Philip Morris
Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
Fields
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- PHOT, PHOTOGRAPH
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Site
- N28
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
Related Documents:
Document Images
'v%.Z~
1 . " )
j 1I11{lr-f, ~'I t-,7, (-) Fl',I N P,i !-,~),9 `;~t L tl, lt a
J`ftJI.ILJIL2~~J ULil1L.`J
T he Tobacm Institute, an industry
tradt; orcanization, charges that'thc
" Antcrican Cancer Society struck a low
blow last scintcr ttlten: it relcased~ the
rtes:.rlts of unpablished research pur-
portcaly proving that cigarette sno'c
induced lun; cancer in~beag!cs. The
~doSs didn't suffer front characteristic
human lung cancor, says the institute,
asd dhta from the study aren't ss'ail-_
blc so it can make its own cvaluatian.
f Not sa, says ACS. The smoke front
the impasse has yeCto clear.
Scienti,ic: consultants to the insti-
i tute claim that the results of the hi,hly:.
, publiciz~d stud'. conducted by, p:thol-
ogisl Oscar Auerbach of' the East
Orang-c (\.J,) V>1 Hospital!and ACS
~ biostatistici:m E" Ctrclcr Hamnmo:rd
arc ambiguous. \furcos'er, say patLol-
~ ogist Sheldbn Sonlmcrs of Ncst Yoru_'s
Lcnox L:ill IIosp tili and biocl'emist
Arthur Irurst of the University of San
Francisco, both the ACS and Dr.
~ Auc`bach have re,ectcd thr.`prci,o>al
. .. a .r ..
...t..,..... .
blbcl:cd thent from seeing the s.udys
~
1unS-patlto'o,~y siides.
Says Dr. Soatmcrs: _Qtr onlv.
1.no«'ldse of IJ 1t.cri-h s-. ^~
secoad hanJ.Iknm _r.c.%sr_;r : c-
~ counts." Dr. -_Son n crs co-ncnd; t Mt
12 of the cigar Itcsmo{ n_ bm~!' s
devrlbp ,d ad~no:arcinonasand only
two, sq:.nntous cclt carcinon as.
~ "~b: , adcnocarcinomn of tllc hu-
man 1un_ is infrequcnt," sau s Dr. Som-
ntcrs, "so I do notsee:that this studv
showed anythin, about smoking and
: i }wman lung cancer. Funthcrmorc, we
have seen larg~: glossy prints of the
squamous typcs [see smaller print bc-
lowl and they do not indic,rte clear-
cut clnccr either on th surfacc or in-
vasrvely: Presum: bly, th sc %%crr their
bcst pictures; if so, why areu't tiiey
convincingl" -
Joseph Culliuan 1'lt, chairr.:an of
the Tobacco Institute, warns that I: ^_al
steps mi;hb b2 taken to secure thc
eontcsted data. "This research vras
supponcd by public fu nds;" Cuilinan
says. The beagle cxperintcnts were
supported by the ACS and the VA.
Replies Dr. Aucrbach: "If Dr.
Sontmc.s wants to~sce the slid, ,, 1'11
show them to~ him. He never ;ked.
Representatives fromith: Tobacco In-
stitute wore at the sF,aial oprng mctt-
ing whcn this niatcrial vcas first prc-
sen sd. Escnbody received a eopy, of
the research report."
Mr. Cull n..nclirrr-a Fa c_nur
th~.rl~ ;ti. ra
unn rl i7d 13 ~i: tc o~ Cr.
'S..... r. ,""`. .i ~... >- i....a
-~-- -- ~ -
~urnuf ;:c:~ cl tki: r o rt.c~ t titis
sciea-
ti5c r.sons but b=caude the story ap-
pearcd in anoih:r meclical prrblirition:
The researcl P t~r_s, scLetiulcd to bc
~i~"etr anew at tha r1`°[A m:eting in
Chica,co on J1rnc 22, lie 'inc cc t-
sidcrcd i.,r_PrNica__inm i F1: t tr71..
~Ic.+~ chilc, llr. At.tru; ch pDints
out' that "seme of thc b:st patltol-
o,ists in the ~~or1 7'os~ niacd thc slidass
an&the dataand wncurocd v:ith tl::.
conclusions." He adds, "Thc ihstitutC
is doin- to tnc what Gcucrrl \lotors
did to I:alph Nader. Andl cvcrybody
has askcd mc: 'What is the institutc
doing but giving me tuorepubGcity', 'I
The concurring patltolo i;ts in-
cluded Dr. Jo}ut Rcr chief )athol-
ogist at the \ation:il C<mccr Institutc:
"As far as 1' know," 1Dr. 13crgsa%s, "noo
one has bcen dcnicd access to Dr.
Aucrbach's datar L'coplc have bcen
trackin ; in and out of his laboratory
ever since his rcport ca=r: cut. And
as for Dr. Somnicrs' poin:' about Qrc
squamous ocll! pictures, I drni t find
an3, reason for his unccrtairayc, I don't
know h-j%v much surcn any 091: could
be that they indicate incasixe ca tcer.
"If Dr. Soninters says thrt lung
adcnocareiitoma is rare in humans,
he's just~plain wrong. TruL;,thcy'rcnot
as common assqp-tmous, LurI's"c just
bccn lool.ing at som:, fi uros fro;n
Connceticut st'herc th^ occurrencc of
:dbnocarcinonra is put at 305~. Fur-
thurrnore, many of thosc: adeno =_r-
.-:~..+c
ing scco,id::ry squamoustcll c~nz:rs."
At this point, say" ACS offioiais,
thcy, will requcst that the study data
be an: !yzed by Dr: Jesse Steinfcl f, 4:e
Sur.;oon Gcncral of the PI1S. And tile
ollicc of' hc Su _con Gencral indicates
thau it is receptive to thc rc,uc>t.
The institute had proposcd to
nomiu, ,c i't!c,own roicw panel subject
to the socicty^ s veto for good caux."
Commcnt ACS o(ln.tals: '.fisl ing thc
institutc to appoint an inrl.artial group
is like askin~; the wolf to exan.inc the
~
shecp 'd
': ' . To Dr. Sa::nmers (lr/t) cridcnnr (crntrr) o/'sq:rnrnor,r ccll
CarCiiroenn irrradih, n s unkir~ (,c,; !r's Lu,~ r+u!i'ir'rurron-
vrircing: GnrA'Cl's 13r. Gcrg(ri.~4n) is alisoLucl}' con r ir7cc^ti.'
