Philip Morris
the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs
Fields
- Type
- SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Named Person
- Andersen
- Auerbach, O.
- Cohen
- Dahme
- Friedlander
- Guttman
- Haenszel
- Hammond, E.C.
- Liebow
- Nielson
- Park
- Watson
- Rosenblatt, M.B.
- Auerbach, O.
- Document File
- 2015046706/2015046732/Consultants' Reviews of A-H Paper of 700205
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- Memorial Hospital
- Veterans Administration
- Memorial Hospital
- Litigation
- Okag/Privilege Withdrawn
- Okag/Produced
- Txag/Trial Exhibit P-1703
- Okag/Produced
- Site
- N28
- Date Loaded
- 14 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- lcw74e00
Document Images
i
C:t<r<<<r-..
The Effects of Cigarett_e Smoking U2on Dogs
Research program supported by the American Cancer
Society and Veterans Administration and presented by
E. Cuyler Hammond and Oscar Auerbach at special scient;_fic
meeting of the society at Waldorf Astori3 Hotel, New York
City, February 51, 1970.
In its pronouncement that "for the first time,
scientists have produced lung cancer in a significantly larger
experimental animal as a result of heavy cigarette smoking",
the American Cancer Society acknowledged that all previous pub-
iicizad claims were false. The evidence now presented and the
conclusions drawn from these experiments are also subject to
considerable criticism.
Design of Experiment
The experiment started with 97 dogs certified healthy
but 3 of the dogs were quickly eliminated because of brain tumor,
bronchopneamonia, and pulmonary infarction, respectively. The
remaining 94 dogs were subjected to tracheostomies kept patent
my means oi hollow Teflon tubes. There were 8 dogs used as
controls. The rest of the dogs were divided into groups accord-
ing to whether they smoked filter or non-fr ilter cigaret-tes. The
latter category was subdivided into light smokers and heavy
smokers. The heavy smoking dogs were further segregrated into
two groups accordin; to ;~eight. It was the inter.tion of the

-2-
experimenters not to sacrifice the dogs weighing the most but
to keep them smoking until all eventually died. All the heavy
smoking dogs were exposed to 9 cigarettes daily f or a period
of approximately two and a half years. (9 cigarettes daily
for dogs weighing 20-39 pounds would correspond to approximately
60-80 cigarettes daily when related to human male exposure)
Results
The number of dogs examined pathologically was 68
which included 12 in the heavy weighing group not intentionally
sacrificed. There were tumors found in 36 of the dogs, some
with multiple tumors. In 24 dogs, the tumors were non-invasive
of the bronchioloalveolar type. ("Many so small they would
probably not have been found by routine autopsy") Invasive
bronchiolo-alveolar tumors were found in 12 of the heavy smokers
of non-filter cigarettes; 2 of these dogs also had early squamous
cell carcinomas.
C omment
The findings are purported to confirm the cigarette-
cancer link previously suggested by the statistical studies.
The histologic findings are of 3 types, namely, non-invasive
bronchioloalveolar tumors, invasive bronchioloalveolar tumors,
and early squamous cell carcinoma. The results in each category
will be discussed separately.

Non-invasive bronchioloalveolar tumors are, in actu-
ality forms of benign epithelial proliferation of the terminal
bronchioles. They occur commonly in all types of acute and chronic
lung infections and calling them tumors is a question of semantics.
The dogs were subjected to tracheostomies and the smoking dogs to
repeated exposure of the lungs to the external environment. It
is surprising that only 24 of the 36 dogs shocred epithelial pro-
liferative changes. It is also of interest that in Auerbach's
group H (lighter weighing dogs smoking non-filter cigarettes)
there were 19 non-invasive tumors in 24 dogs whereas in gxoup h
(heavier dogs smoking non-filter cigarettes) there were only 4
non-invasive tumors in 12 dogs.
The attempt to relate cigarettes to the etiology of lung
cancer on the basis of these findings is highly imaginative and.
borders on experimental desperation. Benign epithelial prolifera-
tion was described as early as 1876 by Friedlander (1) and a spate
of reports(2-13)~ has since appeared in the medical literature re-
lating the condition to bronchitis', pneumonia, pulmonary infarction,
bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and thromboembolism. Benign
epithelial proliferation (fiuerb ach's non-invasive bronchioloalveolar
tumors) has been commonly observed at autopsy since its first
description a century ago. It is found in children and in adults,
in smokers and non-smokers. It is irresponsible to associate N
O
this finding with lung cancer because it occurred in smoking dog,s.U1
O
Auerbach, himself, found it in 25 per cent of his non-smoking ~
controls. .J
O

Invasive bronchiolo--alveolar tumors were found in 12
(33.3 per cent) of 36 heavy smoking dogs exposed to non-filter
cigarettes. If these resul.ts were extrapolated to experience
in humans there would be at least 20,000,000 cases of bronchiolo-
alveolar carcinoma inithe United States. Equally paradoxical
was the proportion of invasive bronchiolo-alveola:r tumors to the
total number of malignant tumors in the dogs. There were 17
tumors (15 invasive bronchiolo-alveolar and 2 squamous cell
carcinoma in the 12 dogs) so that the incidence of invasive
bronchiolo-alveolar tumors among all the lung cancers was almost
90 per cent. In human lung cancer the vast majority of cases
are squamous cell carcinomas and the bronchiolo-alveolar cancers
are an almost negligble quantity.
In a study of 4,068 cases of primary lung,cancer at
the Memorial Hospital in the period 1926-1960, Watson (14) found
the incidence of bronchiolo-a:lveolar carcinoma to be 6.5 per cent.
Inasmuch as the resemblance of primary bronchiolo-alveolar car-
cinoma to metastases from extrathoracic glandular carcinomas was
not fully appreciated by pathologists in the early years of the
study, it is probable that the true incidence was even lower
(15-21).
Auerbach explained the disparity between the large pro-
portion of invasive brcnchiol.o-alveolar tumors found in the dogs
and the small percentage found in hunans by rationalizing that
some bronchiolo-alveolar tumors are reported under the term,
adenocarcinoLqa. While this may be true it offers a very tenuous

explanation for the paradox of invasive bronchiolo-alveolar
tumors constituting 90 per cent of the lung cancers produced.
Adenocarcinomas provide a small percentage of all lung cancers in
humans. In a series of 676 lung cancer autopsies at the Memorial
Hospital Watson (14) foundthat the number of adenocarcinomas
and'bronchiolar carcinomas, combined, were less than one third
of the total lung cancers. Liebow (22) estimated that approximately
15 per cent of pulmonary cancers were adenocarcinomas. Haenzel et
al (23) found the incidence of adenocarcinoma and alveolar cell
carcinoma, combined, to be 21 per cent of all lung cancers.
As further justification for his bizarre findings,
Auerbach referred to an epidemiologic study (23) showing that
the standardized mortality ratio for adenocarcinomaa of the lung
was 26 times as high among male smokers of more than 1 pack daily
as among male non-smokers. Without discussing the validity of
these findings it is very apparent that they have no relevancy,
wha.tsbever, to Auerbach's experiments which produced bronchiolo-
alveolar tumors. It should be further noted that Auerbach culled
from the above report only those findings which gave him comfort
and omitted to state that the same study found only 59 alveolar
cell carcinomas out of a total of 2,381 lung cancers. Actually
only 27'of the 59 alveolar cell carcinomas were confirmed by
autopsy. But even if all had been confirmed this would give an
incidence of 2.5 per cent of alveolar cell carcinomas among all
the lung cancers contrasting considerably with Auerbach's f inding
of 90 per cent in the dogs. Whatever was produced in these experi--
mznts bears little relationship to lung cancer in humans.

-6-
A clue to the Auerbach findings may be obtained from
studies of spontaneous lung tumors in dogs. Nielson (24) found
that most of the spontaneous primary tumors of the lungs were
located in the peripheral areas of the lung and were classifiable
as bronchiolo-alveolar carcinomas; it is significant that 2 of
his 11 spontaneous lung cancers in dogs were squamous cell car-
cinomas. In another veterinary study by Cohen, et al (25) there
were 22 spontaneous primary cancers diagnosed of which 9(4Gper
cent) were of the lungs and bronchi. It was also noted that the
risk of acquiring a malignant tumor increased with the age of tre*
dog (Auerbach's dogs had doubled their age at the end of the
experiment). Dahme (26) found that adenocarcinomas were the most
common spontaneous lung tumors in domesticated animals but his
illustration of adenocarcinoma closely resembled the histologic
features of bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma:.
Animal experimentation has shown that when lung tumors
were produced in beagles, the tumors were usually bronchiolo-
alveolar carcinomas. Park, et al (27) using,plutonium aerosols
via masks produced 6 primary lung cancers in 42 exposed dogs; all
were bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma and in 5 of the dogs the N
tumors originated in more than one lobe. In another experiment, ~
UI
Andersen and Guttr.ran (28) expcsedbeagles to whole body radiation Q
and produced 7 lung cancers with histologic features typical of ~
bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma. ~
W
It would therefore appear that when lung cancers occur
i'n,dog:, whsther spontaneous or experimentally produced, the tumors

histologically are bronchiolo-alveolar carcinomas in the vast
majority of cases. This is an inherant biologic feature of lung,
cancer in animals. The pro.duction of these tumors in dogs by
cigarette, or other exposure, has little relevancy to lung can-
cer in humans in whom bronchiolo-alveolar carcinomas occur in--
frequently and are often found to be metastatic from extrathoracic
cancers erroneously diagnosed. (.howhere in the Auerbach pre-
sentation is it stated that complete autopsies were done to exclude
,
primary cancers elsewhere metastasizing to the lungs).
There were 2"Early squamous cell carcinomas" found in
Auerbach's experiment each in a heavy smoking dog. These same
dogs also showed invasive bronchiolo-alveolar tumors. It was
stated'that the early squamous cell carcinomas" were indistin-
guishable from "early invasive squamous cell carcinomas" found
in humans who smoke cigarettes. Evaluation of these findings
must await publication of the photomicrographs. At present, one
can only comment that Auerbach has been more fortunate than most
pathologists in f inding early squamous carcinomas. In a previous
N
study (29) of humans he found them slightly more frequent in the
O
proximal parts of the main bronchial tubes, an area in which lung N
UT
cancer seldom develops. In this experiment, one of the early ~
squamous carcinomas was found in a dog's left main bronchus, also ~
a proximal part of the mainn bronchial tubes. ~
The only significant conclusion from the Auerbach experi-
mPnts is that 2 early squamous carcinomas were found. Whether
the tumors occurred spontaneously as the dogs grew older o~.~

-8-
whether they were producedby the exposure of the dogs to the
equivalent of 18 years of human smoking of 60 - 80 cigarettes
daily are questions which may be resolved by duplication of these
experiments by other investigators. It also must be verified
by non-committed pathologists that the lesions found are
compatible with the diagnosis of squamous cell. carcinoma.
With respect to Hammond's presentation, all it demon-
strates is that if dogs are subjected to irritation of the
respiratory tract in a way that interferes with their defenses
against pulmonary infection, they will develop varying degrees of
pneumonitis andsequelae such as compensatory emphysema, fibrosis,
and enlargement of the right heart. Apparently the nature of the
experiment also interfered with the ability of the dogs to swallow
properly inasmuch as 2 of the dogs died from asphyxiation fron
aspiration of food. It is impossible to state how many of the
other dogs may have aspirated food into the lungs, at various
times, resulting in repeateod pulmonary infections.
Hammond's colossal ignorance of the subject of patho-
logic changes in the lungs is emphasized in his statement "Both
in human beings and in dogs, emphysema (rupturing or destruction ~7
O
of alveolar septa), fibrosis ..............seld=occur, or occur ~
to only a slight degxee, in the lungs of non-smokers (except non- 0
~Pb
smokers with occupational exposure to certain dusts and vapors)." ~
N
Emphysema andfibrosis were foundin the lungs of non-smokers for Clt
hundreds of year s( 30) before cigars ettes were manufactured. There
is a vast literature on emphysema in the 19Lh century proving that
it was a common pulmonary ailment readily detected by clinicians
and pathologists.

REFERENCES
1. Friedla.nder, C.: Experimental Untersuchungen ueber chronische
Pneumoni') und Lungenschwindsucht, Virchow's Arch. f.
path. Anat., 68:325, 1876.
2. W'olf, K.: Der primare Lungenkrebs, Fortschr. d. Med. 13:725,
1895.
3. Kitamura, S.: Ueber second'are Veranderungen der Bronchien
undEinige Bemerkungen uber die Frage der Metaplasie,
Virchow's Arch. f. path. Ana:t. 190:163, 1907.
4. McKenzie, L.: Epithelmetaplasie bei Bronchopneumonie, Vircho<<r's
Arch. f. path. Anat., 190:350, 1907.
5. Menetrier, P.: Cemcer.primitif du Poumon, Prog. M6d. 3:436, 1886.
6. Ribbert, H.: Bemerkungen zu einen Falle von primaren Lungen-
carcinom, Deutsch. Med. Wchnschr. 22:165, 18016.
7. Haythorne, S.R.: On the metaplasia of bronchial epithelium,
J. Med. Research 24:523, 1912.
8. Tyzzer, E.E.: A series of spontaneous tumors in mice with
observations on the influence of heredity on the fre-
quency of their occ urrence, J. Med. Research, 21:479,
~
O
1909. N
~
9. Slye:, M., Holmes, H.F., and~Wells, H.G.: The primary spon- p
4.1h
taneous tvmors of the lungs in mice, J. Med. Research M
30:417
1914 N
.
, 0
10. Winternit--, M.C., Wason, I.M. and; Mc1?amara, F.P.: The
Haven, Conn: Yale University
Pathology of Influenza, New
Press, 1920.

REFF;REI3CES
11. Bell, E.T.: Hyperplasia of the pulmonary alveolar epithelium
12. in disease, Am. J. Path 19:901, 1943.
Balo, J., JuhAsz, E., and Temes, J.: Pulmonary infarcts
13. and pulmonary carcinoma, Cancer 9:918, 1956
Berkheiser, S.: Bronchiolar proliferation and metaplasia
associated with bronchiectasis, pulmonary infarcts, and
anthracosis, Cancer 12:499, 1959.
14. Watson, W'.L.: Lung Cancer, St. Louis: C. V. r7osby, 1968,
p:-387.
15. Herbert, P.A.: Alveolar cell:tumor of the lung, Arch. Path.
41:1'75, 1946.
16. 'Overholt, et al.: Favorable bronchiolar carcinoma, Dis.
. Chest 27:403, 1955.
17. Eck, H.: Uber den sogennante Alveolarzellk+e'js (Lungen-
adenematose), Ztschr. fiir Krebsforsch. 60:433, 1955.
18. Jojzansen, C. and Olsen, S.: Alveolar cell carcinoma, Acta
Path. Microbiol. Scand., 41:187, 1957.
19. Rossman, P. and Vortel, V.: Pulmonary metastases imitating
alveolar-cell carcinoma, J. Path. Bacteriol. 81:313, 1961.
20. Hewer, IL". F.: The metastatic origin of alveolar-cell tumor
of the lung, Ji. Path, Bacteriol. 81:323, 1961.
21. Rosenblatt, M.B., Lisa, J.R. and Collier, F.: Primary and ~
metastatic bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma, Dis. Chest ~
52:147, 1967. CA
O
~
N
