Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Cullman, J.F. III
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Area
- LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
- Recipient (Organization)
- American Cancer Society
- Named Person
- Auerbach
- Hammond
- Recipient
- Lewis, W.B.
- Document File
- 1005091663/1005091855/703 Position Papers. Bw 971
- Author (Organization)
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-039
- Stmn/R1-053
- Stmn/R1-133
- Stmn/R1-039
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Site
- N28
- Master ID
- 1005091669/1855
Related Documents:- 1005091669-1855 'smoking Dogs' -- Case History of An Attack on Advertising That Failed
- 1005091676 the Truth Seems A Little Twisted
- 1005091677 'all Advertising Should Be Truthful'
- 1005091678 the Voice of the Advertiser Cancer Society, Heart Assn., Admen Voice Opinions About Aa 'honesty in Anti- Smoking Ads' Editorial
- 1005091679-1683 Backgrounder 'the Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs'
- 1005091684-1685 12 Dogs Develop Lung Cancer in Group of 86 Taught to Smoke
- 1005091686 Smoking and Cancer
- 1005091687
- 1005091688
- 1005091689-1690 Last Gasp for Cigarettes?
- 1005091692 Smoking Controversy
- 1005091693
- 1005091694 Tony 'iq' Curtis Pays $120 Pot Fine in London
- 1005091695
- 1005091696
- 1005091697-1711 Remarks of Joseph F, Cullman 3rd Chairman of the Executive Committee the Tobacco Institute, Inc,
- 1005091712-1713
- 1005091714 Tobacco Institute Ads Challenge Cancer Society
- 1005091715 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete, Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091716
- 1005091716A
- 1005091716B
- 1005091717 the Cigarette - Cancer Dispute
- 1005091718 Study Data on Cancer
- 1005091719 Smoking Beagles Draw Fire
- 1005091720 Question Validity of Smoking Dog Slides
- 1005091721-1722
- 1005091723 Smoking - Cancer Study Action Rejected by Surgeon General
- 1005091724 Correspondence Between the Tobacco Institute and the American Cancer Society 700227 - 700429
- 1005091725
- 1005091726 the Tobacco Institute Believes the American Public Is Entitled to Complete Authenticated Information About Cigarette Smoking and Health, the American Cancer Society Does Not Seem to Agree.
- 1005091727
- 1005091728
- 1005091729
- 1005091730
- 1005091731
- 1005091732-1733
- 1005091734-1735
- 1005091736-1738
- 1005091739-1741 Report Relates Cancer and Smoking. Auerbach - Hammod Smoking Beagles.
- 1005091742-1753
- 1005091754 Cancer Report Disputed Eject Tobacco Men for Row Wth A.M.A.
- 1005091755 Research Plea Smoking Dog Test Repeat Is Urged
- 1005091756 Tobacco Group Challenges Cancer Study
- 1005091757-1759 No Smoking
- 1005091760-1794 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs I. Design of Experiment; Mortality; Findings in Lung Parenchyma,
- 1005091795-1818 Effects of Cigarette Smoking Upon Dogs II. Pulmonary Neopl
- 1005091819 Why Stifle Debate on Smoking?
- 1005091820-1821 Tobacco Institute Vs American Cancer Society
- 1005091822
- 1005091823-1824
- 1005091825 Ama Journal Decides to Withhold Reports on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091826 Tobacco Spokesman Says Dog Tests May Be Greatest 'scientific Hoax'
- 1005091827 Ama Journal Rejects Paper on Acs' Smoking-Dog Study Evidence of Cancer Found Lacking
- 1005091828-1829 Acs Researchers Retreat on Claims for Beagle Study Now Say Only Two Dogs Got Cancer
- 1005091830-1831 An Editorial
- 1005091832 Reports Linking Cigarets and Smoking 'not Rejected'
- 1005091833 Voltairean Principle
- 1005091834 Lung Cancer Makes Strange Bedfellows
- 1005091835-1836 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091837 What Became of 'landmark' Cancer Study?
- 1005091838 Beagles, Smoking Article to Be Printed
- 1005091839-1845 of Beagles, Smoking, and Cancer Cigarette Smoking Canines Answer the Demand for Laboratory Confirmation of the Statistical Cancer Link by Developing Invasive Lung Tumors
- 1005091846-1847
- 1005091848-1849 Study on Dogs and Smoking
- 1005091850 Cancer Society's Test on Dogs Looks Like A Hoax, Tobacco Industry Says
- 1005091851 Hoax, Institute Suggests Smoking Dog Cancer Test Challenged
- 1005091852 Cancer Society Was Wrong
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- eye91a00
Document Images
f r
i
f' o
4
Josl:Pri I'.CLzr,aaN.3xn
CI/AIRMANOF TNE DOAf.p
A1r.Wil9iam B. Lcvris, Chairman of the Board
.
American Cancer Society
219'Last 42'ndlStreet
New York, New N'orl: 100; 7
Dear 14,"r. Lcu'is:
March 20, I9M
I have your lctter _ fWch 12, 1970. I am 2reatly disarlpKn'sd tilat the 1\mc~r~ican~C~rc~r
has ref ~scd~~trllynlit tli l/~~a 1 tinl r ec i Yw of the ~>;:uerbach-l-Ianlrnond dutai\vLich, 1
requc:.ted in m}~
lettcr o. ~'cbraary 27. Sincc th4 Society has called upon thc aretteindustiy'to reassess its
lrolicks in ligl)e
of thefindiilgs, it is only fair and prop er for the So;,icty, to permit us tohare those findings
evlaluated
'byindependcni'e~rerts~andinlul~cdiatcl}I. You will reca 1l that I propose to'nominilte as
rcvie\\'crs sevcraliwc11-l:nowu scientists highly qualified
in the fields o`'cxpcrimentaU\\,orl:, tumor patllolon.}'y and lung diEeases.'I11cy will all be
subj,ct to }c)ur
rejecticn for goori'icause.
1'our reasons for denving'iny requcst, ail enderstand'Meni fronn your letter, arethat the fornlal
papers will be publislled in the very near futtlre and that a study of tilenr"ili satisfy any
scientifi:, or oth:r
a~...,l,IVi.J L~.jallulll~ tll4 lltlullg.. L\IU lPtll 11n1U 1110 1C.71C1M lU! U111}'!1Ig I1q
i[iCiU::\I' [ll.llll C.11;1\{IIC.II:g.
First, pu1Y111C.ltlomin a sGlelit'.i1r jollllla l'\\'lH not occur Unt9l many n]nntils a ftQr the
VQ:1Clorf-f,stOria%
press conference of February 5- _Sf'condt113 A111cTilcan CIIidcJ.l' Society ?it that press
Co.1f:rCnCZ made S°r10tIS allC; FitIG'ru ag,i3ntit this
industry and its prodws. The Society said in irs ftessaWi°ase that the f\uel'o;;ch-Ilarumoarl
findings
"shoulci liai& a siUnificant imhc:cUon tllc slaol;in`, of cigllrcttcsin this cot.nt'r}', and will
probably Il:a d'to a
reassessment of advertisinV clainls and policies of tii clgarette intiustry:" Thcce findings have
been
t\'idcly publi'cizcd in nc"opallel : and tilc :medical pstss. How can the Cancer Society say that
serious
anal}si:; of the \vor1: nlus+ be dcla)cd until fornlall; ablicatibn!
Finally, the published prapers cannot sat'i sfy qlicsti; ns about such m:atters as the prop^r
in'xrpre-
lation c f the patllo'ogic n-raterial, the :11 . g;airJn tha: cigarette smo':e produced various
eflec.s ini thc do_s,
the valiaity'and adequacy of the cxpellmental G.aif.,n ;lnd pro.edllrc, and im gcneral!whe,ti>,c ,
as you
asscrt, tllc: exp^riment "meetstGre hi glir,:st tradi''iio:.s and l;roto:ol of scicntifec
invi`stiS;ltion:" These
matters can only l\e resolvedi by exar.,ination;of tule p ertincnt ol:a : and Irr:1te ri;;L_.
It tlie Canc.er Societ'y does not accede to my r:c;uest\vc plan to use every clCans at 01,11-
disposal to
see to it th,lt the ntedical and laypublic are made il\\'are of our msPecti\c positions iin~this
rnattcr: ~
1'llrtilCrmolc, \\c intcnd to coil 1 wGG to t-7C C`(1 1'r~(Ii+iCl f:Y, ("j1O'IiPC hll C`-1'' l
Irleilt t(l`I11?;`~Ctti1~I
~... .~
$Cll'ntl'f!C SQI U:'il\'t Ill.ltiC II...L...:r S11` ~'_UStti.t..lt,1?J C~lil t 1 ~S.~I . CCllt l~
i.t[)C ~.~1\y
:ryCICsCtot11 \t?II 11CIlA\et101~ '(!l~~ _C~CtI'\1111 11.1, ;C_t(~' 'Mlh~l I1\ 'rl(CI'It! tl?!tt=~
y . : _ _. ....,.~..:
):1
!ll'l1 ~1~C11 il. 119l,11)il;f({ it.l\I II I IIC)} t.l!I)I~) ",i'ti~G 111 1r /1oiS li9 Cl 1t t}t
S,^cI,_t~'C W~lli l:l ~ 1. t(l ..
. ...~ ..~-~~~..~...~..~..~..~..c,..~........ r.` ,...-...._._.,.e..:.~,...~...~. ,....-
.~..-+.~.......~.... a~.. :.. ..~... ...-,- .
COllfCI[!ICe..
...-,.. Q.. ~,... ... ~...
PHILIP liIOR,'RIS
.
IWCC..U",LV. .
100 PARK /1\'ENUE.,NEV+''itOr:K, 11.Y. 100 17
Yours vcry'trnl};
~}
JQiL
,_ ,
.
, Joseph F. CullTllan, 3rdl
Chairnran of the Lxccutive Comztliticc
171c Tob;tcco Tnstilute, Ictc ` -6~~
