Philip Morris
Phillip Morris Incorporated Annual Report 830000
Fields
- Author
- Goldsmith, C.H.
- Millhiser, R.R.
- Weissman, G.
- Millhiser, R.R.
- Characteristic
- MINI, MINIMUM CODING
- Site
- N2
- Type
- REPT, OTHER REPORT
- BUDG, BUDGET/BUDGET REVIEW
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Stmn/Selected
- Request
- Stmn/R1-003
- Stmn/R4-001
- Area
- CORPORATE SECRETARY
- Author (Organization)
- Coopers + Lybrand
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- sfg12a00
Document Images
For our real estate operations, 1983 was a
year of recovery. Housing starts, sales,
andprofits were all up strongly. Operating
revenues at$258:5 mjllionand operating
income at $40.5 million were the highest
in the company's history.
During the year. Philip Morris made a
number of strategic changes in its real
estate operations designed to expandprof-
@s in both the short andthe long term by
fortning Mission Viejo Realty Group Inc.
("Realty Group"), a whoUy-owned sub-
sidiary of Philip Morris Incorporated.
Realty Group will have its own subsidi-
aries:, Mission Viejo Company, which
will continue to be responsible for devel-
opment, residentialtonstruction, and
sales at Mission Viejo and Aliso Viejo in
Californiaand Mission Viejo and High-
lands Ranch in Colorado; and Continental
Equityinvestments Inc., a new corpora-
tion responsible for the development and
operation of investment properties.
When mortgage rates declined and
buyers returned to the marketplace in
1983, the Realty Group hadhomes thati
were ready to be occupied. Residential
closings were strong throughout the year.
The Realty Group continues to meet
the changing needs of the housing market
with a variety of new housing plans. In re-
cent years, dramatic shifts have occurred
in the housing market. As interest rates
climbed, demand shifted from larger to
smaller houses. The Realty Group re-
sponded by offering new houses designed
to appeal to first-time home buyers.
For example, Mission Viejo, California,
opened its Evergreen program, which
featured moderatelypriced, single-family,
detached homes designed for young fami-
lies. At nearby Aliso Viejo, there are now
four lower-priced'programs while at our
Highlands Ranch just south of Denver,
Colorado, we are offering competitively
priced housing in all of the major market
segments. Highlands Ranch is a planned
community that will 'eventually supply
some 30,000 housing units on 22,000
acres for the burgeoning Denver market.
In Colorado, as in Southern California,
we offer a total living environment where
families can take advantage of plannedi
communities built around high-quality
housing, schools, parks, recreational
facilities, and commercial and industrial
parks.The Realty Group continues to be a
leader in building communities that are in
balance with the environmental, social,
and economic needs of our society.
Photo Captions:
1 Olympic Swim Team Coach, Mark Schubert,
prepares Mission Viejo swimmers for1984! The
U.S. National Swim Team will tnin at Mission Viejo,,
which will also be the site of thefirstOlympic
event:long-distancecycling road races.
2 The new Stratton Ridge homes in Highlands
Ranch; ,Colorado~ offer elegant, spacious living:
3 Residentsgather for the annual Highlands
Ranch Spring Roundup and barbecue.
4 Lake Mission Viejo, California.

Management Succession
In November, George Weissman, who will
l
step aside on August 1, 1984, as Chair-
man and Chief: Executive Officer upon
reaching age 65, announced that at that
time the Board of Directors intends for
him to be succeeded in those positions by
Hamish Maxwell, age 57, formerly Presi-
dent of Philip Morris Internationall
As the first in several moves to imple-
ment the plan of orderly succession, the
Board elected~Mr. Maxwell President and'
Chief Operating-0tficer of Philip Morris
Incorporated effective December 1, 1981
The Board also stated its intention to
elect as ofthe August 1, 1984, date John
A. Murphy, age 54, President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Corporation with
all 'operating companies reporting to him.
Until August, Mr. Murphy will continue
as Group Executive Vice Presidenti with
the Miller Brewing CompanyThe Seven-
Up Company, andthe Mission Viejo
Realty Group Inc. reportingto him.
The Board alto plans to elect Hugh
Cullman, age 61i as a Vice Chairman
effective August 1,1984. Mr. Culltnan is
Group Executive Vice President and
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Philip Morris U.S,A.
To facilitate the transition, the Board
elected Clifford H. Goldsmith, President
since 1978, Vice Chairman and Chairman
of the Corporate Products Committee.
Ross R. Mililriser continues as Vice
Chairman andChairman of the Finance
Committee.
The Office of the Chief Executive now
consists ofGeorge Weissman, Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer;
Hamish Maxwell, President and Chief
Uperating Officer; and John A. Murphy
Group Executive Vice President.
It was also announcedthat the Board
intends to elect Mr. Weissman, who has
been Chairman andChief Executive Offl-
eer since 1998, Chairman ofthe Execu-
tive Committee o0the Board on April 25,
1984, succeeding Joseph.F. Cullman 3rd,
who in turn will become Chairman
Emeritus of the company.
Another major promotion was that of
R. William Murray, formerly Executive
Vice President of Philip Morris Interna-
tional, to President and Chief Executive
Officer, Philip Morris International,
replacing Mr. Maxwell.
The new management team, which in-
eludes other management promotions on
both corporate staff and operating com-
pany levels, is moving into place eNec-
u
tively and smoothly. Almost the entire
senior management team has worked
closely together for 20 years or more.
Board of Directors
At the annual meeting in 1983, Dr. Harold
Brown, Visiting Professor at The Johns
Hopkins University, was elected a mem-
ber of our Board of Directors. Dr. Brown
has an outstanding background in busi-
ness, government, and education, includ.
ing service as Secretary of Defense and'
President of the California Institute of
Technology.
H. Robert &tarschalk, a diiector of
Richardson-Vicks Inc., has retired after
serving as a director for 17 years. We
deep1y appreciate the value of his counsel
and guidance, and~are pleased that he
continues as a Director Emeritus.
The Public Interest
As the leading U.S. exporter of tobacco
products, and with interests in~the inter-
national beer and'softdrink industries,
Philip Morris supports policies designed
to promote free and fair trade.
In 1983, Philip Morris made a netposi+
tive contribution of$1.1 billion to the U.S,
balance of trade through the export of
cigdrettes, tobacco, beer, soft drink ex-
tract, and other products.
Our products are manufactured and
marketed abroad by more than 300 affili-
ates; licensees, and franchised bottlers.
Philip Morris contributes positively to the
economies of the countries in which we
operate by purchasing materials and ser-
vices locally and by generating large tax
revenues, and by training thousands of,
employees.
Together, Philip Morris and its affiliates
employ nearly 28,000 people abroad. Our
involvement overseas significantly helps
the U.S. economy in addition to the local
economies in which we operate. About
17% of all the jobs in our domestic ciga-
rette operations are di'rectly linked to our
foreign business. Moreover, our exports
increase employmenGamong our domes-
tic suppliers.
At Philip Morris, good~corporate citi-
zenship is not an afterthought but an
active concern in everything we do. Our
achievements grow out of a corporate
philosophy that values quality people and
quality products, individual excellence
and achievement, efficient use of re-
sources, and a sense of sociallresponsibil+
ity. At all times, our business activities
must makeaociaLsense, and our social
activities must make business sense.
We make this commitment for a variety
of reasons: We want others to think well

ates
i. Our
ielps
local
out
ciga-
to our
ports
smes-
Our
te
e and
ice
onsibil-
ties
cial'
variety
c well
-fus as a company and of all our employ-
~es. We believe a company should return
ometliing to the society which gives
so much. Ultimately, we believe any
,rporation-to survive-must interact in
responsible manner with the society
am which it draws its charter and
rengths.
.ie primary foeus of ourphilanthropic
:ing historically has been in the area
education, which in 1983 accounted for
er a third of our overall contributions
dget.
We donate money to various indepen-
nt college funds and make direct grants
educational institutions located in
ose communities in which we maintain
ajor operations. In addition, we have an
tive and extensive program of, matching
nployee gifts to institutions through-
at the country. In other words, our em-
toyees helped shape our overall contribu-
.!ons policy.
We also establish and fund innovative
programs that address the specialized
needs of both the traditional and non-
traditional student. Children of our em-
ployees benefit both from our College
Scholarship Program and our ten-year-old
Vocational/Technical Scholarship Award
Program which provides scholarship
grants to post-secondary students.
In major plant communities, our
Career Scholarship Program for men
and women returning to college and our
Vocational/Technical Career Scholarship
Program for adults completing high
school or vocational training have been
successful.
In April; `Agriculture in the Twenty-First
Century," the third symposium in a series
funded by Philip Morriswas held at the
Manufacturing Center in Rietimondi Vir-
ginia. Arturo R: Tanco, Jr., Minister of
Agriculture for the Republic of the Philip.
pines, was the keynote speaker at the
two-day event.
The aational tour of "The Vatican Collec-
tions: The Papacy and Art;' sponsoredby
Philip Morris,.was a major event as it
moved from New Yorkto Chicago and San
Francisco: By the end of the tour in Feb-
ruary 1984, more than 2 million people
had seen the exhibition.
Our involvement with the arts con-
tinues to be eclectic, ranging from "The
Precious Legacy: Judaic Treasures From
the Czechoslovak State Collections" to
17
"Painting in the South;' a comprehensive
study of Southern painting. to "Dimen-
sion IV," a competition for young West
German artists, to an exhibition of Guate-
malan Indian textiles.
We renewed a five-year grant to sup-
port innovative Australian artists, and
helped fund the Alvin Ailey 25th Anniver-
sary NationalTour; the Joffrey Ballet
Nationat Tour, and a 28-citgtour for
chamber music groups from the Marlboro
School of Music in Vermont.
In April, we opened the Whitney
Museum of American Art at Philip Morris
in our New York World Headquarters.
Philip Morris received The Architectural
League's award for our 25-year support of
the arts and architecture. To date, in ex-
cess of 300,000 people have visited the
Museum.
Our social commitment is equally broad.
As lead company for the New York City
Partnership's Summer Jobs '83 Program,
we helped find work in the private sector
for 19,798 disadvantaged youngsters.
. Alongside these activities, Philip
Morris continued to deposit funds in
minority-owned banks, award numerous
contracts to minority-ownedbusinesses;
and underwrite and publish directories
and other aids for black, Hispanic, and
women's organizations.
Perennial Problems
Government taxation and restrictions
designed to limit consumer usage of our
main products continue to increase.
In 1983, consumers in our most impor-
tant cigarette market, the iJnited'States,
facedthe largest federal cigarette tax in-
crease in the history of the country. In
addition, some 27 states, cities, and
counties also increased their cigarette
taxes. Taxes have also increased in many
of our major international markets.
Since 1979, taxes imposed by all levels
of government have risen over 50%. To-
day, nearly half of the price.of a pack of
cigarettes in major localities such as New
York and Chicago is attributable to taxa-
tion. These are regressive taxes which
unfairly penalize consumers with lower in-
comes. All told, federal, state, and local
governments in the United States collect
about $10 billion annually from smokers.
The 1983 federal excise tax increase
is due to be rescinded in October 1985
under 3 sunset provisiomenacted by
Congress.
In the p,astgovernments facing un-
funded budgets have imposed taxes with
rel9tive ease on the products we produce.
Today;however, governments that heavily , .

tax cigarettes and beer are finding that
extra taxes do not yield as much revenue
as anticipatedi
Governments abroadi too, are begin-
ning to reconsider the efficacy ofsky-high
taxation.
In Uruguay, the fiscal authorities re-
duced the excise tax on a trial basis in an
effort both to stimulate sales and increase
government revenues. Similarly in Argen-
tinathe government agreedito eliminate
a 5% cigarette excise tax surcharge. In
two of Canada's provinces, Ontario and
New Brunswick, taxes have been reduced.
At the same time, anti-smoking forces are
gaining in influence. Virtually everywhere
we do business, we are challenged by
restrictive legislation. Last year in the
United States alone, nearly 400 pieces of
anti-smoking legislation were proposed'
at the state and local levels, however,
most were defeated when logic prevailedi
More are expeoted in 1984.
In Australia, legislation to ban ciga-
rette advertising andsports promotion
failed to pass in Western Australia follow-
ing an intense media campaign publicizing
the detrimental repercussions the bill
would cause. The rights of smokers to
smoke in government offices in Canada
were defended by the industry through,
research which illustrated the unfeasibil-
ity and costliness of such restrictions.
-- Smoking aboard aircraft is yet another
. area subject to government intrusion.
The Civil Aeronautics Board is currently
seeking a complete ban on smoking on
flights lasting two hours or less. Nearly
one-third of all U.S. airline passengers
will be affected. Yet an independent study
shows that 83% of surveyed airline pas-
. sengers are satisfied with the present
smoking regulations.
The Scandinavian Airlines System
abandoned its trial non-smoking flights
between Oslo and'Stockholm after a pas-
senger survey showedthat smoking on
aitcraff was not a serious enough matter
. of public concern to warrant such a ban.
Philip Morris continues to challenge the
assertion that there is conclusive proof of
- a cause-and-effect relationship between
cigarette smoking and chronic diseases.
. We remind our stockholders that:
No one knows what causes cancer or
other chronic diseases claimed to be
related to smoking;
Numerous factors, including occupa-
tionalenvironments, industrial'pollution,
toxic waste. heredity, and stress, seem to
affect the frequency ofbccurrence of
these compiex diseases,according to sci-
entific studies;
There is no scientific proof that the
healthy non-smoker is harmed by his
neighbor's smoking;
Only further research can provide valid
answers about the effects of smoking.
The tobacco industry has contributed
almost$111 million to fund independent
research on smoking and health. We will
continue to fund such research.
Government issues also affect our bever-
age operations. There has been an in-
crease at the state level in forced-deposit
legislation, and the possibility exists ofa
federal forced-deposit law. Miller and
Seven-Up have encouraged'recycling by
choice. Miller distributors operate alumi-
num reclamation centers, which last year
paid the public more than $11.4 million for
46 million pounds of aluminum cans. We
also support "Keep America Beautiful;' a:
non.profit organization devoted to educat-
ing the public about litter problems.
The problems associated with alcohol
abuse at all ages are gaining national at-
tention. For many years, Miller has sup-
porteda number of alcohol education
programs and works closely with
BACCHUS (Boost Alcohol Consciousness
Concerning the Health of University Stu-
dents). AIM (Alcohol Information from
Miller) is the latest extension of the
Miller Brewing Company's commitment
to alcotiol'edUcationand to the promotion
of responsible use of its products. We can
help solve the problems of alcohol abuse
by fostering responsible attitudes in our
homes, businesses, andthroughout our
communities about drinking.
Philip Morris, working directly and'
through its trade associations. will con-
tinue to urge governments, wherever we
do business, to lower the unfair and dis-
criminatory tax burden on our products,
and reduce unnecessary , and restrictive
legislation.
The political!action committee of the
people ofiPhilip Morris is PHIL-PAC. Our
nonpartisan, issue-oriented PAC con-
tinues to play an important role in our
Voter Involvement Program and an ~impor-
tant role in our ongoing government rela-
tions. PHIL-PAC's theme is "Democracy
is not a spectator sport_" In 1983, more
than 2,000 employees and:stockholders
agreed with thaCmessage and supported
corporate PHIL-PAC. A survey showed
that our contributors are better citizens-
they register, they vote, and they give of
their personal time to civic interests.

The Outlook
We operate in highly competitive indus-
tries-as we have historically-at a time
when many of the worldls economies are
still struggling out of recession. We make
products whose use gives pleasure to 90
million people every day.
It is evident that our cigarettes and
beverages serve a basic need acknowl+
edged by mankind for thousands ofyears.
The record is clear. The people who
enjoy smoking and drinking have prevailed
over those who oppose these customs.
The industries which serve them have
grown and prospered.
We are realistic about the problems our
industries face, but we look forward to
the continued growth ofour companies
within those industries. The challenges
are opportunities.
From a strong domestic market where
we face little foreign competitionj we
reach out into 170 countries and territo-
ries. Outside the United States, our
share of the world"s cigarette market is
still only$:2%u+ and we are only just start-
ffig to tap many of the major foreign mar-
kets for our beverages.
Ftnancially and ptiysically; Philip
Morris has never been in better shape.
Our current and projected cash flow is
sufficient to meet our needs and to main-
tain our plants as the most efficient
in the world.
.. 3- 5 .~'~ ~ . " `
- . :~' S . ..'._
t~ Vt:~'L ~ ~>/ - . ..
But our greatest resource is our peo-
ple. Thanks to the skill, productivity,
dedication, and continued loyalty of our
68,000 employees around the world, we
have produeedan unbroken record of 30
years of growth and can face the future
with optimism.
George Weissman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Ross R. Millhiser
Vice Chairman of the Board
Clifford H. Goldsmith
Vice Chairman of the Board
George Weissman, chairman of the board andebiet executive officer(front) meets with other members
of be Office of he Ch'aiiman 4lefrto right): John A.
Murphy, group execuuvevice president: Hugh
CuWman. group executive vice president; Hamish Maxwell. president and chief openting officer; Ross
R. tvtillhisepvioe chairman of the board; ,ClYftord'H1 Goldsmith,vice chairman of the board.

Nineteen eighty-three marked'the 30th consecutive year of
growth for Philip Morris. Operating revenues were $13':0 billion;
an increase of 12.0% from 1982. Net earnings rose 15.6% to
$903.5 million. Earnings per share reached $7.17a gain of 15.1%
(Chart 1).
During1983, the company's real estate operations were
reorganized under Mission Viejo Realty Group Inc.,and are
accountedfor on the equity method. Real estate operations were
previously consolidated. Prior-year amounts have been restated+
where applicable.
In February, 1983, the Board of Directors declareda 20.8%
increase inrthe common stock dividend to an~annual rate ofiS2.90
per share. 7Jhis represented the 16th consecutive year of increase
an&our 56th consecutive year of dividend payments. Over the
last decade, dividends per share increased 24.0% annually, while
net earnings per share increased118.2% (Chart 2).
In 1983, capital expenditures totaled $566 million. Over the
past five years, we have spenLnearJy $3.9 billion on additions to
our fixed assets compared to $1.5 billion spent during the previous
five years. A third of theamounU spent over the past five years was
for .4filler Brewing and most of the remainder for our domestie
andiinternational tobacco operations. At year-end 1983, approxi-
mately 90%u ofour fixed assets wereiess than ten years old.
We estimate capital expenditures of $500 million in 1984: and
approximately $2.1 billion in the five-year period 1984 through
1988: Over 80% of these expenditures will be for forecasted
capacity needs and productivity improvements. They will be con-
tinually monitored to insure high returns and a elose correlation
with demand for our products.
In 1983; our funds from operations increased 16;3%a toS1.3bil-
lion(Chart 3). Over the last ten years, internal'funds generation
increased 22.4% annually. During the same period, net earnings
advanced 19.8% annually (Chart 4). Approximately 35%a of 1983
funds from operations are represented by depreciation and
deferred income taxes which are primarily related to our fsxed -
asset base.
Total assets were $9.7 billion at year-end 1983.This was
nearly five times greater thanour asset base ten years earlier.
Our net return on average total assets was 10.6%, which was the
highest in the company's tiistory , (Chart, 5).
Stockholders' equity has increased nearly five times during
the past decade, reaching $4.0 billion at the end of4983. Our net
return onaverage stockholders' equity was 23;5% in 1983, up
from 22.7% in 1982 and set a new high (Chart6).
Total debt at year-end 1983 was $3.1 billion, a $671 million
decrease from a year earlier: Our debt-to.equity ratio improved to
.76 to 1compared with 1.02 to 1 in 4982 and an average 1.05 to 1
over the last ten years (Chart 7):
During the year, we prepaid three Swiss franc loans amounting
to $132 million, and repurchased $56 million of 14%, 141/s%I and
151/4%d notes. We expecYa further decline in our debt over the
next five years.
On December 9, 1983; Philip Morris began a 4,000;000 share
common stock repurchase program. By year-end, approximately
Vrlmfry Errnlnpf Per S1,vm
OIVIA~nCfOfG~rW
Pfe Sn~n~

1.4 million shares were accumulated. The repurchase program
was completed in February, 1984. The reacquiied shares are to
be usediforthe exercise of employee stock options and4ar other
corporate purposes.
At year-end'1983, fixed-rate obligations were approximately
87%a of total debt compared with 68% in 1978. The fixed-interest
portion of our debt, totaling $23 billion at year-end, carries an
average annual interest rate of approximately 9.5%.
Currently, Philip Morris has short-term creditfacilities with a
number of financial institutions totaling approximately $1.4 billion.
Of this amount, approximately $350 million is in revolving credit
agreements and other arrangements with both U.S. and Euro-
pean banks. These facilities, which comfortably exceed our
expected needs in 1984, provide support for our commercial
paper borrowings and other credit activities. Philip Morris con-
tinues to maintain the highest ratings in the commercialipaper
market and a solid 'X' credit rating for longer-term obligations.
Interest expense in 1983 totaled 5233.9'million, compared!
with 8267.2million in 1982 (Chart 8). The decrease was due prin-
cipally to lower outstandingdebtL Interest capitalized in 1983 was
3128.8million compared with $162.6 million in 1982. The reduc-
tion of interest capitalized in 1983 was attributable to lower inter-
estrates and reduced plant construction. Earnings coverage of
interest expense continued to improve during the past year
reaching 7.78 times interest expense for 1983eompared with
5.87 for 1982.
Our effective income tax rate was 43.0%u in 1983and 39.9% in
1982. Lower investment tax credits during 1983were the primary
reason for the higher effective tax rate.
In summary, 1983 was a good year for Philip Morris. Strong
earnings gains and cash flow momentum providea solid basis for
continued growth. We believe this growth can be accommodated
through internal cash generation and prudent use of credit facili-
ties. Our financial condition is stronger than ever and is expected
to remain strong in 1984 and beyond.
Total YN..1. (YoM.EnG)
N.I Ralurn an
r.189. Total A...1.
B !.ons Cl Lbn3,s
.. ,PSn ea
!~~
~
,. /
4x ':P
all.-53'a1 4 4
2t
SIOe.Ab4d.n'EquNyq.qnEnOl
N O R .lurn Cl
v.r.9.94acknaw.n Equity
To1.FO.b1(Y.ar-Ena) iR.AIo. at To4al D.bl
to sluckFoldn' Eqult9ry
e e«,: ol 0Cl1d1s

Selected Financial Data
(in millions of dollars, except per share data)
for years ended December 31 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Operating Revenues $12,975.9 S111,586:0 510,7223 59,649.5 $8.149.1
United States Export Sales 969.5 978:0 833.5 702:4 521.2
Interest Expense 233.9 267.2 258.5 215.0 205.5
Depreciation Expense
Net Earnings
Earnings Per Common Share
Total Assets
Long-Term Debt
Total Debt
Deferred Income Taxes
Stockholders' Equity
Dividends Declared Per Common Share
The atioveselected financial dAta of the company and consolidated subsidiaries
for the five years ended December314 1983, should!be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statementsandnotes thereta included in this report.
During 1983 the company's real estate operations were reorganized under Mission ~Viejo Realty Group
dnc.,and are accounted foron the equity method.
Real estate operationswere previously consolidated. Prioryear amounts have
been restated, where applicable. The company believes theequity metAodbf
accounting forthe reorganized real estateoperattonsprovtdes a more meaning-
fiil presentation of financial results. In addition to cigarettes. Philip Morris International
iexports tobacco and
293.8 249.9 210.5 178.0 132.6
903.5 781.8 659.7 549.1 507.9
7.17
9,667.0
2,514.7
3,074.9
737.3
4,033.7
2.90
1,348.4
566.2
6.23 5.28' 4.41 4.08
9,622.1 9,1115.1 7,301.7 6,322.1
3,745.8 3,498.2 2,597.2 2,446.7
3,745.8 3,804.2 2.800.1
564.5 41iL.3 302.9
3,662.9 3,233.7 2,837.0
2.40 2.00, P.60
1,159.8 976.3 784.2
918.2 1,0114.5 750.8
2,507.1
219.6
2,471.0
1.25
702.9
629.4
tobacco-related productssoftdrink ingredients and beer, and subsidiaries and
affi4iacespurchase tobacco grown in the United States. In1983;the value of
all exports from the United States by Philip MorrisIh~ternational amounted to,
$~1.084 billion.
E ffective in 1980, the company adopted the last-inj first-out (LIFO) imethod of
costing the leaf tobacco components of inventories used in itsU.S. and U.S.
export operations. Effective in 1981,use of the LIFO method'was extendedto
cover additional inventories. The 1980 change to LIFO decreased 1980 net earn-
ingsand earnings pershare by $61.8 million and $.49:pershare. respectively;
and in 198Pby $14.4 million and 5.12per share, respectively.

I
979
49.1
21.2
5.5
32.6,
7.9
.O8
22^1
i6`7
)7.1
19.6
~1.0
1.25
)2.9
>9.4
Management Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
In 1983, funds from operations of $1.3 billion exceeded total funds
used by $179':5 million. This compares with a funds requirement
ifter funds from operations of $156.3 miltion and 31.3 billion for
1982 and 1981, respectively, The increase in funds from opera-
tions of $188.6 ,million (16.3%)in 1983over 1982 was due to)igher earnings coupled with increases in
depreciation and
ieferred taxes.
Of the totalYundh used, capital expenditures accounted for
tpproximately 48'io in 1983, compared'with 70~"o in 1982'and 44%
n 1981. Capital expenditures of $566 million for 1983 were below
he previous two years and are estimated at S500 million in 1984
md $2:11 billion~for the years 1984 through 1988.
Total debt at December 31, 1983, was 53.1 billion, a $671 mil+
.iondecrease from a year earlier. At year-end 1983, the com-
?any's debt-to-equity ratio was .76 to 1, compared withi1.02to 1
at December 31, 1982. The decrease was mainly attributable
to increased earnings for 1983 coupied with a reduction in capitalI
expenditures and working capital.
The company anticipates that funds from operations will
exceed the needs of the business in 1984. However, credit facili-
ties maintained througH revolvingcredibagreements and bank
lines ofcredit will provide extensive credit should the need arise.
Longer-term financing needs are expected to be met through
long-term debt and other financing as required.
During1983, the company prepaid three Swiss franc loans
aggregating $132 million and repurchased J56 million of bank
term notes bearing interest at 14"5 to 151141/B, After these and
other transactions; fixed-interest debt at December 31, 1983,
was 87% ofYotal debt compared with 78% and71%d,at December
31, 1982 and 1981, respectively. This d'ebt, had~an average interest
rate of approximately 9!5% at December 31, 1983.
InDecember, 1983, the company purchased 1.4 million sharesof its common stock under an announced
program to reacquire up
to 4' million shares for, treasury. The repurchase program was
completed in February, 1984. The treasury shares are to be used
for the exercise of employee stock options and other corporate
purposes.
In 1983. interest expense was 8233.9 million, a decrease of
S33,3 million (12:5°'oYover 1982 due principally to a decrease in
average borrowings resulting from lower capital expenditures
and an increase ininternally generatedfunds. Interest capitalized
in 1983 was $128.8 million, compared with $162.6 million and
5110:0 million for 1982 and1981, respectively. The reduction of
interest capitalized in 1983 was attributable to lower interest
rates and reduced plant construction.
During 1983, the company's real estate operations were
reorganizedunder Mission Viejo Realty Group Inc., and are
accounted for on the equity, methodi Real estate operations were
previously consolidiVted. Prior-year amounts have been restated,
where applicable.
. Operating revenues, net earnings and learnings per share for
1983 increased 12.0%, 15.6%, and 15.1"0, respectively, over 1982.
In 1983: consolidated operating revenues of S13!0 billion were
$1.4 billion or 12.0% higher than in 1982, attributable principally
to increased revenues of 513 billion from tobacco, and $119 mil-
lion from Seven-Up. Beer revenues decreased by S6million.
The increase in tobacco revenues was attributable to increases in
excise taxes and'selling prices redueed by S179 million due to cur-
rency translation: cigarette unit volume of both Philip Morris
U.S.A. and Philip Morris International was virtually unchanged
from 1982. The decrease in beer revenues was attributable to a
decrease in volume partially offsa by price increases. As a resulb
of lack of growth in the beer industry, Miller has delayed produc-
tion at its Trenton, 6hio, brewery.
In 1983, operating income of consolidated companies was $231,
million (14.0%) higher than in 1982, due mainly to domestic
tobacco products. Tobacco products operating income increased
$171 million (11.6%) from 1982dueto price increases offset by
currency, translation ofS59million. Philip Morris U.S:A. operat-
ing income was up S236 million (21.4%) while Philip Morris lnter~
national was down $65 million (17.3070). Despite a reported 4.5%
domestic cigarette industry decline, Philip Morris U.S.A.
increased its unit volume marginally and its market share signifi-
cantly. In addition~to the adverse effect of currency translation,
Philip Morris International operating income was affected by
price competition in a number of markets and reduced exports
due to a stronger U.S; dollOr. Beer, operating income increased
$68 million (42:97b)',over 1982 due to price increases and'cost
savings. Seven-Up's 1983 operating loss of $10.8 million was
attributable to increased marketing expenditures. Tobacco prod-
ucts contributed 88% and beer 12170 of consolidated operating
income for 1983.
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries and affili-
ates in 1983increased $11.4million over 1982: The increase
was attributable principally to inereased'earnings from real estate
operations.
In 1982, consolidated operating revenues were 5864 million
(8:1%) higher than in 1981, attributable principally to increased
revenues of $740 million from~tobacco, $91 milllondrom beer, and
$99 million from Seven-Up:The increase in tobacco revenues was
attributable toincreases in selling prices and cigarette unit vol-
ume, redueed!bv $230 million attributable to currency translation.
The increase in beer revenues was attributable to price increases,
partially offset by a decrease in volume.
In 1982; operating income of consolidated companies was $256
million(18.5'?'0) higherthan~in 1981, due principally to tobacco
products. Tobacco products operating income increasedl$221

million (17.6%) from 1981 due to volume and price increases off-
set by unfavorable currency translation of $60 million. Beer
operating income increased $45 million (39:2%)over 19811due to
price increases and cost savings. Seven-Up's 1982 operating loss
of $1.2million was principally attributable to increased marketing
expenditures. Tobacco products contributed 90% and beer10%
The following current cost information is presentedinaccordance
with the requirements of the Financial Accounting Standardk
Board (FASB).
The currenCcost method reflects the effect of changes imthe
specific prices of the resources used in the company's operations.
This method measures the resources and their consumption
based on the current cost of replacing them with like resources,
rather than in terms of the historical cosCamounts actually ex-
pended to acquire them. These values do not consider technolog-
ical improvements and efficiencies associated'with the normal
replacement of productive capacity. Adjustments for changes in
specific prices of property, plant, and equipment are principally
based on externallprice indexes specifically or closely related to
the resources being measured, or internally developed indexes
and, in the case of inventories and cost of sales, on recent
purchases and production costs. The U1S. Consumer Price
Index is used to measure the effects of general inflation for the
(in millions of dbllarsexcept per share data)
Deductions from operating revenues:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation expense
Earnings per common share
of consolidated operating income for the year.
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated'subsidiaries and
affiliates in 1982 increased $13':1 million over 198ll The increase
was attributable principally to increased earnings from the
Rothmans investment offset byprotit declines incurred by real
estate operations:
translated'current cost information.
The current cost method involves the use of assumptions, ap-
proximations, and estimates and, therefore, the resulting mea-
surements should be viewed in~that context and not as precise
indicators of the effects of inflation. The results do not neeessar-
jly represent amounts for which the assets could be sold!or costs
which will be incurred in future periods, or the manner in which
actual replacement of assets will occur.
Schedule I presents earnings and other: data for 1983 as re-
ported and as adjusted for current cost. Schedule ll covers the
five-year period to show the trends inkey financial data
restated in terms oNaverage 1983 constanudollars measured by
the U.S. Consumer Price Ihdex. During 1983. the company's real
estate operations were reorganized and are accounted for on the
equity method. Realestate operations were previously consoiida-
tedi Prior-year amounts have been restated, where applicable.
As Reported in the Adjusted:for Changes
Primary Statements in Specific Prices
(Historical Cost) (Current Cost)',
$12,975.9
S
Gain from decline in purchasing power of net amounts owed
Inventories and property, plantand equipment:
Increase in specific prices (current cost)i°"
Increase in general price level
Excess of increase in specific prices over increase in~general price level,
Translation adjustment
7.17
Q_S 771.0
S 6.12
~,173.9
}i $ 430.4
356.3'
----~~
J 74.1
-----.-~~.)
Stockholders' equity $ 4,033.7 y 5,826.4
(A)In accordance with FASB requirements, im0ation-adjusted amounts do (B) AUDecember 31. 1983. the
current cost of inventories was53.460.6
not7eflect any adjustments in the provision for income taxes:Conseqytentfy, miWion, and thecurrent
cosFof property: plant:and equipment, net of
effective tax rates are: accumulated depreaation, was$5.412:1million.
_ As reported in~ the Primary Statements 43.0'yo
Current Cost ~ 46'.9 ,o
