NYSA TI Single-Page 4
Allegations of Fda Abuses of Authority Hearings Before the
Abstract
For sale b) the U.S. Govem,nenl Priming Office Sup~ri.tcnd~'nt of Dc.,cumcnL~,. Congressional Sales 0/1icą, Washington.
Fields
- Named Organization
- American Bar Association
- American Dental Association
- American Medical Association (physicians group)Professional trade group representing American physicians.
- Baylor College of Medicine (Located in Houston, Texas)
- Biomet Inc.
- C-Span
- CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System)
- Cleveland Clinic
- *Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Department of State (DOS)
- DuPont
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
- Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
- Federal District Court
- Federal Register (publication)
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- General Counsel
- *Health and Human Services (HHS) (use United States Department of Health and Hum (US)
- Health Research Group (An anti-smoking group)An anti-smoking group
- Heritage Foundation
- House of Representatives
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
- Justice Department
- Mayo Clinic (Located in Rochester, Minnesota)Has a nicotine dependence center; runs the smoking cessation program at the Mayo Clinic
- McDonald's Corp.
- Merck (pharmaceutical company)
- Ministry of Health (Located in Singapore)
- MRI (see Mason Research Institute)see Mason Research Institute
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- New York Times
- Office of Compliance
- Office of Special Counsel
- Patton, Boggs & Blow
- Public Citizen ("PC") (Nonprofit consumer advocate organization founded by Ralph Na)Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocate-action organization founded in 1971 by Ralph Nader.
- SBA
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Senate
- The Shield (anti-tobacco and alcohol publication of the 1920s)
- United States Senate
- University of Southern California
- USA Today
- Wall Street Journal
- White House
- Winston & Strawn (Tobacco law firm)
- Named Person
- Aikman, Troy
- Alley, Katherine
- Alpert, Susan
- Andros, Rich
- Andros, Richard
- Baca, Joe
- Bailey, George F.
- Barton, Joe
- Bell, Mary Jean
- Bianchi, Pat
- Bianchi, Pat A.
- Bianchi, Patricia
- Boucher, Rick
- Bowen, Thomas
- Bowen, William
- Bowers, Brent
- Brubaker, William
- Bryant, John
- Burlington, Bruce
- Burlington, Donald Bruce
- Burr, Richard
- Chesemore, Ronald G. (FDA Regulatory Affairs, Associate Commissioner 1994)
- Chisler, Pam
- Clark, Mike
- Coale, John
- Coale, John P.
- *Coale, Mr. (use Cale, John P.)
- Coburn, Tom
- Cohen, Bruce, Ph.D. (Epidemiologist, MA Dept. of Public Health)
- Cohen, Ralph
- Cole, John
- Cook, Kay
- Cox, Christopher
- Crapo, Michael D.
- Davis, Dave M.D.
- Davis, Jim
- Deal, Nathan
- Dear, JoePlaintiff
- Deutsch, Peter
- Dingell, John (Philip Morris Washington Office)
- Dingell, John D.
- Dole, Bob
- Driscoll, Mike
- Dunn, A. William
- Eccleston, Bob
- Farr, Leonard
- Fields, Jack
- Foster, Kent R.
- Frank, Gloria
- Franks, Gary A.
- Furse, Elizabeth
- German, Mary
- Gibbs, Jeff
- Gibbs, Jeffrey N.
- Gill, Lillian
- Gordon, Bart
- Gorman, Mary
- Greenwood, James C.
- Haley, Charles
- Hall, Ralph M.
- Hampton, Tommy
- Hamrick, Kay
- Holcombe, Kay
- Holston, Sharon
- Hooten, Marina
- Horowitz, Leon
- Hutchison, Kay Barley
- Isaacs, John
- Jaffe, Richard
- Jaffe, Richard A.
- Jank, Roland C.
- Johnson, John
- Kaplan, Sheila
- Kelly, Patrick
- Kent, John
- Kessler, David A., M.D., J.D. (Former FDA Commissioner)appointed FDA Commissioner by President George Bush in December 1990.
- Klink, Ron
- Kress, Jack
- Levitt, Joseph
- Lincoln, Blanche Lambert
- Lorenz, Walter
- Lowell, Roger
- Lowell, Roger L.
- Manton, Thomas J.
- Markey, Edward J.
- Mcdonald, Gabrielle
- Mcgarry, J. Michael, III
- Medi, Sara
- Michaels, Mary
- Michaels, Mary K.
- Michaels, Paul
- Michaels, Paul A.
- Michelson, Gary
- Michelson, Gary K.
- Miller, Dane
- Miller, Dane A.
- Milliken, Roger
- Moorhead, Carlos J.
- Morrison, Alan B.Plaintiff
- Moss, Ralph
- Myers, Dennis
- Nader, Ralph (Consumer Activist)Consumer activist long renowned for a career of exposing corporate deception and wrongdoing that result in human harm.
- Nolan, Patrick
- Norwood, Charlie
- Oxley, Michael G.
- Pallone, Frank, Jr.
- Palmore, Mary
- Parr, Edward J., Jr.
- Parr, Ted
- Pedersen, Amanda
- Pendergast, Mary
- Peters, Amanda
- Pines, Wayne
- Pollard, Colin
- Porter, Margaret
- Porter, Margaret Jane
- Powers, Debra
- Raphael, Sally Jesse
- Redmond, Geoffrey P.
- Redmond, Patricia
- Richardson, Bill
- Richardson, Glenda
- Richter, Kimber
- Rush, Bobby L.
- Schaefer, Dan
- Scheman, Carole
- Single, Gregory
- Singleton, Greg
- Snyder, Sharon
- Spiller, Robert
- Stearns, Cliff
- Steelman, Deborah
- Stone, Bob
- Stone, Roger
- Stupak, Bart
- Taylor, Nancy
- Thomas, Cheryl Rayner
- Thomas, Rich
- Thomas, Rick
- Thompson, Diane
- Thompson, Diane E.
- Upton, Fred
- Watkins, Bob
- Watkins, Robert
- Watkins, Robert G.
- Waxman, Henry A.
- White, Rick
- Whitfield, Ed
- Willis, Delores
- Withers, John
- Wolf, Dr. ---Defense
- Wolf, Sidney
- Wolfe, Sidney M.
- Wolfe, Sidney M. D.Plaintiff
- Woods, James D., Ph.D. (Building Construction Professor, VA Tech.)Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
- Worland, Richard
- Wright, Earl
- Wright, Grant
- Wright, Grant A.
- Wright, H. Earl
- Yin, Lillian
- Young, Frank, M.D. (FDA former commissioner)
- Zeller, Mitchell R., J.D. (Former FDA employee)Assisted with investigation of tobacco companies and nicotine after ABC Day One segment claims of nicotine spiking.
- Date Loaded
- 18 Jul 2005
- Box
- 8166
Document Images
4O
Mr. JAFFE. Basically, that it was a subject of an ongoing criminal
investigation for FDA violations and trying to dissuade people from
undergoing his treatment.
Mr, BURR. In the third Grand Jury case, was an Assistant U.S.
Attorney presenting the case removed for abusive use of subpoe-
nas?
Mr, JAFFE. He was removed and he did abuse the subpoena proc-
ess. The government said that it was part of a general shakeup,
but they couldn't identify any other U.S. Attorney that was re-
moved or anything else about the staffing issues.
Mr, BARTON. The gentleman's time has expired. We will have an
opportunity for a few additional questions, if the gentleman still
has additional questions.
Mr. BURR. I do, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. BARTON. Okay. The Chair would recognize, for a second
round of questions, the ranking minority member, Mr. Wyden.
Mr, WYDEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll be brief. Mr. Jaffe,
to what extent, if at all, is your client barred from distributing
peer-reviewed articles on their procedure?
Mr, JAFFE. I'm not clear on your question.
Mr. WYDEN. One of the things that we're concerned about is ac-
cess to information, about innovative medical products and devices.
I'm c~trious whether your client has been in any way barred from
distributing promotional information about their product.
Mr, JAFFE. There are two separate questions, promotional infor-
mation and peer-reviewed articles. I would say, as a general mat-
ter, as someone who represents many of these practitioners around
the country, they do not have access to peer-reviewed publications
in this country, as a general rule. In particular, Dr. Burzynski sub-
mits his publications to some American journals.
The technical articles, biochemistry, in some of the major arti-
cles, his publications are just turned down. The criticisms leveled
against Dr. Burzynsld are published in the peer-reviewed journals.
His rebuttals, by and large, are not. But I would say that that is
a problem which I have seen in many of these individuals, not just
Dr, Burzynski,
As to the promotional materials, which is a separate issue, I
think there are issues of Federal and State law. Directing your at-
tention to Federal law~
Mr. WYDEN. On this point, has he in any way been restricted in
making presentations about his product by the FDA?
Mr. JAFFE. By the FDA?
Mr. WYDEN, Yes.
Mr. JAFFE. No, sir.
Mr. WYDEN. Well, I thank you. One of the things that we are
looking at, again, in an effort to try to bring about reform, is to
make it easier to get information out in credible journals. At the
same time, we would like to give the Food and Drug Administra-
tion the opportunity, if they have questions about the integrity of
one of these journals, to, for example, submit an additional state-
ment saying that they have reservations about the article. But I
gather that was not a problem.
41
Mr. JAFFE. I would say, affirmatively, sir, I don't think that his
problems with peer-reviewed journals are directly related or caused
by the FDA.
Mr. WYDEN. Okay. I thank you.
Mr. BARTON. The Chair would recognize the distinguished mem-
ber from New York and, before that, indicate that since there is
only one Democrat presently attending the hearing, the Chair al-
ternates back and forth between sides, that's why Mr. Wyden had
a second set of questions. Mr, Frisa.
Mr. FRISA. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I'd like to ad-
dress this to the entire panel. Is there any established procedure
by which someone with a product or a treatment or a procedure
that falls outside that which is approved and is established and is
tried and true for an innovation for something, again, that falls
outside the normal categories to be brought to the attention of the
FDA, to say this is different, please listen to our innovation.
Mr. JAFFE. Up until a few years ago, there was no vehicle what-
soever, and I think that's one of the problems with the leDA regula-
tions. They treat everyone the same. And it's well a~.d goo.d if
you're a multi-zillion dollar drug company and have the $200, $300
or $400 that it takes to get a drug approved. But if you're a small
company, it's very difficult.
I know the Congress, through the auspices of Senators Harkin,
Daschle and others, have enacted this bill relating to alternative
medicine. That has some of its problems now, but you now have an
Office of Alternative Medicine which somehow helps. By and large,
that's one of the problems. They treat everyone the same.
Throughout history, basically, many innovators have been people
sitting in basements somewhere that come up with an idea and the
problem that I see, just as a theoretical and legislative matter, is
that there is no vehicle in the FDA to recognize these kinds of peo-
ple, and I think there needs to be. Otherwise, what you're going to
have is all research done in institutions. And that's why, after how
many hundreds of billions of dollars in 30 years, we don't have a
cure for most kinds of solid cancers, because they all get the
money. It all gets channeled in there and you have to get through
all these processes and there are all these people out there who
have interesting ideas that aren't getting tested.
So I think you have identified one of the major problems in the
drug approval process, and I think it's structural and it needs to
be changed.
Mr. FR~SA. I think it's obvious that most organizations resist
change. I guess it's apparent in this case that there are very seri-
ous implications for the way they go about resisting change.
It appears to me that the FDA seems to do it with a vengeance.
In the case of the Michaels, had you allowed yourselves to be in-
timidated by either the fact that this is not a traditional treatment
or that there might be consequences for going forward, there might
have only been one of you here today. That, I think, is the tragedy,
for an Agency that's charged with ensuring the health and safety
of Americans.
I'd like to see a warning label that the FDA may be harmful to
people's health and safety. I just think it's a sorry state of affairs.
I'm brand new to the Congress and it just seems agency after agen-
