Philip Morris
Smoker Psychology 810701 - 810731
Fields
- Author
- Dunn, W.L.
- Alias
- PRO1600
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Area
- CENTRAL FILES/DATABASE
- Site
- R100
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-071
- Stmn/R1-145
- Stmn/R1-147
- Stmn/R1-149
- Named Person
- Dunn, S.
- Fagan, R.
- Gullotta, F.
- Jones, J.
- Ryan, F.
- Master ID
- 2022151336/1407
- 2022151336-1407 Monthly Progress Reports Period Covered 810701 - 810731
- 2022151339-1340 Analytical Research
- 2022151341 Mechanism for Smoke Formation 810701 - 810731
- 2022151342-1343 Cigarette and Tobacco Measurement Methods 810700
- 2022151344-1345 Improved Semiworks Operations 810700
- 2022151346-1347 Entomological Research 810701 - 810731
- 2022151348-1350 Reconstituted Tobacco Development 810709 - 810806
- 2022151351-1352 Modified Smoking Materials 810701 - 810731
- 2022151356 Filtration Physics 810701 - 810731
- 2022151357-1358 Cigarette Making Technology 810701 - 810731
- 2022151359-1360 Tobacco Physics 810701 - 810731
- 2022151361-1362 Physical and Chemical Properties of Tobacco 870701 - 870731
- 2022151363-1364 Tobacco Microstructure 810701 - 810731
- 2022151365-1367 Tobacco Processing 810701 - 810731
- 2022151368-1369 Expanded Tobacco - Process Improvement 810701 - 810731
- 2022151370-1371 Biochemical Modification of Tobacco 810701 - 810731
- 2022151372-1373 Microbial Technology 810701 - 810731
- 2022151374-1375 New Products 810700
- 2022151376 Filter Development 810700
- 2022151377 Applied Technology 810701 - 810731
- 2022151378 Flavor Development 810701 - 810731
- 2022151379-1380 Flavor Development 810701 - 810731
- 2022151381 Flavor Component Evaluation 810701 - 810731
- 2022151382-1383 Synthesis of Tobacco Additives 810701 - 810731
- 2022151384-1386 Nuclear and Radiochemistry of Smoke 810701 - 810731
- 2022151387-1388 Botanical Investigations 810701 - 810731
- 2022151389-1390 Flavor - Release Chemistry 810701 - 810731
- 2022151391-1393 Synthesis of Flavorants 810700
- 2022151394-1395 Chemistry and Isolation of Tobacco Constituents 810701 - 810731
- 2022151396-1397 Smoke Studies 810700
- 2022151398-1399 Brand Modifications 810700
- 2022151400-1402 Biological Effects of Smoke 810701 - 810731
- 2022151403-1406 Smoke Condensate Studies 810701 - 810731
Related Documents:
Document Images
CHARGE NUMBER: 1600
PROJECT TITLE: Smoker Psychology
PERIOD COVERED: July 1 - 31, 1981
PROJECT LEADER: W. L. Dunn
DATE OF REPORT: August 10, 1981
c
I
c
r
C
I
c
Acceptability and Firmness. (Frank Ryan)
R&D smokers are rating 13 different cigarettes on an
acceptability scale. The cigarettes differ only in firm-
ness and weight, with compacimetric firmness scores of
37.8, 37.5, 35.5, 31.9, 31.5, 29.5, 29.0, 27.5,24.0, 23.8,
21.9, 20.9'and 20.5. The acceptability scale ranges from
terrible to excellent with 7 other adjectives or phrases in
between: bad, poor, marginal-but not acceptable, marginal-
barely acceptable, acceptable, good, and very good.
Five samples of each cigarette are presented in random
order, so that 65 ratings are made in about 20 minutes. Eight
people had rated the cigarettes as of 7 August, and although
it is too soon to make statements about the firmness which
will eventually get the highest mean rating,, we can see that:
(1) the subjects are able to make distinctions between cigarettes,
(2) they assign their ratings systematically, and in conformity
to such expressed beliefs as "the firmer, the better:, "I like
them soft, but not mushy", (3) the form of the resulting accept-
ability vs. firmness plot will depend in part on the balance of
soft- or firm-likers in the sample, so that it may make sense
to construct two different curves instead of combining the data.
The Inhalation Monitoring Program (Jan Jones)
Computer Programming
Frank Ryan has provided the additional software to give us
data output on a subject's respiration patterns,, which can be
compared with the smoke-laden inhalations. For the two subjects
studied thus far we find that the smoke-laden inhalation is of
greater volume and is held longer prior to exhalation than the
typical breath. The more shallow inhaler inspired 132% greater
volume when smoking his usual brand'and retained this smoke-laden
inhalation 864% longer than his normal breath; the second sub-
ject inhaled 190% greater volume when smoking and held the in-
halation 273% longer.

Charge Number 1600 -2- August 10, 1981
Several program modifications now enable us to measure two
additional parameters of the smoke-laden inhalation curve - area
under the curve andlmean expiratory flow. We are able to reproduce
the typical inhalation curve that a subject demonstrates for each
type of cigarette smoked.
A Stud of Chan es in Smoke Inhalation Patterns as a Function
o Changes in Nicotine elivery
Data from the first two subjects to complete the inhalation
study suggest that smoke-laden inhalation behavior is modifiable,
and is altered as a function of two factors: nicotine delivery and
cigarette acceptability. Aversiveness of the cigarette appears to
be an extraneous variable which may or may not override the in-
fluence of changes in nicotine delivery. Future research will
eliminate the acceptability component by pilot testing experimental
cigarettes on this dimension prior to introducing them into the
study.
The Effects of Ci arette Smokin on Brainstem Auditor Evoked
Potenia s (Frank Gu otta
We have justlcompleted running subjects, and data analyses
are currently under way. A memo describing the results will
be written in the near future.
Duration of Effect Study (Frank Gullotta)
This study is well under way and should be completed in
October or November.
Perce tion and Pattern Reversal Evoked Potentials: Smokin
E ects ran u otta)
We are currently gathering pilot data on four subjects,
employing a signal detection task. In this study, we are
interested in whether a subject's perception of the cigarette
that has been smoked affects the PREP, independent of nicotine
delivery.
StudZ of Psychosocial Factors Influencin Smokin Behavior
an ra )
Presently we are working on entering the data in the
computer to perform additional analyses. The next question
we will ask of the data is whether there are psychosocial
variables that discriminate between the high and low delivery
smokers.
StudZ of the Perce tion of the Social Desirabilit of Smoking
an ra Dunn)
We have begun a study to measure the image of cigarette
smoking. The dimensions of a person's image of cigarette

Charge Number 1600 -3- August 10, 1981
I
i
r.
E
smoking that are being measured'include: attractiveness,
sociability, socio-economic status, personal character,
health status, self-control, and desirability.
The instrument chosen to elicit a person's image of
cigarette smoking, the Adjective Check List, has been ad-
ministered to a sample of 120 people. The data have been
collected and scoring is in process.
Differences in Nicotine Intake Between Hi h and Low Delivery
Smo ers (S. Dunn)
In collaboration with Dr. R. Fagan,., we are doing a
butt analysis for differences in nicotine intake between
twenty of the high delivery smokers and twenty of the low
delivery smokers who were participants in the Psychosocial
Project. We have contacted the participants and we are in
the process of collecting the cigarette butts.
Influence of Situational Events on Smoking Behavior (Sandra Dunn)
We are working on a study to determine whether there are
differences'among smokers in responsiveness to situational
events to motivate smoking. In collaboration with Dr. Frank
Gullotta, we plan to study the smoking patterns of a group of
subjects who show differences in their electroencephalographic
response to cigareĀtte smoking after smoke deprivation. We have
designed a log that these subjects will use to record the event,
emotion, time, place and activity each time they light a cigarette.
Data collection will begin this month.
Consultant Search (Sandra Dunn)
We are currently working on building portfolios of perspective
candidates for the position of program consultant. A recommend-
ation will be made this month.
/iw
