Philip Morris
the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
Fields
- Type
- NEWS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Site
- N28
- Named Person
- Auerbach, O.
- Hammond, E.C.
- Surgeon General
- Hammond, E.C.
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- US Public Health Service
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Ny Times
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091691
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- qye91a00
Document Images
1\'E i+: Y[7I:;c: 'ra;:r:i;S
hihY' 9, 1970
PAGL; 24
-~he Cigaret-te-C;ancer Dispme
An overwhelming volume of evidence suggests
- that ciUarette smoking is harmful and can lcad to lung
..-cancer, emphysema, and various heart and circulatory
; problems. In the Ccr-2^t 'dispiute between The Tobacco
Institute and the':."'-ric-r,n Ci?ncer Secict~, however,
, ,,.. .....r....u~ z
; the latter organiz,:oit t1~~c+e an errnr c:f -- - iua;:ment
. . _. p..- .--...-... -
': which it }:as nov,,c>nly partially rectified. _
;- Last February Dr. E. Cuyler Harnmond and Dr.
-~ Osczr Auerbaclr attracted world attention when~ they
_ reported that twelve of 86 bea.alcs trained to smoke
' cigarettes hart deve'_-ned lung cancer. The American
: Cancer So_izty, which helped supr ~,rt' this work,
: declared the findings "eCfcctivcly refute contentions'
by cigarette manufacturing interests that there was
, no cigarette-cancer link."
The Iiamnrond~Auerbach results were path-breal:incl
and important, but ]ike all pioncerin, investigations
they must be scrutinized with perticular care. That
the tobacco eon1;^dc.^.6es?;o .~?nt_to c}fccti the d-1ta
is ut~c?erV a~ ~i a. and patco,n, ists aadd statisticians
'~--
`. freeao:n to examine the ti :c evCi^,l,.e. It V'a° a rnis-
take_frr- il:^ A'TTlPr1C"°:1 C?1 er SC . n/v to TCi :it to ask
_ 9 _ -~..e. ~ .. .. .... ~ ~.....~ ..-,_ ,
i~e two sc;rntists to"st?bmit their f ir:aing$ to any
selected committee chosen by the Tobacco lnstit'ute,
-, or any other group."
In the face of public complaint by The Tobacco
Institute, the An:ericar. Cat;c,~r Society ha_s h?d second
t} OUn~ tS> 1L "'S Io\ ^.S' ~CI tl i_S l: ^~O l~cii l ~~ Sfl
,~-- ' --
th^ Z.,:it.'Yl S~~es 7 lb~le ' r. lyli ~~to r.e_v,r,:tN..
ata: p,:a1 : P~ol c~} c~ti~ ~Sc rvic ejs ; lrc4 i~~en
iccot;i as beiev:a c?a c;e~s~ to nis dan, ~7t~ouj
to l~~altn
Scicntific iruth is dcternlined ulti:,tntely by open
cxamination of data~ and fulli discussion by alli com
petent persons in a fic,ld- The Ham:,tond-Auerbach
results shoul;t be scrutinized! intensively byy all inter-
' csted partics. Any other approach thro%vs needless
doubt on the already ovcrV: helmint case <'ainst
ciuaretto snno'.tin'g.
~
R
9UP
f
n
V
t
®
c.z
aK
i
~~~,
J,fi.~
V?
i
f
~~:' z~
