NYSA TI Single-Page 4
A SCCIAL PROBLEI.[ _Cc_erciai Unizn i.._zr-nc_-=_ _c_a..ies_ ZTZ3
Abstract
Background: Asbestos and Consequences of its Use A.
Fields
- Named Organization
- Abbott Laboratories
- American Cancer Society
- American Tobacco Company
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
- Burlington Industries (Textile Manufacturer)
- Cape Industries
- Cassiar (Asbestos Mining Company)
- Celotex Corporation
- Chrysler Corporation
- Commercial Union
- Crown, Cork & Seal
- *Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) (use United States Departmen (use @hew_dept)
- Dow Chemical Co. (Marketed Nicoderm patch)Dow Chemical is a 72% owner of its Marion Merrell Dow Inc. unit in 1994 (WSJ 7/29/94). Marion Merrell Dow markets Nicoderm brand nicotine patch, used to help people stop smoking (Reuters 5/9/94).
- E.R. Squibb & Sons (Pharmaceutical company)
- Eagle Picher Industries
- Fibreboard Corporation
- Ford Motor Company
- GAF Corporation
- General Dynamics
- General Dynamics Corp.
- General Motors Corporation
- Hooker Chemical Company
- House of Representatives
- Johns-Manville Corporation
- Kaiser Cement
- Liberty Mutual
- Marsh & McLennan
- Metropolitan Life Insurance (Insurance Company)
- National Gypsum (Manufacturer of Asbestos)
- National Union
- Navy
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Held hearings in 1994 to ban smoking in workplaces)OSHA opened hearings in September 1994 on a proposal that amounts to a virtual ban on smoking in every workplace in the nation
- Owens, Corning
- Owens-Illinois Inc.
- PPG Industries Inc.
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Cigarette manufacturer (Camel, Winston, Doral))Cigarette manufacturer (Camel, Winston, Doral)
- Rapid American Corporation
- Standard Asbestos
- U.S. Steel
- United States House of Representatives
- Westinghouse
- Named Person
- Alden, Glen
- Carey, Philip
- Coats, Allen H.
- Foster, Benjamin
- Givens, Edgar H.
- Harbor, Pearl
- Harvey, Sid
- Hayden, Porter
- Ochsner, Alton, M.D. (President, Ochsner Foundation, Early Anti-Tobacco Expert)Plaintiff
- Selikoff, Irving J., M.D. (Conducted landmark 1964 study on asbestos)
- Short, George
- Stern, Martin, Jr.
- Trucks, Mack
- Wheeler, Foster
- Wilson, Grant
- Date Loaded
- 18 Jul 2005
- Box
- 0624
Document Images
A SCCIAL PROBLEI.[
~Cc~erciai Unizn i.._zr-nc_-=~ = = ~c~a..ies~ ~
ZTZ3
TI05390121

A SOCIg~L PROBL=~I-~.
"F.
Introduction
Background: Asbestos and Consequences of its Use
A. History of Asbestos Use
B. Health Hazards Inherent in Asbestos Use
C. Biological Effects of Asbestos Use:
Asbestos-Related Diseases
1. Asbestosis
2. Mesotheiioma
3. Bronchoqenic Carcinoma
Asbestos-Related Carcinomas and the Synergistic
Effects of Asbestos and Other Substances:
The Case of Cigarette Tobacco Smoke
Scope of the Problem
A. The Victims of Asbestos Use
i. Workplace Victims
2. Other Victims
B. Medical and Personal Costs Associated with
Asbestos-Related Diseases
C. The Costs to Scciet-y of Asbestos-Related Diseases
Ramifications of the Prcb!em:
Victims
Compensaticn ~= Asbestos
A. Workers' Compensation and Other "~on Fault"
Programs
B. Litigation as a Compensazicn Remedy
C. The Nature of Asbestos Product Liability
Litigation
D. Inadequacies of Litigation as a Compensation
Remedy
-= .... e ~#= -- 3n the insurance
Ramifications of
industry and the_.,,~__~-
~. The Insurance [ndustr'y's Fin-..-~='=~___ Distress
B. The Expansion of Tcrt Lia~~ ~ ~-"_ anl insurance
Con~racZ Law as Yzc~crs in zhe ~iai~ Problem
".':. Cznc iuslcn :
A~vend:x A
.'-_~7 e ndi:,: :
~, 1
p. 4
D. 6
=. 7
D. 8
o. 9
C._~2
O. 14
~. 20
" 34
c. ]?
c
c. ~'-
T105390122

I. INTRODUCTION
The past decade has witnessed increased attention to
the hazardous effects of products and substances considered
essential to industrial and technological proqress. This
has been particularly true with asbestos, a mineral whose
unique characteristics permit its use in over 3,000 indust-
rial, commercial and personal products.
Despite the useful product applications which have
been made of asbestos, a substantial body of medical evidence
demonstrates that there are harmful health effects inherent
in its use. Exposure to asbestos is known to be a causative
cr contributing factor in certain respirator~y and qastro-
intestinal diseases. Though the health effects linked to
asbestos exposure have been known since early this c~.~t._
failure and unwillinqness tc take necessary measures to ccntrcZ
its hazardous tendencies have led to a medical situation in
which as many as 5.6 ml_l_on individuals ma~y die from an
asbestos-related disease or~=_om~ ,, ccmD!ications_ associated there-
with, and in which millions cf others zay be disabled.
Current means of compensa~inq the victims of asbestos
for their ph-ysica!, economic and emctac..a~ losses ar~ in-
effective, =~" have helped create a sccia~ problem of cri-i-
~ropor~ions. ~ecause workers' ccm:ensaZion, and p'~:~.~c =~:~-
ance preqrams fail :~ provide adequate benefits, cZalman:s
The es~L~a~ed n'-m~__~ :~ __-= cases =::; -~ ~:-: ~=qces_ =:_- .._~..
T!05390123

as 12,000, involving same 25,000 plaintiffs and more than 260
defendants.1 The demands placed on the courts have been
substantial. The judicial process has been impeded in many
v__t_ms and other litigants
jurisdictions, affecting asbestos ~ ~
alike. With the likelihood ~hat many thousands of ~dditionai
claims will be filed during the next 25-30 years, it is be-
coming increasingly apparent that our judicial system will
be incapable of providing an effective means of relief for
those injured by asbestos-related diseases.
Reliance upon tort litigation as a means of compensa-
ting asbestos victims has had serious ramifications that
extend beyond the parameters of the judicial system. The
complexity of cases and the fact that they often involve a
large n~mber of defendants and third-party defendants increases
the time and costs of litigation. In an effort to provide
compensation ~ deservinc claimants, courts have often fashion-
ed new concepts of law. This recent expansion of the Doun~arL_s
of insurance and product iiabi!it'y law has confronted defendants
with unprecedented levels of !iabi!i~'y.
These factors place severe burdens cn those responsible
in the first instance for compensa~inc asbestos victims--the
me.~ers of the insurance and asbestos industries. Viewed
.... p~.one - • _ --
ASBESTOS LETIC-ATECN P~PGRT~R, ":arch i~, 1981 and
:.[arch ~ _. "
T|05390124

objectively, the proliferation of asbestos claims ~nd the
costs associated with their administration, defense and payment
jeopardizes the financial stability of many of these com-
panies. The consequences of this problem are not, however,
confined to these two industries. Rather, continued pursuit
o5 these matters through the traditional tort litigation pro-
cess may Yell cause a severe contraction of our insurance
system, with resulting dislocations in our economy as a whole.
This report examines the nature and scope of this
pervasive and inlmediate social problem. It indicates the in-
ability of traditional methods to appropriately compensate
asbestos victims and demonstrates how continued resort to
such methods creates problems of a broader dimension. The
report concludes that the nature of the prcbiem necessitates
federal legislative action to devise and implement a system
that adequately and equitably addresses the needs and interests
of asbestos victims, the asbestos industry and insurance com-
canies. It is the expectation and belief of ~..e authors tha~
this report succeeds in providing a basis for understanding
this serious and important problem, and that ~t hei~s to establish
a _o~..ca~_o., = "-" ~ ~ upon_ which =- proper scluzicn can be devel~ped.
T105390125

Ii. BACI<GROU~D: ASBESTOS .~ND CONSEQUENCES OF ITS USE
The substance that has caused the present situation
is "asbestos," the generic name for a group of hydrated
mineral silicates that can be separated into relatively
2
soft, single fibers. Due to its nonflanlmability at even
extreme!~y high temperatures, its ability to inhibit certain
types of chemical react±ons, and its flexibility and tensile
strength, asbestos is particularl-y suitable for a variety of
industrial, commercial and personal uses 3 (See ~D~endix A)
A. HISTORY OF ASBESTOS USE
Because of its unique characteristics, asbestos has
been used by man since antiquity. However, though extant
doc~r, ents record its use by the ancient Greeks and Romans, it
has only been during the past century--partlcular!y since
World War iI--that asbestos has been extensively relied upon
for a large number of commercial and industrial purposes. All
Asbestos minerals can be classified according to two ma~cr
categories:
a) the serpentines, which includes chrysotile- _._~
b) the amchibeles_ , which inci~des
~_~c_~c~ ~; .... "~-~,
actinclite-tremoiite, a~csite andan~..c~..y~ ~,'~;-= ......
it is possible -_hat as many as _~O00 different prcduct~ in
daily_ use thrcuchou~_ the wcri5 ~_c..~_in~ = some asbes.-.cs. These
;nc~uce he= .... ~istant textile=,
:='- - :-- indu-tri_i chemlzai_~,
=-= -~- = =
zi"_es, -?askets, auzomczive br~ke ilnlngs, concrete water
~i~es -.d ";ariDus t-zzes of co---no-_nd ccmccun~s -u~ -_ :
the pr=;u-- ~q'- iy desirable for
- 4 -
TI05390126

told, more than 30 million tons of asbestos have been consumed
in the United States since 1890, with perhaps as many as 27
4
million tons having been consumed since 1940.
B. HEALTH ~%ZARDS INHERENT IN ASBESTOS USE
The fact that asbestos is hazardous to human health was
receqnized cuite early. It is reputed that in the first
century both Pliny the Elder a~ Strabo wrote of a sickness of
the lungs in slaves whose occupation was the weaving of asbestos
into cloth. However, the relationship between asbestos and
respiratory disease remained largely undiscovered and ,~nknown
until this century. Although the period between 1906-24 saw
the publication of a n~mber of reports doc'~menting the associa-
tion between asbestos and pulmonary disease, the seminal point
occurred in 1930 when Dr. E.R.A. Merewether and C.W. Price,
respectively, medical and engineering inspectors of factories in
Great Britain, presented a report to Par!i~ment establishing
Published statistics indicate that 24,827,500 tons of asbestos
were consumed in the United States between !890-196g, including
16,607,000 tons between 1940 and the latter date. See
Selikoff, Asbestos-Associated Disease, ~UBLIC HEALTH A~D PRE-
~NTI~ MEDICINE l!th ed. (i980), at 595 (Table !3-9).
Between !971-7~, apparent ccns-~p:icn cf asbestos fiber in
the United States was slightly less than 4 mi!iicn tons, wi~h
a similar volume of cons-~mption anticipated for the L9~6-77
period. See U.S. Department of Health, Educa~ien and Welfare,
ASBESTOS: ~2~ INFC~ATION RESCURC~ (19~8), at 9-[0.
The ~-~ted States B~~= ~ ~ f Mines
.... "-.~a'- o has estimated ~h__ nhls
zcuntrv'= demand for asbestos in zh_ ~-_a_
between !-~.3~ mi~_i~.~ ~n :cns. U.S. ]e>artnenz -= fnneracr,
.. .... =.~_ FACTS A..'~ PROBLEMS (i9,
T105390127

~he fact that "inhalation of asbestos dust over a period of
years results inthe development of a serious type of fibrosis
in the lungs.
The early studies were, with the exception of some
isolated and largely-ignored reports, concerned primarily with
the effects of the inhalation of asbestos fibers among individ-
uals exposed to asbestos in large quantizies, such as miners
and workers in textile and other manufacturing facilities. In
the mid-1960's, publication of epidemioloqical studies by a
group at New Ycrk's Mr. Sinai School of Medicine doc,u~..ente~ the
relationship between exposure to asbestos by asbestos insulation
6
workers and various respiratory diseases. The latter studies
demonstrated not only the widespread occurrence of pulmonary
fibrosis a~onq such individuals, but also the relatively high
incidence of certain lung cancers.
C. BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ASBESTOS USE: ASBESTOS-RE~ATED
DISEASES
The medical evidence that has accumulated during zhls
centur~y ~lea_~y indicates that inhalation c--asbestos fiber=
Merewether and Price, Retort ~= ===ect of Asbestos Dust on
Lungs and Dust,Suppression, in the Asbestos industry. London,
H.>I. Stationery O~fice (2930).
Selikoff,
C..ur~. and Ha~T.ond, Asbes~os Ex?osure =~ :.;eozlasia
188 JCU~_NAL CF
Selikoff, Churg and H~m~ond, Uhe ~ccurrence ef Asbestcsis
~mon~ Insulazion Workers in zhe United Stazes, "-~ ""~'~--
T!05390128

leads to histological changes that can result in various severe
and debilitating pulmonary diseases.7 Because the effects of
excessive inhalation of asbestos fibers are time and dose-related,
certain of these diseases may develop only after the inhala:ion
of substantial amounts of asbestos over a substantial pericd
ef time. Others require only a comparatively small dose for
their occurrence. The long latency periods that are character-
istic of the diseases--that is, the period between initial
exposure to asbestos and the actual exhibition of the~__
clinical signs or symptoms of disease--indicates that the
disabilities presented today are reflective of conditions
that might have existed as long as 30, 40, or 45 years earlier.
There are three primary diseases known to be associated
with the inhalation of asbestos fibers. These are asbestosis,
mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcincma. ~.~.~ simi!ar in
many respects, each has its unique charicteristics:
I. ASBESTOSiS
A chronic respiraterv ailment, asbestcsis
is the most come, on cf ~he asbestos-re!a~ed
diseases. Characterized by a fibrcsis cr scar-
ring of the lungs, it has an average latency
period of 17 years, its signs or symptcms in-
clude breathlessness on exerticn, a dry cough,
tightness or pain in the chest area, decrease
~qhen asbestcs fibers are inhaled, a percentage of the fibers
smaller than five zicronswl_~_~_~==ch the Dorticn. of ~he
__..~_
where cas exchance occurs. ~ -~=r~ c-- the body's defense
mechanism, the fibers may heccme =_nca~su!ated
scar .-_issue _nd,~ ~ when sufficient scarrinc, has dev='-~=~', -_he
capacity ~f the iu_ncs to exchance zases ~___ be dlm'_.-.ished
=~ == ~ cause shor-_ness _f ~ = ~ Eee ~reessen,
--dwards, ~'_ler and Sayeth, .'-. _~_u-v zf Asheszcsls in
.[-c.._i.-_u_-i ~ next = e,
T105390129

in lung volume and flow, and eventual clubbing
of the fingers. A cumulative disease, asbestosis
is generally found among individuals exposed
to asbestos fibers on a regular, prolonged basis.
Although asbestosis can be disabling, it is
neither malignant nor necessarily fat~l.
However, the debilitating nature of asbestosis
is such as to increase the likelihood of death
from other medical complications.
MESOTHELIOMA
A malignant tumor occurring in the lung cr
abdominal cavity lining, mesothelioma is extremely
rare in the general population but common among
workers exposed to asbestos. The disease is
characterized by shortness of breath and pain in
the chest wall or abdomen. Its latency period
averages between 25 and 40 years. Mesothelioma
is thought to be invariably fatal, with death
generally occurring ~ithin 2 years of onset.
Unlike asbestosis, it is not cumulative, thereby
requiring a comparatively small dose of asbestos
fibers to produce the maliqnancy.
BRONCHOGENIC CARCENOM~
A malignant tumor generally orginatinq in
the upper portion of the lungs, bronchogenic
carcinoma is characterized by chest pain, a
frequent and intense cough, and blood-streaked
sputum coughed-up from the lungs. The disease
has an average latency period of 15-25 years
and, like m.esotheiioma, is usually fatal. Though
bronchoqenic carcinoma is ccmr.cniy found among
asbestos workers, its primary causative aqent
may be cigarette tobacco smc~e rather than
asbestos.
n addi~
- ..on to the respiratory diseases for which asbestos is a
knc~ causative agent, it is also associated with an increased
__s:~ ~f cancer ~f the esophagus, larynx, crcDharvnx, --tomach,
colon, rect'~-m and kidneys The incidence . f these cancers
ix (1938;, Selikcff, Asbe3tcs-Assccia:ed ~isease,
Some :ime after breathinc
_ ' --m_ fi'-~_- which cause
=~=r--- ri..=-~ of the lunq :issue, a :alignan: t-~.7.or may develop.
T!05390130
