Philip Morris
President's Commission on Heart Disease, Cancer, and Stroke Progress 640615
Fields
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- LIST, LIST
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Site
- N28
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- UNCO, UNCODED LIST
- Document File
- 1005099199/1005099222/1016 Report to the President 64. 50-2f
- Master ID
- 1005099199/9222
Related Documents: - Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Named Person
- Ackerman, S.J.
- Anderson, O.
- Andrus, E.C.
- Baker, A.B.
- Borhani, N.O.
- Brand, D.
- Carrese, L.
- Cole, C.
- Cumley, R.W.
- Day, E.
- Dempsey, E.
- Dennybrown, D.
- Diehl, H.S.
- Ellwood, P.
- Endicott, K.
- Farber, S.
- Fisher, C.M.
- Foote, E.
- Ganz, A.
- Gorman, M.
- Guthrie, E.
- Handler, P.
- Hanish, A.
- Henderson, M.
- Heyman, A.
- Hoge, V.
- Huggins, C.
- Kane, C.
- Kissick, W.L.
- Knutti, R.
- Kotin, P.
- Kowalewski
- Lee, L.E.
- Leiter, J.
- Levin, M.L.
- Liethman, H.
- Lilienfeld, A.M.
- Locksley, H.
- Lyons, C.
- Martin, L.E.
- Merritt, H.H.
- Meyer, J.
- Moore, G.E.
- Morrison, B.
- Ogden, H.G.
- Oleary, J.
- Page, I.
- Paul, O.
- Peterson, P.Q.
- Phillips, H.T.
- Powers, L.
- Putnam, J.J.
- Ravdin, I.S.
- Rosenberg, H.
- Rusk, H.A.
- Sadusk, J.
- Sahs, A.L.
- Schnaper, H.W.
- Schottenfeld, D.
- Shannon, J.
- Shear, M.J.
- Sherman, J.F.
- Shimkin, M.B.
- Shira, R.
- Siekert, R.
- Sohnson, L.B.
- Taylor, A.N.
- Troupin, J.L.
- Turner, J.D.
- Waalkes, T.P.
- Warren, S.
- West, M.
- Wilkins, R.W.
- Wright, I.
- Zamecnick, P.
- Zubrod, C.G.
- Zwick, D.
- Zworykin, V.
- Anderson, O.
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-037
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-037
- Named Organization
- Ama
- American Academy of General Practis
- American Cancer Society
- American Hospital Assn
- American Public Health Assn
- Assn of American Medical Colleges
- Ben May Lab for Cancer Research
- Boston Univ
- Bureau of Chronic Diseases
- Bureau of Medicine
- Bureau of State Services
- Cancer Chemotherapy Natl Service Ce
- Cancer Research Inst
- Cancer Subcomm
- Ca Dept of Public Health
- Cleveland Clinic
- Columbia Univ
- Commission on Heart Disease Cancer
- Commission on Environmental Medicin
- Communications Subcomm
- Comm of Medical Consultants
- Congress
- Cp Huntington Hospital
- Dept of Medical Education
- Dept of Medicine + Surgery
- Division of Chronic Diseases
- Duke Univ
- Extra Va Research Division
- Facilities Subcomm
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration
- Govt Operations Comm
- Harvard Univ
- Heart Disease Subcomm
- Heart Disease Control Branch
- Hew, Dept of Health Education and Welfare
- Hri, Health Research Inst, Roswell Park
- Johns Hopkins Univ
- John Collins Warren Laboratories
- Leukemia Society
- Manpower Subcomm
- Mayo Clinic
- Ma Dept of Public Health
- Ma General Hospital
- Medical Arts Publishing Foundation
- Memorial Hospital
- Nas, Natl Academy of Sciences
- Natl Aeronautics + Space Administra
- Natl Cancer Inst
- Natl Comm Against Mental Illness
- Natl Heart Inst
- Natl Inst of Arthritis + Metabolic
- Natl Inst of General Medical Scienc
- NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
- NIH, Natl Inst of Health
- Northwestern Univ
- Office of Program Planning
- Office of the Director
- Public Health Service
- Rca Lab
- Rehabilitation Subcomm
- Reorganization + Intl Organizations
- Research Career Section
- Research Subcomm
- Resources Analysis Branch
- Secret Service
- Sister Elizabeth Kenny Foundation
- Social Security
- State Univ of Ia
- Strang Clinic
- Stroke Subcomm
- Temple Univ
- Univ of Al
- Univ of Buffalo
- Univ of Chicago
- Univ of Ia
- Univ of Md
- Univ of Mn
- Univ of Pa
- US Senate
- Veterans Administration
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center
- Wa Univ
- American Academy of General Practis
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- une54e00
Document Images
stubbornly remain the leading causes of death in the United States.
PROGRESS REPORT
June 15, 1964
PRESIDENT'S COMMSSION ON HEART DISEASE, CANC
In his Health Message to Congress, early in 1964, President
Lyndon B. Johnson indicated that "Cancer, heart disease, and strokes
They now afflict 15 million Americans--txo-thirds of all Americans
now living will ultimately suffer or die from one of them.
through new knowledge and more complete utilization of the medical
I am establishing a Comtnission on Heart Disease, Cancer, and
Strokes to recommend steps to reduce the incidence of these diseases
study by the'end of this year and submit recommendations for action."
prominent in medicine and public affairs.. I expect it to complete its
knowledge we already have. The Commission will be made up of persons
On March 7, the President announced the names of the members of,
this Comnission=as follows:
Dr. Michael DeBakey, Professor and Chairman, Department of
Surgery, Baylor University College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Members
Chairman
Dr. Samuel Bellet, Professor of Clinical Cardiology, Graduate
School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Mr. Barry Bingham; Editor and Publisher, Louisville Courier-
Journal, Louisv3lle, Kentucky

Mr. John M. Carter, Editor, McCall's Magazine, New York, New York
Teacad . _ ~ . , . .
of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston,
Dr. R. Lee Clark, Director and Surgeon-in-Chief, The University
University, St. Louis, Missouri
Dr. Edward W. Dempsey, Dean, School of Medicine, Washington
Boston, Massachusetts
Research Foundation and ProYessor, Harvard Medical School,
Dr. Sidney Farber, Director of Research, Children's Cancer
_ Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Dr. Marion S. Fay, Former President and Dean, The Women's
Education, and Welfare
New York, Former Secretary of the U. S. Department of Health,
Mr. Marion B. Folsom, Director, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester,
New York, New York
Mr. Emerson Foote, Chairman of the Board, McCann-Erickson, Inc
National Red Cross, Washington, D. C.
General Alfred M, Gruenther, Immediate Past President, American
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Dr. Philip Handler, Professor and Chairman, Biochemistry Depa.rtmentt
Mr. Arthur 0. Hanisch, President, Stuart Company, Pasadena, California
Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York
Dr. Frank Horsfall, Jr., President and Director, Sloan-Kettering
Dr. J. Willis Hurst, Professor and Chairman, Department of Internal
Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Dr. Hugh H. Hussey, Director, Division of Scientific Activities, ®
American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois
Mrs. Florence Mahoney, Co-Chairman, National Committee Against ~
Mental Illness, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Charles W. Mayo, Emeritus Staff Surgeon, Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota
Dr. John S. Meyer, Professor and Chairman, Department of Neurology,
Wayne State University College of A~radicina, Detroit, Michigan

Mr: James F. Oates, Chairzran of the Board, Equitable Life
of America, New York, New York
General David Sarnoff, Chairman of the Board, Radio Corporation
Medical Center, New York, New York
Dr.'Paul W. Sanger, Surgeon, Charlotte, North Carolina
Assurance Society, New York, New York
Dr. E. M. Papper, Professor and~ Chairman, Department of
Anesthesiology,-College of Physicians and Surgeons,
Columbia University, New Yorkp New York
. Dr. Howard A. Rusk, Professor and Chairman, Department of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York University
Dr. Helen B. Taussig, Emeritus "Professor of Pediatrics,
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Mrs. Harry S. Truman, Independ'ence, Missouri -
University Medical College, New.York, New York
Dr. Irving S. Wright, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Cornell
Surgery, New York University Medical School, New York,_New York
Dr. Jane C. Wright; Adjunct Associate Professor of Research
The Commission's Assignm.ent
White
On April 17, 1964, the Conmission held its first meeting in the
House. The President addressed the Commission as follows:
take time for a brisk walk outside this morning. I am a
subscriber to the view once expressed that if you want to
know if your brain is flabby, you better feel your legs.
Ladies and Gentlemen: On beautiful days like this, the
President and school boys have a hard time staying indoors.
I think we would set a good example for the Nation, and we
would advance the cause that brings us together, if we would

.
Health is something that we treasure in this house
where you are gathered this morning, and I know it is
treasured in every houne throughout our land and around
the world. It was said several centuries ago, health is
11
the greatest of all possessions. A pale cobbler is better
than a sick king.
The work that you have begun today is work in which
I have the keenest and the greatest and the most personal
interest. You are here to begin mapping an~attack by this
often fatal. Every two minutes cancer strikes a man or a
a year are struck down in the prime of-life by heart attacks,
knowledge and give us guidelines on overcoming those obstacles.
To this group I do not think I need to tel].. you how vital
this is. Unless we do better, two-thirds of-'all Americans now
living will suffer or die from cancer, heart disease, or stroke.
I expect you to do somothing about it. Five million Americans
for acquiring new knowledge that we already have; third, to
identify the obstacles which stand in the way of advancing
majority of deaths and much of the serious disability which
strikes our people every year.
I have asked you to undertake these three objectives:
First, to measure the full magnitude of the impact of these
diseases upon the Nation; second, to evaluate our resources
heart, cancer, and stroke disease. These three account for the
Nation upon the three great killers, the three great cripplers-

woman or a child in this country. Every year strokes
leave 200,000 Americans dead and another 2 million
incapacitated.
I want us to put our great resources--and they are
unlimited--to work to overcome this. We can, and because
of the work you will do, I believe we will. So let me
say this: I know there are some differing viewpoints
about the prospects for success in these fields, but
from what some of you on this commission have reported
to me, and from some other sources that I believe in,
I think our goals are in sight. It is well within the
range of reasonable expectation that work being done now
in regard to controlling growth of cells in the human body
will bring decisive victories over heart disease and'cancer
. and strokes.
The point is, we must conquer heart disease, we must
conquer cancer, we must conquer strokes. This Nation and
the whole world cries out for this victory. I am firmly
convinced that the acewmulated brains and'determinatioaof
this coa~uission and of the scientific community of the world
will, before the end of this decade, com° forward with some
answers and cures that we need so very much. When this
occurs--not "if," but "when," and I emphasize "when" --we
will face a new challenge and that will be what to do within
our economy to adjust ourselves to a life span and a work
spa.n for the avarage man or woman of 1Q0 years.

Knowing Government as I do, I am sure some President
some day will be appointing a comnission to study tfiat very
graat problcm, and I would be ploaaed to be that Px©aidont.
If you do your work well and if you do your work with
dispatch, maybe I will have that privilege.
I have often been reminded myself of Shakespeare's.line,
"A good heart is worth gold." I am glad mine is good now,
and if the doctors and the Secret Service and my guardians
in the press will just permit me to get my exercise, I
intend to keep it that way.
I want to thank you very much for beginning the work
that I think will ultimately win the hardest fight that we
have ever fought, and I would suspect that just as we look
back on Lincoln's proclamation a hundred years ago, when he
took the chains off the slaves, I would suspect that some day
your grandchildren and great, great grandchildren will be
,looking at this picture made this morning in this beautiful
rose garden, all the thorns are inside, and see the leadership
of 50 States who are willing to give their talents and their
energies and their imaginations, and stay awake atnight and
roll over and go get a glass of water and come back and think
soxe more on how to get the results that we know are within
our reach.
In My Judgwnt, there is nothing that you will ever do
that will keep your name glorified longer, and that will mako

your descendants prouder than this unselfish task that you
have today undertaken to get rid of the causes of heart
and cancer and stroke in this land and around~the world.
What can be more satisfying than to feel that you have
preserved not a life, but millions of them, for decades.
I am here to say to you that while we are interested in the
food stamp plan, we are interested in medicare for the aged
under Social Security, we.are.interested in the civil rights
bill that we consider most essential to our leadership in
this country and in the world, we are interested in the
pay bill that will keep our good civil servants here, we
are interested in the iuunigration'bill that will permit
families to join each other, and we are interested in the
poverty bill that will take our boys out of the pool halls
and out of the slums and out of the juvenile delinquency
centers of the Nation--we are interested in all of those things.
There is nothing that really offers more and greater hbpe
to all humanity and to preserving humanity than the challenge in
the task that you have undertaken. You have among you some of
the great doctors, some of the great public servants of-our
time. Som.ehow, some way, some timse, you are going to find
the answers, and I hope it will be soon.
Thank you.

The Cocunission accepted the assignment, as follows:
We accept the President's challenge with a deep sense of
responsibility and a high dogreQ of enthucicanm. Wo havc been gzvon
an unparalleled opportunity to alleviate suffering and prevent needless
death.
During the past decade and a half, an unprecedented program of
medical research has been instituted on a nationwide scale. Through
cooperative endeavors of public and private organizations--voluntary
health agencies, universities, research institutions, medical scientific
co=uunities, individual philanthropists, and Fed'eral, State, and local
governments, this program has already proved its worth. Indeed, greater
advances have been made in these fields of endeavor than through all
the previous years of recorded history. N'.any types of diseases, which
only a decade ago were considered hopeless, are now completely curable.
In many respects, we are in the midst of an exciting biomedical revolution.
In fulfilling the historic mission assigned to us by thePresident, ,
we have agreed to consider the following areas of interest:
1. THE MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM
This will include not only a reassessment of present mortality
and disability statistics, but a new appraisal of the costs of these
long-term illnesses to our nation.
. C~
Yet so much remains to be done.
Areas of Interest
Is our network of collecting statistics adequate for obtaining
CO
., N
the information necessary for the planning of programs to accomplish 0
PA

9
our goal? If not, what means must be found to provide the required
information?
Is there a need for carrying out special surveys of the prevalence
of these diseases on a national scale? Studies of mortality indicate that:
different parts of the country have diffe'rent death rates from some forms
of these diseases. Does this indicate differences'in prevalence of these
diseases? If so, what are the reasons? Do they indicate that different
ways of life influence the prevalence?
2. WHAT IS THE PRESENT STATE OF THE ART?
What body of research knowledge db we now possess in the diagnosis,
stroke?
Is there a national scientific consensus of what are the most
effective measures in the current treatmwnt of these diseases?. We are
aware of the fact that the msdical literature is replete with claims
for one mode of treatment as compared to another. Is there not a need
for mass evaluations and field trials of existing therapies to test their
efficacy - - analagous in nature to the field trials which proved'the
effectiveness of virus vaccines against poliozqelitis?
3. UTILIZATIOid OF KNUWLEI'iGE
Are we fully utilizing the research knowledge which we are
currently developing in our universities andresearchinstitutions
throughout the country? What are the barriers that delay public acceptance
and utilization of the results of medical research?

10
T'nere is a strong preliminary evidence to the effect that much
of this information is not sifting down to the average doctor in
vrivata ptdo%3ae.
For exaample, the American Cancer Society has repeatedly noted that
we could save the lives of 50% of all victims of cancer if our doctors
in private practice had available the-latest diagnostic tools'developed by
research. Early detection of stroke could lead, in many cases, to
.successful surgical intervention and, in many others, to considerable
amelioration and rehabilitation if the necessary diagnostic procedures
were available to the majority of American doctors.
In the case of all three of these diseases, why are these
diagnostic procedures not widely disseminated?
4. RESEARCH
What are the obstacles to the acquisition of the new research;,
knowledge so obviously needed to cut down.what President Johnson ha
referred to as "the burden and incidence of these diseases"? -
To what degree is the problem a financial one -- a 2.ack of adequate
public and private support, preventing the necessary acceleration of our
national medical research endeavor.
We are mindftial ofthe fact that our medical research effort started
from o,Imost ground zero at the close of World War II. The developments
since then indicate that the.American people have a strong desire to mount
a research offensive against the major diseases.
.~ O
Q1
O
CD
CD
N
. .

^
A-recent report of the Public Health Service dates the real beginning
medical research will be staffed only as a result of a steadily expanding
pressing in the fields of heart disease, cancer and stroke.
In "NSanpower for N'.edical Research", a 1962 report issued by the
National Institutes of Health at the specific request of Congress, the
Director of the NIfi:estir.ated that we would have to double our medical
research manpower by 1970 if we are to continue the progress made during
the previous decade. The NIH report noted that "the future expansion of
reports from the Executive branch of our government, from the Congress and
from distinguished.scientific organizations such as'the National Academy
of Sciences emphasizing the point that severe shortages of research and
clinical manpower plague medical research generally, and are particularly
is less than the budget of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
for the current year.
Is medical research, then, getting an equitable share of our total
national research and development expenditures?
5. Ka.rT oW ER
Over the past decade, we have been deluged with impressively documented
for all federally supported research and development.
Put another way, this total 17-year medical research expenditure
That same report notes that all,federal medical and health-related
of our national government's effort in medical research to 1947, when
federal expenditures for medical research approximated $27 million.
research expenditures from 1947 through 1963 totaled only $5 billion, or
roughly six percent of the $80 billion made available over the same.period

,national effort, combining private and public resources, to train manpower
research effort was taking its first halting steps, the shortage of adequate
research facilities was a ma3or, if not the ma3or, obstacle to an expansion
of our research effort in the fields of heart disease, cancer and stroke.
Voluminous hearings were held by Congressional committees on this
aub3ect over a period of four years, resulting in 1956 in the passage of the
Xcalth Research Facilities Act.
and schools of the health professions?
How can we attract more young people into medical and related
scientific careers?
How adequate are our present stipend and.fellowship programs for
the training of young people in these fields?
6. FACZLITIES.
During the.period from 1945 to 1955, when our national medical
How much must we increase the training capacities of our universities
to the people?
workers who will bring as expeditiously as possible the results of research
specifically for medical research."
How are we to achieve these widely accepted manpower goals?
How adequate is our corps of professional and supporting health
Under the aegis of this legislation, the federal govern=ent has 1-A
.provided several hundredmillion dollars in matching aid over the past
. C11
eight years for both the construction of new research facilities and the
. Cd
remodeling of existing ones.

,
9:
f
s
However, this legislation has always imposed a rigid ceiling on the
amount of federal aid. Because of the present ceiling of $50 million a
year, the Congrooo, although acoply awaro of the ahortago of roocicd
institutiona of letarning; that we are negloctin;3 many small but highly
competent institutions with excellent scientific credentials, but which
do not possess the finances necessary to m--et the rigid'federal matching
requirement.
facilities, is unable to appropriate sufficient monies to have any appreciable
impact upon the present backlog of close to $200 milliion in scientifically
arrproved applications for research construction from universities, hospitals
and non-profit foundations throughout the country:
In every case, the construction application is accorapanied by detailed
assurance that the local institution will provide 50% of the total
,,.
construction money. In past years, local and private support under this
program has exceeded the federal investment by a ratio of better than two
to one.
Is there a need to amend the Health Research Facilities Act?
As far back as 1959, the Committee of Medical Consultants appointed
by the U. S. Senate reported that the requirement of 50% matching from
local institutions was unduly severe. The Committee of Consultants contended
that only the wealthier states and the largcxuniversities could participate
to a significant degree in~this program. As a result, there have been salvos
of criticism from Congressional and other sources to the effect that our
national medical research effort is increasingly concentrated in our larger

6, .
14
7. CO:2,1IVICATIOTdS
gap between the research investigator in the laboratory and the physician
treating patients in the field.
Over and above the problem of better co=nunications between,the
;rosQarch invcctigator and the practicing doctoro there is the vaat
problem of providing better coannumications between the entire medical
rapidly as possible. It has also called for the more imaginative use of
closed circuit television and medical films in closing the commuzications
The Reorganization and International Organizations Subcommittee
of the Senate Government Operations Coum-ittee,'in many hearings and
reports, has highlighted the problems created by our rapid accumul.ation
of new research knowledge. It has focused particularly upon the extra-
ordinary challenges created by the entrance onto the market of several
hundred new drugs each year. .It has cal.led for a network of regional
centers, using mo4ern computer and other techniques, to bring new
information on drugs and other medications to the family physician as
In recent years, the whole problem of better comnunications
from the medical research co=unity to the private physician, and
to the general public, has come to the fore.
research com unity and the American people.

ti'~ ,-;.~
r
15
with the following Chairmen: Heart Disease - Dr. Irving Wright
Cancer - Dr. Sidney Farber
Stroke - Dr. John Meyer
Research - Dr..Philip Handler
, Manpower - Dr. Edward Dempsey
Communications - Mr. EmersonFoote
Facilities - Mr. Arthur Hanisch
Rehabilitation - Dr. Howard A. Rusk
Or g, nization and Activities of the CoirL*nission
The Commission organized itself into the following SubconIInittees
The Commission established the following methods of operation:
1. The collection of information from all agencies and gro4s
concerned with these diseases through letters, staff visits, etc.
2. The holding of hearings at which expert witnesses from the
widest possible range of interests, both public and private,
present their views and discuss the issues involved.
3. The preparation of the report and its recommendations and their
submission to the President.
.
As of the date of.this report, the Subcommittees have held fifteen
days of uieetings.''Among those who have met with one or more of these
- Subcomn.ittees are:
Dr. E. Cowles Andrus, Professor Enieritus, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Dr. Otis Andexson, American Medical Association, Washington, D. C.
Dr. A. B. Baker, Profeeaor and Chairmn, Departmcnt of NBuroiogy,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dr. David Brand, Chief, Heart Disease Control Branch, Division
of Chronic Diseases, Public Health Service, Washington, D. C. Q11
~
Cd
. . CL~
. . N

:.
16
4
Foundation) Houston, Texas ,
Dr. Clifford Cole, Chief, Neurological andSensory Disease
Service Program, Division of Chronic Diseases, Public
Health Service, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Russel W. Cumley, Executive Director, Medical Arts Publishirig
Dr. L4cerson Day, Director, Strang Clinic, New York, New York
Dr. D. Denny-Brown, Jarr.es Jackson Putnam, Professor of Neurology,
Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Bo$ton, Massachusetts
Dr. Harold S. Diehl, Senior Vice President for Medical Research
and Medical Affairs, American Cancer Society, New York, New York
Dr. Paul Ellwood, Executive Director, Sister Elizabeth Kenny
Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dr. KennethEndicott, Director, National Cancer Institute,
Bethesda,,Maryland _
Dr. C. Miller Fisher, Associate Clinical Professor of Neurology,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Dr. Aaron'Ganz, Head, Research.Ca-reer Section, National Institute
of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. Eugene Guthrie, Chief, Division of Chronic Diseases,-Public
Health Service, Washington, D. C:.
Dr. Albert Heyman, Professor of Neurology, Duke U2liversity School
of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina -
Dr. Vane Hoge,-American Hospital Association, Washington, D.. C.
Dr. Charles Huggins, Ben May Laboratory for Cancer Research, University
of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Dr. Charles Kane, Professor of Neurology, Boston University School
of N.edicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Dr. Ralph Knutti, Director, National Heart Institute, Bethesda,
Maryland
Dr. Paul Kotiny Associate Director for Field Studies, National
Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. Edward J. Kowalewski, Chairza.n, Cozcmission on Environmental
Medicine, American Acad.emy of General Practice, Kansas City,
Missouri

v
"V
~.O. V
17
Dr. Lyndon E. Lee, Jr., Chief, Extra-VA Research Division,
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Adrilnistration,
Washington, D. C.
Dr. Joseph Leiter, Chief, Cancer Chemotherapy National Service
Center, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr: Herbert Licthman, Medical and Research Director, Leukemia
Society, Inc., New York, New York
Dr. Herbert Locksley, Department of Neurosurgery, University
of Iowa School of Medicine,.Iowa City, Iowa
Dr. Char^p Lyons, Professor of Surgery, University of Alabama
School of N:edicine, Birmingham, Alabama
Dr. H'. Houston Merritt, Dean, Columbia University College of
Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
Dr. George E. Moore, Director, Roswell Park Memorial Institute,
Buffalo, New York
Dr. James 0'Leary, Professor and Chairman, Department of
Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Dr. Irvine Page, Director, Research Divisiony Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
Dr. Oglesby Paul, Professor of Medicine, Northwestern University
School of.Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Dr. Paul Q.,Peterson, Associate Chief.for Operations, Bureau of
State Services, Public Health Service, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Harry T. Ph~J.lips, Director of the Division of Chronic
DicGases, N';acsuchusetts Dci art=nt of Fublic Hoalth, Boaton,
t+fab~acp.uset ta
Dr. Lee Powers, Associate Director, Association of American
Medical Colleges, Evanston, Illinois
Dr. I. S. Ravdin, Vice President for Medical Affairs, University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Dr. Herbert Rosenberg, Chief, Resources Analysis Branch, Office
of Program Planning, Office of the Director, National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. Joseph Sadusk, Medical Director, Bureau of Medicine, Food
and Drug Administration, Washington, D. C.

18 -
Dr. A. L. Sahs, Professor of Neurology, State University of
Iowa, Ames, Iowa
Dr. ITarold W. Schnaper, Chief, Research in Internal 2~,~d'icine,
'Veterans Administration, Washington, D. C.
D'.. Ja:nois Stitsnnori, D9.~.4%rsr, Ncitia:~l Inpt3tutoo of ~Ioalth,
$ethesda, Maryland
Dr. Murray J. Shear, Special Advisor, Intramural Research,
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. John F. Sherman, Associate Director, Extramural Programs,
National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases,
Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. M. B. Shir:~tin, Professor of Medicine, TenroLe University,
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Col. Robert Shira, MC, USA, Chief of Dental Service, Walter
Reed Arn;f Medical Center, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Robert Siekert, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Dr. A. N. Taylor, Derart:r:ent of ::edica7l Education, American
Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois
.j
Dr. James L. Troupin, Director of Professional Education, American
Pub3iic Hea];.th Association, Nev York, New York
Dr. T. Philip Waalkes, Associate Director for Collaborative
Research, Natiora1 Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. Shields Warren, Professor, Cancer Research Institute, Boston,
Massachusetts
N'.ra,. Margaret West, Assis',,ant Chief, Public Health Methods, Public
Health Service, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Robert W. Wilkins, Professor and Chzirman, Department of
Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Massachusetts
Dr. Paul Ze.necnicR., Director, John Collins Warren Laboratories
of C. P. Huntington Hospital of Harvard'University at
Massachusetts General H'ospital, Boston, N':assachusetts
Dr. Charles Gordon Zubrod, Director of Intramural Research,
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Dr. Vladimir Zworykin, RCA I,3,bo3'atories,, Princeton, New Jersey

Staff
To support the.work of the Comuission the following staff was
recruited:
Stn#'f DirnGtar
Dr. Abraham M. Lilienfeld, Professor and Chairman, Department
of Chronic Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of
Hygiene, Baltimore, Maryland
Executive Secretary
Mr. Stephen J. Ackerman, Associate Chief for Planning and
Analysis, Bureau of State Services (Commun3:ty Health),
Public Health Service, U. S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare
Staff Associate
Dr. John D. I T;irner, Office of the Director, National Heart
Institute, Public Health Service, U. S. Department of
xealth, Education, and Welfare
Staff Assistants
Dr. Nemat 0., Borhani, Head, Heart Disease Control Program, Bureau
of Chroriic Diseases, California Department of Public Health,
Berkeley, California
Mr. Louis Carrese, Program~Planning Officer, Office of the
Director, National Cancer Institute, Puolic Health Service,
U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Dr. Naureen'Henderson, Associate Professor of Preventive Medicine
and 14ar'1cI.e Scholar, University of Maryland School of Medicir.e,
Baltimore, Maryland
Dr. William L. Kissick, Assistant to the Special Assistant to
the Secretary (Health and Xled3.ca]. Affairs), U. S. Department
of Health, Education, and Wclfara
Mr. Lealon E. tdartin, xnformatioa Officer, National. Heart Institute,
Public Health Service, U. S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare
Dr. Bayard Morrison, Clinical Branch, Collaborative Research,'.
National Cancer Institute, Public Health Service, U. S. 0
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
. .r~ ~
N~
N' O

Mr. Horace G. Ogden, Information Officer, Bureau of State
Services (Coumunity Health), Public Health Service, U. S.*
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
!
Mr. Daniel Zwick, Office of Chief, Bureau of Medical Services,
Public H'ealth Service, U. S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare
Dr. David Schottenfeld, Associate Director, Admitting and
Diagnostic Clinic, Memorial Hospital, Now York, New York
Staff Consultant
Dr.'Morton L. Levin, Professor of Cancer Epidemiology,
University of Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, New York,
SDecial Consultant
Mr. Mike Gorman, Executive Director, National Committee Against~
Mantal Illness, Washington, D. C.
20

PRESIDE.*1;1S CQ~*SISSI3h- ON F~",:.AttT DISUS,~',,' CANC.2.11 M STROK--'.
+
. Dr. Irving S. Wright (Chair~^...aa) Dr. Philip M. Handler (Chairman
Dr. Paul Sanger Yr. J=os F. Oates
Dr. J. Willis Hurst Gen. David Ssraotf
Dr. Samue2 Bellot Dr. Fran:c HGrsta7l
Dr. Helen Taussig
Dr. R. Lee Clark Dr. HuZh fiussey
Dr. Frank Horsfall Dr. Marion Fap
Dr. Jano Wright Yx. M;sion Folson
Dr. Charles Mayo Gen. Alflrcd Cz^aesither
Gen. David Sarno.'f
Dr. Sydney Farber (Chaizti=) Dr. Fdtiard Dcwpsey (Chairnan)
Stroke
Fr'.cilSti43
Dr. John S. Meyer (Chair~.o) . Mr. Arrt~,ur Fs.-iiach (Chairm.an
Dr. Howard RusY ..Mr3. Floreace Mshoney
Dr. E. M. Parper
Dr. Howard Ru: k (C'.«:ir-,.~a)
Mr. Marion Folscm
Mrs. Harry 'k-.=:.a
G
~; ~~. x -r
~-t~''k,. :j :.; ~: _:.?
