Philip Morris
Regional Workshop Advertising - International Coordination
Fields
- Author
- Tully, R.
- Area
- CENTRAL FILES/PRE-DB WAREHOUSE
- Document File
- 2021593769/2021594101/Missing
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Organization
- Eec
- European Advertising Tripartite
- Freedom to Advertise Coalition
- Health Promotion Fund
- Iaa
- Icc
- Infotab, Infotab
- Intl Journal of Advertising
- Libertad
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Wfa
- Who, World Health Org
- Advertising Assn
- Site
- R107
- Request
- Stmn/R1-106
- Author (Organization)
- Infotab, Infotab
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- plc68e00
Document Images
Regional Workshop
ADVERTISING - INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION
Argumentation:
The general argumentation used by the industry is beginning to look
extremely weak and the presentation of these arguments to the
"public" and "opinion formers" needs to be examined in detail.
This is best illustrated in the advertising bans and consumption
argument, where the industry argues that 'advertising does not
increase total market size', yet we are presented with a dilemma
in developing markets where the total market is growing and
advertising expenditure is rising accordingly. How can we reconcile
this?
Should the industry undertake some new studies on a global basis
and consider new arguments, e.g. the effects on the national economy
of advertising bans taking into consideration not only damage to the
tobacco sector, but also to government revenues, consumer spending,
the advertising industry and other media related sectors. Such
studies would have to be centrally planned and administered.
Statistics:
In order to assist the arguments we put forward to our governments,
it is essential definitive data is available on smoking populations,
total tobacco consumption, and per capita consumption. The anti-smoking
lobby continue to coordinate their data on smoking through the WHO,
providing respectability and authority which industry data is unable to
match.
The collection of industry statistics needs to be coordinated by Infotab,
which through its existing network, is best placed to acquire and collate
such data. However, to achieve 'authority' for industry data a respected
independent international organization should be used to publish the
results.
Networking opinion formers:
There is a lack of coordination in addressing responses to anti-
industry literature on this issue. The industry needs to extend its
existing network of respected academics, politicians and influential
laymen, who are prepared to redress the imbalances presented. This
work could be focused through a variety of publications, media
campaigns and direct attacks on anti-industry campaigners.

I*
There are a number of academic journals which would be prepared to accept
well presented and well formulated arguments by eminent individuals, e.g.
the Advertising Association in the UK has been particularly active in
publishing industry material in the journal 'The International Journal
of Advertising'.
To argue our position in society we must prepare and publish a body of
knowledge which we can call upon in future argumentation. The haphazard
approach taken by the industry at the moment is to generate uncoordinated
responses to threats in specific markets. Although this addresses the
problem for one market, it does not allow for dissemination of the
results of expensive industry sponsored research on an international
basis.
Networking Organizations with related interests:
Excellent work has been,done by a number of manufacturers and NMAs
in the fostering of coalitions on a broad advertising platform. In
the USA for example, the TI is closely involved in the work of the
'Freedom to Advertise Coalition', which is a conglomerate of the
major advertising trade associations in the US.
In Europe the formation of the European Advertising Tripartite has
provided a forum for debating and coordinating action against the
proposed restrictive legislation emanating from the EEC. This broad
based membership organization is able to consider the issue of tobacco
advertising on the widest possible commercial platform.
In the USA the formation of 'LIBERTAD' (a diverse international
coalition of business, academic and media leaders) represents a
major step forward in presenting the issue of advertising
freedom to the general public. The Libertad philosophy needs to be
applied in as many countries around the world where tobacco is
marketed, and efforts must be made to encourage manufacturers
of all products to realise the dangers of permitting governments
to introduce restrictive advertising legislation in a single sector.
The IAA, WFA have taken a leading, role in presenting submissions to
the Minister responsible for the introduction of restrictions on
tobacco. Although: it is not known if Ministers take note of such
representation, it is clear national governments are made aware that
the international community is taking note of operating restrictions
placed on international business in their country. This work by the
IAA and WFA is to be commended but could be greatly enhanced if the
industry were to encourage other legitimate trade groups to make
similar representation at both a national and international level.
Relationships inside major international organizations must be
fostered. Any organization whichis in a position to make
representation to governments, should have industry members
on its policy making bodies, e.g. the ICC has membership from many
industries on its board, but is very poorly represented by tobacco
concerns. Ther'e is significant scope for our industry to assist in
policy formulation within groups such as the ICC if we can achieve t3
good representation. It is in our interest to force the hand of any ~'
organization which has access to~the ear of opinion formers. ~
The Anti's have recognised the value of coalition building, particularly ~
from their successes in the introduction of legislation in Canada. We ~
W
~
~

must tackle these coalitions with existing networks and allies. It is a
mistake to form an industry counter group as a reaction to proposed
restrictions, as the single platform issue is the most difficult to
defend. As an industry we must be pre-emptive by developing and fostering
coalitions with long established and well respected trade, political
and freedom associations.
Any form of coalition building is justifiable provided it is targetedd
at broad based organizations with broad policy objectives.
Public opinion:
We need to frame the advertising issue at a very basic level and
present the case to the public. The way to influence opinion formers
is to take your case to the public and obtain their participation
in the fight against advertising restrictions.
There is a major trend emerging around the globe for the establishment
of Health Promotion Funds, which are used to directly fund anti-tobacco
advertising and sponsorship. It is essential the industry meets the
challenge of anti smoking campaigns with ~real money', which means
matching the anti-smoking groups dollar for dollar, to inform the
public through aggressive long term campaigns.
We need to apply the same degree of creativity in pressing the facts
on the advertising issue that we apply in brand marketing. This does
not mean a series of short national campaigns, but a high dollar
spend, over a sustained period of time to innovative campaigns
aimed at an ill-informed public. We must frame the issue in our
terms.
* The NMAs are best placed to initiate such campaign
work and their resources should be increased to
manage such high profile campaigns.
Just remember, we lose more to the bottom 1!ine each year in
markets as a direct result of policies pushed by the anti-smokingg
fraternity. Can we afford to let these groups continue their
propaganda unabated.??
SUI+fMARY :
* initiate an academic publishing programme on the advertising
issue.
* develop and foster coalitions with trade groups and freedom
associations in anticipation of anti-tobacco activity
* prepare voluntary agreements to forestall direct government
legislation.
* avoid accusations of marketing to children by taking a
responsible approach to advertising.
* initiate a witness programme to provide a pool of experts

-r
who can be called upon to testify and publish on this issue.
* present the issue on the broadest possible commercial and
constitutional front.
* encourage trade associations to adopt freedom position through
attaining direct representation on their policy making
committees
* establi,sh a definitive databank of information on total
consumption, per capita consumption and patterns of smoker
populations
* start planning for long term campaigns to the general public on
broad commercial and personal freedom issues.
* identify the key members of government most likely to be involved
in anti-tobacco legislation and establish appropriate lobbying
channels.
* prepare documents in support of the industry position concentrating
on the economic and social role of advertising as well as the
commercial freedom issue.
Ron Tully
INFOTAB 11.10.89
