Philip Morris
Test Brands
Fields
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Type
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Master ID
- 2021574528/4793
Related Documents:- 2021574528 Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Defendant. Exhibits Annexed to Declaration of Wallace S. Snyder in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Volume I Exhibits 1 - 15
- 2021574529 Exhibit 1
- 2021574530 Notices Federal Trade Commission Cigarettes Testing for Tar and Nicotine Content
- 2021574531-4533 Statement of Considerations
- 2021574534-4536 Separate Statement of Chairman Dixon
- 2021574537 Exhibit 2
- 2021574538 Proposed Rule Making Advertising of Cigarettes Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Submit Data, Views, or Arguments Regarding Proposed Trade Regulation Rule
- 2021574539 Exhibit 3
- 2021574540-4541
- 2021574542-4546
- 2021574547-4551 Explanatory Memorandum Relating to Voluntary Program for 'tar' and Nicotine Disclosure
- 2021574552
- 2021574553 Exhibit 4
- 2021574554 Proposed Rule Making Advertising of Cigarettes Notice of Suspension of Trade Regulation Proceeding
- 2021574555 Exhibit 5
- 2021574556-4557 Cigarette Advertising and Other Promotional Practices Announcement of Decision
- 2021574558 Exhibit 6
- 2021574559
- 2021574560 Agenda
- 2021574579 Exhibit 7
- 2021574580-4583
- 2021574584 Exhibit 8
- 2021574585 Cigarette Testing
- 2021574586 Exhibit 9
- 2021574587-4588
- 2021574589 Exhibit 10
- 2021574590-4594 Implications of Barclay Filter on Ftc 'tar' Testing Program
- 2021574595 Exhibit 11
- 2021574596
- 2021574597-4627 Memorandum to the Federal Trade Commission From Philip Morris Incorporated Concerning Barclay Cigarettes and A Proposed Change in the Apparatus Used in the Commission's Laboratory for Testing 'tar' Delivery
- 2021574628 Exhibit 12
- 2021574629-4646
- 2021574647 Smokers Tested by Dr. Roger Kamm
- 2021574648 Cain Butt Study
- 2021574649-4650 Smoke Panel Evaluations of Parclay Ks, Now Ks, and Carlton Ks with 'extended' Rigid Sleeves Around the Filter
- 2021574651-4668 20. Smoking Behaviour in Germany - the Analysis of Cigarette Butts (Kipa)
- 2021574669-4671 Puffing Frequency and Nicotine Intake in Cigarette Smokers
- 2021574672-4702 Memorandum to the Federal Trade Commission From Philip Morris Incorporated Concerning Barclay Cigarettes and A Proposed Change in the Apparatus Used in the Commission's Laboratory for Testing 'tar' Delivery
- 2021574703 Exhibit 13
- 2021574704-4714 Investigation of Barclay Filter
- 2021574715-4720 Animal Inhalation Studies with Tobacco Smoke (A Review)
- 2021574721-4732 14. The Analysis of Smoking Parameters: Inhalation and Absorption of Tobacco Smoke in Studies of Human Smoking Behaviour
- 2021574733-4737 the Case for Medium - Nicotine, Low - Tar, Low Carbon Monoxide Cigarettes
- 2021574738-4740 A Novel Method for the Isolation and Quantitative Analysis of Nicotine and Cotinine in Biological Fluids
- 2021574741-4743 Verification of Smoking History in Parents After Inaction Using Urinary Nicotine and Cotinine Measurements
- 2021574744-4747 Smoking, Carbon Monoxide and Arterial Disease
- 2021574748 Exhibit 14
- 2021574749-4752
- 2021574753 Exhibit 15
- 2021574754-4755 Investigation of Barclay Filter
- 2021574756-4792 Supplemental Memorandum to the Federal Trade Commission From Philip Morris Incorporated Concerning Measurement of the Relative 'tar' Deliveries of Barclay and Other Cigarette Brands Through Analysis of Retained Nicotine in Cigarette Butts
- 2021574793
- Area
- CENTRAL FILES/PRE-DB WAREHOUSE
- Site
- R107
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Request
- Stmn/R1-119
- Named Organization
- Ftc, Federal Trade Commission
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Brand
- Barclay
- Cambridge
- Carlton
- Kent
- Merit
- Now
- True
- Vantage
- Winston
- Cambridge
- UCSF Legacy ID
- lfs88e00
Document Images
t
1
)
TEST BRArtOS
FTC "Tar"
+I 6arctay 85 1.4
V NOYI 85 2.4
Kent 111 85 3.0
VANTAGE ULTRA 85 4.0
~ Trus 85 4.9
:.
I
.
i
I
0
I
I
0
!.
STRENGTH RELA TFD DIMENSIDNS I
BARCLAY 85 VS COMPETITQRS
BARCLAY
TRUE
NOW
CIRCLES DENOTE SIC. DIFF'S
(1ILPHA - .05)
25--1
-.4
-
p 24
7
E '~
R ~7
C -'
I 23
V ~
E ~
D
22 -
R
E
S
I
S 21
T
~
A
N
C BARCLAY
E 20
~
19
20 30 40
(
(
'!E
ANALYTICAL VEhjUS PERCEPTUAL
.
,
A TRUE
50 60 70
nRAFT
80
(
f
90 100 110
(
0
STRENGTH RELA TED DIMENSIONS I I
BARCLAY 85 VS COMPETITORS
NASAL MOUTH
) \ STING STING
0
)
1
I
0
1
/
THROAT
SCRATCH
TONGUE
BITE
N
1
BARCLAY
TRUE
NOW
iV .
DRYING N'
FLAVOR CA
CIRCLES
~
~
~ '
DENOTE SIG. DIFF'S
(ALPHA - .05)
Im
21
* t3ARCLAY
-
1. I
0 1. 5
:
ANALYT I CAI.. VEr,~US PERCEPTUAL
.
r~--rrr
2.0 2.5 3. ©
f
r-~-rrrr~r--i
4.0 4.5
0
TRUE
(
E
E
0
C
0
N
C
26--t
24 -1
23 --
0
F
S
M 22
0
K
E
z
'11ss'114s11
l
9
cONCLUS IOAlS
I
)
)
)
>
)
- In all SENSORY PROFILES, Barclay 85 Is very similar
to True 85 and very different from NOW 85.
- ANALYTICAL DATA on Barclay do not correlate with
actual "flavor" of that brand.
L::::_
36--i
ANALYTICAL VEih J5 PERCEPTUAL
r
TRUE L1
P 34-I
E
B
U
R 30:
N
R
A
T
E
sss~~s~2
26
I
z
50
28--1
~ BARCLAY
i- 1-T- 1
55
__1
60 ' 65
BURN RATE CMG-M I N>
70
75
)
)
1)
STRENGTH RELA TED DIMENSI DNS 11
BARCLAY FILTER VS HOr FILTER
NASAL MOUTH
STING STING
TONGUE
BITE
)
I
1
THROAT
SCRATCH
)
)
DRYING
I FLAVOR
- NOWROD/ BARCLAYFIL
~- ---- NDW C I RCLES DENOTE S I G. II I FF' S
U'1LPHA - .05>
(
STRENGTH RELA TED DIMENSI DNS I
BARCLAY f ILTER VS PiOW FILTER
RESISTANCE CONC.
I \ SMOKE
I
1
)
)
ATE
BARCLAY
BARCLAYROD/ NOWF I L C I RCLES DENOTE S I G. O I FF' S
CALPHA ~ .05)
)
SMOKE DELIVERIES OF COMPETIT VI E BRANDS
AND SOME RJR BRANDS
C I GARET T E BRAND IIDLDER FTC ' TAR' T N' U'd
BARCLAY 85 FTC ~ 1.6i 0.17 8.5
) FILTRONA I 3,9: 0,45 n.0
BARCLAY 100 FTC , 3.41 0.289, 9
F I LTRONA ~ 6.62 0.51 916
i
)
)
'J0W 84 FTC 2.5 0.23 7.2
FILTRONA 2.6 0.24 7.2
WI NSTO'V UL 85 FTC 5.1 0.48 6.2
FILTRONA 5.0 0.47 &.1
VANTAGE UL 85 FTC 5.3 0.48 7.1
. FILTRONA 5.7 0.50 7.0
KENT III 85. FTC 3.0 _ 0.31 6.4
FILTRONA 3.0 0.31 -6.4
TRUE 85 FTC 5.2 0.41 6.0
FILTRONA 4.9 0.40 6.0
CAMBRIDGE 85 FTC .6 0.11 7.6
FILTRONA .6 0.14 7.4
CARLTON 85 FTC .6 0.11 6.8
FILTRONA .7 0.12 7.0
MERIT UL LT. FTC 4.4 0.38 7.2
i
FILTRONA 4.5 0.39 7.2
TRUE UL ONE FTC 1.0 0.13 7.7
FILTRONA .9 0.13 7.7
WI"lSTOy 85 FTC 16.1 1.09 8.5
FILTRONA 16.0 1.07 8.2
)
)
I
)
)
i
)
THROAT
SCRATCH
S TRENGTH RELA TED DIMENSI DNS I I
BARCLAY FILTER VS NOw-FILTER
NASAL
STING
TONGUE
BITE
DRYING
0
FLAVOR
BARCLAY
BARCLAYRODJ NOWF I L CI RCLES DENOTE S I G. D I FF' S
(ALPHA - .05)
FILTER/ROD EXCyAN6E
11
10
0
f
fim F i LTEg
N0~~
"1OW
NOW
1 BARCLAY
TRUE
TRUE
KENT I I I
KENT I I I
) BARCLAY
BARCLAY
BARCLAY
. BARCLAY
)
)
TRUE
BARCLAY
KENT III
F BARCLAY
BARCLAY
NOW
TRUE
KENT III
HOLDER TYPE
TR NA ~
2.6
1.6
2.5
0.7
4.9
1,9
3.0
5,2
0,8
3.0
--. 2.7
3.9
3.7
7.4
3,3
II
3,8
7.4
3.3
~.:.:..
)
)
?
)
)
)
)
,
STRENDTH RELA TED DIMENSIONS I
BARCLAY FILTER VS NOY FILTER
RESISTANCE CONC.
SMOKE
NOWROD/ BARCLAYFIL
NOW CIRCLES DENOTE SIC. OIFF'S
(ALPHA ~ .05)
0
S MMARY .
INCREASED PRESSURE ON BARCLAY FILTER DECREASES
AIR DILUTION AND INCREASES 'TAR' DELIVERY
1
BARCLAY IS PERCEIVED BY SMOKERS TO DELIVER THE
SMOKE AND TASTE OF A 3-5 MG TAR CIGARETTE
0
BARCLAY IS IN FACT SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN A 1 MG
'TAR' PRODUCT BECAUSE SMOKERS EXERT MORE PRESSURE
ON THE FILTER,
~ THE CURRENT FTC HOLDER IS NOT CAPABLE OF ACCURATELY
MEASURING BARCLAY 'TAR' DELIVERY
)
)
SUMMARY
I
I, ~t'rYi 85 1ERSUS ~~'0 ~ RflD SlIBSTIMED FiITM FARCIAY FILTER
) A. .IYN ROaJBARCLAY FILTER 11AS PFRCEINFD TO fic STR0MER
~
B. THAN WOW $5.
TAR DATA FROM FILTRONA HDLDFR COMES CLOSER TO ESTI-
MAT I NG PERCEPTt1AL L1ATA,
0
/
1
i
FILTER PRESSURE VS. 'TAR' DELIVERY
`
4
2
NOW 84
BARCLAY 85
6
..
4
..
H
...
,
.
,
ti
9
2 4
Dt:j;s
.
"str4siczaz
6 8 19 12 14 16 18 28 22 24 26 28 38
PRESSURE , j';HR x 18-1) :,.
,r.
v
W
A
H -
x .
°z 8
0
~
0 6
oac~:~
4
r
4
0
1
FILTER PRESSURE VS. CO DELIVERY
8
6
0 2
DET
I
4
"stPI&stzoz
.
6
i
8
.
18
1
I
.
.
I
12 14 16 18 20
PRESSURE (TORR x18-1)
I
22
I
24
NOW 84
BARCLAY 85
i .
26 28 38
A~ ~ ~i~ -
)
I
SUMh,ARY
)
11. $ARCIAY 25 VERSUS RARClJ1Y ROD SUBST'D WITH fN FILTER
I
A. BARCLAY h'AS PERCEINm TO BE SIMILAR TO BARCLAY ROME FILTER
- IN STRt7vGTH (SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER IN MOUTH S'TING ONLY)
) ~3. AGAIN, TAR DATA FftQM FILTRONA HOLDEt tem AtCtmTELY
ES'TIMATES PERCEP1vAL DATA*
3
?
N
~
N
~
1 ~
.~
