Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Cullman, J.F. III
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Named Organization
- Journal of the American Medical Ass
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Ny Times
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- US Public Health Service
- Ama
- American Cancer Society
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Site
- N28
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Named Person
- Auerbach, O.
- Dorman, G.D.
- Hammond, E.C.
- Surgeon General
- Dorman, G.D.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Tiec, Executive Comm(TI)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Recipient
- Lewis, W.B.
- Recipient (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- fze91a00
Document Images
..
.
PHI LIP Mi
IsC0Rf0~lAf~.C~.4~
100 PARK IiVENUti kEly YORtt, t.:Y. SOJiT
Mr. William B. Lewis
Chairman of the Board.
American Cancer Society
219 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
I am at-aching a co;ay of a letter sent today to Dr. Gerald~ D.
Dorrnan, President of the American Medical Association.
. It concerns the Auerbach-Hammond study of the effects of
= cigarette smoking upon dogs, sponsored by the American
Cancer Society.
My reasons for writing the letter arc simple:
.- First, since my last letter to you, c'.ated April'29, the facts
have not chanoed. You continue to refuse our request for an
impartial, independent review of the Aucrbach-ITian-imond
data. -
Second, the full Auer_bach-H_arnniondi ^repo~t,_v,hichvo_u said
~
~
in your letter of ;March 12 \.ou1d be. l~~lb].ifFhed'
"'i.n the velrv
-near future " reiZ" I r.s ~a~ut~b~,shed. Instead of publication'
-- _~ - ~ . ~ - a ._.,,.-.._, .
there. are *-ess conferences -- t,,:,o in thc past iowr rnonths --
.,....
-
.,~».
.__,.__..w-=-_., .~-..~..._....----,-.....,...~ u .-..._.~.~.:.-V.... .~ .. _...._~.s...-<
_and pres s release:: on data wh.i:ch has nIot Vett hoc.n profes_si.on^:l~ly
- ~ - -- - - - .~. : . . -. ~
reviewed. -In addition, we~have read a published report.to
--....~..a..~,....-
the effect that the validity of the Aue:rbacl.-Haanin.oiad s tudy'
is beint; questioned by scientists reviewing it for the Journal
of the American Mlc.dical Association. Another news story
indicates that at least o»c j;ournal - -the 1\Te%v Enl;J.4nd Journalof Medicine -- has rejected the
article.
- Third,
although, you announced on April 30 that the American
.. Cahcer Society was asl.ing the SwrgEoni General of the linited'.
States Puhlic lI'calth Sere vice to analyze the Auerbach--Hammond
-.,dat.a, the Surgeon General has decli:ned to do so. The substance
Jasrsn F. CvLLtfA2.`, $jtD
CHAIRMAN OF THC B_ ARD
6!
.

Mr. =14rilliam B. I.,ew'is
- Jtuze 22, 1970
Page 2
and rea:,oning of the Surgeon G'cnera'`s reply confirms the _
editorial position of the, Nev., York Ti,nes of 141ay 9, 1970 that
the review should not be undertaken by t'i'rc Public Health
Service, which is already on record as believing that cigarette
smoking is dangerous to health.
additional publicity for .a study -- unEpublish'ed and unsubstantiated
June 23. This press conference will undoubtedly result in
-' during the annual meeting, of the AMA in Chicago on Tuesday,
Finally, it is my'understanding that your second press
conference concerning the study will, be held, at your request,
-- which already ranks as the most widely publicized study
of all time. '
Four months ago, The Tobacco Institute initially requeste6 the
American Cancer Society to permit a thorough, independent
analysis and evaluation of the experiment and its results by a
panel of impartial scientists. In March, the Society responded
stating that tnie sLuQy
future" and that the published papers would satisfy any
s cientific or other ques tions about the wor k. Following a
second request from The Tobacco' Institute, the ACS said it
would refuse to ask the two scientists to "submit their findinbs
to any selected committee chosen by The Tobacco Institute,
or any other group. " Finally, on Aprili 30, following, public
disclosure of these facts by' The Tobacco Institu('e, the Cancer
Society yielded to the degree of annoih-lcing that it was asking
the Surgeon General to ahalyzc the data.
It is our opinion tociav that ili~e_validity _of th'e A'uerhach::-l;monr
i1nCln~^~i.s 11is*'hl s",sl?ect; Il~er?~ti~_4,eh~~.hen the first
announcement of th2!~: work was n1ie1.e-C at a press conference
held under the Cancer Society's a'usp'ices at the Waldor{-
Astoria H'otel in New York City, the ).),ed'i.a_I:e1)02~'tedRthat l2
of 96 dogs e,.posed t.o citya_rettc sli~ol:e haci c~c ~ elor~efl ~r 't~ry
w. ~,~.~.,.r~. _ - ,-....,.... ~ - .... ~........... ~.....:~.. a ~
~7--dI'('"1"UI7 t,h'iF (-"i.s reno.r
was fa,- fro:n accurzate and' that it is Jit:el.'y that none of t~he.
. t . _. . -_.. ... _... ,.~ ~., a ..-.. .... _ ...~...~~ ._.~s...r.~ - ~_... .. . .. ._.. ,~. ,_..
,.,
dogs developed lung cancer.
s

I
Mr~. =1Villi:am~ B. Lewis
June 22, 1970
Page'3
(0
The Tolacco Institute again calls upiin the American Cancer
Society to agree to the impartial review which we have
requested.
As you will~ see in the attached letter, we have al~so suggested
that it might be helpful if the American Iviedica]. Association
of the medical and lay public.
work immediately so as to prevent further possible deception
-.would: release the substance of its editorial evaluation off the
i
.I'ours very truly,
Joseph F. Cullman 3rd
Chairman of the Executive Committee
The Tobacco Znsti.tut:e,_ 'Inc.
