Tobacco Documents Online

Members, Tobacco Institute and TIRC Condensed from Public Sources .by Hill and Knowlton, Inc. . ,. . MAGAZINES . . .. . . . . . . . . .. - . . .~~ #. ~. ~.~,. I ~ ' REDBOOK, . _ ~"n ,.. . . _. , .:~ ~. .. .. . . :~_...:.. ., . ..,. ...-. rg ~:.: . 5 Cigarettes and Your Health• . Are the Facts Bein Filtere . TOBACCO NEWS SUNIlAARY No. 25 May 17, 196o ,` ~~,•:. . .~.. ., - ~ ftirr. L • . . ~ . \' . • . 1 . l./= . ,. .. ~~/;~1~~. Y ily~7'P~r'1 ~.•. June, 1960 . . . . ( . .. ~ . W '. industry activities are generally unfavorable. ~F . __ . . . ..:1' ... . ,.. 1:'4, _ ,' r• t . , Considerable space is devoted to the Cancer Society's position and anti-smoking campaign. The general tone supports the ACS position. . , . .. i. . - . .. .. . :r.: . .. 'References to the Tobacco Industry Research Committee and other . , , .. . _.. • A full article by Walter Goodman, a senior editor, is essentially an attack on the industry, although there are some quotations from a few F" (i. . ,.who do not accept the statistical or other claims against tobacco. Quotations are also included from'Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Flemming, Surgeon General Burney, and F.T.C. spokesmen. The issue is scheduled for publication May 26. (NOTE: Discussions with the author and magazine editor, among others, resulted in only minor modification of a few misrepresentations. Many facts and medical evidence were not accepted. The editors declared they had decided to take the policy position as set forth in the article.) :_r 'S. ~ J •< . _ .. .1 .... . ,...... . ... _..m..f . .. ~. L