Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Dupuis, R.N.
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- BUDG, BUDGET, BUDGET REVIEW
- Alias
- CFNC5400615
- Area
- CENTRAL FILES/DATABASE
- Site
- R100
- Named Organization
- Damon Runyon Fund
- Dr Hellers Inst
- Duke Univ
- TIRC Scientific Advisory Comm
- TIRC, Tobacco Industry Research Comm
- Yale
- Dr Hellers Inst
- Named Person
- Warner, B.R.
- Cantor
- Heller, J.H.
- Mace
- Okeeffe
- Roe
- Smith
- Cantor
- Recipient
- Mccomas, O.P.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2022239369/9374
Related Documents: - Characteristic
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Date Loaded
- 31 Jan 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- tpp53e00
Document Images
C54-O6 15
Mr. 0. P. McComas May 13, 1954
R. N. DuPuis
I am enclosing a letter to Dr. John H. Heller, our consultant
at Yale School of Medicine. It concerns his proposal for
cancer researeh, for which I requested a sizeable amount in
our budget. If you go along with my recoaranendation, will you
please 'orward the letter to Dr. Heller in the attached envelope.
The history of this case is as follows. Dr. Heller made his
proposal to me verbally during a period of se-eral months
beginning last fall. He also has another proposal regarding
high energy electron bombardment which is not involved in the
present discussion.
At a meeting in Richmond several weeks ago, Dr. Heller agreed to
furnish us copies of technical papers relating k.o his cancer
theory. Briefly, he hopes to be able to show that smoke particles
of only a certain size and electrical charge can be absorbed by
the lungs. The objective then would be t6 devise a filter which
would absorb the undesirable particles.
Careful study of the technical papers by Dr. Smith and our own
staff, plus attendance at a meeting at which Dr. Heller spoke,
leads us to the conclusion that the theory is very interesting
and of possible great value, but is not yet proved. Moreover,
the development of a filter which would effect the desired
fractionation would not be simple.
There is moreover the matter of our obligation to TIRC and to
the public. This is discussed in my letter to Dr. Heller.
I would like to have the opinion of the Scientific Advisory
Ccaeaittee on this matter.
In my opinion there is less than an even chance, perhaps no -
better than one in ten, that this would pay off if we sponsored
it. However, with the advice and guidance of the Scientific
Casiittee and the more extensive backing which TIRC could furnish,
chances for success might be better.
One more thing should be mentioned. Dr. Heller proposes that the
researchbe done at an Institute which he is founding, and not
at Yale. He is naturally very much interested in founding this
Institute and in making it a success. He has been very insistent
in getting approval on this project, and claims that at least two
other tobacco companies want to sponsor the work. It is difficult
to assume that the desire to have a successful launching of the
Institute is unrelated to the high intensity of his salesmanship.
r
balc .

Mr. 0. P. MaComas May 13, 1954
R. N. DuPuis
In view of the enclosed recommendation with respect to sponsor-
ing cancer work at Dr. Heller's Institute, which amounts to a
reduction in the Research and Development budget, I am making
the following request.
We have had an application from Dr. Benjamin R. Warr,er, associate
director of the tobacco research project at Duke Univ:rrsity,
for a position in our department. The work of Dr. Warner's
group, which is sponsored by the Demon Runyon Fund, has been
concerned with fractionation of smoke particles, analysis and
fractionation of smoke constituents, and related tobacco research.
He is recaa®ended to me as a top-flight physical chemist.
Dr. Cantor and Dr. Roe know him and reco®end that we give
serious consideration to his application. I know him slightly
from a previous connection. ,
Dr. Warner is in his early 40's. He requests a salary of
$10,000, which is reasonable. .
Dr. Warner's experience and training should make him very useful
to us in the fields of smoke analysis and fractionation, moisture
determination, instrumentat!on, packaging and filters. I have
discussed the matter with Mr. 0'2Geeffe and Dr. Kaae, who feel
that his talents would be put to valuable use in the department.
We have no experienced physical chemist other than Dr. Mae,
who is primarily a chemical engineer with a strong physics back-
ground. Dr. Mace is intensely involved in day-to-day supervisory
and development problems primarily with the snap pack andhas
insufficient time for basic research. If we took on Dr. Warner
he would head a small group doing fundamental work in the fields
mentioned.
It is difficult to find an experienced tobacco research man
except by theft from a eoenpetitor, which is contrary to our
policy. Dr. Warner has had interviews with other tobacco
companies.
Do you approve of modifying budget details to the extent of
hiring Dr. Warner?
ba
