Philip Morris
Recombinant Molecular Research at Cetus Corporation
Fields
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- Site
- R37
- Master ID
- 1000229536/9811
Related Documents:- 1000229537-9544
- 1000229545-9550 Brief Synopsis
- 1000229551-9552 Introduction
- 1000229553-9555 Brief History of Cetus Financing
- 1000229556-9557
- 1000229558-9560 Special Note to Investors
- 1000229561-9563 Special Note Regarding Founder's Stock
- 1000229567-9569 Board of Directors
- 1000229575-9580 Achievements of Cetus People
- 1000229581-9599 Present Cetus Activities
- 1000229600-9616 Research Plan
- 1000229617-9619 Patents
- 1000229621-9656 Debenture Purchase Agreement
- 1000229657-9661 the Cetus Story
- 1000229663-9667 Cloning Business: It's Growing Fast It's Growing Fast
- 1000229668 World Roundup
- 1000229669-9670 Latin Drive: Brazil Spends Millions to Put Alcohol in Cars and Save Oil
- 1000229671 Can US Reduce Imports with Gasoline? Some Say Yes, But Officials Are Dubious
- 1000229672-9673 Bacterial Insulin Production Hears Reality
- 1000229674 Business World
- 1000229675-9677 Who Should Play God?
- 1000229678 Schering Plough New York Analysts' Meeting December 7, 1977
- 1000229679 Indiana Standard Labels Purchase Offer Part of Move to Wider Technology Base
- 1000229680 Big Deal for Berkley Bugs
- 1000229681 Oil-Less World May Run on Bugs
- 1000229682-9685 Tinkering with Life
- 1000229686-9687 Set for Biology's New Revolution
- 1000229688 Little Black Box of Cetus
- 1000229689-9695 Industry Is Finding More Jobs for Microbes
- 1000229696-9701 Dup of Id 1000229657-9661
- 1000229711-9715 New Cetus Antibiotic
- 1000229716-9720 Letter to the Shareholders
- 1000229721-9726 Letter to Shareholders
- 1000229727-9728 Letters to the Shareholders
- 1000229729-9730
- 1000229731-9734 Letter to the Shareholders
- 1000229735-9736 Letter to Shareholders
- 1000229737-9749 the Manipulation of Genes
- 1000229750-9770 Microbial Genetics and the Future of the Pharmaceutical Industry
- 1000229771-9774 Recombinant Dna: Fact and Fiction
- 1000229775-9778 Testomony of Ronald E Cape, Phd President, Cetus Corporation, Berkeley, California Before the House Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology
- 1000229779-9797 Biosystems Poised for Growth
- 1000229798-9805 Testimony of Ronald E. Cape, Ph.D President, Cetus Corporation, Berkley, California Before the Senate Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space
- 1000229806-9807 Statement of Ronald E. Cape, Ph.D President, Cetus Corporation, Berkeley, California Before A Special Joint Congressional Hearing in Conjunction with Oversight Hearings on Science and Technology Policy the Senate Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Presiding, Senator Adlai Stevenson, III Washington, Dc
- 1000229808-9811 Statement of Ronald E. Cape, Ph.D. President, Cetus Corporation, Berkeley, California at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Session on Recombinant Dna Public Health and Biomedical Research Policy Washington, D.C.
- Characteristic
- CONF, CONFIDENTIAL
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-150
- Named Person
- Hopwood, D.
- Area
- WAKEHAM,HELMUT/KAROL SHARPE'S OFFICE
- Named Organization
- Cetus Board of Scientific Advisors
- NIH, Natl Inst of Health
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- oei84e00
Document Images
4=2

y:~`7 .,:! ~.~,,.'r v;~.
,.r r
r
.. ! . . .. 'rr`., . . '.r. , ~-, . Ca:J!.,r.
... ~:~ .. ~..
worked with Micromonospora because one of our clients discovered
his unique antibiotics, ~in it-. Biut it's a recalcitrant beast. A.
different genus, Streptomyc4s,; is much more docile, much more apt
to give higher yield~y- by anforder of magnitude, perhaps. (Pro-
David Hopw~ood, of;"England, a member of the Cetus Board of
fessor
Scientific Advisors, is the'world's recognized authority on the
genetics of Streptomyces. Up to now, we have historically ac
cepted that a'new compound discovered in a particular organism, t~
Recombinant Molecular Research at Cetus Corporation
The newest genetics technologies, recombinant DNA and cell fusion, can
facilitate previously unheard-of products and processes. Some of them
will have revolutionary social and economic impact during the next
generation. Just as was the case with~semi-conductor technology, where
~. ,.. 4
:,<'~'" ~. ~~~~E:
i
P i Y Y 9 ,
P P ..-:~ H ,, ~;~ r ,!'~. ~"~'
sors, digital watches and the like, we are not doing justice to the `~
~~
potential of biology in what follows. Nonetheless, it is clear that we
are addressing markets in the billions of dollars. ^Lar. d~~ " ~~*Ft:
y,
'i~ysF~}~'rr'. *r '. _ r .;; (yi:. F Ir r.C` _i..~ k ~f {( ~ tt f ~
,~tr , ' ; . ~ ..; ; ` : b
1. There are some here-and-now opportunities and_-co~Kmitments which
represent the first step. o~
,
'
r
`
raa;
. , : . b r :. p
> .,
Tr
,~
nm; ~< _ ~~nz~
A~I,~~" :' ... '..; .. ::. ..-,. ,.: vr' : ,r~. Z -, :,'4. : r =. .'r, ....~'1Y1~ , -~ O .
d'(.r ' .~=. r " ~`F~d~'~ 7- iJ'.fnu~i
The existing fermentation industry has a Qcombined W~.ume which has,'.
_= < been estimated to be well in excess ofIerObillio^dollars: There
are many opportunities to improvetodays~processes with~ genetic'
approaches. We're already involved,in yield-z0rovement programs
for antibiotics.~ But until recently jae've been using conventional
mutational methods. Our present;experience`illustrates how much
more elegant are the techn3ques;that are today available. We have'
.,'"'~ 1',;:-.
now cell fusion-.techniques, and we have used them successfully,
v
whereby thes ;antibiotic synthesis capabilities may be transferred.
from one species or genus to another. Transferring the antibiotic
potential of Micromonospora into Streptomyces was a significant
objective,o
o.~ti ~~ __ . . ~ ef ~.;; h
~ ,~a _ " j ' . , ~
Sf
If
~~F.:;1,
cs
must be producedcommercially in that organism. For example,
penicillin is discovered in the mold Penicillium then that's the
organism we're.`stuck"with for commercial production. But there are t~;fi
.~c.)
AnoiexZample: The production of useful cephalosporin deriva- k
tivesfrom cephalosporin C has been plagued by the necessity of
isolation of the intermediate and the costly chemical removal of
the (D)a-aminoadipyL side chain, as no biological system has been
found capable of this cleavage. On, the other hand, P. chrysogenum
enzymes must have the ability to cleave the (L)a-aminoadipate from
the postulated penicillin precursor, isopenicillin N. The fusion
of Penicillia and Cephalosporia could provide a mechanism for
fb reallocation of the genes that code for these activities and per
haps make possible the direct production of useful cephalosporin
J ~;F~Y R derivatives in the resultant organism.
-~., x~' _ . -. , ~ ~: , . . , .
.;..
..- .'r.7~-~5' ~'~i.' ,r~,
1 6 r~.~^; 1'~r5y ~.~` F ;"f. ^ . ', ::~., . , ...?,'L;f - `. ,;7.
. . .r v';-`1 , ..~~.. .' :\~.~' , . ~4 . .. .... . ~ i. ,
.
r ~,Yt~,+~~3-rk +~ ~
~d'` `" ` . , 1, . ' RR x 'x r 9 ~}, 7f
a. . .^,
7 r rt;~'
~ ti art` 1 ~;,.~'~.'gy,
,va: t..
F

" .~. kx. -*

.~.,
j:f~,..~'TkFrF'R,if R_~:?~f:i t~~~1.k~~~~~
Q
h _ .,.
..~,
i}ii
.~.
~rs
~;.~~;
.;.
~, .~, tt~
ti ``i i --~ .. ~..' -!t ~+~ :; . .. ~ , 7. 5 :.
`Developi'ng these abilities at Cetus may open the way to many near-
term short cuts to analogous non-pharmaceutical industrial prob-
lems. For example, these techniques might today be applied to
increasing the efficiency of fermentation of an assortment of
chemicals now made from petroleum sources and also other compounds
now made by fermentation, but comparatively inefficiently.
There are also some similar short-term goals for recombinant DNA'
work. Some might, in fact, address the above-mentioned problems.
, ' . . . . r * ,.. , . . . ,. ' . `.'. , .. _ 1 . ~ ..
Our long-term recombinant DNA program~also includes the following:-
understood as well. Because of this familiarity with E. ?1
coli, most work continues te~'be varried out,,with it. But
since it is a natural inhabitant'of the hua-an body, concerns
have beemexpressed as tQ~its suitability in industrial pro-
p e upon e genetics of the common colon bacillus ~t
Escherichia coli (E. coli). The work ,hasin tur~ resulted in
more and more knowledge about E. co 12: Q No other organism is,:
f.
: l af1 y.}L ! L . .1
The greatest amount of progress in recer~ mo~ecularbiology
has de end d th '' ~'~ ~ ~x
x The development of a "stable" of production mieroorganisms
proprietary to Cetus. 4 t ~;G ib~ry `f a h^ rQ ,'4': t t~~iiY~t v,
duction, particularly wj~th foreign gene5 inserted into it by
recombinant DNA techrf iques~ Biological containment means
crippling E. coli geneticall~ to make it impossible for thel
organism to live oufsidet2ie laboratory. EK2 and EK3 are
specifications for the'degree of crippling. We will similarly
have to develols organisms'sufficiently crippled that they
.j
cannot live outside; the: industrial fermentation tank. We
can't tell todaywhether or not E. coli will ultimately be `~
acceptable,~ no matter-how crippled, and to this end work is
beginning`.to examine"and prepare alternative organisms for
molecular genetics. We at Cetus Corporation propose to
prepare an`entire stable of such'workhorse microorganisms.
commercial use,.o' F; coli has been called the workhorse of ~s r A,
But wev can'e-stop there. It will be necessary to catch up' in
geneticbackground;knowledge, to bring our understanding of
theseynew industrial microorganism candidates toa state more
coinparable to what we know about E. co1i. (David Hopwood has
tiaIready started^to so for Streptomyces, as mentioned above.)
Inshort, we must develop dexterity with the genetics of these
ne&Worganisms.
One more step is essential to bring'these organisms out of the
academic world and into the "real" world of industry. They
must be genetically developed to grow economically on cheap,
.,;
wt
~f,
r R
plentiful food sources whose continuing supply is assured. It
should be stressed that such a program does not, at first,'
require recombinant DNA experiments,
. ~ , . - ,. . °:. ,. . .
~ ~r :~.~ ..r~ t,,.:,..:. ,~+ ..rv ~y~ ~f°'~
, .<~
.1
.~y.`h _.t~ ,.: ';.
. ,.~
a .~'~~ .. .~Y.
. . . . .., , ~ . . ~ -. . , .. . . . . v~+. ... a~k
} : } ~' " .
~)F
V.
~
.;~
~f
R-
V;i
r'.

~ ,
~~*'''r~~-Y.''T.'"`~'"'r'~C:''. .. . ~-~:t_ , s ' `_;_ -+tAV64-
o...%.n.ar~w i - . .. *d ~ . . ,. . . .. . . t . .. . , .. _ . _ , . . .. ~ ~ - . . ~. . -
~....°.af~.
I
.'J
O

~."'e~r+s.M7f!R!..;*'.~,yti;r,..:t~rt~ A!.,~+..~:~~ms;.ir.'+a~.--.v.r~-',"~wal~
.. . _ . L.~~'- .. ~~ . . . ~ . ~ . .,~
come to us if their results are only in E. co1i.
sense. If we have the organisms ready, others may have to
production plant which utilizes a new, safer organism, to make
large quantities of insulin efficiently at a price which makes
a test tube will occur very soon, but that it will be many
years, and many millions of dollars more, before we see a
In short, the ultimate commercial application of this tech-
nology will require a great deal of developmental work after
most of the intellectual excitement has gone. Such production
organisms will be required for the exploitation of the favora-
ble laboratory outcome of successful programs at Cetus or
anywhere else! By way of illustration, we believe that the
demonstration of the production of human insulin in E. coli in
availability (this is not a cell mass, single cell protein
project, but a model project for a host of gene=stitching
of predicted and optimized amino acid corlten~ and protein
, . , i,
The development, by synthesizing genes, of artificial proteins '
. . ..~
.~ ~_' ~_:
O. `
r
over antibiotics ~ti antibodies may be safer, and they may be
effective agains.L'virusesand maybe even cancer cells, which
~.
safely with human proteins which we call antibodies. It is
even more exciting~to talk,of the advantages of antibodies
disease quickly, cheaply, very.,effectively, and possibly very
antibodies in microorganisms.,,-. It's exciting to talk of treating
this technology - the synthesis.'of highly-;specific human
The addressing, beginning soon,of the ultimate expression of
,
L
antibiotics, essentially ;do not attack.
R°
earlier Csmaller,~intermediate target would be the use of this
antibody diagnostically in testing for pregnancy. The early
stages of this'program, with 3-5 year success delivery expec-
tations,.1and $i-2 million running costs, would result in
antibodyfor ultimate`use as a birth control drug, then a much
In a particular example-, if it were decided to target anti-HCG
ri be less stringent than for a therapeutic drug. Later
_.,
`%, - 'll,
o
.`. ^ xpec a e regu a ory process (FDA, etc.)
, 'T-easoiiable t
e t th 4- th 1 t
LJ . ~V
tient,,but is used in a test tube to test for pregnancy, it is
, .. _..
tion-of_iintermediate term scientific and commercial feasi-
bility~: ;;And since the product is not administered to a pa-
testing;^'~>TYie appeal of this approach lies in its demonstra-
purified'antibody for diagnostic purposes for pregnancy
worx would address the much larger birth control market.
market as today's multi-billion dollar antibiotics market., F -
existent today, but perhaps representing at least as big a
above, is to prevent and treat disease. Ultimately, the
expectation is to establish preeminence in that market, non-
Of course, the largest imaginable use of antibodies, as stated
Estimates vary, but we believe the utilization of antibodies
produced this way to protect against epidemics, as well as to

-.-(-.~-1a~'1: r,~i~.r~.-:y,r~
. . . ..... w. . ii..! - v
S_: - ~ - .~':.R 'r '~'~ ~{"'.w:%~i.~,~`~%'.:,:.;
'+Y vi.i:;
~ '~ ~_. . ~:C ~. ~. t t,
. .. .. . ,.. . .. .. ~.v..,... _
wu Y.. j' 7
AS,
T~+r'-+ ~~.:i . y ~l~ S °:i;{''(..... ...,.. .~r~' . :3 . .. ,..t ,7~.~':l'- :I .._ ~c rr'~
.:.i'?_7 ::J.?'..,J '~~~ `~f'J ~ .
:i~' Cl '~ .3''i. 7.. _ ;,.., *,,~.,"/3 :~`~C' ._ rtj1:~3
J. wy
. . _ ;l t. n:e l _ . Aqw"I .iv{', ~ .~.: a^,rC'1'~~ : j .~k9j ~ ,
.. ~., . . ... ~i .~.~~. +aT.~ ::~.t _ . . ..~~....~..~ -i.... .... .~ ~~."~. . i ~H :4+ 1-.~.u
ltl.r~~ 1 .,,
~:. ~ Yr. a~' ^. ~~ L .J. I. . 1,' . ,
:.. .... ... ,.,. _.~~.~..x.'~ ., ci:.. ..'-is.. ..:':~ ~~ _:il~~.. `'`,i. .. ,.3#a'~. '
C c :'1 ".'F5 :t az: t .`i. 6,.!'3 _s 'i:- I:.e 't^," ...s
., ,
.<:is, .a-;tvti

=z
y.qs p~r{
,
.<..:..~ :'~.;T
'F~6/~~ ~-. ~~~ `~.'afi
- . . ~ . ~. ' . ...~ .. ~~.,. ..
treat their victims, and to treat a host of other conditions
including the common cold, is at least 15 years away. The
scientific work may take 10 or more years, and may cost as
much as $5,000,000 the first five years. But we are budgeting
less, expecting that scientific success in early years will
generate'sources of additional funds.
Facilities.
dictable directions. It is, however, highly`'desirabl to build a
are c
cens
ian n , an
era
aw an
n ma
e
g g 3 may yet ta
e unpre-
We believe that conscientious development of this field will re-
quire substantial physical containment facilities. This fact will,
of itself, restrict responsible entry into the field. Our percep-
tion
now is that, although some of the above projects can be carried
out, for a period of 2-3 years, in what are called P2 surroundings,T
the really exciting work will requ~re at least P3~. and maybe even
require
7a :
P4 facilities. It is not a good idea at this ~tinie to plan to build -41
a P4 laboratory. It may become a white elephant; specifications
d li
h
l l
i
d f
d
Tc
v n
P3 facility right away, and we are doinq: t.x-ka',,.
...- .,:aaa.,.~a l-,.~ st~~~e t ;.ir~~v.i~ ..:Q.O r~
Cetus does all its work in its 'own laboratories'JStr Our P2 exceeds
NSH requirements, as will ouz,J3 labs: Cetus -,3 facilities will
include small-scale productzo capability. Our recombinant molecu-
lar research staffing presently consists of'about twelve persons
with varied skills. The-s~aff"continues to grow. We insist on the
highest caliber of perso~iinel,rid we are encouraged by the ease with
which this can be accoplished: Our recruiting is facilitated
largely because of the luAre of the staff and consultants already
assembled.
_ G~~ 'a,GO~J'~ sti ,~~ - '. . . .
~* O . r
tio S~;
Gwt o
o
oQt~ afi
~`b P3
O1 110 GGO~
t..
o
. , ~~a~{'~ o;,v _ . , s
'~ , ..
,..
'Y~`~'.~,s~_;..'.6fi,..~.~~'~ ~,
t's
'l?r:
. +. . ~. .~ . s,. . .: ~Q
rli!~.4...-
t . µ.
k; :'r`f:as- r ,. ,! a.# ~~.F:~>

% e F
.. ,. . ~ ~ ......~'i:~::
~ _ ,... :.r~~.... ._ r...~~.a~
. .~.~:i1 . .. .S~ .. _... . . ~
.~_'~ .. ~.., r `G. "... _ ". .
:~. ...2 .. . -.. ".
; ~`t.
.'-
:''s^''?'r.`y~''~z2f`L'x"IC. ~''t:: ~.:-^~:44:'~-71-~`
tn .^
~,...
O
