Jump to:

Philip Morris

Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed

Date: 16 Sep 1970
Length: 1 page
1005091838
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 1005091838

Fields

Type
NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
Area
LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
Site
N28
Named Person
Auerbach, O.
Boucot, K.
Hussey, H.H.
Named Organization
Ama
American Cancer Society
Archives of Environmental Health
Journal of American Medical Assn
TI, Tobacco Inst
Request
Stmn/R1-004
Stmn/R1-039
Stmn/R1-053
Stmn/R1-133
Document File
1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
Winston Salem Journal
Master ID
1005091669/1855
Related Documents:
Characteristic
EXTR, EXTRA
MARG, MARGINALIA
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
UCSF Legacy ID
baf91a00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: baf91a00 Log in for more options!
WsbN-.SnLE iN Toul~,vAk q1 rc~~ 70 ~ ~~g ~ eagles, Srn~kingAniele t a BeTrinted I I F I I I.. I I I- L A controversial experiment that used beagle doos in evaluating the relationship of, cigarette smoking to cancer will be pubGshed by a scientific journal. the study decided to submit their papers to her f o r publication. " "Smokino is a major public health problem of our time and~ tthese findings deserve to be Dr. Katharine Boucot o f( published;" she said. She added -ZVynnewood, Pa., editor of the ~ that she welcomes all types of' Archives o f Environmental Hpalth; told the 1Vinston-Salpm JournaI by telephone yesterday she plans to pub:ish the study in manuscripts and that many of them are rejected. Her publica,ion, one of 10 a press conference in New York, a letter in April that said, "The City. " American Cancer S o c i e t y' s The gist of the findina was exploitation of this unpublished that cancer of the human type worf: for publicit'y purposes is had' been produced in beagle truly tir-ithout precedent in the does from cigarette smoke scientific community. And in inhalation. June, the Tobacco Institutee suggested in a letter to the Since that announcement the president of the A m e r i c a n ,tobacco industry has sought the .1ledical Association that "it full data on the Cancer Society might be helpfutif the AIIA at experiment' "for evaluation by a this point. would release the. panel of independent experts.to substance of the reviews in its be designated by the Tobacco possession concerning t h i s lnstitute and subject to the study, including any negative. lapproval of the A m e r ic c a ni findings." ,Cancer Society." The institute Also in June the Tobacco lotfcred to bear the costs oC such Institute called on, the Cancer a winter issue, possibly , in ~ specialized publications of the December. She said she could I American :liedical. Association not say just when: has about 9,000 circulation and The studS, she said, has been is distributed throughout the returned by reviewers s h e ~ world. The maiw eomphasis of h hl i h ne, s e er mont 3 maeaz selected "to tear it apart" and i report'~ back to her. The findings are now being prepared for publication. said, is preventive medicine and;'a retitew. Society by letter "to a;ree to impartial review which we -i the ucli" o bl f t r en nmen s pro ems o I The American C2ncer So as pollUtion: etety's reply to the tobacco have requested"' and stated, The stud y done by Dr: Oscar industry v, as that it wouU not "there is now good reason to Her policy,, she said, is not to querbach, a research arantee ob'las'•; these scientists to submit lisuspect 'hat this report' was far disclose the names of reviewers lthe American Cancer Soclet};,Itheir findings "to any selected, frcm accurat'e and that it is of such papers. \o editor does ( d •I H d l committee chosen by thei likely that none of the dovs de• ~ D E C this, she said. u} er ammon , a ~ an r. , vice president of the American( ToSacco Institute or any othe I veloped lung cancer." Dr. Boucot said she did not know just why the authors of ~-• Cancer Society, was announcedleroLp; by the Cancer Society Feb. 5 at~l The: Tobacco InstitutP criticize the American Cancer ( Society for the way it handled the report of the dog experi- ment and its failure to permit ;'an impartial review. % Dr. Huoh H. Hussey of FChicago, editor of the American 1lfedicat Association's Journall jtold! the Winst'on-Salem Journal by telephone yesterday that his jpublication had given Auerbach 'and Hammond an opportunity to "resubmit their manuscripts" to the A:%f A 'Journal. Auerbach and Ham- -mond decidecl uot to send their manuscrii?ts back, There had been claims by the ,Tobacco Institute that t h e iAmeivcan Medical Association had rejected the papers pre= pared by Auerbach a n d Hammond. This was not exactly the case, Hussey said. The .papers submitted: to t h e American Medical Association Journal were submitted to the Consultants who made critical xuogestions for revisions. Hussey said the papers of Auerbach and Hammond could ' have been published by the : AMA Journal with corrections and revisions as suggested by h consultants = „ ~ e rt: s<W.,, , -s.Qr "A, :A,sr+WtA~. ~t The tobacco industry throu.gh issued its institute has continued to i ,

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: