NYSA TI Single-Page 3
SS,_ies 4-2 Health Statistics
Fields
- Named Organization
- Bureau of the Census
- Census Bureau
- *Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) (use United States Departmen (use @hew_dept)
- National Health Survey
- Simmons Market Research Bureau (Advertising auditing company)
- Univac
- Named Person
- Burgess, Robert W.
- Burney, Leroy E., M.D. (U.S. Surgeon General 1957)Dr. Leroy E. Burney was the United States Surgeon General under Eisenhower (1957) (E. Whelan 1984; Dallas MN 1/12/94).
- Cunningham, Margery R.
- Finch, Robert Ho, Jr.
- Hurwitz, W.N.
- Hurwitz, William N.
- Lawrence, Philip S.
- Linder, Forrest E.
- Losee, Jo
- Lucas, Helen M.
- Steinberg, Joseph
- Waterhouse, Alice M.
- Woolsey, Theodore D.
- Date Loaded
- 18 Jul 2005
- Box
- 5204
Document Images
SS,~IES 4-2
HEALTH
STATISTICS
FRO,¥ THE If. S. ,%~ATIOgAL HEALTII SURVEY~
~he
statistical design of the
Health Household-Interview Survey
by staff of the
$. National Bealth Survey
and the
Bureau of the Census
U. S. DEPARTHENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATIOH, AND WELFARE
Harion B, Folsom, Secretary
Public Health Service
Leroy E. Burney, Surgeon General
Division of Public Health Hethods
Wil]iz~ H. Stewart. H. D.,Chief
III
Washington, D. C.
July 1958
Tl06653812

IU. S. NATIONAL HEALTH SURVEY
Forrest E. Linder, Ph.D., Director
Theodore D. Woolsey, Assistant Director
Alice M. Waterhouse, M. D., Medical Advisor
Walt R. Simmons. Statistical Advisor
O. K. Sagen, Ph. D., Chief, Special Studies
Philip S. Lawrence, Sc. D., Chief, Household Survey Analysis
Margery R. Cunningham, Staff Assistant
The U. S. National Health Survey is a continuing program under which
the Public Health Service makes studies to determine the extent of ill-
ness and disability in the population of the United States and to gather
related i~ormation. It is authorized by Public Law 652, 84th Congress.
(:O-OPERATION OF THE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Under the legislation establishing the National Health Survey, the
Public Health Service is authorized to use, insofar as possible, the
services or facilities of other Federal, State, or private agencies. For
the national household survey the Bureau of the Census designed and
selected the sample, conducted the household interviews, and processed
the data in accordance with specifications established by the Public
Health Service.
Public Health Service Publication No. 584-A2
TI0~653B13

PREFACE
This report presents a description of the initial statistical
design of the continuing Health Household-Interview Survey,
which is a major phase of the program of the U. S. National
Health Survey. The design described inthis report is that used
during the period, July-December [957, which, with minor
modifications, will be used throughout 1958. Except for such
modifications, the design is, therefore, the basis of the sta-
tistical reports being published from the household interviews
conducted during this period.
General requirements for the survey design were pre-
pared by the Public Health Service and on the basis of these,
the theoretical and operating plan of the sample was prepared
by th~ staff of the Census Bureau. Although there are some
important differences, the sample plan for this health survey
draws heavily from designs previously developed by the Bureau
of the Census for its Current Population Survey.
In addition to its function as the principal designer of the
survey sample plan, the Census Bureau also conducts the field
interviewing, and processes the data in accordance with spec-
ifications provided by the Public Health Service. Tabulation is
handled on the Census Bureauts electronic computers. Final
tables and published reports are planned and prepared by the
Public Health Service.
Principal responsibility for development of the statistical
design and preparation of the text of this report was shared by
William N. Hurwitz, Harold Nisselson, Walt R, Simmons,
Joseph Steinberg, Joseph Waksberg, and Theodore D. Woolsey.
(Messrs. Simmons and Woolsey are members of the U. S. Na-
tional Health Survey staff; Messrs. Hurwitz, Nisselson, Stein-
berg, and Waksberg are staff members of the Bureau of the
Census.) They were assisted by numerous members of the
Census Bureau staff, including especially Katherine G. Capt.
Robert Ho Finch, Jr., Mary J. Jaracz, Garrie Jo Losee, and
Helen M. Lucas.
TI06653814

STATISTICAL DESIGN OF THE
HEALTH HOUSEHOLD-INTERVIEW SURVEY
1. INTRODUCTION
The program of the U. S. National Health Sur-
vey is a statistical measurement of the extent of
illness, disability, and related conditions of the
population. This program consists of several dis-
tinct but related parts. One of these is the collection
of data on health through a continuing Health House-
hold-Interview Survey. A second main part of the
program is a series of surveys which utilize pro-
cedures other than household interview as the
source of data on health. A third phase of the pro-
gram evaluates procedures and results and devel-
ops improved techniques of measurement.
The present report describes the statistical
design of the ftealth Household-Interview Survey.
In addition to setting forth the pattern of the Survey
as it was initiated in Jdy 1957 and as it functioned
in its first year of operation, the report will em-
phasize two further points. One is that the house-
hold interviews, while independent in a statistical
sense of other surveys in the program, are but one
very important component of the broader under-
taking which is the U. S. National Health Survey
(NHS), The second is that the "hdusehold survey
constitutes an evolutionary program which may be
expected to change as experience accumulates and
which, at any given time, is expected to fulfill only
those objectives of the National Health Survey for
which it is the most appropriate vehicle.
Substantive findings from the household-inter-
view survey are being published by the Public
Health Service in a sequence of numbered docu-
ments identified as Health Statistics. Series B.
Technical reports and methodological studies are
issued in Series A, and include this report on sta-
tistical design,
Arrangement of material in the present re-
port is intended to facilitate use by two different
groups of readers. It is hoped that the body of the
report will be of interest to and readily readable
by all professional persons coneernod with health
problems and those interested in research methods.
Several technical appendices have been added for
the benefit of statisticians, but contain material
which may be informative for a wider audience.
2. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
History
A detailed account was given in the first pub-
lication in this Series t, of the background, need
for, purposes, and expected product of the U. S.
National Health Survey. That story will not be du-
plicated here. However, it may be helpful to recall
very briefly a few highlights of the period which
preceded initiation of the operating program in the
middle of 1957.
By 1957 it had been more than 20 years since
thelast major survey to obtain comprehensive sta-
tistics on diseases, injuries, and impaixments in
the general population of the United States. Carried
out in 1935-36, that survey was a major project in
which 737,000 urban households were visited by
interviewers to obtain data on morbidity, impair-
ments, and health characteristics. It remains a
landmark in the field.
In the years since 1936 there have been a num-
ber of community studies of morbidity, prominent
among which are the names of Hagerstown and
Baltimore, Md.; Pittsburgh, Pa.; Hunterdon County,
N. J.; Kansas City, Mo.; New York Cit~,; and Cali-
fornia (both San Jose and a statewide study). These
T106653815

~tubie~. as well as ozcasional emferimmnts with
me~.J is ~le of pro~J~g
injuries [oge~r %~th rela~ i~o~adon &uch as
~e accompany~g lo~s of ~ ~om work or o~er
u~ual acd~J~es.
~ Janus., 1949, ~e U. S. NatlonM Com~ee
on VitM and Heal~Statisdcs was established. Sub-
committees were established in ~cem~r 1949 and
~to~r 1950 to study the needs for current mor-
bi~ty sta~sdcs. As a res~ of lhe~ recommenda-
tions, a third S~¢o~ttee was established in
Februa~ 1951 under ~e chaima~s~p of Dr. W.
~urber F~es of Jo~s HopMns Univ~rsi~, and
instructed to draft a "Plan fern nation~
surveykeepinginview~e interests ofl~al ar~s."
After ~reful study, t~s S~co~ittee recom-
mend~ that several s~eps be taken, and in ~rtic-
~ar: "~at a condn~ng na~onal morbidity survey
~ conducted .... ks pu~ose would he ~o obtain
data on the prevalence and ~cidence of disease.
injuries, and impairments, on the nature and du-
ration of the resulting disability, and on the amoun~
and type of mescal care received. ~e data wouid
~ obtained from a probability sample of house-
holds" (page 28 of reference i).
Public Law 652 and NHS Objectives
In the summer of 1955, the Department of
Health, Education. and Welfare proposed legisla-
tion for a continuing health survey, closely paral-
leling recommendations of the Subcommittee, The
proposal was included in the President's recom-
mendations on health matters, received bipartisan
support in Congress, was enacted into Public Law
652, 84th Congress. and was signed by the Presi-
dent on July 3, 1956. Later the same month appro-
priations were made available for planning and
pretesting during the fiscal year ending June 30,
1957.
The law authorizes the Surgeon General of the
Public Health Service to make continuing surveys
and special studies of the population of the Urtited
States to determine the extent of illness and disa-
bility and related information suchas: the number,
age. sex, ability to work or engage in other activi-
ties, and occupation or activities of persons af-
flicted with chronic or other disease or injury or
handicapping condition; the type of disease or in-
jury or handicapping condition of each person so
afflicted; the length of time that each such person
has been prevented from carrying on his occupa-
tion or activities; the amounts and types of serv-
ices received for or because of such conditions;
and the economic and other impacts of such con-
ditions.
A sigmificant feat-are cf PubLic Lay; 652 is that
it not e:Lly provides ~at s~.d:srantive data h_
bled, but in additicn, directs th~ Public Health
S~'ice. "to develop and test hey, or improved
mer/-tcd3 for chtaining current data cn illness and
disabilitT and related information."
Thus legislative intent Ic-~ks to the establish-
menz of health statistics as noted in the law. and
foresees "... continuing surveys ... spqcial stud-
ies... [and] develop ling] a.d test ling] new and
improvcd methods" as the objectives of the U, S,
National Health Survey.
Planning and Pretesting
the Household fnterv'iews
Throughout the fiscal year ending in June 1957
plans were developed for organizing and carrying
out the household survey which had been contem-
plated by the Subcommittee and authorized by Con-
gress. The law contained the provision whereby the
program could secure the assistance of other Fed-
eral agencies, as well as private persons or agen-
cies, in carrying out its responsibilities. Under
this provision, the NHS made arrangements to uti-
lize the very extensive resources and experience
of the Bureau of the Census in planning and con-
ducting the household-interview .survey.
From the beginning, it was clear that the N~-
tional Health Survey should be a general mttItipur-
pose undertaking, rather than a study with some
single specific limited objective. This concept
meant that presurvey planning was particularly
important. It required a careful review of previous
efforts, a weighing and evaluating of a large number
of possible alternatives, so that the new survey
might be sufficiendy comprehensive to cover many
of the desired objectives, while at the same time
not to be so diluted as to deal inadequately with all
topics,
By February 1957, general structure of the
survey had been determined, samples had been
drawn, and a tentative questionnaire and field in-
structions had been drafted. A pretest of 1,200
households was condt/cted in Charlotte, N, C,, to
provide a complete field trial of procedure. The
pretest was used alsofor training field supervisors
for the national program, The next month was de-
voted topolishing the questionnaireand procedures,
and to hiring and training interviewers, In the 2
months of May and June, the entire nationwide or-
ganization went through a shakedown and araiuing
period with interviewing and editing proceeding
just as though the survey were in operation. Of-
ficial collection of data began the first week in
July 1957.
TI08653816

3. SUMMARY OF STRUCTURE OF
HEALTH HOUSEHOLD-INTERVIEW SURVEY
Role of Intervlew Survey.
As noted in the previous .~ection, the program
of the U. S. National Health Survey is intended to
be an intensive and sustained undertaking to pro-
vide morbidity and health statistics, utilizing what-
ever resources andmethods are appropriate to the
task. Tt~e program is expected further to evaluate
existing sources and methods and to develop new
methodologies.
Among possible sources of data a prominent
position goes to medical and health records. These
include such originating places as hospitals, physi-
cians' and dentists' offices, and insurance records
of several kinds. They include, too, reporting under
governmental regulation of certain types of mor-
bidity and mortality, and especially the filing of
death certificates.
Another potentially significant source of in-
formation may lie in samples of persons who are
given clinical tests and measurements or general
health or medical examinations.
All these sources, and others, are to be ex-
plored by the NHS. Several pilot projects in these
areas already have been initiated.
However, a considerabl~ body of opinion con-
siders the household interview as one of the most
promising sources of data on health.
There are limitations to the accuracy of diag-
nostic and other information collected in household
interviews. For diagnostic information the house-
hold respondent, can, at best, pass on to the inter-
viewer only the information the physician has given
to the family. For conditions not medicallyattended,
diagnostic information is often no more than a de-
scription of symptoms. However, other types of
facts, such as those concerning t.he circumstances
and consequences of illness or injury and the re-
suiting action taken or sought by the individual,
can be obtained more accurately from household
members than from any other source since only
the persons concerned arc in a position to report
all of this type of information. Furthermore this
type of survey facilitates greatly comparison of
the ill population and the well population, and as-
sessment of relative impacts of a variety of ill-
nesses and impairments. The Health Household-
Interview Survey described in this report is the
vehicle being used by the U. S. National Health
Survey to produce data presently believed to be
most appropriately obtained from members of the
household.
Evolutionary Pattern
Continuity and comparability of estimates for
different time periods are desirable objectives,
and will be given attention in the interview survey,
especially when changes are proposed but they will
not have overriding priority. A substantial portion
of resources and energy of the NHS, at least dur-
ing its early years, is to be devoted to studies and
evaluation of quality of data input, to efficiency of
collection and processing, and to usefulness of out-
put. It is expected that these activities, augmented
by the active and constructive criticism of users.
will lead to a program which is changing in re-
sponse to need in scope, content, method, and spe-
cific product.
Although the interview survey has only had 1
full year of operation, already changes have been
made in sample design, questionnaire, and collec-
tion and processing procedures. The description
given in the follo~ving pages is in all major re-
spects that which was in effect through the first
year of operation, although minor changes occurred
from one quarter to another. Quantitative refer-
ences suchas sample sizes and noninterview rates
apply for the most part specifically to experience
in the first 2 quarters of operation.
The Questionnaire
The questionnaire is a 9-part document which
is handled by the interviewer rather than the re-
spondent, and on which the interviewer transcribes
replies of.the respondent. Most replies can be re-
corded by checking proper boxes on the form. The
text of the questionnaire is supplemented by6 check
list cards which are shown to the respondent at
appropriate points in the interview. The check lists
clarify certain questions so as to aid the respond-
ent in understanding types of answers required and
in recalling specific experiences.
Physically, the questionnaire is of the hook
type, providing separate columns for each of 7
possible members of a household. If a household
contains more than 7 members, more than 1 ques-
tionnaire is used.
A facsimile of the questionnaire is contained
in Appendix I.
It is planned that items on the questionnaire
may be divided into 2 groups--not separately ex-
T108653817

i-/hited in the prem~ format. 0~ group
efa core of ~asic quz$~ns w~ch ,~I ~e re~a~d
~n rela~vely unchanSed fo~ over an exTen~
~od ~f tim~. ~e me~nd ~oup consists of sup-
plemenm~' questions which will ke inclul~ ~em-
psra~ly for blccks o[ I or a few ~len~r quar-
ters. ~s general plan provides for ~e
of re~ar se~es of ~sic stads~cs, and at
same time ~e~its fle~flity in secu~ng oc~-
sional measures of a %~der class of phenomena.
As initially used, ~e questionnaire ca~ies 40
items for identification of households and persons
and soci~cono~c desc~pdon of respondents. (A
question to which the inter%ewer must secure an
answer is interpret~ as one item in this count.
~e same inte~retation applies in ~e following
counts.) It includes 12 general questions on
presence or absence of illness, accidents, ~ir-
ments, or con~tions for each member of the house-
hold, and 54 detailed questions for each ~rson--
for whom the questions are appropriate--on de-
tails of illnesses, accidents, and impairments,
and on m~ical, dental, and hospital care. For
most questions, the re~ll peri~ is the previous
2 weeks. But for some items of lo~v incidence, for
which memo~ is reliable, such as hospitaliza-
Oons, the recall exteads over the year pre~ous
to the interview.
Interviewin~ is conducted in the home, when-
ever possible with the in~vidual person if over
years of age, and otherwise with a responsible
adult mem~r of the family.
A separate report on the questionnaire is in
preparation. It will trot more thoroughly the def-
initions, concepts, scope, and content of ~e sched-
ule. In addition, each report issued on a substantive
h~Ith topic trots that part of the questionnaire
w~ch applies most directly to ~e topic under study.
Sample Design, Survey Methods,
and I:stimation
The sampling plan of the survey follows a high-
ly stratified multistage probability design which
permits a continuous sampling of the civilian pop-
ulation of ~- United States. The first stage cf the
de~i~n coasists o5 an area sample of 372 from
among ahzut 1,9~0 geo~aphi~lly de~ned p~m~"
s~ ~ts (PSU's) into whi~ the con~nen~l
U~ted States has been ~Sded. A PSU is a counD',
a ~oup of cen~guous counties, or a Stan~rd
ropolitan Ar~.
With no lo~s in general undersmn~ng, the
main~g sta~es~wl~ch consist of a s~ies ~f sam-
plings of successively smiler parcels of land--
can he telescoped and treated at this point in the
report as an ~t~ate stage. Within PSU's then,
d~mate-stage ~its called se~ents are defined,
also ge~raphically, in such a manner that ~ch
segment contains an expected 6 households in ~e
sample. For each week a random sample of about
120 se~ents is drawn. Persons in the appro~-
mately 700 households in those segments areinter-
viewed conceding illnesses, injuries, chronic con-
~dons, disability, and other factors retated to
health.
Household members interviewed each week are
an independent representative sample of the pop-
ulation, ~o that samples for successive weeks can
be combined into larger samples for, say, a calendar
qua~er or a year. Thus, the desi~ permits both
continuous measurement of characteristics of high
incidence or prevalence and, through the larger
consolidated samples, more detailed analysis of
less common characteristics and smaller cate-
gories.
The national sample plan over a 12-month
peri~ includes appro~mately 115,000 persons from
some 36,0~ households in a~ut 6,000 segments,
wi~ representation from every state. The desi~
is such that tabdaOons can ~ provid~ from the
annual sample for various geographic sections of
• e United States and for metropolitan, urban, and
rural sectors of the Nation.
Estimation is accomplished by a technique
wMch insures that sample results are consistent
with official Census Bureau estimates of current
population by age, sex, and color, and which se-
cures si~ificant reductions in sampling variance.
Tec~ically, ~is pr~edure is a 2-stage ratio e~-
Omation. Subsequent sections in the b~y of this
report and in the Appendices descri~ leading fea-
tures of the design ~n greater detail.
4. SURVEY PROCEDURE
Collection of Data
Data are collected through a household inter-
view. Over the Nation there are 120 interviewers,
trained, directed, and guided by 17 supervisors
located in Census Bureau Regional Offices. The
4
supervisors are career Civil Service employees
whose prime responsibility is the National Health
Survey. They have administrative and clerical
support from the Census Bureau field organization,
and direct technical guidance from a Health Sta-
tistics Branch in the Washington office of the Cen-
sus Bureau.
T106653818

Tn-~ inter'dewers (initially aH ~'om~) are
gar~-tim~ employee~, selected through an exami-
nation and ~es~n~ p~ce~s ~]~ch is a~i~stered
hy ~e suF~isors, accor~n~ to ~ec~ons set
~ ?;as~ton. ~e ~c~t of work done ~y an in-
~e~;ie~er v~es deFen~ en densi~" of ~ sam-
p~e n~r her home london. A ~i~l inte~iewer
m~y have 26 assi~ents in a }~r, or an average
of I assi~t each 2 ~eeks. Usually an assi~-
meat consists of ~e~iews in appro~mately 12
households. Inclu~g trai~n~. ~avel, and call
~cks, ~he ~yp[cal ~ervle~er is employed an aver-
a~e of 12 ho~s per week.
Trai~n~forbo~ su~rvisors and~erviewers
is a pr~ess for ~prov~ and con~ollin~ ~e
inte~iew and dam from it. As such, it is a pro-
cedure, par~s of which mus~ con~nue throughout
~e life of the su~ey, and is not an ac~ivky which
co~d ~ completed at ~he ~i~in~ of ~e opera-
dons.
~e su~rvisor is ~iven 5 ~nds of trainin~
~yond ~e Ci~l Se~ce requirements for
sppoin~ent ~o ~e job.
First, the su~isor is supplied wi~ written
~ck~ro~d m~terials se~tin~ fo~h ~e
objectives, and pu~eses of ~e ~dertakin~. Sim-
~arly he is ~iven demil~ inspections cove~n~
every aspec~and i[em of field operations. He s~ud-
ies the materials, d~s practice exercises, sad
rakes written examina~ons.
~e second bl~k of ~rainin~, for [he firs~
~roup of supe~isors, was participation for2 weeks
ih ~e dress-rehearsal pretes~ of the su~ey which
t~k place in Charlotte. Replacements have simi-
]at experiences while se~in~ as understudies
another supe~isor.
~e ~hird type of trainin~ comes from the
condnuin~ flow of written instructions and corre-
spo~ence, and of evaluations of ~ormance
ou£from Washington. ~e latter come from quality-
control sad q~lity-checkin~ operations pe~orm~
in Washington as psr~ of ~he edidn~ processes.
Twice a year (3 dines the first year) super-
~sors over ~he Nation are assembled for a 2-day
review of pr~ram objectives, new developments,
and selected proc~ursl problems. ~ese sessions
permit, of course, a helpful exchange of ideas
amon~ supervisors sad between the field super-
visors and the Washin~on staff.
Finally, ~e supervisor has the advantage of
condnuin~ experience since his regular job includes
• e ~rsinin~ of interviewers, obse~adon of inter-
~ewiu~ for new inte~qewers, and personally re-
in[erviewin~ a s~sample of households as a
of ~he quali~y-conzrol pr~ram.
As sta~ed above, ~he prospective in[erviewer
is selected ~hrou~h a pr~ess of e written e~m-
ina~on and testin~ of ~enersl ~eHi~ence and for
apzRude for su~ey operations w~ch she wo~d
exacted to pe~orm. ~e new in~e~iewer is
@yen a 5-day initial co~se of ~ainin~. ~is course
consists of 5 ~y~s of activity: (I) Instruction from
a field ~z~rvisor on ~u~os-= and ge=~ral charac-
teristics ~f~e s~:ey. (2)A demiled Fage-~--~age
te~be~%er and su;e~-issr go ~ou~ aH ~c-
d~n~ mate~al ~c~e~er. (S) ~as~reom Frac~ce
Exercises. ~ %Td~ ~e ~te~ewer solves ~Ti~en
proble~ and %~dth ~e ~sor
de~e~es correct a~w~rs--~ese are exercises
ra~r than zests, and ~y ~he inte~Jewer
defi~tely how we~ she has succe~. (4) Home
assi~ents which also are ~en answers
problems, which are ~eat~d more in ~e ~ure of
tests sad ~ w~ch res~ are ~scuss~ by inter-
~ewer s~ su~isor. (5) Practice
in households ~der directperso~l obse~;adon by
~he supervison ~e s~udyofins~cdons, ~he prac-
tice exercises, and ~he home assi~ents are ~s-
~rib.Zed ~rou~hout the 5-day peril.
If ~e pros~cdve ~ze~iewer successfully
completes ~e tr~nin~ course, she ~ins opera-
tional inte~ie~in~, her firs~ assi~en~
~rried out a~in ~der ~rec~ person~ observa-
tion by ~e supervisor.
After sppro~stely 1 month, a new ~er-
viewer is ~v~ f~her Home Assi~me.~s which
a~ain are ~aded and discussed, if neces~ry, by
the supe~isor. Subsequently, in co--on wi~
inte~iewers, she spends 2 hours each month on
such assi~men~s.
Each quarter the supe~isor recon~acts abou~
one sixth of ~he households in his par~ of the sam-
ple. He audits ~he household informa~on obtained
~rlier and reinte~ie~s indepe,dendy one predes-
i~sted me~r of the household. He compares
• fferences ~veen the ~ointe~iews and attempts
to de~e~ine w~ch i~orms~ion is correct. ~ese
rein~e~iews are randomly dis~ribut~ amon~ the
in~e~iewers ~der his supervision so ~ha~ control
charts based on s~ut5 percent of sn interviewer's
work can ~ maintained. Each ~eek, as a par~
~he editin~ pr~ess in Washington, error rates are
calculated separately for ~ch ~te~iewer's work.
~ese are ~ansmit~ed ~o the appropriate su~r-
~sor for his use in further trainin~ and in ti~ht-
e~n~ control over ~he In~ervIew process.
Two or t~ee times each year, ~roups of in-
reviewers are assembled et Ke~ionsl ~ices for
I- or 2-~y refresher co~ses on objectives, mesh-
es, proc~ures, and special ~ures of ~he sur-
vey.
After a household has been selected ~or the
sample. ~ "Dear Fried" letter, si~ned by ~he
rector, Bureau of ~he Census (fi~. I). is addressed
and a few days ~fore [he exacted ~te~iew
mailed to the household. This letter is intended ~o
~ s ~eneral in~ucdon ~o ~he su~ey, to have
~ect of addin~ o~cial ssnc~on to i~, and ~o make
i~ somewhat ~sier for the in~e~[ewer to secure
sn au~ence. ~ no precise address is ~o~, ~his
9tep is fore~one.
Wan ~e Mte~ewer a~ives at the household,
after s ve~, brief ~ucdon, she he~ns imme-
T106653819

Form-hq-IS-6C4)
(4-26-57)
F~A~MF_NT (D~" COMMKI:ICt="
WASHIN~TON 25
6
D~ar Friend:
The Bureau of the Census has been asked by the Public Health
Service to act as its agent to carry out a survey to obtain information
about illnesses, diseases and injuries among residents of this area.
The survey is one part of the National Health Survey Program which
Congress recently authorized because of the need for up-to-~late sta-
tistics on the health of our people. Physicians, research workers, and
other ~roups in health fields are much interested in the knowledge
which will be gained from this survey.
Every month several thousand addresses are chosen to give a
cross-section of the whole United States. and the people at those ad-
dresses are interviewed to obtain the necessary information. This
month the address of your dwelling place is one of those chosen, and
you will be visited by a Census Bureau interviewer within the next
week or two. The interviewer will ask you a number of questions
about the health of the members of your family, particularly about the
illness and injuries you have had in recent weeks. Your cooperation
in helping complete a questionnaire will be very much appreciated.
The information you give will of course be held in confidence,
We have the assurance of the Public Health Service that the informa-
tion will be seen only by authorized personnel of the two agencies and
that nothing will be published except statistical summaries in which
no individuals can be identified.
Sincerely yours,
Robert W. Burgess
Director
Bureau of the Census
TI0o653820

is a~ked e:,mcfly as pP~ cn ~ quez~or~e.
Required ~fo~m~cnfor ~ch ~er~on ~ ~e
responsible ~rEon 18 y~rs o~ age or older and a~
~me at ~e ~me of~e ~; c~e~e bTa relat~
~er~n who is r~arded as q~fied to We accu-
rate i~oma~on. ~s ~efi~fion ~ an eli~le
~on~ is s~Hed ou~ ~ some detail in ~= ~ter-
viewers' h~u~. ~ summa~, a~wers for
~en are Wen by a related ad~t; for a miss~g
adult, by wife, parent, or ad~t son or daughter; or
for an ad~t not related to ~= head of th~ house-
hold, o~y by himself or a =elated ad~. Early ex-
perience indicates that for persons over 18 years
of age, 58 F~rcent are "self-respondents," w~le
~e remainder for whom another p~rson was
informant are designated "pro~-respondents".
~e inte~iew averages ~ minutes. Immediately
follovdngthe in~e~iewa "Tha~ You" letter si~ed
by the S~geon Gener~ of ~e P~lic Health Se~-
ice is hand~ to ~e respondent (fig. 2).
In order to minimize ~avel ~me, wor~cads
are so arranged that when an inte~ewer is in a
neighboxh~ for an inte~ewing assi~ment, he
carries ou~ necessa~ list~g operations for seg-
ments which are in ~at same neigh~rho~ and
w~ch will appear in samples,for ~e next 2 ~len-
~r quarters. Ap~n~x VI sets for~ in some
rail ~e manner In which assi~en~s are random-
ized over each quarter so that ~ch week's inter-
~ewing constitutes a random sample of th~ popu-
lation, and within r~sonable arrangements of
workload is widely diversifi~ by ge~raphy and
inte~iewer.
~e following statistics for the first 6 months
of operation shed added li~t on selected aspects
of the collection pr~ess. ~ aH addresses initially
schedu1~ for inclusion in ~e sample, 14 percent
had ~come, by tim~ of ~II, wha~ are desi~at~
as ~pe B or T~ C exclusions, which are t~es
of addresses which should no~ be Inte~iewed:
dwelling u~ts which are demolished or which on
more caref~ inspection were found to ~ outside
chosen sample se~ents; households w~ch were
deleted in ~e field, according ~o instructions,
through s~sampling o~rations (derails on
step are set for~ later in ~e report); households
which were vacant; or households whose me~rs
had residence elsewhere. ~ those households in
which an ~te~iew shoed ~ve ~en conductS, 6
percent were no~nte~iews. ~e perc~t were re-
fusals, and five percent were not inte~iewed ~-
cause of all other reasons, but princi~lly ~use
no one was at home after re~at~ ~Ii ~cks.
In a~ut 63 ~rcen~ of households, inte~iew-
ing was completed on the first visit. PerCent of
households for which varies n~s of revisits
proved to ~ necessary are sho~ ~ ~e following
breakdown.
~u:zb=~r of visits Percent of all
h~rJ~eholds
All cases
I 63
2 24
3 9
4 3
5 or ~ore i
Editing and Processing.
The interview is recorded initially in the book
questionnaire, Form NHS-1. This form is reviewed
for completeness and proper identification of per-
son and household, hut other~vise not edited by the
supervisor in the Census Regional Office. Reports
are batched and transmitted to the Census Bureau
in Washington for editing and fumher processing.
In Washington, certain control operations are
performed, reported information is ceded with
special attention being given to medical coding,
and to adequacy of data for medical coding (editing
reports on inadequate information are returned to
Regional Offices for future use in training and in-
terviewer control), and the data are transcribed to
document-sensed cards and then to punch cards.
These cards are processed on conventional punch-
card equipment mainly for purposes of interviewer
control and for a more thorough check for com-
pleteness of entries. Rejects are returned to clerks
for review and correction. Corrections and addi-
tions are punched and added to the deck. Informa-
tion on cards is then transferred to magnetic tape,
and further processing is handled on Univac elec-
tronic computers.
The computer carries out 4 basic opera-
tions: (I) an edit of the raw reports; (2) the gener-
ation of data from edited reports (e. g., bycounting
number of chronic conditions reported for a per-
son, to generate the statistic "number of chronic
conditions reported for a person"); ~(3) estimation
of specified statistics, including all necessary
computational steps such as insertion of sampling
rates and adjustment for noninterview; and (&) ar-
rangement of estimates into derived statistical
tables.
As for any job of processing and editing re-
turns in a sizeable survey, a myriad of steps is
necessary. Most of these need no mention in this
account. A few circumstances are worth noting.
Information moves through 4 separate' chart-
nels in processing, each channel being identified
as a card, and each card containing the class of
information indicated by its title. The four chan-
nels are household cards, person cards, condition
cards, and hospital cards.
In nearly all surveys the choice of definitions
and of categorizing devices is critical to the un-
T106653821
