Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Surgeon General
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Named Organization
- NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
- Public Health Service
- Veterans Administration
- Public Health Service
- Site
- N28
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Named Person
- Yesner, R.
- Auerbach, O.
- Berg, J.W.
- Hammond, E.C.
- Surgeon General
- Auerbach, O.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Public Health Service
- Recipient
- Rhoads, J.E.
- Recipient (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- uye91a00
Document Images
PUnlac 1i[:nt.'r H GCriVIc:t_
1'1/.t;rcnNolor:.,UC. ~cfei
,1U51 ~ ~ IDJ10
Janathan E: _ kiaads, }f. D.
hmerican C81Tcer SOciety, Inc.
2 19 Er, st 42nd Street
Rew, York 10017
]'orlcs,
ncar Dr. F.hoads : _
~ Pr.r~tc ~o:
t,le hd1e carefully reviewecl your rcquest th.1t I as Su*r(geon Ceneral
establish a cc::::iittee of scientists to conc.uct a formal analysis of
the Auerbach-tr.:;;:.ond study. S)z,p<t}hetic a:. l:e are to f:lie reasons
trtiicll have lec to t}iis request, t,e do not t':elieve sl:cii a foi,~al-
.=e~,~._._. ~ ..._. _.
1rel=.iC:c' i6 ilC.ce: Gc'.ry in ordc'_I' to C.tc i~:'Si1 0le\'Ct)jali1_4y of the Stu"Cl}'.
study in detail, a.ad, thGt- the ophorthnity corztiniies for revieay
b).
otl;rcr personc, anc)_uding scientiit.s ieprescl7ti_iiS the t~:bacco :industr)r.
. I1Ltz-bCr of --ciel:tists outsiziC the Cove;::l,tent h.tvL also gone over the
~%uaa:::iG~;tt:L ]:rC'1 tnr' VetC:r?_ilP3 17:tGe1";,`tr.I1d t}mt a
to the laborctorv :...aterial :rc Dr. John 11. L: r- t, c hr:;u'holozist
iro`:~ the Ni1i.7_Ga:?aa' Cancer I:..:i..'lt.(2te LS'i(i Dr: t?ra,'
sL~t~es
_ ~. . _. . .:..~~.
t.~ithlieJ_d. Amo:i- the qur_lifiieci Pe_-sont: uirio already n-lrldc theia-
XC j>; coT2trFi):-y to 1'act 'th'it sc:1'_elltifi::s 11a,Ve bCC;1 prevented f1:o.t
ze`=ic~,1-nlg the ~aucrbach-};r caond etur,y orr t':4t u.:ta 1a4ve been
iilk'estfg`tors l?llo have t^t:de \'«IuF,ble colltl'i}hlttio1:5 in tbejJ' rCSOective
believe ijiineceseaiT. Dr£.:. t'.uerJac}1 ,:I1d 11'.:::moi'J6 i:.Ze quc.i.-'fied -
There is 110 sc3.etzti.ffc study -,:,hi_cti casinot- benefit by the :-evietY off
other scientists; it is the j.natit-uti.ona]., "j'llry" rev;cu l:l:ich we
:fields over ap:aciod of ra,ny years. T},cy h::ve c<.rried' on tiic, present
-Btu4y uiider the i:,ost eminent r,l>onsorshil), ;:hat of your Socie'ty <+nd of:
the Veteraais hdr:a.l:istration. T7le proce:lur.e& tlre.y h'-ave fo).1cw'e1 i9uvc
been full_y descri_L:.Q in t31e lit:er3turc; they Il lye
Tf ClI( C~ l9~lc?t" il )`)Ciir~:.
~.~-..,r,..,-.. .»..~...._.,..~.,...vl.,,,,,..,.~
to be en ade-ow:te re~~ort c~f t}rc?i:~ z~tu ";., cu~ci ti~e~ 1)ave ou^ned Lhei~r
---.- ~,,.,.,,....~...r....,,~..,,. ~~~. . ,.,._~..~, ». a. ....~,
~- :
dat:i to t}~e inst~cctto:~ of o..,ier sc:iencJj.:;t~.. l;e, do not lalow tYi3azt ilotc
Ca il
for
be e):pc.cted of iAivesti ;atorr, especirlly tliosc t?i_th t]ie
N
~
):cpt~t~~tica~s O
c:xcel3.eiice and probity enjoyed 1)3, })ru. I;uei-br~eh r.nd }'lasmmoiao3~.
.-

3onLtht~ti~ I:. I'~lror:dU, tS.A.
:'cizr 2~ -
: Dr. IScr~, har told ur~ iahr,t i:n lir_s no douht' but th;:t the rrol;res:;jvc
chanl;c~i: 1~m tltir. t.ironcl~,~ir .~ir~ titsc:ucr3 of tl,e c:i~ rslt~ t~t:uc?icd ~~ere as
Dr, l.ueLbacl, has dcscri.hcd thc~, aald thnt ~-;us~~, othcr eo~~d'itions
={,c.1116 vcrc e,!rly invasive squanous cell c<<cinoma in the bronchiPl
i-i".ncs of vvo of the do~s. T.~f the qucstion at i_scue is whc~ther hunr,na-
ciF,arette sr.:olce, then thc answer is yes, in the view of a Public ,,
Iicalth Sci-v.'.-ce Pathologict with special cc-zpctencc in cancer. 1'h is
lung canccrr has been discovered in tl:e luns;s of' do-,s exposed to
pathoLo&ist;. who have reviewed the mutcrial. .
-- icE also the view, we ti:uider.et4nd, of Da'. fe.:rler and of the other
that ciS;arette st:,ot.i-ng causes lung cancer in }tumr,l beings. There was
-.cnough evid'cncc si.x yer.rs a-o to causc the Sur-con General's AdvJ:sor.y
Co~-,mittce on Se:ol:xng'r.nd l.ealth to co;ne to this conclusion, and this
It 3_c not necessary to go to this study to support tlie conclusion
-~-- - - - - -.~....a.....~.......... . .
$Lll(~iy addr; onCG' nore e]emi`Tlt of cerra;*!,ilt" tJ a coacll3;io:1 \!hlc{l the
evidence has been str.criStiiened in the ;}cars since, ' 7`he liucrhach-Net,,mon:3
.~.~.~
.~ ,~h02id's t:a-Clicai a11a tlez.l~:th c:unorit:ieS ;aready cons;ider certains
r~ ~-= Tl1C' StUC3~' jS G1~~*j!Ol7SS r 5~~~,P~f'Cint O 1 C?S 'd
~7~UrSr~ "CO: . xt appears tC:'
an l'_L]pJrti=ni n-1w research tool, an ul;?ltla! .''.-yn tC:1 on which Llodif.LCat1ons
- rlcopJ.esta.c and non--neoplra,tic and f:Ltlie ::o=e, it ;,; y provide us ;c{ th
provide us vith new 3n` 1`;h~.t ? i,t0 CinSe-I ~l~ Cd }Tialm.iJntt1T}' char:Zes, 1)otll
_~~e the ciF;?_rCi~:tC cG.`t be tested. and
The I'u')llc jieratll Servicc: ha s the str:twt_=,~, .. responsibility of r.eportir.~-,
-Ct t-Ln (`nc.c~:-C+c . -4',t regular 1i1 'CrVF.1S G n t:a ' 11:'_cnliifl co'_"t:ieCliucnces of
c~--
~
AIS G 1,
r1te VS
s~[ 1,r1teVS t11u
i
-world' . sczeirti f ic literature on s,n;o?ang "d iical:.h Z:nd evaluates i tth
the htlp of esLinc_nt scientists, select-cc~ :_e:; both those outsiee the
= Gorcrn.-neni: as 4rell as those in the Sc:~'j.ce itself,
=,The next revi e;a of the health consen,arences of -sr.:o?:in ;wilJ1 be rePortcld at
the end of the calendar year. ihe A ucrh`ch-1'ii~:r.::.o,,-, 3 st udy' Frill be Si.ve n '
` forr:.aZ,re:~ieti1 at this .t:ir.te in its- Propc:r; contc;:t, ._w one of r~on}s resec=cn
: ntu:Iic:s shcddin& laS;ht 'on -a difficult ru1.: i,_portr_:.L' hcal th problem: I
'
_
lt a.t: ~~ill n_'ot-'-e r.o
::-_ _:fccl cccrtain fro;i ve atrcnc'v l:rtol:? of `hc! s;t-iadv tl:z
~._ - -
-~-_-_._...
.
'
- be arl co;rtritauvi o;i to our uilc
.erstanciinS of the -sr..ol:i ng n.zd .
