NYSA TI Single-Page 4
FOR RELEASE UPON DELIVERY October i, 19 81 _TATKMENT BY
Abstract
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommitee:
Fields
- Named Organization
- ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms)Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
- Named Person
- Walker, John M., Jr.
- Date Loaded
- 18 Jul 2005
- Box
- 0624
Document Images
FOR RELEASE UPON DELIVERY
October i, 19 81
~TATKMENT BY ~
THE HONORABLE JOHN M. WALKER, JR.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY {~NFORCEMENT AND OPERATIONS)
U.S. TREASU,RY DEPARTMENT
BE FOR~ THE
SUBCOMMITTEE Oh~ CRIME OF THE
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommitee: "
I appreciate this opportunity to testify concerning the
Bureau of Alcoh~l, TObacco and Firearms (BATF).
Rep-o~ts which appeared in the media recently regarding
a final specific Administration proposal to eliminate BATF
were incorrect. While a number of possible options to
reorganize and possibly eliminate a number of activities are
being considered, no final decision has been made by the
Department to .dismantle or abolish BATF. At the present
time BATF"will continue to operate as an independent bureau
pending further review ~f its status and functions.
However, in line with Administration d~cisions to impose.
b~dget-cuts across hhe board, BATF does face substantial
budget cuts in FY 1982~ These cuts w{ll result in personnel
reductions,
T105390288

oI o
- 2 -
The Department bel{eves that in the area of criminal
~nforcement substantial savings can be made by reducing certain
lower priority functions while still maintainiDg statutorily
mar~ated priority functions. For example, the closing of
certain offices; the realignment of all regulatory functions
in the firearms and explosives area from regulatory enforce-
ment to criminal enforcement personnel; and the consequent
reductions in administrative overhead costs as a result of
these actions are among some of the budget cutting moves we
are considering in FY 1982. "~s you know this is a process
that is going on in all government agencies at this moment.
It is important that we continue to enforce the firearms
and explosives statutes because of the impact that violations
of these laws have on $i0ient crime. We beii.eve that effective
enforcement in these areas can be accomplished with fewer
people and greater productivity. Special attention in the
firearms area will be concentrated on .the following types of
of fenders :
- Narcotics t~affickers;
- Stolen property fences;
- Interstate traffickers;
- Organized crime figures;
- International arms traffickers;
- Outlaw motorcycle gang members; and
- Terrorists.
T!05390289

The exploosives statutes will also continue t~ be
enforced. Major arson cases, which are an outgrowth of the
explosives statutes, will continue to be pursued. Arson
investigations• will stress the-concentration of resources in
those cases where there are arson-for-profit schemes involving
c~mmercial premises engaged in street crimes. We believe
that this-is the.proper Federal role. in .arson investigations.
We plan to put great emphasis~on the training of state and
local officials t~) handle arson\k~roblems. We are hopeful
that this will enable some iqcal jurisdictions to take over
their own arson investigations, thereby reducing the need
for ATF presence.
We plan-to reduce investigations of illicit alcohol .~•
and cigarette smuggl.ing: "~ number of cases referred {n-". ........
recent times in these areas is substantially lower than in
the past and state and local enforcement agencies are doing
a good job in handling what are essentially state and local
government probiems. If a case is referred to ATF which
state and local enforcement is unable to handle completely,
we will, of course, render assistance. As you know, ATF. has
an excellent reputation_for cooperation with state and local
enforcementauthorities. We intend to see that this cooper-
ation continues.
Regulatory Enforcement
In the area of regulatory enforcement, we expect to be
able to make substantial reductions without .~eopardizing the
T105390290

approximately $8 billion, in revenue expected to be collected
in FY 1982 from the alcohol and tobacco excise taxes. As you
may recall, the Federal~ Government's basic approach to revenue
protection for alcoholic beverages has shifted in the last
three years f~om one of joint custody of t~he product, which
required the physical presence of a BATF warehouseman, to
one in which the taxable product is kept under bond, with
proper payment of ~xcise taxes ensured through periodic
audits of financial and inventory records. Thus, these
important revenues can be protected with substantially less
personnel than was required in the past, and we believe that
there is minimal risk to these revenues from the reductions
we are considering.
With respect to other reg.._ulatory functions performed by
• BATF in the areas of product fraud, labeling, advertising,
an~ anti-competitive trade practices, while it is true that
we may be making substantial reductions in these functions,
it is also true that many of these fundtions, which are
conducted under authority of the 1935 Federal Alcohol
Administration Act, ma~ be outmoded and unnecessary. We
believe that those regulatory functions that are useful
can be performed more efficiently and with less manpower
than has been devoted to them in the past. And, of course,
state governments still have the preeminent authority
granted to themby the Twenty-First Amendment to regulate
the.sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages within their
own borders as they see fit.
T105390291
