477 Smokers: An Endangered Species
- 2022875479-5481 Burning Issue at Work, Firms' Rules Put Smokers Under Fire
- 2022875483-5485
- 2022875487-5488 Epa: Keep Smokers Nonsmokers Apart
- 2022875490-5491 More and More Firms Adopt Smoking Policies
- 2022875493-5494 Where There's Smoke You May Be Fired - or at Least Not Hired
- 2022875496-5499 Don't Light Up Near Me.
- 2022875501-5504 Tobacco Profits Still A Picture of Health
- Named Person
- Baloff, A.
- Fehrenbach, A.
- Martin, M.J.
- Rosner, R.
- Fehrenbach, A.
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- whb02a00
Document Images
Services of Mead Data Central, Ina
LEVEL 1- 54 OF 55 STORIES
Copyright (c) 1986 Business Wire Inc.;
Business Wire
September 3, 1986, Wednesday
PAGE 215
DISTRIBUTION: News/Medical Editors
LENGTH: 629 words
HEADLINE: UC-SAN FRANCISCO; FEATURE/Banning smoking in workpi.ace helps smokers
quit but they don't quit their jobs, researcher finds
t2t
BODY:
One year ago 15,000 employees of Pacific Northwest Bell were told they co,uld
no longer smoke at work. Within six months of the company announcement 25
percent of the smokers signed up for smoking cessation programs and no employees
have quit their jobs because of the smoking ban, according:to Michael J.
Martin, M.D., a UC-San Francisco clinical epidemiologist at San Francisco
General Hospital. ''The actual number of smokers who tried to quit is probabl y
much larger because many smokers prefer to quit on their own rather than by
going to cessation programs, " Martin said. Martin commented, on the results of
the company's smoking policy in a report published in the Sept. 4 issue of the
NewlEngland Journal of Medicine. None of the company's 4,000 smokers quit their
job because of the smoking ban. " A few were irritated enough to1write letters
complaining about the ordinance, " Martin said, " but that was about it.'' He
added that enforcing the ban has not been a problem even though the company has
over 800 buildings in three states. To date, there have been no lawsuits
concerning the ban and the two unions representing company employees have
supported it. " Much of the ban's success, " Martin pointed out, " is because it
was applied uniformly to all employees. Employees sometimes have objected to
smoking bans that allow those with private offices to smoke while those in la rge
open work areas cannot. This smoking policy applied equally to everyone. " Many
companies are thinking about instituting smoking bans, Martin said, because it
will save them money. Published reports estimate that it costs a company between
$336 and $601 more per year to employ a smoker compared to a nonsmoker. Most of
this comes from higher health care costs and absenteeism. In the report, Martin
addressed the issue of smoking bans in hospitals. While most hospitals have
segregated smokers from nonsmokers andVor have prohibited the sale of
cigarettes, a few hospitals have banned smoking completely. Two of them are t he
Public Health Service Indian Hospital on the Hopi Reservation and the Group
Health Cooperative Hospital of Puget Sound. " It is now time for all hospitals
to consider a smoking ban. Smoking is the greatest cause of premature death and
disability in the United States and it would be ironic if health care
institutions let the general business community take the lead in banning smoking
in the workplace, " he said. Martin pointed out that there are dramatic
differences in the health of smokers and nonsmokers and'that there is an
improvement both in the short and long-term health status of individuals when
they quit smoking. The Tongr-term positive effects on serious diseases like lung
cancer, emphysema and heart diseases have been demonstrated in numerous studies,
he said. " The results of the Pacific Northwest Bell experience also indicate
that even the employees who continued to smoke after the ban smoked less,"'
Martin said. " Workplace smoking bans do encourage people to!quit or smoke less
and if they ever become the norm,it will have a profound impact on thi!s
country's cigarette consumption,."' Martin, who is studying,the effect of passive
smoking an the risk of heart disease, feels there are proven risks associated
®~ ® ® ®
~~~~~ ~~- ®~ ~~~®~ ~~fii~~

Senrices of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE 216
(c) 1986 Business Wire, September 3, 1986
with breathing other people's cigarette smoke. " The risks are clearly there and
it is time to start protecting the rights of nonsmokers.'" Co-authors ofi the
report are Annet~_Fehrenbach, Ph D, psychiatric consultant at Pacific
Northwest Bell, and Robert Rosner, executive director of the Smoking PoZicy
ns itute, Albers School~~usiness, ~eafTlP UPf-iyersi y.
CONTACT: SFGH/UCSF, San Francisco
Alice Baloff, 415/821-5310 or 415/476-2557
7t
V
LEXIS"NEXIS "L ExIs"NEXe s"
