Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Lewis, W.B.
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Site
- N28
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Named Person
- Auerbach, O.
- Hammond, E.C.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Recipient
- Cullman, J.F. III
- Recipient (Organization)
- Tiec, Executive Comm(TI)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- bze91a00
Document Images
F
F
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC.
219 E A S T 4 2 N D
S T R E E T
NEW YORK, N.Y. 1OOU7
('21'2) 867-3700
WILLIAM B. LEWIS
CHAIRMAN;BOARD OF DIRECTORS
I
r
(
I-
F
I
L
April 17, 1970
RESEARCH
E DUCATIOI*I
SERVICE
Mr. Joseph F. Cullman, 3rd
Chairman of the Executive Committee
The Tobacco Institute, Inc.
Philip MorrisInc.
100 Park Avenue
New YorkNew York 10017
Dear Mr. Cullman:
The Veterans Administrationthe American Cancer Society and Doctors Auerbach and
Hammond cannot accede to the requests stated in your letter of February 27 and March 20 for an
evaluation of the Auerbach-Hammond study on "The Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs" by a
panel of independent scientists chosen by you.
Your request is withoubprecedent in the scientific community. The study under question was the
result of three and a half years of diligent and brilliant work by two eminently qualified
scientists
whose findings have been validated by distinguished pathologists of worldwide reputationL In
addition,
other leading,pathologistshighly regarded bythe scientific community, have visited Dr. Auerbach's
laboratory, seen his slides and praised the work.
We do not intend to ask that these two eminent men submit! their findings to any selected
committee chosen by the Tobacco Institute, or any other group. Their work will be judged in the
traditional manner of American: science,, where findings are presented, discussed, accepted or
rejected
by scientist's and physicians whose only motiivation is the truth. Doctors Auerbach and Hammond
worked flreely, and without restraint with funds furnished by the federal government': and the
American
Cancer Society. They are beholden only to the scientific community at large and to the integrity
it represents.
If the Tobacco Institute, or any scientific research, group, has doubts about the findings of this
study, the way it was conducted; or the credentials of the investigators, there is a time-honored
and
scientifically accepted way to proceed. Let your own or another group of scientists repeat the
experiments in a laboratory to prove that, smoking dogs will not suffer tissue damage, emphysema and
lung cancer. The Auerbach-Hammond methodolbgy is readily available to you. And D presume that
in the Council for'P'obacco Research you have or caniset up the mechanism for conducting such a
study.
If you carry out your plan to publicize "our respective positions" to the medical and lay public,
you have ourpermission to use this letter as the position paper of the American~Cancer Society.
i
W
William B. Lewis
