Philip Morris
Study Data on Cancer
Fields
- Author
- Lewis, W.B.
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Site
- N28
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Veterans Administration
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Named Person
- Auerbach, O.
- Hammond, E.C.
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Ny Times
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- rye91a00
Document Images
New XorS: 7imEs
Study Data on Cancer
- _ To the Editor: ~
Recently you published a
- tull_paf e ~~crt~l~'x za from
:: the Toaacco h, utLIte yUestic n- i
ing the scientific validity ol a
stud y by Drs. Auerbach and
Ifarr;nond on cigarette smoking
in dogs, which was presented
by tt:e Anrerican~ Cancer So-
ciety.
There has been a mass of
evidence, statistical, epidemio-
' logical and bioionical, t:lat cig- ,
arette smohino is the major
- eaus° of lung czuricer in man.
= The cuLminating evidence in
- the recent Auerbach-Har,+_mond j
= s.udy demonstrates at c oos
= car, E^t lurz., cancer froln sc:ok-
i..g eih3rettes.
_ . The Tobacco Institute states
that "Fresent accouats of this
study are based solely upon the
info: natioz and interpretations
pro-,-i:ied by the press." The
facts are that the findin.-s of
the study we:e mae'e public at
: a scientific meeting of the
Arnerjuz Cancer Se:::et~~. T is
=w .-~ ar, onen raeetino tti t;-I:ch
`
,ntaties cf resa_rci and
rePresev.
;educational institut!ions were
: invited. -.
~ O.ne of the reaso:is for a
- prompt pre:entation to scien-
; tists and the pubt:c ti': as the -
significant data obta:ned' in
supFt,rt of the theory that the
: less tar and niaotine in the
~ mainstream of smoke, the less
May 13, 1970 PZge 41 C.
! the risk of emphysema. and
~ lurig cancer.
For yca!s seenients of the
cigaret:e ir.c;h.try have attac:;ed
! warnin~s of the dangers of
cip,aretre smc '.tinp and l:rntest-
; ed that', no one had i>eeiu ati!e
Ao produce lung cancer in ani-
ma's \':ith' C:g1re.tti'.sinoKt'. Zhis
~ has now been done.
The Tobacco Institute attacl:s
the hittericaiu Cancer Srciety
for "its use of pu:o;icity techni.
= ques." This cornes from an in-
dustry that. for years has re-
lied on pJ`,licity and advertis-
ing to obscure the fact that
.' cig3rette srn -~kin." is the m<<in
restriction a-z:;.'nst incividu;al
ti
sci.°n st'c v:~i:i-,, t;:e
:,,;,..:..:_......~.. :.~-- .~: .._ ~--
OranL " , N. J.,, :Y;:ere t:,e v:crh
was dcne, at d ne.ie.z;n~ ihe
.. Tese3: e;l V: it:: Drs. .SL£I: ach
: and~ Ha+.nn:3nd. A r.u:nber of
distir:louishel scientists h:~v-e
: already reviev.ed the findin--s.
cause of lur.;; cancer in ma n."-
The Tob::cco Institute re-
quested tha, it be al',ov: ed to
appoint a ca-nmittee to~-eciew-
the f:ndir.gs in t};e Aaerbach-
Hamnlond study. This reduest
is without precedenf in the
scientifir co:nmu:city, and we
refused tt!e reque_t.
There has never been Gn<<
Bccaus2 of'~ tjia great
interest in the li::k b=;_vreeu
ci~c ari.tle s_it^lang ' F,nCli IuiC` Can-
cer, a.r.d
ti:in- c
~
,
rTy~)i1.~ r.CO.il:UL d[1'2. % J.s of.
LRC /i'~~- ! 1' fl-Iial'terllori!' StlV1V
' datn, [Ft'.itOrial ;.ta.l 91
WILLIA"a IZ. LEWls.
Chairman. &,ard of I?L~ctors
A;r rican Cc,,ccr Soc:et~~
New York, May 7, 1JG(1
