Jump to:

Philip Morris

Smoking and Cardiovascular Diseases

Date: No date
Length: 11 pages
1005053103-1005053113
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 1005053103-1005053113

Fields

Author
Mcgill, H.C., J.R.
Rogers, W.R.
Schwartz, C.J.
Area
LEGAL DEPT/CARLSTADT QRSA
Type
PSCI, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION
BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
Site
N28
Named Person
Astrup
Birnstingl
Blackburn
Bouchard
Buerger
Chandler
Charcot
Cobb
Eastcott
Gori
Kannel
Mcgill
Mcgill, H.C., J.R.
Pineas
Rogers
Rogers, W.R.
Schwartz, C.J.
Surgeon General
Walsh
Wynder
Request
Stmn/R1-048
Stmn/R1-059
Stmn/R1-060
Stmn/R1-071
Stmn/R1-072
Stmn/R1-073
Stmn/R1-091
Stmn/R1-092
Document File
1005052694/1005053222/Carton C17f
Named Organization
Public Health Service
Natl Heart Lung + Blood Inst
Advisory Comm
British Royal College of 'physicians
Author (Organization)
Southwest Foundation for Research +
Southwest Research Inst
Univ of Tx
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Master ID
1005052801/3146
Related Documents:
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
UCSF Legacy ID
mkx28e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 11: mkx28e00 Log in for more options!
Gt7R1: I would just like to reconcile some apparent' differences between your ;Yy~# presentation and! Dr. Astrup's presentation. Is it true that' what you were referring tu before was speciticallv obtained with CO exposurr°only,. not withlci arette smokine) Would' ou care to comment on whether there is '' ~ y an implication that other smoke components may counteract the effects of _ CO7' • ;'SCHWaRT2: The data, has not yet been totally analyzed. It may be possible. with more varied' anadysis, to look at independent effects of CO levels versus other factors. I can't answer that question. Our study basically gives the results of chronic smoking exposure in nonhuman, primates on lipids- ant. various other things. whereas •Dr. Astrup's data is qµice clearly the effect of CO. I don't think these are necessarily in eontl6ct, but we obviously have a more complicated sys- tem. ~ GORt: Dr. Astrup presented!some similar data at a meeting in Berlin almost a 1' year ago. I' remember that even at that time he showed some different results at different times during the experiment and could not confirm previous experience concernin,... ASTRUP: ...direct toxicity of CO on the endotheliall lining?' GORI: Right. At that'time, we werralsospeaking of the necessity of carrying on studies with CO in different anitnals, particularly in primates. Do you - think that the results that Dr. Schwartz has reported are more pertinent'to the human, situation than what one could have obtained with rabbits or with guinea pigs? A:STRtuP: I' think they are, because he uses tobacco smoke. I think it is J' important, to distinguish between the various components in tobacco smoke for identifying the real'toxic ones. , • . . ~ SCHWARTZ: I agree with Dr. Astrup that one really needs to be able to do. _ these things, both i^ terms of the total smoking situation and tr.e manipu- lation of different types of cigarettes gi'ving,differenrtypes of response. lnn addition, in the acute studies example. ti think we should be looking, at some of the smoking components, spet:iticallyas independent %ariables:

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: